al-Adirnawī, Aģmad b. Muģammad: Šabaqāt al-mufassirīn, ed. Sulaymān b. Ŝāliģ al- Khizzī, al-Madīna: Maktabat al-‘ulūm wa-l-ģikam 1997.
Afsaruddin, Asma: “Muslim Views on Education: Parameters, purview, and possibilities”, Journal of Catholic Legal Studies, 44 (New York 2005), pp. 143-178.
Ahmed, Shahab and Filipovic, Nenad: “The Sultan’s Syllabus: A Curriculum for the Ot- toman Imperial Medreses Prescribed in a fermān of Qānūnī I Süleymān, Dated 973 1565 ”, Studia Islamica, 98/99 (Leiden 2004), pp. 183-218.
Boullata, Isa: “The Cambridge History of Arabic Literature: Arabic Literature in the Post-classical Period, edited by Roger Allen and D. S. Richards (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006,” Digest of Middle East Studies, 16 (Malden & Chichester 2007), pp. 108–113.
.......: “The Rhetorical Interpretation of the Qur’ān: i‘jāz and related topics,” Andrew Rippin (ed.), Approaches to the History of the Qur’an, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1988, pp. 139-157.
Calder, Norman: “Tafsīr from Šabarī to Ibn Kathīr, Problems in the description of a genre, illustrated with reference to the story of Abraham,” G.R. Hawting and Abdul-Kader A. Shareef (eds.), Approaches to the Qur’ān, London: Routledge 1993, pp. 101-140.
Carter, Michael: “Humanism and the Language Sciences in Medieval Islam”, Asma Af- saruddin & A. H. Mathias Zahniser (eds.), Humanism, Culture, and Language in the Near East, Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns 1997, pp. 27-38.
Dammen-McAuliffe, Jane: “The Tasks and Traditions of Interpretation,” Jane Dammen- McAuliffe (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Qur’an, Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press 2006, pp. 181-209.
.......: Qur’anic Christians, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1991.
Denny, Frederick: “Exegesis and Recitation”, Frank Reynolds et al (eds.), Transitions and Transformations in the History of Religions, Leiden: Brill 1980.
Hallaq, Wael: Authority, Continuity and Change in Islamic Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001.
Heinrichs, Wolfhart: “Takhyyīl and its traditions”, Alma Giese and Christoph Bürgel (eds.), God is Beautiful and He loves Beauty, Bern: Peter Lang 1994, pp. 227-247.
Holt, P. M.: Studies in the History of the Near East, New York: Routledge 1973.
Ibn Khaldūn, Abu Zayd ‘Abd al-Raģmān b. Muģammad: The Muqaddimah, 2nd revised edition, trans. Franz Rosenthal, Princeton: Princeton University Press 1967.
al-Sakkākī, Abu Ya’qūb Yūsuf b. Abī Bakr: Miftāģ al-‘ulūm, ed. Akram ‘Uthmān Yūsuf, 1st edition, Baghdad: Dār al-risāla 1982, published with the assistance of Baghdad University 1980/1981.
Schacht, Joseph: “Abu’l-Su‘ūd”, The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition, Leiden: Brill 1979, vol. 1, pp. 152-3.
al-Shawkānī, Muģammad b. ‘Alī: al-Badr al-šāli‘ bi-maģāsin man ba‘d al-qarn al-sābi‘, 2 vols., Cairo: Dār al-kitāb al-islāmī n.d.
Smyth, William: “Controversy in a Tradition of Commentary: The Academic Legacy of al-Sakkākī’s Miftāģ al-‘Ulūm,” Journal of the American Oriental Society, 112 (Mich- igan 1992), pp. 589-597.
.......: “Some Quick Rules Ut Pictura Poesis: The Rules for Simile in Miftāģ al-’Ulūm,” Oriens, 33 (Leiden 1992), pp. 215-229.
.......: “The Canonical Formulation of ‘Ilm al-Balāgha and al-Sakkākī’s Miftāģ al-’Ulūm”, Der Islam, 72 (1995), pp. 7-24.
.......: “Criticism in the Post-Classical Period,” The Cambridge History of Arabic Litera- ture: Arabic Literature in the Post-classical Period, Roger Allen and D. S. Richards (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006.
Winter, Michael: “Historiography in Arabic During the Ottoman period”, Roger Allen and D.S. Richards (eds.), Arabic Literature in the Post-Classical Period, Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press 2006, pp. 171-188.
Yerinde, Adem: “Ebussuud’s Tafsir and Its Copies,” an unpublished paper presented at the History of Ottoman Thought Study Meeting II, Istanbul: Sabanci University 14-15 Dec 2011.
En kapsayıcı yönüyle bu makalenin amacı, genellikle çağdaş tefsir araştırmalarında ihmal edilen klasik dönem sonrası tefsirini incelemek ve bu aşamada şekillenen tefsir geleneğinin iç dünyasını kavramaya çalışmaktır. Bu sebeple makale, çeşitli kaynaklarda belâğî yorumlama özelliğiyle Zemahşerî ve Beydâvî’nin tefsir eserleriyle aynı seviyede değerlendirilerek büyük bir övgüye layık görülen Ebussuud’un (ö. 982/1574) İrşâdü’l-akli’s-selîm ilâ mezâya’l-kitâbi’l-kerîm (Kitâb-ı Kerîm’in Üstün Anlam İncelikleri Konusunda Akl-ı Selîm’e Rehberlik Yapma) adlı Kur’an tefsiri üzerinde yoğunlaşmaktadır. Temelde bu çalışma, İrşâd’ın hem kendi metnini ve hem ortaya çıktığı bağlamı incelemekte, özellikle belâğat ve Kur’an tefsirinin kesiştiği noktada Ebussuud gibi onaltıncı yüzyıl Osmanlı ulemasının tefsir alanındaki meselelerinin şekillenmesinde rol oynayan entelektüel tartışmaları ve fikir alışverişlerini ele almaktadır. Temsil ve onun bir türü olarak istiare, çalışmamızın metin ve bağlam incelemesinde temel malzemeyi oluşturmaktadır. Konuyla ilgili İrşâdü’l-akli’sselîm’den getirilen ve Ebussuud Efendi’nin bir tefsir aracı veya üslubu olarak temsili, nasıl temellendirip uyguladığını gösteren örnekler, titizlikle incelenerek önceki tefsirlerle mukayesesi yapılmıştır. Sonuç olarak bu çalışma, bir klasik dönem sonrası tefsiri olarak İrşâd’ın temel özelliklerini yansıtmakta ve tefsirin 16. Yüzyıl Osmanlı entelektüel dünyasındaki fikri ve siyasi önemiyle ilgili bazı gözlemler ve tespitler içermektedir
al-Adirnawī, Aģmad b. Muģammad: Šabaqāt al-mufassirīn, ed. Sulaymān b. Ŝāliģ al- Khizzī, al-Madīna: Maktabat al-‘ulūm wa-l-ģikam 1997.
Afsaruddin, Asma: “Muslim Views on Education: Parameters, purview, and possibilities”, Journal of Catholic Legal Studies, 44 (New York 2005), pp. 143-178.
Ahmed, Shahab and Filipovic, Nenad: “The Sultan’s Syllabus: A Curriculum for the Ot- toman Imperial Medreses Prescribed in a fermān of Qānūnī I Süleymān, Dated 973 1565 ”, Studia Islamica, 98/99 (Leiden 2004), pp. 183-218.
Boullata, Isa: “The Cambridge History of Arabic Literature: Arabic Literature in the Post-classical Period, edited by Roger Allen and D. S. Richards (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006,” Digest of Middle East Studies, 16 (Malden & Chichester 2007), pp. 108–113.
.......: “The Rhetorical Interpretation of the Qur’ān: i‘jāz and related topics,” Andrew Rippin (ed.), Approaches to the History of the Qur’an, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1988, pp. 139-157.
Calder, Norman: “Tafsīr from Šabarī to Ibn Kathīr, Problems in the description of a genre, illustrated with reference to the story of Abraham,” G.R. Hawting and Abdul-Kader A. Shareef (eds.), Approaches to the Qur’ān, London: Routledge 1993, pp. 101-140.
Carter, Michael: “Humanism and the Language Sciences in Medieval Islam”, Asma Af- saruddin & A. H. Mathias Zahniser (eds.), Humanism, Culture, and Language in the Near East, Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns 1997, pp. 27-38.
Dammen-McAuliffe, Jane: “The Tasks and Traditions of Interpretation,” Jane Dammen- McAuliffe (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Qur’an, Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press 2006, pp. 181-209.
.......: Qur’anic Christians, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1991.
Denny, Frederick: “Exegesis and Recitation”, Frank Reynolds et al (eds.), Transitions and Transformations in the History of Religions, Leiden: Brill 1980.
Hallaq, Wael: Authority, Continuity and Change in Islamic Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001.
Heinrichs, Wolfhart: “Takhyyīl and its traditions”, Alma Giese and Christoph Bürgel (eds.), God is Beautiful and He loves Beauty, Bern: Peter Lang 1994, pp. 227-247.
Holt, P. M.: Studies in the History of the Near East, New York: Routledge 1973.
Ibn Khaldūn, Abu Zayd ‘Abd al-Raģmān b. Muģammad: The Muqaddimah, 2nd revised edition, trans. Franz Rosenthal, Princeton: Princeton University Press 1967.
al-Sakkākī, Abu Ya’qūb Yūsuf b. Abī Bakr: Miftāģ al-‘ulūm, ed. Akram ‘Uthmān Yūsuf, 1st edition, Baghdad: Dār al-risāla 1982, published with the assistance of Baghdad University 1980/1981.
Schacht, Joseph: “Abu’l-Su‘ūd”, The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition, Leiden: Brill 1979, vol. 1, pp. 152-3.
al-Shawkānī, Muģammad b. ‘Alī: al-Badr al-šāli‘ bi-maģāsin man ba‘d al-qarn al-sābi‘, 2 vols., Cairo: Dār al-kitāb al-islāmī n.d.
Smyth, William: “Controversy in a Tradition of Commentary: The Academic Legacy of al-Sakkākī’s Miftāģ al-‘Ulūm,” Journal of the American Oriental Society, 112 (Mich- igan 1992), pp. 589-597.
.......: “Some Quick Rules Ut Pictura Poesis: The Rules for Simile in Miftāģ al-’Ulūm,” Oriens, 33 (Leiden 1992), pp. 215-229.
.......: “The Canonical Formulation of ‘Ilm al-Balāgha and al-Sakkākī’s Miftāģ al-’Ulūm”, Der Islam, 72 (1995), pp. 7-24.
.......: “Criticism in the Post-Classical Period,” The Cambridge History of Arabic Litera- ture: Arabic Literature in the Post-classical Period, Roger Allen and D. S. Richards (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006.
Winter, Michael: “Historiography in Arabic During the Ottoman period”, Roger Allen and D.S. Richards (eds.), Arabic Literature in the Post-Classical Period, Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press 2006, pp. 171-188.
Yerinde, Adem: “Ebussuud’s Tafsir and Its Copies,” an unpublished paper presented at the History of Ottoman Thought Study Meeting II, Istanbul: Sabanci University 14-15 Dec 2011.
Naguıb, S. (2013). Guiding the Sound Mind: Ebu’s-su‘ūd’s Tafsir and Rhetorical Interpretation of the Qur’an in the Post-Classical Period. Osmanlı Araştırmaları, 42(42), 1-52.
AMA
Naguıb S. Guiding the Sound Mind: Ebu’s-su‘ūd’s Tafsir and Rhetorical Interpretation of the Qur’an in the Post-Classical Period. OA. Aralık 2013;42(42):1-52.
Chicago
Naguıb, SHURUQ. “Guiding the Sound Mind: Ebu’s-su&Lsquo;ūd’s Tafsir and Rhetorical Interpretation of the Qur’an in the Post-Classical Period”. Osmanlı Araştırmaları 42, sy. 42 (Aralık 2013): 1-52.
EndNote
Naguıb S (01 Aralık 2013) Guiding the Sound Mind: Ebu’s-su‘ūd’s Tafsir and Rhetorical Interpretation of the Qur’an in the Post-Classical Period. Osmanlı Araştırmaları 42 42 1–52.
IEEE
S. Naguıb, “Guiding the Sound Mind: Ebu’s-su‘ūd’s Tafsir and Rhetorical Interpretation of the Qur’an in the Post-Classical Period”, OA, c. 42, sy. 42, ss. 1–52, 2013.
ISNAD
Naguıb, SHURUQ. “Guiding the Sound Mind: Ebu’s-su&Lsquo;ūd’s Tafsir and Rhetorical Interpretation of the Qur’an in the Post-Classical Period”. Osmanlı Araştırmaları 42/42 (Aralık 2013), 1-52.
JAMA
Naguıb S. Guiding the Sound Mind: Ebu’s-su‘ūd’s Tafsir and Rhetorical Interpretation of the Qur’an in the Post-Classical Period. OA. 2013;42:1–52.
MLA
Naguıb, SHURUQ. “Guiding the Sound Mind: Ebu’s-su&Lsquo;ūd’s Tafsir and Rhetorical Interpretation of the Qur’an in the Post-Classical Period”. Osmanlı Araştırmaları, c. 42, sy. 42, 2013, ss. 1-52.
Vancouver
Naguıb S. Guiding the Sound Mind: Ebu’s-su‘ūd’s Tafsir and Rhetorical Interpretation of the Qur’an in the Post-Classical Period. OA. 2013;42(42):1-52.