BUILDING EVERYDAY BORDERING AND SYRIAN REFUGEES: THE CASE OF ALTINDAĞ

Öz

This study aims at understanding the multifaceted everyday bordering practises that the Syrian refugees face drawing on the 30 in-depth interviews conducted with the Syrian refugees living in Altındağ, Ankara. Building on Critical Border Studies and Migration Studies, the study contends that as the physical borders between Turkey and Syria become more porous, internal bordering practices have become more diffused and are enforced mainly by non-state actors. This has been driving “reactionary bordering” against Syrian refugees by the Turkish population. In order to cope with the bordering practices, Syrian refugees develop various and sometimes contradictory de-bordering strategies. The study revealed 3 types of bordering practices faced by Syrian refugees in Altındağ. These are "bogus refugee" in which the status of asylum seeker is questioned, “cultural bordering” in which Syrians are seen as culturally inferior, and threat perception that sees the refugees as national security concern. The strategies developed by asylum-seekers in response to these practices vary according to their social positionings

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Critical Border Studies
• Bordering
• Everyday Bordering
• Syrian Refugees

GÜNDELİK SINIRLARIN İNŞASI VE SURİYELİ SIĞINMACILAR: ALTINDAĞ ÖRNEĞİ

Öz

Kuramsal olarak Eleştirel Sınır Çalışmaları ile Göç Çalışmalarını bir araya getiren bu araştırma ampirik olarak Ankara’nın Altındağ ilçesinde Suriyeli sığınmacılarla gerçekleştirilen 30 yüz yüze derinlemesine mülakata dayanmaktadır. Çalışmada Türkiye ile Suriye arasındaki fiziksel sınırların daha geçirgen hale gelmesi sonucu, sınır bölgelerinden uzakta “sınır”lama (bordering) uygulamalarının daha yaygın hale geldiği öne sürülmekte ve bu uygulamaların sınırı çizmek ve korumakla sorumlu aktörlerden ziyade gündelik hayatta sıradan insanlar tarafından hayata geçirildiği söylenmektedir. Bu çalışma, Türkiye'deki değişen siyasi, ekonomik ve sosyal ilişkilerin getirdiği daha geniş bir yapısal ve kurumsal dönüşüm süreci ile sınır çalışmalarını bir araya getirmekte, Suriyeli sığınmacılara karşı hayata geçirilen gündelik sınır koyma pratiklerini tartışmakta ve sığınmacıların bu pratikler karşısında geliştirdiği baş etme/sınırla(n)mayı aşma stratejilerini ele almaktadır. Çalışmada Suriyeli sığınmacıların karşı karşıya kaldığı 3 tür sınırlama pratiği ortaya çıkmıştır. Bunlar, sığınmacı statüsünün sorgulandığı “sahte mültecilik”, Suriyelilerin kültürel olarak geri görüldüğü kültürel sınırlama ve sığınmacıların tehditleştirilmesidir. Bu uygulamalara karşılık olaraksa sığınmacıların geliştirdikleri stratejiler, sığınmacıların öznel sosyal konumları doğrultusunda çeşitlilik göstermektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Eleştirel Sınır Çalışmaları
• Sınırlama
• Gündelik Sınırlar
• Suriyeli Sığınmacılar

Kaynakça

1. Altıok, B. & Tosun, S. (2019). Understanding Foreign Policy Strategies during Migration Movements: A Comparative Study of Iraqi and Syrian Mass Refugee Inflows to Turkey, Turkish Studies, 21(5).
2. Aslan, A. (2016). Modern Dünyada Sınırlar. Düşünüyorum. http://www.dusunuyorumdergisi.com/modern-dunyada-sinirlar/
3. Balibar, E. (2002). Politics and the Other Scene. Verso: London.
4. Bélanger, D. & Saraçoğlu, C. (2019). Syrian Refugees and Turkey: Whose Crisis?. Oxford Handbook of Migration Crises içinde, C. Menjívar, M. Ruiz, & I. Ness, (Ed.), Oxford University Press.
5. Bernstein, M. (2005). Identity Politics. Annual Review of Sociology 31(1), 47–74.
6. Carastathis, A. (2014). The Concept of Intersectionality in Feminist Theory. Philosophy Compass, 9(5), 304-14.
7. Coşar, S. (2014). AKP’nin İktidarla Dansı: Neoliberalizm ve Türk İslam Sentezi. İktidarın Şiddeti içinde, S. Coşar & G. Yücesan-Özdemir (Ed.), İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
8. Delanty, G. (2006). Borders in a Changing Europe: Dynamics of Openness and Closure. Comparative European Politics, 4(2/3).

9. Diker, N.P. & Karan, O. (2021). Suriyeli Mültecilerin Karşılaştıkları Sosyal Dışlanma ve Geliştirdikleri Direniş Taktikleri: Ankara Örneği. Ankara Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(2), 281-321.
10. Dill, B. T. & Zambrana, R. E. (2009). Critical Thinking About Inequality: An Emerging Lens. Emerging Intersections: Race, Class, and Gender in Theory, Policy and Practice içinde B. T. Dill & R. E. Zambrana (Ed.), New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
11. Doevenspeck, M. (2011). Constructing the border from below: Narratives from the Congolese-Rwandan State Boundary. Political Geography, 30(3), 129-142.
12. El-Tayep, F. (2016). UnGerman: The Construction of Otherness in the Postmigrant Society. Unrast.
13. Fine, S. (2018). Borders and Mobility in Turkey. Palgrave.
14. Fox, J.E. & Miller-Idriss, C. (2008). Everyday Nationhood. Ethnicities, 13, 385-400.
15. Genç, F. Heck, G. & Hess, S. (2019). The Multilayered Migration Regime in Turkey: Contested Regionalization, Deceleration and Legal Precarization. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 34(4), 489-508.
16. Gilmartin, N. (2022). Fear, force, and flight: configurations of intimidation and displacement in Northern Ireland’s ‘Troubles’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies.
17. Göç İdaresi Genel Müdürlüğü. (2022). https://en.goc.gov.tr/temporary-protection27.
18. Gökalp-Aras, N. E. & Z. Şahin-Mencütek. (2016). From Assertive to Opportunist Usage of Mass Migration for Foreign and Asylum Policy: Turkey’s Response to the Refugees from Syria. Turkish Migration Policy içinde, I. Sirkeci & B. Pusch (Ed.), London: Transnational Press, 91–126.
19. Guiraudon, V., & Lahav, G. (2000). Comparative Perspectives on Border Control: Away from the Border and outside the State. The Wall around the West: State Borders and Immigration Controls in North America and Europe içinde P. Andreas & T. Synder (Eds), Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
20. Herbert, S. (2000). For ethnography. Progress in Human Geography, 24, 550-568.
21. İçduygu, A. & Kirisci, K. (2009). Land of Diverse Migrations: Challenges of Emigration and Immigration in Turkey. Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi University Press.
22. Johnson, C., Jones, R., Paasi, A., Amoore, L., Mountz, A., Salter, M., et al. (2011). Interventions on Rethinking “the Border” in Border Studies. Political Geography, 30(2), 61-69.
23. Jones, R., & Johnson, C. (2014). Placing the border in everyday life. London and New York: Routledge.
24. Kaşlı, Z. & Yanaşmayan, Z. (2020). Migration Control, Citizenship Regime, and the Spectrum of Exclusion in Turkey. Crimmigrant Nations: Resurgent Nationalism and the Closing of Borders içinde, R. Koulish & M. Van der Woude (Ed.), New York: Fordham University Press.
25. Kolossov, V., & Scott, J. (2013). Selected Conceptual Issues in Border Studies. Belgeo, 1(October), 1-16.
26. Korkut, U. (2016). Pragmatism, Moral Responsibility or Policy Change: The Syrian Refugee Crisis and Selective Humanitarianism in the Turkish Refugee Regime. Comparative Migration Studies, 4 (2), 1-7.
27. McMahon, S. & Sigona, N. (2018). Navigating the Central Mediterranean in a Time of ‘Crisis’: Disentangling Migration Governance and Migrant Journeys. Sociology, 52(3), 497-514.
28. Myrivili, E. (2004). The Liquid Border: Subjectivity at the Limits of the Nation-State in Southeast Europe. Columbia University.
29. Newman, D. (2006). Borders and Bordering: Towards an Interdisciplinary Dialogue. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(2), 171e186.
30. Newman, D. (2011). Contemporary Research Agendas in Border Studies. Research Companion to Border Studies içinde, Wastl Water D. (Ed.), Ashgate Farnham: Ashgate.
31. Norman, K. P. (2020). Migration Diplomacy and Policy Liberalization in Morocco and Turkey. International Migration Review, 54(4), 1158-1183.
32. Öniş, Z. (2015). Monopolising the Centre: The AKP and the Uncertain Path of Turkish Democracy. The International Spectator, 50(2), 22-41.
33. Paasi, A. (1998). Boundaries as Social Processes. Territoriality in the World of Flows. Geopolitics, 3(1), 69-88.
34. Paasi, A. (2009). Bounded spaces in a “borderless world”: Border studies, power and the anatomy of territory. Journal of Power, 2(2), 213-234.
35. Parker, N., & Vaughan-Williams, N. (2009). Lines in the Sand? Towards an Agenda for Critical Border Studies. Geopolitics, 14(3), 582-587.
36. Parker, N. & Vaughan-Williams, N. (2014). Critical Border Studies: Broadening and Deepening the ‘Lines in the Sand’ Agenda. Routledge.
37. Rumford, C. (2006). Theorizing Borders. European Journal of Social Theory, 9 (2), 155-169.
38. Russell, K. (2007). Feminist Dialectics and Marxist Theory. Radical Philosophy Review, 10(1), 33-54.
39. Sosyal Demokrasi Vakfı (SODEV). (2021). Suriye Göçünün 10. Yılında Türkiye’de Suriyeli Göçmenler Araştırması. Erişim tarihi: 24 Haziran 2022. https://sodev.org.tr/sodev-suriye-gocunun-10-yilinda-turkiyede-suriyeli-gocmenler/
40. Şimşek, D. (2018). Integration Processes of Syrian Refugees in Turkey: ‘Class-based Integration’. Journal of Refugee Studies, 33 (3), 537-554.
41. van Houtum, H., & van Naerssen, T. (2002). Bordering, ordering and othering. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 93(2), 125-136.
42. Walters, W. (2006). Border/control. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(2), 187-203.
43. Wemyss, G. & Cassidy, K. (2017). ‘People think that Romanians and Roma are the same’: Everyday Bordering and the Lifting of Transitional Controls. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(7): 1132–1150.
44. Winker, G. & Degele, N. (2011). Intersectionality as Multi-Level Analysis: Dealing with Social Inequality. European Journal of Women s Studies 18(1):51-66.
45. Wonders, N. A. (2006). Global Flows, Semi-permeable Borders and New Channels of Inequality: Border Crossers and Border Performativity. Borders, Mobility and Technologies of Control içinde S. Pickering and L. Weber (Ed.), Dordrecht: Springer.
46. Yanaşmayan, Z., Üstübici, A & Kaşlı, Z. (2019). Under the Shadow of Civilizationist Populist Discourses: Political Debates on Refugees in Turkey. New Diversities, 21 (2).
47. Yuval-Davis, N. (2013). Working Paper 2: A Situated Intersectional Everyday Approach to the Study of Bordering: Situated Knowledge and Imagination (August).
48. Yuval-Davis, N. (2014). Situated Intersectionality, Inequality and Bordering Processes. Politiques, 58, 91-100.
49. Yuval-Davis, N., Wemyss, G. & Cassidy, K. (2019). Bordering. Cambridge: Polity