Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

THE POLITICAL CONDITIONALITY IN THE ENLARGEMENT OF EUROPEAN UNION: THE CYPRUS CASE

Yıl 2022, , 331 - 340, 31.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.51562/nkuhukuk.2022324

Öz

The political conditionality is an effective strategy of the EU enlargement policy, and it aims to provide a democratic bridge between candidate member states and the EU. Besides using the political conditionality, the EU assumes confirmation of democracy by the compliance of member states. Accordingly, the following question may arise ''why the political conditionality is the major strategy for EU?'' which is outlined in Article 6, 1: ''The Union founded on the principles of liberty, democracy, and respect for human rights, fundamental freedom, and legislation, principles which are common to the EU Member States.'' An article aims to explain how enlargement policies of the EU should follow the strategy of political conditionality. This paper will critically evaluate; the consequences of EU enlargement in 2004 and its effectiveness over candidate states. The main focus will be on the application of political conditionality in Cyprus and its correctness. Accordingly, the papers seek to analyze first how the EU's political conditionality was applied through the 2004 enlargement process and then on which grounds of political conditionality couldn't illustrate its effectiveness in the case of Cyprus

Kaynakça

  • Arikan, H. (2003), ‘‘Good Neighbourliness condition for EU Membership: The EU Policy Towards The Cyprus Conflict and Its Security Implications’’, Ankara University Journal of the Faculty of Political Science, 58 (4), 25-46.
  • Brewin, C. (1999b) ‘‘Turkey, Greece and the European Union’ in Cyprus. The Need for New Perspectives’’, Eothen Press.
  • Diez T. (2002) ‘‘Why the EU Can Nonetheless Be Good for Cyprus’’, JEMIE - Journal on ethnopolitics and minority issues in Europe, 2.
  • Duner B. (1999) ‘‘Cyprus: North is north and south is south’’, Security dialogue, 30 (4), 485-496.
  • Eralp Doga U. and Beriker N. (2005) ‘‘Assessing the Conflict Resolution Potential of the EU: The Cyprus Conflict and Accession Negotiations’’, Security dialogue, 36 (2), 175-192.
  • Ercin E. (2008) ‘‘A Critical Assesment of the European Union Dynamics Prevailing in Cyprus’’, Eastern Mediterranean University Press.
  • Grabbe H. (1999) ‘‘A Partnership for Accession? The Implications of EU Conditionality for the Central and East European Applicants’’, European University Institute Working Paper, 99/12.
  • Grabbe H. (2002) ‘‘European Union Conditionality and the Acquis Communautaire’’, International political science review, 23 (3) 249-268.
  • Loizides N. G. (2002) ‘Greek-Turkish Dilemmas and the Cyprus EU Accession Process’, Security Dialogue, 33 (4), 429-442.
  • Muftuler-Bac M. and Guney A. (2005), ‘‘The European Union and the Cyprus Problem 1961–2003’’, Middle Eastern Studies, 41 (2), 281 – 293.
  • O'Rourke B. (2004) ‘‘Cyprus: Failure of Referendum Means Headache for the EU’’, EURAC Research.
  • Oudenaren John (2005) ‘‘Uniting Europe: An Intorudction to the European Union’’, Rowman and Littlwfield Publisher.
  • Redmond J. (1997) ‘‘From Accession towards the Application for Full Membership: Cyprus’s Relations with the European Union’, in Cyprus and the European Union. New Changes for Solving and Old Conflict’’, Sudosteuropa-Gesellscharf.
  • Schimmelfennig F. (2001), ‘‘The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union’’, International organization 55 (1), 47-80.
  • Schimmelfennig F. Engert S. & Knobel H. (2003) ‘‘Costs, Commitment and Compliance: The Impact of EU Democratic Conditionality on Latvia, Slovakia and Turkey’’, Journal of common market studies, 41 (3), 495-518.
  • Schimmelfennig F. &, Sedelmeier, (2004) ‘‘Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe’’, Journal of European public policy, 11 (4), 661-679.
  • Schimmelfennig F. (2005) ‘‘European Regional Organizations, Political Conditionality, and Democratic Transformation in Eastern Europe’’, East European politics and societies, 21 (1), 126-141.
  • Sozen A., (2008) ‘‘The Cyprus Negotiations and Basic Parameters: An Overview of the Inter-Communal Negotiations’’, Eastern Mediterranean University Press.
  • Tocci N. (2008) ‘‘EU Incentives for Promoting Peace’’, Reuters/Fatih Saribas, 30-34.
  • Tocci N. (2008), ‘‘The Missed Opportunity to Promote Reunification in Cyprus’’, Eastern Mediterranean University Press.
  • Yesilada B. and Sozen A. (2002) ‘‘Negotiating a Resolution to the Cyprus Problem: Is Potential European Union Membership a Blessing or a Curse?’’ International negotiation 7 (2), 261-285
  • Yesilada B. and Sozen A. (2008) Emperor Has No Clothes: EU’s Cyprus Challenge, Eastern Mediterranean University Press.
Yıl 2022, , 331 - 340, 31.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.51562/nkuhukuk.2022324

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Arikan, H. (2003), ‘‘Good Neighbourliness condition for EU Membership: The EU Policy Towards The Cyprus Conflict and Its Security Implications’’, Ankara University Journal of the Faculty of Political Science, 58 (4), 25-46.
  • Brewin, C. (1999b) ‘‘Turkey, Greece and the European Union’ in Cyprus. The Need for New Perspectives’’, Eothen Press.
  • Diez T. (2002) ‘‘Why the EU Can Nonetheless Be Good for Cyprus’’, JEMIE - Journal on ethnopolitics and minority issues in Europe, 2.
  • Duner B. (1999) ‘‘Cyprus: North is north and south is south’’, Security dialogue, 30 (4), 485-496.
  • Eralp Doga U. and Beriker N. (2005) ‘‘Assessing the Conflict Resolution Potential of the EU: The Cyprus Conflict and Accession Negotiations’’, Security dialogue, 36 (2), 175-192.
  • Ercin E. (2008) ‘‘A Critical Assesment of the European Union Dynamics Prevailing in Cyprus’’, Eastern Mediterranean University Press.
  • Grabbe H. (1999) ‘‘A Partnership for Accession? The Implications of EU Conditionality for the Central and East European Applicants’’, European University Institute Working Paper, 99/12.
  • Grabbe H. (2002) ‘‘European Union Conditionality and the Acquis Communautaire’’, International political science review, 23 (3) 249-268.
  • Loizides N. G. (2002) ‘Greek-Turkish Dilemmas and the Cyprus EU Accession Process’, Security Dialogue, 33 (4), 429-442.
  • Muftuler-Bac M. and Guney A. (2005), ‘‘The European Union and the Cyprus Problem 1961–2003’’, Middle Eastern Studies, 41 (2), 281 – 293.
  • O'Rourke B. (2004) ‘‘Cyprus: Failure of Referendum Means Headache for the EU’’, EURAC Research.
  • Oudenaren John (2005) ‘‘Uniting Europe: An Intorudction to the European Union’’, Rowman and Littlwfield Publisher.
  • Redmond J. (1997) ‘‘From Accession towards the Application for Full Membership: Cyprus’s Relations with the European Union’, in Cyprus and the European Union. New Changes for Solving and Old Conflict’’, Sudosteuropa-Gesellscharf.
  • Schimmelfennig F. (2001), ‘‘The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union’’, International organization 55 (1), 47-80.
  • Schimmelfennig F. Engert S. & Knobel H. (2003) ‘‘Costs, Commitment and Compliance: The Impact of EU Democratic Conditionality on Latvia, Slovakia and Turkey’’, Journal of common market studies, 41 (3), 495-518.
  • Schimmelfennig F. &, Sedelmeier, (2004) ‘‘Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe’’, Journal of European public policy, 11 (4), 661-679.
  • Schimmelfennig F. (2005) ‘‘European Regional Organizations, Political Conditionality, and Democratic Transformation in Eastern Europe’’, East European politics and societies, 21 (1), 126-141.
  • Sozen A., (2008) ‘‘The Cyprus Negotiations and Basic Parameters: An Overview of the Inter-Communal Negotiations’’, Eastern Mediterranean University Press.
  • Tocci N. (2008) ‘‘EU Incentives for Promoting Peace’’, Reuters/Fatih Saribas, 30-34.
  • Tocci N. (2008), ‘‘The Missed Opportunity to Promote Reunification in Cyprus’’, Eastern Mediterranean University Press.
  • Yesilada B. and Sozen A. (2002) ‘‘Negotiating a Resolution to the Cyprus Problem: Is Potential European Union Membership a Blessing or a Curse?’’ International negotiation 7 (2), 261-285
  • Yesilada B. and Sozen A. (2008) Emperor Has No Clothes: EU’s Cyprus Challenge, Eastern Mediterranean University Press.

AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ GENİŞLEMESİNDE KOŞULLULUK İLKESİ: KIBRIS ÖRNEĞİ

Yıl 2022, , 331 - 340, 31.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.51562/nkuhukuk.2022324

Öz

Siyasi koşulluluk ilkesi, Avrupa Birliği genişleme politikasının en etkili stratejisidir ve bu ilke aday üye ülkelerle AB arasında demokratik bir köprü sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Avrupa Birliği, siyasi koşulluluk ilkesini kullanarak üye ülkelerin uyumuyla birlikte kendi demokrasinin ispat etmeye çalışmaktadır. Buna göre, şu soru ortaya çıkabilir ''siyasi koşulluluk neden AB için ana stratejidir?'' Bu onuda Madde 6.1’de özetlenmiştir: ''Birlik özgürlük, demokrasi, insan haklarına saygı, temel özgürlük ve mevzuat, AB Üye Devletleri için ortak olan ilkeler üzerine kurulmuştur.'' Bu araştırma, AB'nin genişleme politikalarının siyasi şartlılık stratejisini nasıl izlemesi gerektiğini açıklamayı amaçlıyor. Bu makale eleştirel olarak değerlendirilecektir; 2004 yılında AB genişlemesinin sonuçları ve aday devletler üzerindeki etkinliği. Bu makale, AB'nin genişleme politikalarının siyasi koşulluluk stratejisini nasıl izlemesi gerektiğini açıklamayı amaçlıyor. Çalışma, 2004 yılında AB genişlemesinin sonuçlarını ve aday ülkeler üzerindeki etkinliğini eleştirel bir şekilde değerlendirecektir. Çalışmanın ana odak noktası, Avrupa Birliği üye ülkesi olan Kıbrıs'ta siyasi koşulluğunun uygulanması ve doğruluğunun değerlendirilmesi olacaktır. Buna göre, makale önce AB'nin siyasi koşulluğunun 2004 genişleme süreci boyunca nasıl uygulandığını ve daha sonra hangi siyasi koşulluluk gerekçelerinin Kıbrıs konusunda verimliliğini gösteremediğini analiz etmeyi amaçlıyor.

Kaynakça

  • Arikan, H. (2003), ‘‘Good Neighbourliness condition for EU Membership: The EU Policy Towards The Cyprus Conflict and Its Security Implications’’, Ankara University Journal of the Faculty of Political Science, 58 (4), 25-46.
  • Brewin, C. (1999b) ‘‘Turkey, Greece and the European Union’ in Cyprus. The Need for New Perspectives’’, Eothen Press.
  • Diez T. (2002) ‘‘Why the EU Can Nonetheless Be Good for Cyprus’’, JEMIE - Journal on ethnopolitics and minority issues in Europe, 2.
  • Duner B. (1999) ‘‘Cyprus: North is north and south is south’’, Security dialogue, 30 (4), 485-496.
  • Eralp Doga U. and Beriker N. (2005) ‘‘Assessing the Conflict Resolution Potential of the EU: The Cyprus Conflict and Accession Negotiations’’, Security dialogue, 36 (2), 175-192.
  • Ercin E. (2008) ‘‘A Critical Assesment of the European Union Dynamics Prevailing in Cyprus’’, Eastern Mediterranean University Press.
  • Grabbe H. (1999) ‘‘A Partnership for Accession? The Implications of EU Conditionality for the Central and East European Applicants’’, European University Institute Working Paper, 99/12.
  • Grabbe H. (2002) ‘‘European Union Conditionality and the Acquis Communautaire’’, International political science review, 23 (3) 249-268.
  • Loizides N. G. (2002) ‘Greek-Turkish Dilemmas and the Cyprus EU Accession Process’, Security Dialogue, 33 (4), 429-442.
  • Muftuler-Bac M. and Guney A. (2005), ‘‘The European Union and the Cyprus Problem 1961–2003’’, Middle Eastern Studies, 41 (2), 281 – 293.
  • O'Rourke B. (2004) ‘‘Cyprus: Failure of Referendum Means Headache for the EU’’, EURAC Research.
  • Oudenaren John (2005) ‘‘Uniting Europe: An Intorudction to the European Union’’, Rowman and Littlwfield Publisher.
  • Redmond J. (1997) ‘‘From Accession towards the Application for Full Membership: Cyprus’s Relations with the European Union’, in Cyprus and the European Union. New Changes for Solving and Old Conflict’’, Sudosteuropa-Gesellscharf.
  • Schimmelfennig F. (2001), ‘‘The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union’’, International organization 55 (1), 47-80.
  • Schimmelfennig F. Engert S. & Knobel H. (2003) ‘‘Costs, Commitment and Compliance: The Impact of EU Democratic Conditionality on Latvia, Slovakia and Turkey’’, Journal of common market studies, 41 (3), 495-518.
  • Schimmelfennig F. &, Sedelmeier, (2004) ‘‘Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe’’, Journal of European public policy, 11 (4), 661-679.
  • Schimmelfennig F. (2005) ‘‘European Regional Organizations, Political Conditionality, and Democratic Transformation in Eastern Europe’’, East European politics and societies, 21 (1), 126-141.
  • Sozen A., (2008) ‘‘The Cyprus Negotiations and Basic Parameters: An Overview of the Inter-Communal Negotiations’’, Eastern Mediterranean University Press.
  • Tocci N. (2008) ‘‘EU Incentives for Promoting Peace’’, Reuters/Fatih Saribas, 30-34.
  • Tocci N. (2008), ‘‘The Missed Opportunity to Promote Reunification in Cyprus’’, Eastern Mediterranean University Press.
  • Yesilada B. and Sozen A. (2002) ‘‘Negotiating a Resolution to the Cyprus Problem: Is Potential European Union Membership a Blessing or a Curse?’’ International negotiation 7 (2), 261-285
  • Yesilada B. and Sozen A. (2008) Emperor Has No Clothes: EU’s Cyprus Challenge, Eastern Mediterranean University Press.
Toplam 22 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Hukuk
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Fetine Bayraktar 0000-0003-0614-9634

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022

Kaynak Göster

APA Bayraktar, F. (2022). THE POLITICAL CONDITIONALITY IN THE ENLARGEMENT OF EUROPEAN UNION: THE CYPRUS CASE. Tekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 331-340. https://doi.org/10.51562/nkuhukuk.2022324
AMA Bayraktar F. THE POLITICAL CONDITIONALITY IN THE ENLARGEMENT OF EUROPEAN UNION: THE CYPRUS CASE. NKU Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. Aralık 2022;3(2):331-340. doi:10.51562/nkuhukuk.2022324
Chicago Bayraktar, Fetine. “THE POLITICAL CONDITIONALITY IN THE ENLARGEMENT OF EUROPEAN UNION: THE CYPRUS CASE”. Tekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 3, sy. 2 (Aralık 2022): 331-40. https://doi.org/10.51562/nkuhukuk.2022324.
EndNote Bayraktar F (01 Aralık 2022) THE POLITICAL CONDITIONALITY IN THE ENLARGEMENT OF EUROPEAN UNION: THE CYPRUS CASE. Tekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 3 2 331–340.
IEEE F. Bayraktar, “THE POLITICAL CONDITIONALITY IN THE ENLARGEMENT OF EUROPEAN UNION: THE CYPRUS CASE”, NKU Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 3, sy. 2, ss. 331–340, 2022, doi: 10.51562/nkuhukuk.2022324.
ISNAD Bayraktar, Fetine. “THE POLITICAL CONDITIONALITY IN THE ENLARGEMENT OF EUROPEAN UNION: THE CYPRUS CASE”. Tekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 3/2 (Aralık 2022), 331-340. https://doi.org/10.51562/nkuhukuk.2022324.
JAMA Bayraktar F. THE POLITICAL CONDITIONALITY IN THE ENLARGEMENT OF EUROPEAN UNION: THE CYPRUS CASE. NKU Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022;3:331–340.
MLA Bayraktar, Fetine. “THE POLITICAL CONDITIONALITY IN THE ENLARGEMENT OF EUROPEAN UNION: THE CYPRUS CASE”. Tekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 3, sy. 2, 2022, ss. 331-40, doi:10.51562/nkuhukuk.2022324.
Vancouver Bayraktar F. THE POLITICAL CONDITIONALITY IN THE ENLARGEMENT OF EUROPEAN UNION: THE CYPRUS CASE. NKU Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022;3(2):331-40.

Eserlerin gönderilmesi veya yayınlanması için yazarlardan hiçbir ücret talep edilmemektedir.

Yazarların makale gönderebilmeleri için ORCID numarası almaları zorunludur.

Dergide yayınlanan makaleler intihal değerlendirmesinden geçirilmektedir. Benzerlik oranı % 20'den fazla olan çalışmalar yayınlanmamaktadır.


İndeksler

       21265