DEĞERLER VE ÇIKARLAR ARASINDA: ABD’NİN ORTADOĞU’DAKİ SOĞUK SAVAŞ DÖNEMİ DARBELERİYLE İLİŞKİSİNE FARKLI BİR BAKIŞ

Öz

ABD’nin Soğuk Savaş döneminde demokratik değerlerin savunuculuğunu üstlendiği bilinmektedir. Fakat Ortadoğu söz konusu olduğunda, savunduğu değerler ile çıkarları arasında sıklıkla ikileme düştüğü ve bu durumlarda tercihlerini çıkarlarından yana kullandığı gözlemlenmektedir. Bu çalışmada, ABD’nin Soğuk Savaş dönemi Ortadoğu politikasında yaşadığı değer-çıkar ikilemi, bölgedeki demokratik rejimlere düzenlenen darbeler (1953 İran Darbesi ve 1980 Türkiye Darbesi) karşısındaki tutumu üzerinden masaya yatırılmaktadır. Tasnif dışı bırakılmış Amerikan belgeleri çalışmada başvurulan temel kaynakları teşkil etmektedir. Bu belgeler ışığında, ABD’nin Türkiye darbesinden memnuniyet duyduğu, İran darbesini ise bizzat düzenlediği anlaşılmaktadır. Çalışmada ABD’nin Sovyet nüfuzunun engellenmesini ulusal çıkarları açısından birincil amacı olarak değerlendirdiği ve bölgedeki güç dengesini kendi lehine tesis edecek yönetimlerin halk iradesini yansıtıp yansıtmamalarıyla ilgilenmediği sonucuna varılmaktadır. Ayrıca demokratik değerleri üzerinden yaşadığı baskıyı hafifletmek amacıyla çıkarlarına uygun yeni söylemler kullandığı da gösterilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• 1953 İran Darbesi
• 1980 Türkiye Darbesi
• ABD Dış Politikası
• Soğuk Savaş

BETWEEN VALUES AND INTERESTS: REVISITING U.S. ENGAGEMENT WITH COLD WAR COUPS IN THE MIDDLE EAST

Öz

It is known that the U.S. undertook the advocacy of democratic values during the Cold War. However, when it came to the Middle East, it is observed that it frequently fell into a dilemma between its values and its interests, and in these cases it preferred its interests to its values. In this study, the value-interest dilemma experienced by the U.S. in its policy towards the Middle East during the Cold War is discussed through its attitude towards the coups against the democratic regimes in the region (1953 Iranian Coup and 1980 Turkish Coup). Declassified American documents constitute the main sources used in the study. In the light of these documents, it is understood that the U.S. was pleased with the 1980 coup in Turkey, and orchestrated the Iranian coup itself. The study concludes that the U.S. considered the prevention of Soviet influence as its primary goal in terms of its national interests and was not concerned with whether the governments that would establish the balance of power in the region in its favor reflect the will of their own people. The study also shows that it used new discourses in line with its interests in order to alleviate the pressure it experienced over its democratic values.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• 1953 Iranian Coup
• 1980 Turkish Coup
• U.S. Foreign Policy
• Cold War

Kaynakça

1. Abrahamian, E. (1979). Iran in revolution: The opposition forces. MERIP Reports, 75/76, 3-8.
2. Ahmad, F. (1993). The making of modern Turkey. London and New York: Routledge.
3. Albrecht, H. (2015). The myth of coup-proofing: Risk and instances of military coups d’état in the Middle East and North Africa, 1950-2013. Armed Forces & Society, 41(4), 659-687.
4. American Embassy Ankara to Secretary of State. (1980, March 24). Turkish response to message on economic sanctions against Iran. National Security Council, Country File: Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands: 6/77-1/81 through Turkey: 9/80-1/81, Box 75, Jimmy Carter Library.
5. Albright, M. K. (2000). Basın açıklaması: Amerikan-İran ilişkileri. Dış İşleri Bakanlığı Arşivi.
6. Aslan, Ö. (2019). The United States and military coups in Turkey and Pakistan: Between conspiracy and reality. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
7. Birand, M. A. (1984). 12 Eylül saat: 04:00. İstanbul: Karacan Yayınları.
8. Beard, C. A. (1966). The idea of national interest: An analytical study in American foreign policy (2nd ed.). Chicago: Quadrangle Paperback.

9. Burchill, S. (2005). The national interest in international relations theory. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
10. Carter, J. (1980). Carter Doktrini. Address by President Carter on the State of the Union Before a Joint Session of Congress, January 23, 1980. Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS), 1977-80, vol. I, Foundations of Foreign Policy.
11. Central Intelligence Agency. (1953, January 9). National Intelligence Estimate (NIE-75/1). Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS), 1952-1954 Iran, 1951-1954.
12. Central Intelligence Agency. (1951, April 5). Iran’s position in the East-West conflict. NIE-6. SECRET, Digital National Security Archive (DNSA).
13. Central Intelligence Agency. (1952, February 4). National Intelligence Estimate (NIE-46). Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS), 1952-1954 Iran, 1951-1954.
14. Central Intelligence Agency. (1949, November 9). The current situation in Iran. SECRET. Declassified Date: July 21, 1992. Access: DNSA.
15. Central Intelligence Agency. (1949, June 27). The current situation in Iran. SECRET. Declassified Date: July 21, 1992. Access: DNSA.
16. Central Intelligence Agency. (1980, April). Turkey’s relations with Iran: An intelligence memorandum. CIA-RDP81B00401R000500130008-8.
17. Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1984). Group identification, values, and the nature of political beliefs. American Politics Quarterly, 12(2), 151-175.
18. Consultative Security Framework for the Middle East. (1979, February 28). TOP SECRET, Donated Historical Material Zbigniew Brzezinski Collection, Geographic File: Southwest Asia/Persian Gulf 2/79-12/79 through 5/80, Box 15, Jimmy Carter Library, Georgia, United States.
19. Demirel, T. (2003). The Turkish military’s decision to intervene: 12 September 1980. Armed Forces & Society, 29(2), 253-280.
20. Demirel, T. (2012). 12 Eylül’e doğru ordu ve demokrasi. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 56(4), 43-75.
21. Department of State. (1980, September 12). Bulletin.
22. Department of State. (2017). Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS), 1952-1954: Iran 1951-1954. Washington: United States Government Publishing Office.
23. Draft Memorandum from the Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs (Nash) to the Chairman of the Planning Board of the National Security Council (Cutler), undated. Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS), 1952-1954 Iran, 1951-1954.
24. Draft Statement of Policy Proposed by the National Security Council. (1951, March 14). Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS), 1952-1954 Iran, 1951-1954.
25. Dukhong, K. (2007). Core values and public opinion on foreign policy (Doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University, Illinois.
26. Eisenhower Doktrini. (1957, January 5). Address by President Eisenhower, Special Message to the Congress on the Situation in the Middle East. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project.
27. Erhan, Ç. (2009). ABD ve NATO’yla ilişkiler. In B. Oran (Ed.), Türk dış politikası: Kurtuluş Savaşı’ndan bugüne olgular, belgeler, yorumlar (Vol. I, pp. 522-576). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
28. Feldman, S. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 416-440.
29. Frankel, J. (1970). National interest. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
30. Gasiorowski, M. (2012). U.S. foreign policy toward Iran during the Musaddiq era. In D. W. Lesch & M. L. Haas (Eds.), The Middle East and the United States: History, politics, and ideology (pp. 55-70). Colorado: Westview Press.
31. Harris, G. S. (2004). Turkish and American relations since the Truman Doctrine. In M. Aydın & Ç. Erhan (Eds.), Turkish-American relations: Past, present, and future (pp. 66-91). London: Routledge.
32. Hudson, M. C. (1996). To play the hegemon: Fifty years of US policy toward the Middle East. Middle East Journal, 50(3), 329-343.
33. Hunt, M. H. (2009). Ideology and U.S. foreign policy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
34. Huntington, S. P. (2011). American ideals versus American institutions. In G. J. Ikenberry (Ed.), American foreign policy: Theoretical essays (pp. 220-250). USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
35. Hurwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (1987). How are foreign policy attitudes structured? A hierarchical model. American Political Science Review, 81(4), 1099-1120.
36. Karwat, M. (1982). Political values as ideas of social needs. International Political Science Review, 3(2), 198-204.
37. Kertzer, J. D., Powers, K. E., Rathbun, B. C., & Iyer, R. (2014). Moral support: How moral values shape foreign policy attitudes. The Journal of Politics, 76(3), 825-840.
38. Kinzer, S. (2003). All the Shah’s men: An American coup and the roots of Middle East terror. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
39. Kürkçü, B. (2022). The question of U.S. involvement in Turkish military coups during the Cold War: An analysis via available CIA archives. Journal of Military History, 86(1), 110-131.
40. Letter from Turkish Prime Minister Ecevit to President Carter. (1979, April 21). Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS), 1977-1980, v. XXI, Cyprus, Turkey, Greece.
41. McCormick, J. M. (1985). American foreign policy & process. Boston: Wadsworth.
42. McElroy, R. W. (1989). Morality and American foreign policy: The role of moral norms in international affairs (Doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, California.
43. McGhee, G. (1990). The U.S. Turkish-NATO-Middle East connection: How the Truman Doctrine contained the Soviets in the Middle East. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
44. Memo, Brzezinski to The Secretary of State, The Secretary of Defense, The Secretary of Energy, The Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff Director, Central Intelligence. (1979, April 13).
45. Memo, Henze to Brzezinski. (1980, April 11). National Security Affairs, Evening Reports File: 2-5/78 through 7-12/80, Box 6, Jimmy Carter Library, Georgia, United States.
46. Memo, Henze to Brzezinski. (1980, September 12). Our response to military takeover in Turkey. National Security Council, Country File: Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands: 6/77-1/81 through Turkey: 9/80-1/81, Box 75, Jimmy Carter Library, Georgia, United States.
47. Memo, Henze to Brzezinski. (1980, September 12). Turkey-General Evren’s speech. National Security Council, Country File: Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands: 6/77-1/81 through Turkey: 9/80-1/81, Box 75, Jimmy Carter Library, Georgia, United States.
48. Memo, Henze to Brzezinski, 12 Eylül 1980, National Security Council, Country File: Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands: 6/77-1/81 through Turkey: 9/80-1/81, Box 75, Jimmy Carter Library, Georgia, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri.
49. Memo, Henze to Brzezinski, 15 Nisan 1980, National Security Affairs, Evening Reports File: 2-5/78 through 7-12/80, Box 6, Jimmy Carter Library, Georgia, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri.
50. Memo, Henze to Brzezinski, 25 Temmuz 1980, National Security Council Evening Reports File: 11/77-1/78, Box 5, Jimmy Carter Library, Georgia, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri.
51. Memo, Muskie to Carter, 12 Eylül 1980, CK 3100518651, SECRET, Date Declassified, Aug 03, 2002.
52. Memorandum from Director of Central Intelligence Dulles to President Eisenhower, 1 Mart 1953, Foreign Relations of United States (FRUS), 1952-1954 Iran, 1951-1954.
53. Memorandum of Discussion at the 135th Meeting of the National Security Council, 4 Mart 1953, Foreign Relations of United States (FRUS), 1952-1954 Iran, 1951-1954.
54. Memorandum of Discussion at the 136th Meeting of the National Security Council, 11 Mart 1953, Foreign Relations of United States (FRUS), 1952-1954 Iran, 1951-1954.
55. Miller, W. L., White, S., & Wood, P. H. (1998). Values and political change in postcommunist Europe. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
56. Monthly Report Prepared in the Directorate of Plans (Iran: February 1953), tarih belirtilmemiş, Foreign Relations of United States (FRUS), 1952-1954 Iran, 1951-1954.
57. Morgenthau, H. J. (1950). The mainsprings of American foreign policy: The national interest vs. moral abstractions. The American Political Science Review, 44(4), 833-854.
58. Myrdal, G. (1944). An American dilemma: The Negro problem and modern democracy. London & New York: Harper & Brothers.
59. National Security Council Directive on Office of Special Projects, Foreign Relations of United States (FRUS), 18 Haziran 1948.
60. National Security Council, Report of the National Security Council on the Position of the United States with Respect to Iran, 21 Temmuz 1949, NSC 54, TOP SECRET, Erişim, Digital National Security Archives (DNSA) veritabanıyla sağlanmıştır.
61. National Security Council, United States Objectives and Policies with Respect to the Near East, 23 Temmuz 1954, NSC 5428, TOP SECRET, Erişim: Digital National Security Archives (DNSA).
62. National Security Council, US Policy toward the Near East, 4 Kasım 1958, NSC 5820/1, TOP SECRET, Erişim: DNSA.
63. Nuechterlein, D. E. (1976). National interests and foreign policy: Conceptual framework for analysis and decision-making. British Journal of International Studies, 2(3), 246-266.
64. Okur, M. A. (2014). Türkiye-ABD ilişkileri’nin 12 Eylül kavşağı: Amerikan belgeleri darbe hakkında ne anlatıyor? Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, 10(40), 67-93.
65. Okur, M. A. (2015). The American geopolitical interests and Turkey on the eve of the September 12, 1980 coup. Cumhuriyet Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(21), 199-222.
66. Osgood, R. E. (1953). Ideals and self-interest in America’s foreign relations: The great transformation of the twentieth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
67. Progress Report to the National Security Council, 20 Mart 1953, Foreign Relations of United States (FRUS), 1952-1954 Iran, 1951-1954.
68. Risen, J. (2000, 16 Nisan). How a plot convulsed Iran in ’53 (and in ’79). The New York Times.
69. Rosenau, J. N. (1968). National interest. In Sills, D. L. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. 11, pp. 36-42). USA: The MacMillan Company & The Free Press.
70. Secretary State to Am. Embassy Ankara, Christopher-Ozal meeting, 29 Eylül 1980, Evening Reports File: 11/77-1/78, Box 5, Jimmy Carter Library, Georgia, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri.
71. Secretary State to Am. Embassy Ankara, Message from President Carter to General, 27 Ekim 1980, National Security Council, Country File: Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands: 6/77-1/81 through Turkey: 9/80-1/81, Box 75, Jimmy Carter Library, Georgia, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri.
72. Secretary State to Am. Embassy Ankara, U.S. relations with Turkey, 23 Eylül 1980, National Security Council, Country File: Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands: 6/77-1/81 through Turkey: 9/80-1/81, Box 75, Jimmy Carter Library, Georgia, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri.
73. Secretary State to Am. Embassy Ankara, Vest-Elekdağ discussion on business with Iran, 25 Mart 1980, National Security Council, Country File: Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands: 6/77-1/81 through Turkey: 9/80-1/81, Box 75, Jimmy Carter Library, Georgia, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri.
74. Sönmezoğlu, F. (2000). Uluslararası politika ve dış politika analizi. İstanbul: Filiz Kitabevi.
75. The American Paper, FRUS, 1947, vol 5, 575.
76. Thompson, K. W. (1973). Moral values and international politics. Political Science Quarterly, 88(3), 368-374.
77. Thompson, J. A. (2013). Woodrow Wilson. In M. Cox, T. J. Lynch, & N. Bouchet (Eds.), U.S. foreign policy and democracy promotion: From Theodore Roosevelt to Barack Obama (pp. 45-62). USA: Routledge.
78. Tsanoff, R. A. (1951). Moral principles and national interest. Ethics, 62(1), 11-15.
79. Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi, Ülkemizde demokrasiye müdahale eden tüm darbe ve muhtıralar ile demokrasiyi işlevsiz kılan diğer bütün girişim ve süreçlerin tüm boyutları ile araştırılarak alınması gereken önlemlerin belirlenmesi amacıyla kurulan Meclis Araştırması Komisyonu Raporu, Meclis Araştırması Komisyonu, c.1: 376, Kasım 2012, 561-915.
80. Uslu, N. (2000). Türk-Amerikan ilişkileri. Ankara: 21. yy Yayınları.
81. Uzgel, İ. (2010). ABD ve NATO’yla ilişkiler. In B. Oran (Ed.), Türk dış politikası: Kurtuluş Savaşı’ndan bugüne olgular, belgeler, yorumlar (Vol. II, pp. 34-82). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
82. Wilber, D. (1954). Clandestine service history: Overthrow of Premier Mossadeq of Iran (November 1952-August 1953).
83. Williams, R. M. (1968). Values: The concept of values. In Sills, D. L. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. 16, pp. 283-287). USA: MacMillan.
84. Yetkin, Ç. (2011). Türkiye’de askeri darbeler ve Amerika. Ankara: Kilit Yayınları.