International Migration Dynamics in the Context of OECD Countries

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 54 - 78, 01.06.2021

Sinem Dedeoğlu Özkan , Seda Özlü Dilek Beyazlı

Öz

Globalization, one of the important phenomena of today, has led to political, social and economic changes in both regional and national scale. These rapid changes seriously affect the phenomenon of migration, its target and the quality of life. Especially in EU and OECD countries, various policies have been implemented to prevent the increasing migration rate, fulfill the requirements of the global economy, and to eliminate the developmental differences between countries, regions and sub-regions. Thus, it is of great importance to investigate the causes of international migrant mobility that deeply affects the economic and social structure of nations. The present study aimed to determine the factors that affect international migration towards the OECD countries. A current data set consisting of 79 variables defining the social, economic, environmental structure was created and correlation and regression analysis methods were used to determine the factors that affected international migration in OECD countries. With this work; it has been observed that there are strong relationships between international migration and various economic and social development variables. Hence, it is envisaged to make a descriptive and statistically valid, reliable assessment, to make predictions, and to contribute to the scientific literature in the context of international migration policies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

correlation-regression analysis, migration, international migration stock, migration dynamics, OECD

OECD Ülkeleri Bağlamında Uluslararası Göç Dinamikleri

Öz

Günümüzün önemli olgularından biri olan küreselleşme, hem bölgesel hem de ulusal ölçekte politik, sosyal ve ekonomik değişikliklere yol açmıştır. Bu hızlı değişimler göç olgusunu, hedefini ve yaşam kalitesini önemli şekilde etkilemektedir. Özellikle AB ve OECD ülkelerinde artan göç hızının önlenmesi, küresel ekonominin gereklerinin yerine getirilmesi, ülkeler, bölgeler ve alt bölgeler arasındaki gelişmişlik farklılıklarının giderilmesi için çeşitli politikalar uygulanmaktadır. Bu nedenle ulusların ekonomik ve sosyal yapısını derinden etkileyen uluslararası göçmen hareketliliğinin nedenlerini araştırmak büyük önem taşımaktadır. Bu çalışma, OECD ülkelerine yönelik uluslararası göçü etkileyen faktörleri belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma kapsamında sosyal, ekonomik ve çevresel yapıyı tanımlayan 79 değişkenden oluşan güncel bir veri seti oluşturulmuş, OECD ülkelerinde uluslararası göçü etkileyen faktörleri belirlemek için korelasyon ve regresyon analiz yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Bu çalışma ile; uluslararası göç ile çeşitli ekonomik ve sosyal kalkınma değişkenleri arasında güçlü ilişkiler olduğu gözlemlenmiştir. Böylelikle uluslararası göç politikaları bağlamında tanımlayıcı ve istatistiksel olarak geçerli, güvenilir bir değerlendirme yapılması, tahminlerde bulunulması ve bilimsel literatüre katkı sağlanması öngörülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

korelasyon-regresyon analizi, göç, uluslararası göç stoğu, göç dinamikleri, OECD

Kaynakça

• Abel, G. J. (2018). Estimates of global bilateral migration flows by gender between 1960 and 20151. International Migration Review, 52(3), 809-852.
• Anich, R., Brian, T., & Laczko, F. (2013). Migration trends: Comparing the four pathways.
• Arango, J. 2000. “Explaining Migration: A Critical View,” International Social Science Journal 52(165): 283–296.
• Benería, L., Diana Deere, C., & Kabeer, N. (2012). Gender and international migration: Globalization, development, and governance. Feminist Economics, 18(2), 1-33.
• Bertocchi, G., & Strozzi, C. (2008). International migration and the role of institutions. Public choice, 137(1-2), 81-102.
• Bewick, V., Cheek, L., & Ball, J. (2003). Statistics review 7: Correlation and regression. Critical care, 7(6), 451.
• Bossard, L. (2009). The Future of International Migration to OECD Countries. Regional Note West Africa.
• Bounds, M. (2004). Urban Social Theory: City, Self, and Society, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Castles, S. (2010). Understanding global migration: A social transformation perspective. Journal of ethnic and migration studies, 36(10), 1565-1586.
• Castles, S. and Miller, M.J. (2009) The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan and Guilford (4th edition).
• Cohen, J. E., Roig, M., Reuman, D. C., & GoGwilt, C. (2008). International migration beyond gravity: A statistical model for use in population projections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(40), 15269-15274.
• Cohen, R. (ed.) (1995). The Cambridge Survey of World Migration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Czaika, Mathias. 2012. “Internal versus international migration and the role of multiple deprivation,” Asian Population Studies 8(2): 125–149.
• Davis, J., & Lopez-Carr, D. (2010). The effects of migrant remittances on population–environment dynamics in migrant origin areas: international migration, fertility, and consumption in highland Guatemala. Population and Environment, 32(2-3), 216-237.
• De Haas, H., Czaika, M., Flahaux, M. L., Mahendra, E., Natter, K., Vezzoli, S., & Villares‐Varela, M. (2019). International migration: Trends, determinants, and policy effects. Population and Development Review, 45(4), 885-922.
• De Tapia, S. (2003). New patterns of irregular migration in Europe: seminar report 12 and 13 November 2002, Council of Europe (Vol. 7). Council of Europe.
• Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (2001). What have we learned from a decade of empirical research on growth? It's Not Factor Accumulation: Stylized Facts and Growth Models. The worldbank economic review, 15(2), 177-219.
• Esipova, N., Ray, J., & Srinivasan, R. (2011). The world’s potential migrants. Who they are, where they want to go, and why it matters. Gallup White Paper.
• Fargues, P. (2017). International migration and education: a web of mutual causation.
• Fargues, P. (2018). Advancing knowledge on international migration: data and research needs.
• Fransen, S., & de Haas, H. (2019). The Volume and Geography of Forced Migration. IMI Working Paper series, (156).
• Friedberg, R. M., & Hunt, J. (1995). The impact of immigrants on host country wages, employment and growth. Journal of Economic perspectives, 9(2), 23-44.
• Gagnon, J., & Khoudour-Castéras, D. (2011). Tackling the policy challenges of migration. OECD.
• Gamlen, A. J. (2010). People on the Move: Managing Migration in Today's Commonwealth.
• Hagen‐Zanker, J. (2008). Why do people migrate? A review of the theoretical literature. A Review of the Theoretical Literature (January 2008). Maastrcht Graduate School of Governance Working Paper No.
• Hatton, T.J. and Williamson, J.G. (2005) Global Migration and the World Economy. Boston: MIT
• Hatton, T. J. 2009. “The Rise and Fall of Asylum: What Happened and Why?” Economic Journal 119(535): 183–213.
• International Organization for Migration (IOM, 2004), International Organization for Migration, International Migration Law Glossary on Migration, Geneva 2004, http://www.iomvienna.at/sites/default/files/IML_1_EN.pdf
• Jennissen, R. (2007). Causality chains in the international migration systems approach. Population research and policy review, 26(4), 411-436.
• Kane, H. (1995). The hour of departure: Forces that create refugees and migrants. Worldwatch Paper 125, Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute
• Krieger, H., & Maitre, B. (2006). Migration trends in an enlarging European Union. Turkish Studies, 7(1), 45-66.
• Lee, E. S. (1966). A theory of migration. Demography, 3(1), 47-57.
• Lee, R. D. (2011). The Outlook for Population Growth, Science, 333(6042):569–73.
• Mahendra, Edo. 2014. “Financial Constraints, Social Policy andMigration: Evidence from Indonesia,” IMI/DEMIG Working Paper 101. Oxford: International Migration Institute, University of Oxford.
• Marchiori, L., & Schumacher, I. (2011). When nature rebels: international migration, climate change, and inequality. Journal of Population Economics, 24(2), 569-600.
• Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1994). An evaluation of international migration theory: The North American case. Population and development Review, 699-751.
• Newbold, K. B. (2010). Population Geography: Tools and Issues, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Lanham.
• Newland, K. (2011). Migration and Development Policy: What have we learned. Migration Policy Institute, Washington, DC.
• Ortega, F., & Peri, G. (2013). The effect of income and immigration policies on international migration. Migration Studies, 1(1), 47-74.
• Polgreen, L. A., & Simpson, N. B. (2011). Happiness and international migration. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(5), 819-840.
• Stalker, P. (1994). The work of strangers: a survey of international labour migration. International Labour Organization.
• Taylor, J. E. (2006). International migration and economic development. In International symposium on international migration and development (pp. 28-30).
• World Bank. (2018). Moving for prosperity: Global migration and labor markets. World Bank Group.