Kutup İpek Yolu Kapsamında Çin'in Arktik Altyapı Politikaları

Öz

Bu makale, Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi’nin (BRI) kuzey uzantısı olan Kutup İpek Yolu (PSR) çerçevesinde Çin’in Arktik’teki faaliyetlerini incelemekte ve Çin’in bölgedeki altyapı politikalarının ortaya çıkan yeni Arktik düzeninin şekillenmesine nasıl katkıda bulunduğunu analiz etmektedir. Küresel ısınma ve buna bağlı olarak hızla eriyen buzullar, yeni deniz rotalarının açılmasına ve enerji kaynaklarına erişimin kolaylaşmasına imkân tanıyarak bölgenin jeopolitik ve ekonomik önemini artırmaktadır. Bu bağlamda Çin, kendisini “Arktik’e yakın bir devlet” olarak tanımlamakta ve bölgesel yönetişim, bilimsel iş birliği ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma girişimlerine aktif biçimde katılma hedefini ortaya koymaktadır. BRI, Çin’in ekonomik, teknolojik ve jeopolitik hedef kümelerini içeren kapsamlı bir girişimdir. Bu girişimin bir bileşeni olan PSR ise Arktik’in, Çin’in küresel bağlantısallık vizyonunun ve ticaret koridorlarını çeşitlendirme stratejisinin ayrılmaz bir parçası hâline geldiğini vurgulamaktadır. Bu çalışma, nitel araştırma yaklaşımına dayalı olarak literatür taraması ve doküman analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular neticesinde, Çin’in Arktik altyapı politikaları özellikle enerji, deniz ulaştırması ve diplomasi alanlarında şekillenmektedir. Enerji bağlamında Yamal LNG ve Arctic LNG 2 projeleri öne çıkarken; deniz ulaştırması kapsamında Kuzey Deniz Rotası’na yönelik çalışmalar, buz kıran gemileri, seyrüsefer sistemleri ve liman geliştirme politikalarına yapılan yatırımlar bölgesel denizcilik altyapısının güçlendirilmesine hizmet etmektedir. Çin’in tüm bu kritik altyapı girişimleri, aynı zamanda ülkenin altyapı diplomasisi araçlarını oluşturmaktadır. Bu sayede Çin hem ekonomik etkisini artırmakta hem de Arktik devletleri, özellikle Rusya ile stratejik ortaklıklar geliştirerek enerji ve ulaştırma açısından hayati öneme sahip hatlara erişim sağlamaktadır. PSR üzerinden Çin, Arktik’i küresel ticaret ve yönetişim mekanizmalarına entegre ederken, aynı zamanda Kuzey’in geleceğini şekillendirmede merkezi bir aktör olma yönündeki stratejik hedeflerini somutlaştırmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kutup İpek Yolu
• Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi
• Arktik yönetişimi
• altyapı diplomasisi
• Çin'in Arktik politikası

China’s Arctic Infrastructure Policies within the Framework of the Polar Silk Road

Öz

This article examines China's activities in the Arctic within the framework of the Polar Silk Road (PSR), the northern extension of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), and analyses how China's infrastructure policies in the region contribute to the shaping of the emerging new Arctic order. Global warming and the associated rapid melting of glaciers are facilitating the opening of new sea routes and easier access to energy resources, thereby increasing the geopolitical and economic importance of the region. In this context, China defines itself as a “near-Arctic state” and has set out its goal of actively participating in regional governance, scientific cooperation and sustainable development initiatives. The BRI is a comprehensive initiative encompassing China's economic, technological and geopolitical objectives. The PSR, a component of this initiative, emphasises that the Arctic has become an integral part of China's global connectivity vision and trade corridor diversification strategy. This study was conducted based on a qualitative research approach using literature review and document analysis methods. The findings reveal that China's Arctic infrastructure policies are taking shape particularly in the fields of energy, maritime transport and diplomacy. In the energy context, the Yamal LNG and Arctic LNG 2 projects stand out; in the context of maritime transport, efforts related to the Northern Sea Route, investments in icebreakers, navigation systems and port development policies serve to strengthen regional maritime infrastructure. All these critical infrastructure initiatives also constitute the country's infrastructure diplomacy tools. In this way, China is both increasing its economic influence and developing strategic partnerships with Arctic states, particularly Russia, to gain access to vital energy and transportation routes. Through the PSR, China is integrating the Arctic into global trade and governance mechanisms while also realising its strategic objectives of becoming a central actor in shaping the future of the North.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Polar Silk Road
• Belt and Road Initiative
• Arctic governance
• infrastructure diplomacy
• China’s Arctic policy

Kaynakça

1. Akkoyun, M. (2025, Ekim). Yamal LNG Projesi. Erişim: https://ansiklopedi.tubitak.gov.tr/kutup/ansiklopedi/yamal-lng-projesi
2. Alexeeva, O., & Lasserre, F. (2012). China and the Arctic. Arctic Yearbook. Erişim: https://arcticyearbook.com/images/yearbook/2012/Scholarly_Papers/3.Alexeeva_and_Lassere.pdf
3. Alexeeva, O., & Lasserre, F. (2018). An Analysis on Sino Russian Cooperation in the Arctic in the BRI Era. Advances in Polar science, 29(4), 269-282. doi: 10.13679/j.advps.2018.4.00269.
4. Baldıran, S. (2023). Avrupa Birliği'nin Arktik politikası. Novus Orbis: Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 5(1), 75-107.
5. Baldıran, S. (2024). Ukrayna Savaşı Bağlamında Avrupa Birliği’nin Arktik Politikası. Paradigma: İktisadi ve İdari Araştırmalar Dergisi, 13(Özel Sayı), 140-161. ISSN: 2822-5570.
6. Brady, A.-M. (2017). China as a Polar Great Power. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316832004
7. Güçyetmez, F., & Kısacık, S. (2024). The impact of climate and geopolitical changes on Russia’s Energy Policies in the Arctic region. Novus Orbis: Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 6(1), 29-54.
8. Güçyetmez, F., & Kısacık, S. (2025). Çin'in Deniz Taşımacılık Koridorları Çerçevesinde Arktik ve Akdeniz Geçitlerinin Konumları Hakkında Bir Karşılaştırma. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 24(2), 912-935.

9. Grigoryev, M. N. (2021). Development of Transit Potential of the Northern Sea Route. Outlines of Global Transformations – Politics, Economics, Law, 12(5), 109 129. https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-109-129.
10. Huang, Y. (2016). Understanding China's Belt & Road Initiative: Motivation, Framework and Assessment. China Economic Review, 40, 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.07.007.
11. Johnston, L. A. (2019). The Belt and Road Initiative: What is in it for China? Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 6(1), 40-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.265
12. Katona, N. (2025). Arctic LNG 2: How China Revived Russia’s Frozen Gas. Oil Price. Erişim: https://oilprice.com/Energy/Natural-Gas/Arctic-LNG-2-How-China-Revived-Russias-Frozen-Gas.html
13. Kobzeva, M. A. (2021). Cooperation between Russia and China in Arctic Shipping: Current State and Prospects. Arctic and North, (43), 89 108. https://doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2021.43.89
14. Lajeunesse, A., Whitney Lackenbauer, P., Manicom, J., & Lasserre, F. (2018). China's Arctic Ambitions and What They Mean for Canada (p. 274). University of Calgary Press.
15. Lasserre, F. (2014). Case studies of shipping along Arctic routes. Analysis and profitability perspectives for the container sector. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 66, 144-161.
16. Lasserre, F., Huang, L., & Alexeeva, O. V. (2017). China's Strategy in the Arctic: Threatening or Opportunistic?. Polar Record, 53(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247415000765
17. Lamazhapov, E., Stensdal, I., & Heggelund, G. (2023). China’s Polar Silk Road: Long Game or Failed Strategy?.
18. Lim, K. S. (2018). China’s Arctic Policy & the Polar Silk Road Vision. Arctic Yearbook 2018. Erişim: Arctic Year Book: https://arcticyearbook.com/images/yearbook/2018/Scholarly_Papers/24_AY2018_Kong.pdf
19. Liu, M., & Kronbak, J. (2010). The potential economic viability of using the Northern Sea Route (NSR) as an alternative route between Asia and Europe. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(3), 434–444.
20. Moe, A. (2019). Asian Countries and Arctic Shipping: Policies, Interests and Engagement. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 10(1), 1 17. https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v10.1324
21. Rantanen, M., Karpechko, A. Y., Lipponen, A., Nordling, K., Hyvärinen, O., Ruosteenoja, K., ... & Laaksonen, A. (2022). The Arctic Has Warmed Nearly Four Times Faster Than the Globe Since 1979. Communications Earth & Environment, 3(1), 168. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00498-3
22. Rogan Finnemore, M., Browne, N., Flått, S., Wang, S., & Sliester, R. (2021). Icebreaking Polar Class Research Vessels: New Antarctic Fleet Capabilities. Polar Record, 57, e46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003224742100067X
23. Shang, H. (2019). What is the Belt and Road Initiative?. In The Belt and Road Initiative: Key Concepts (pp. 1-25). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
24. Smith, L. C., & Stephenson, S. R. (2013). New Trans-Arctic shipping routes navigable by midcentury. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(13), E1191-E1195.
25. Spears, J. (2009). China and the Arctic: The Awakening Snow Dragon. China Brief, 9(6), 1-13.
26. State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (2018, January 26). China’s Arctic policy (White Paper). Erişim: https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/white_paper/2018/01/26/content_281476026660336.htm
27. Stepien, A., Kauppila, L., Kopra, S., Käpylä, J., Lanteigne, M., Mikkola, H., & Nojonen, M. (2020). China’s Economic Presence in the Arctic: Realities, Expectations and Concerns. Chinese Policy and Presence in the Arctic (pp. 90-136). Brill Nijhoff.
28. Stünkel, L. (2022). China’s Polar Silk Road Revisited. Institute for Security & Development Policy. Erişim: https://www.kas.de/documents/272774/272823/Chinas-Polar-Silk-Road-Revisited_Larissa-Stunkel.pdf/
29. Sukhankin, S. (2019). Russia’s Belkomur Arctic Railway Project: Hope, Illusion or Necessity? Erişim: Jamestown: https://jamestown.org/russias-belkomur-arctic-railway-project-hope-illusion-or-necessity/
30. The Arctic Institute. (2023). Sanction‑proof? Russia's Arctic Ambitions and the China Factor. Erişim: https://www.thearcticinstitute.org/sanction-proof-russias-arctic-ambitions-china-factor
31. The Diplomat. (2018, Ocak). China’s Stakes in the Russian Arctic. Erişim: https://thediplomat.com/2018/01/chinas-stakes-in-the-russian-arctic.
32. The Global Oil & Gas Exit List (GOGEL) (2024, Kasım). Yamal LNG and Arctic LNG 2: Gas in the Russian Arctic. Erişim: https://gogel.org/yamal-lng-and-arctic-lng-2-gas-extraction-russian-arctic.
33. Türker, H. (2024). China's Arctic Aspirations and Polar Silk Road: Implications for Great Power Competition. Current Perspectives in Social Sciences, 28(1), 98-110. DOI: 10.53487/atasobed.1454578
34. United States Geological Survey-USGS (2008). Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal: Estimates of Undiscovered Oil and Gas North of the Arctic Circle. Erişim: https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2008/3049/fs2008-3049.pdf.
35. Vakhrusheva, K. (2025). Vessels on the Northern Sea Route. Bellona Foundation, Vilnius.
36. Zysk, K. (2010). Russia's Arctic Strategy: Ambitions and Constraints. Joint Force Quarterly: JFQ, (57), 103.
37. Xing, L., & Bertelsen, R. G. (2021). The Drivers of Chinese Arctic Interests: Political Stability and Energy and Transportation Security. In J. Barnes (Ed.), China’s Arctic Engagement: Following the Polar Silk Road to Greenland and Russia (pp. 15-37). Arctic Yearbook / NAADSN. ISBN: 978-1-989811-12-2
38. Wade, R. (2008, January 16). A Warmer Arctic Needs Shipping Rules. Financial Times. Erişim: https://www.ft.com/content/1c415b68-c374-11dc-b083-0000779fd2ac.
39. Weidacher Hsiung, C. (2016). China and Arctic Energy: Drivers and Limitations. The Polar Journal, 6(2), 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2016.1241486.
40. Wenger, M. (2023, June 29). China Starts Construction of Its Third Polar Going Vessel. Erişim: The Polar Journal: https://polarjournal.net/china-starts-construction-of-its-third-icebreaker/.
41. Woon, C. Y. (2020). Framing the “Polar Silk Road” (冰上丝绸之路): Critical geopolitics, Chinese scholars and the (re) positionings of China's Arctic interests. Political Geography, 78, 102141.