Komplike Olgularda Diz Ve Çevresi Yumuşak Doku Defektlerinin Distal Anteromedial Perforatör Uyluk Flebi İle Kapatılması

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 145 - 151, 23.08.2020

Muhammed Besir Ozturk

https://doi.org/10.37696/nkmj.650983

Öz

Özler

Amaç:
Diz ve çevresi yumuşak doku rekonstrüksiyonunda
ekspoze yapıların yeterli yumuşak dokuyla örtülmesi gerekliliği yanında diz
fonksiyonunun korunması da önemlidir.Diz çevresi cilt defektleri
için çok çeşitli flepler tarif edilmiştir. İleri yaşlı, eşlik eden
komorbiditeleri olan ve lokal flep seçenekleri kısıtlı olan olgularda ise
çapraz bacak flebi dışında iyi bir alternatif bulmak zordur. Distal
anteromedial uyluk flebi klasik tanımlanmış fleplerin dışında diz ve çevresi
cilt defektlerinin rekonstrüksiyonu için iyi bir lokal alternatif flep seçeneği
sunmaktadır.

Materyal
metot: 2014-2019 yılları arasında diz ve diz çevresi
cilt defektleri için opere ettiğimiz üç kadın üç erkek toplam altı hasta bu çalışmaya
dahil edildi. Bu hastaların dördü yaşlı ve eşlik eden çoklu ek hastalıkları
mevcut iken iki hastada ise geçirilmiş kompartman sendromu ve nekrotizan
fasiite bağlı lokal flep seçenekleri kısıtlıydı.

Bulgular:
Bir hasta hariç tüm hastalarımızda defektler başarılı
bir şekilde kapatıldı. Yüzeysel marjinal nekroz gelişen hastamızda kalan defekt
sorunsuz şekilde greftlendi. Parsiyel %40 nekroz gelişen hastamızda patella
üzeri defekt kapatılabilirken pretibial bölge üzeri kapatılamadı ve çapraz
bacak flebi planlandı.

Sonuç: Distal anteromedial uyluk perforatör flebi rekonstrüksiyonu
zor diz ve çevresi cilt defektlerinde kullanılabilecek iyi bir seçenektir.
Patella altına ulaşan defektlerde delay yapılarak kullanılması venöz yetmezliği
engellemek için uygun olabilir.

 

Abstract:

Objective:  In soft tissue
reconstruction of the knee and its surrounding tissue, it is important to cover
the exposed structures with sufficient soft tissue and to protect the knee
function. A wide range of flaps have been described for skin defects around the
knee. In elderly patients with multiple comorbidities and in patients with
limited local flap options, it is difficult to find a good alternative except
for the cross-leg flap. The distal anteromedial thigh flap provides a good
local alternative flap option for the reconstruction of knee and peripatellar
skin defects other than classical defined flaps.

Material and Methods: Six patients (three females, three males) who were
operated for knee and peripatellar skin defects between 2014-2019 were included
in this study. Four of these patients were elderly and had multiple
comorbidities, whereas two patients had limited local flap options due to
previous compartment syndrome and necrotizing fasciitis.

Results: The defects were successfully closed in all patients except
one. In one of our patient who developed superficial marginal necrosis, the
remaining defect was grafted without any problem. The other patient who
developed partial 40% necrosis, the patellar defect was closed but the
pretibial region could not be closed and a cross leg flap was planned.

Conclusion: Distal anteromedial thigh perforator flap is a good option
for reconstruction of knee and peripatellar skin defects in complicated cases.
It may be appropriate to use the delayed flap for the defects of infrapatellar
region to prevent venous insufficiency.

Anahtar Kelimeler

distal anteromedial thigh flap, peripatellar soft tissue reconstruction, diz ve çevresi yumuşak doku rekonstrüksiyonu, distal anteromedial uyluk flebi

Destekleyen Kurum

yok

Kaynakça

• 1) Misra A, Niranjan NS. Fasciocutaneous flaps based on fascial feeder and perforator vessels for defects in the patellar and peripatellar regions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:1625-32.
• 2) Zheng HP, Zhuang YH, Lin J1, Zhang YX, Levin LS, Grassetti L, Lazzeri D, Persichetti . Revisit of the anatomy of the distal perforator of the descending genicular artery and clinical application of its perforator "propeller" flap in the reconstruction of soft tissue defects around the knee. Microsurgery. 2015;35(5):370-9.
• 3)Arnold PG, Prunes-Carrillo F. Vastus medialis muscle flap for functional closure of the exposed knee joint. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981; 68(1):69-72.
• 4) Swartz WM, Ramasastry SS, Mc Gill JR, Noonan JD. Distally based vastus lateralis muscle flap for coverage of wounds about the knee. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;80(2):255-65.
• 5) Tobin GR. Vastus medialis myocutaneous and myocutaneoustendinous composite flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;75(5):677–684.
• 6) Petty CT, Hogue RJ Jr. Closure of an exposed knee joint by use of a sartorius muscle flap: Case report. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978;62(3):458–61.
• 7) Feldman JJ, Cohen BE, May JW Jr. The medial gastrocnemius myocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978;61(4):531–539.
• 8) Lu LJ, Gong X, Cui JL, Liu B. The anteromedial thigh fasciocutaneous flap pedicled on the supragenicular septocutaneous perforator: Application in 11 patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;67(3):275–78.
• 9) Acland RD, Schusterman M, Godina M, Eder E, Taylor GI, Carlisle I. The saphenous neurovascular free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981; 67(6):763-74.
• 10) Hayashi A, Maruyama Y. The medial genicular artery flap. Ann Plast Surg. 1990;25(3):174–80.
• 11) Bertelli JA. The saphenous postero-medial island thigh flap and the saphenous supero-medial cutaneous island leg flap. Surg Radiol Anat. 1992;14(2):187-9.
• 12) Hallock GG. Local knee random fasciocutaneous flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 1989;23(24):289-96.
• 13) Fisher J, Cooney WP III. Designing the latissimus dorsi free flap for knee coverage. Ann Plast Surg. 1983;11(6):554–562.
• 14) Yuen JC, Zhou AT. Free flap coverage for knee salvage. Ann Plast Surg 1996;37(2):158–-66.
• 15) Bhattacharya V, Reddy GR. Retrograde perforator-based cross-leg fasciocutaneous flaps for distal leg and foot defects. Plast ReconstrSurg. 2006;117(5):1662–64.
• 16) Lazzeri D, Huemer GM, Nicoli F, Larcher L, Dashti T, Grassetti L, Li Q, Zhang Y, Spinelli G, Agostini T. Indications, outcomes, and complications of pedicled propeller perforator flaps for upper body defects: A systematic review. Arch Plast Surg. 2013;40(1):44–50.
• 17) Georgescu AV. Propeller perforator flaps in distal lower leg: Evolution and clinical applications. Arch Plast Surg. 2012;39(2):94–105.
• 18) Rad AN, Christy MR, Rodriguez ED, Brazio P, Rosson GD. The anterior tibialis artery perforator (ATAP) flap for traumatic knee and patella defects: Clinical cases and anatomic study. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64(2):210–216.
• 19) Moscatiello F, Masia J, Carrera A, Clavero JA, Larra~ naga JR, Pons G. The ‘propeller’ distal anteromedial thigh perforator flap. Anatomic study and clinical applications. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(12):1323–30
• 20) Hupkens P1, Van Loon B, Lauret GJ, Kooloos JG, Vehof JW, Hartman EH, Spauwen PH. Anteromedial thigh flaps: an anatomical study to localize and classify anteromedial thigh perforators. Microsurgery. 2010;30(1):43-9.
• 21) Moscatiello F1, Masià J, Carrera A, Clavero JA, Larrañaga JR, Pons GThe 'propeller' distal anteromedial thigh perforator flap. Anatomic study and clinical applications. .J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(12):1323-30.
• 22) Akhtar MS1, Khan AH1, Khurram MF1, Ahmad I1. Inferiorly based thigh flap for reconstruction of defects around the knee joint. Indian J Plast Surg. 2014;47(2):221-6.