Araştırma Makalesi

Retrospective Evaluation of Placenta Previa Cases: A Secondary-center Experince

Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2 23 Ağustos 2020
PDF İndir

Retrospective Evaluation of Placenta Previa Cases: A Secondary-center Experince

Öz

Abstract Aim: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the maternal and neonatal outcomes of placenta previa cases managed in our hospital. Material and methods: The records of 107 placenta previa cases delivered between 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Age, gravida, parity, red blood cell (RBC)-fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion necessity, gestational week at birth, birth weight, 1st and 5th minute Apgar score, number of previous cesarean sections, requiring additional surgical intervention (Hypogastric artery ligation [HAL], peripartum hysterectomy) and maternal complications were examined. Results: RBC-FFP transfusion and HAL rates were significantly higher incomplete placenta previa cases than the partial placenta previa cases. RBC-TDP transfusion, HAL and peripartum hysterectomy rates were significantly higher in placenta accreata spectrum (PAS) cases compared to those cases with normal placental invasion. Prematurity risk increased in all placenta previa subgroups. Conclusion: Pregnancy complicated by placenta previa increases the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, especially if there is a concomitant placental invasion anomaly. Keywords: Placenta previa, Placenta accreata spectrum, Hypogastric artery ligation, Peripartum hysterectomy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destekleyen Kurum

yok

Kaynakça

  1. References 1. Durukan H, Durukan ÖB, Yazıcı FG. Planned versus urgent deliveries in placenta previa: maternal, surgical and neonatal results. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;
  2. 2. Kollmann M, Gaulhofer J, Lang U, Klaritsch P. Placenta previa: incidence, risk factors and outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(9):1395-8.
  3. 3. Solheim KN, Esakoff TF, Little SE, Cheng YW, Sparks TN, Caughey AB. The effect of cesarean delivery rates on the future incidence of placenta previa, placenta accreata, and maternal mortality. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(11):1341-6.
  4. 4. Matalliotakis M, Velegrakis A, Goulielmos GN, Niraki E, Patelarou AE, Matalliotakis I. Association of Placenta Previa with a History of Previous Cesarean Deliveries and Indications for a Possible Role of a Genetic Component. Balkan J Med Genet. 2017;20(2):5-10.
  5. 5. Karami M, Jenabi E, Fereidooni B. The association of placenta previa and assisted reproductive techniques: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(14):1940-47.
  6. 6. Rosenberg T, Pariente G, Sergienko R, Wiznitzer A, Sheiner E. Critical analysis of risk factors and outcome of placenta previa. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284(1):47-51.
  7. 7. Jauniaux E, Alfirevic Z, Bhide AG, et al. Placenta previa and Placenta Accreata: Diagnosis and Management: Green-top Guideline No. 27.a. BJOG. 2019;126(1):e1-e48.
  8. 8. Jauniaux E, Bhide A, Kennedy A, et al. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreata spectrum disorders: Prenatal diagnosis and screening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;140(3):274-80.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Klinik Tıp Bilimleri

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

23 Ağustos 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

29 Kasım 2019

Kabul Tarihi

19 Mayıs 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Obut, M., & Oğlak, S. C. (2020). Retrospective Evaluation of Placenta Previa Cases: A Secondary-center Experince. Namık Kemal Tıp Dergisi, 8(2), 197-203. https://doi.org/10.37696/nkmj.653185
AMA
1.Obut M, Oğlak SC. Retrospective Evaluation of Placenta Previa Cases: A Secondary-center Experince. NKMJ. 2020;8(2):197-203. doi:10.37696/nkmj.653185
Chicago
Obut, Mehmet, ve Süleyman Cemil Oğlak. 2020. “Retrospective Evaluation of Placenta Previa Cases: A Secondary-center Experince”. Namık Kemal Tıp Dergisi 8 (2): 197-203. https://doi.org/10.37696/nkmj.653185.
EndNote
Obut M, Oğlak SC (01 Ağustos 2020) Retrospective Evaluation of Placenta Previa Cases: A Secondary-center Experince. Namık Kemal Tıp Dergisi 8 2 197–203.
IEEE
[1]M. Obut ve S. C. Oğlak, “Retrospective Evaluation of Placenta Previa Cases: A Secondary-center Experince”, NKMJ, c. 8, sy 2, ss. 197–203, Ağu. 2020, doi: 10.37696/nkmj.653185.
ISNAD
Obut, Mehmet - Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil. “Retrospective Evaluation of Placenta Previa Cases: A Secondary-center Experince”. Namık Kemal Tıp Dergisi 8/2 (01 Ağustos 2020): 197-203. https://doi.org/10.37696/nkmj.653185.
JAMA
1.Obut M, Oğlak SC. Retrospective Evaluation of Placenta Previa Cases: A Secondary-center Experince. NKMJ. 2020;8:197–203.
MLA
Obut, Mehmet, ve Süleyman Cemil Oğlak. “Retrospective Evaluation of Placenta Previa Cases: A Secondary-center Experince”. Namık Kemal Tıp Dergisi, c. 8, sy 2, Ağustos 2020, ss. 197-03, doi:10.37696/nkmj.653185.
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Obut, Süleyman Cemil Oğlak. Retrospective Evaluation of Placenta Previa Cases: A Secondary-center Experince. NKMJ. 01 Ağustos 2020;8(2):197-203. doi:10.37696/nkmj.653185