Eğitimde küresel vatandaşlık yayınlarındaki eğilimlerin belirlenmesi: Bibliyometrik bir analiz

Yıl 2024, , 1534 - 1555, 21.12.2024

Erdi Erdoğan , Ayşenur Temel

https://doi.org/10.48146/odusobiad.1506654

Öz

Küresel vatandaşlık üzerine çok sayıda eğitim çalışması yapılmış olmasına rağmen, eğitimde küresel vatandaşlık araştırmalarının kapsamlı bir şekilde anlaşılması için literatürdeki önemli bir boşluğun doldurulması gerekmektedir. Bu nedenle, bu çalışma eğitimde küresel vatandaşlık konusundaki akademik üretimi analiz etmek için bibliyometrik bir yöntem kullanmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, 2000-2022 yılları arasındaki veriler Web of Science veri tabanından elde edilmiş ve yıllık bilimsel üretim, atıf yapılan belgeler, kaynaklar, yazarlar, bağlantılar, ülkeler, anahtar kelimeler, araştırma eğilimleri ve kavramsal yapıyı kapsayan bir analiz gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ayrıca, küresel vatandaşlık araştırmalarının geleceğine ilişkin öngörülerde bulunulmuştur. Analiz, RStudio aracılığıyla Biblioshiny arayüzü kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Küresel vatandaşlık araştırmalarının 2008 yılından bu yana güçlü bir yükseliş eğilimi gösterdiği sonucuna varılmıştır. Özellikle Amerika Birleşik Devletleri ve Birleşik Krallık, küresel vatandaşlık alanında merkezi katkı sağlayan ülkeler olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Küresel vatandaşlık araştırmaları, küresel vatandaşlık eğitimi boyutuna doğru evrilmektedir. Özellikle, küresel duyarlılığı geliştirmek için müfredatın içselleştirilmesine odaklanılmaktadır. Gelecekte yapılacak araştırmalarda, küresel vatandaşlığın alt temaları farklı yapay zekâ araçları kullanılarak test edilebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Küresel vatandaşlık, bibliyometrik analiz, eğitim araştırması, biblioshiny, Web of Science veri tabanı

Determining the trends in global citizenship publications in education: A bibliometric analysis

Öz

Although numerous educational studies have been conducted on global citizenship, a significant gap in the literature needs to improve a comprehensive understanding of global citizenship research in education. Therefore, this study aims to employ a bibliometric method to analyze the academic production of global citizenship in education. In line with this purpose, the data from 2000 to 2022 were obtained from the Web of Science database, and an analysis encompassing annual scientific production, cited documents, sources, authors, affiliations, countries, keywords, research trends, and conceptual structure was conducted. Furthermore, predictions were made regarding the future of global citizenship research. Analysis was performed by using the Biblioshiny interface via RStudio. It is concluded that global citizenship research has shown a strong upward trend since 2008. Notably, the United States and the United Kingdom have emerged as central contributors in the field of global citizenship. Global citizenship research is evolving towards the global citizenship education dimension. In particular, there is a focus on internalization of the curriculum to develop global sensitivity. In future research, sub-themes of global citizenship can be tested using different artificial intelligence tools.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Global citizenship, bibliometric analysis, educational research, biblioshiny, Web of Science database

Kaynakça

• Ahmed, E. I., & Mohammed, A. (2021). Evaluating the impact of global citizenship education programmes: A synthesis of the research. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 17(2), 122–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/17461979211000039
• Aktas, F., Pitts, K., Richards, J. C., & Silova, I. (2017). Institutionalizing global citizenship: A critical analysis of higher education programs and curricula. Journal of Studies in International Education, 21(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315316669815
• Andreotti, V. de O. (2006). Soft versus critical global citizenship education. Policy and Practice: A Development Education Review, 3, 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137324665.0009
• Andreotti, V. de O. (2011). (Towards) decoloniality and diversality in global citizenship education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(3-4), 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2011.605323
• Aparicio, G., Iturralde, T., & Maseda, A. (2021). A holistic bibliometric overview of the student engagement research field. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(4), 540–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1795092
• Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
• Atenas, J., Havemann, L., & Priego, E. (2015). Open data as open educational resources: Towards transversal skills and global citizenship. Open Praxis, 7(4), 377-389. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.7.4.233
• Baker, W., & Fang, F. (Gabriel). (2021). ‘So maybe I’m a global citizen’: developing intercultural citizenship in English medium education. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1748045
• Bromley, P. (2009). Cosmopolitanism in civic education: Exploring cross-national trends: 1970–2008. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 12(1), 33–44.
• Brown, N. (2009). Embedding engagement in higher education: Preparing global citizens through international service-learning. https://compact.org/resources/embedding-engagement-in-higher-education-preparing-global-citizens-through-international-service-learning
• Celume, M.-P., & Maoulida, H. (2022). Developing 21st century competencies among youth through an online learning program: be a global citizen. Education Sciences, 12(3), 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030148
• Chen, Y.-S., & Leimkuhler, F. F. (1986). A relationship between Lotka’s Law, Bradford’s Law, and Zipf’s Law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(5), 307–314.
• Chiba, M., Sustarsic, M., Perriton, S., & Edwards, D. B. (2021). Investigating effective teaching and learning for sustainable development and global citizenship: Implications from a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Development, 81, 102337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102337
• Davies, I., Evans, M., & Reid, A. (2005). Globalising citizenship education? A critique of ‘global education’ and ‘citizenship education.’ British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(1), 66–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00284.x
• Davies, L. (2006). Global citizenship: abstraction or framework for action? Educational Review, 58(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910500352523
• Dill, J. S. (2013). The longings and limits of global citizenship education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203374665
• Franch, S. (2020). Global citizenship education: A new ‘moral pedagogy’ for the 21st century? European Educational Research Journal, 19(6), 506–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904120929103
• Goren, H., & Yemini, M. (2017). Global citizenship education redefined – A systematic review of empirical studies on global citizenship education. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.02.004
• Gumus, S., Bellibas, M. S., Esen, M., & Gumus, E. (2018). A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 46(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216659296
• Huang, C., Yang, C., Wang, S., Wu, W., Su, J., & Liang, C. (2019). Evolution of topics in education research: a systematic review using bibliometric analysis. Educational Review, 72(3), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1566212
• Karaca, A. & Akbaba, B. (2021). Vatandaşlık eğitimine yönelik bibliyometrik araştırma: 1980-2020 yılları arasında yapılan çalışmaların analizi. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(3), 788-804. https://dx.doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2021.21.64908-904375
• Kerkhoff, S. N., & Cloud, M. E. (2020). Equipping teachers with globally competent practices: A mixed methods study on integrating global competence and teacher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101629
• Kim, G. (2023). Geography education professionals’ understanding of global citizenship: Insights for a more just geography curriculum. Theory & Research in Social Education, 51(3), 438–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2022.2159595
• Kolleck, N., & Yemini, M. (2020). Environment-related education topics within global citizenship education scholarship focused on teachers: A natural language processing analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 51(4), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2020.1724853
• Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–323.
• Mannion, G., Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Ross, H. (2011). The global dimension in education and education for global citizenship: genealogy and critique. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(3-4), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2011.605327
• McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433–443.
• Misiaszek, G. W. (2015). Ecopedagogy and citizenship in the age of globalisation: Connections between environmental and global citizenship education to save the planet. European Journal of Education, 50(3), 280-292. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12138
• Moon, R. J., & Koo, J.-W. (2011). Global citizenship and human rights: A longitudinal analysis of social studies and ethics textbooks in the republic of Korea. Comparative Education Review, 55(4), 574–599. https://doi.org/10.1086/660796
• Morais, D. B., & Ogden, A. C. (2011). Initial development and validation of the global citizenship scale. Journal of Studies in International Education, 15(5), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315310375308
• Myers, J. P. (2006). Rethinking the Social Studies Curriculum in the Context of Globalization: Education for Global Citizenship in the U.S. Theory & Research in Social Education, 34(3), 370–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2006.10473313
• Myers, J. P. (2010). ‘To benefit the world by whatever means possible’: adolescents’ constructed meanings for global citizenship. British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902989219
• Ng, S. W. (2012). Rethinking the mission of internationalization of higher education in the Asia-Pacific region. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 42(3), 439–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2011.652815
• Osler, A., & Starkey, H. (2003). Learning for cosmopolitan citizenship: Theoretical debates and young people’s experiences. Educational Review, 55(3), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191032000118901
• Oxfam. (2015). Education for global citizenship – A guide for schools. Oxfam House. https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/620105/edu-global-citizenship-schools-guide-091115-en.pdf?sequence=11&isAllowed=y
• Oxley, L., & Morris, P. (2013). Global citizenship: A typology for distinguishing its multiple conceptions. British Journal of Educational Studies, 61(3), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2013.798393
• Palaz, T. (2021). Global Citizenship and Education: A Bibliometric Research. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches, 6(16), 1907-1947. http://dx.doi.org/10.35826/ijetsar.416
• Pashby, K. (2015). Conflations, possibilities, and foreclosures: Global citizenship education in a multicultural context. Curriculum Inquiry, 45(4), 345–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2015.1064304
• Pashby, K., & Costa, M. da. (2021). Interfaces of critical global citizenship education in research about secondary schools in ‘global North’ contexts. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 19(4), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2021.1904213
• Pashby, K., Costa, M. da, Stein, S., & Andreotti, V. de O. (2021). Mobilising global citizenship education for alternative futures in challenging times: an introduction. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 19(4), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2021.1925876
• Pashby, K., da Costa, M., Stein, S., & Andreotti, V. De O. (2020). A meta-review of typologies of global citizenship education. Comparative Education, 56(2), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1723352
• Praetzel, G. D., Curcio, J., & Dilorenzo, J. (1996). Making study abroad a reality for all students. International Advances in Economic Research, 2(2), 174–182.
• Rapoport, A. (2010). We cannot teach what we don’t know: Indiana teachers talk about global citizenship education. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 5(3), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197910382256
• Santoro, N. (2014). ‘If I’m going to teach about the world, I need to know the world’: developing Australian pre-service teachers’ intercultural competence through international trips. Race Ethnicity and Education, 17(3), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2013.832938
• Scheunemann, A. E. (2021). Validation of the global mindedness scale, student factors associated with studying abroad, and the effect of studying abroad on student global mindedness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University, USA.
• Shultz, L. (2007). Educating for global citizenship: Conflicting agendas and understandings. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 53(3), 248–258.
• Toy, İ. (2023). Türkiye’de küresel vatandaşlık üzerine yapılan lisansüstü tezlerin araştırma eğilimlerinin incelenmesi: Bir meta-sentez çalışması.Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Eğitimi Dergisi, 9(1), 52-90. https://doi.org/10.47615/issej.1082097
• UNESCO. (2015). Global citizenship education topic and learning objectives. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232993
• UNESCO. (2018). Preparing teachers for global citizenship education: A template. https://bangkok.unesco.org/content/preparing-teachers-global-citizenship-education-template
• United Nations. (2012, September 26). Secretary-general’s remarks on launch of education first initiative [as prepared for delivery]. United Nations. https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2012-09-26/secretary-generals-remarks-launch-education-first-initiative
• United Nations. (2015). The sustainable development goals report. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/
• Veugelers, W. (2011). The moral and the political in global citizenship: Appreciating differences in education. Globalization, Societies and Education, 9(3-4), 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2011.605329
• Xin, S., Ping, W., & Qin, Y. (2021). Twenty years development of translanguaging: a bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2021.2007933
• Yemini, M., & Furstenburg, S. (2018). Students’ perceptions of global citizenship at a local and an international school in Israel. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(6) 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2017.1418835
• Yemini, M., Tibbitts, F., & Goren, H. (2019). Trends and caveats: Review of literature on global citizenship education in teacher training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.014