Contender in the Classical Turkish Poem
Öz
Positive and negative human types are united
around their specific character features in The Classical Turkish Poetry. Main
character features of positive types are various virtues such as sincerity,
loyalty and ingenuity. On the other hand negative types have bad character
features such as hypocrisy, selfishness and lying. Poets compare these types
with theirs characteristics, try to clarify ideal person and his relevant
conceptions by sampling.
Positive ideal types are man of heart,
especially lover, wise and optimistic persons. They live in a way that is away
from selfishness and have no problem of showing themselves like and proving
their superior qualifications to the others. From other side, negative types
such as opponent, ascetic and preacher found their lives upon selfishness and
claim that have been equipped with various virtues in their attitudes,
behaviors and words as a requirement of this reaching the benefits of world
with glory, fame, authority, property and possessions. These types are called
contender (muddeî) because their lives are shaped within this framework in
general. This (muddeî) name is their upper identity almost.
Contender is a person that claims that he
has ideal persons’ features, but has none of these. His inner and external
worlds and self and words are not the same. Every move and act misleading. His
words are always lies. He regulates his relations according to world benefits and so descends forever. Although there is not a
conflict interest among them, he treats man of heart as an enemy. He condemn
him in every oppotinity to shows that he is worthless, and so tries to glorify
himself in the eyes of the other peoples.
Except for his being talentless and
ignorance main reason for these worst features is to be far from love and
affection. Because a person that is far from these can not live the states of
abandonment and absence that are necessary for ingenuity and truth because of
addition to ego and desires. Contender has not an effort in this direction.
Based on own opinion, the contender thinks that he had lived these status and
reached to all targets whole, ignores the suggestions of the man of heart about
these subjects. Thus, he chases his suspicion and dreams, claims that they are
truth and tries to prove this case with various tricks.
This study aims to display concept of
contender and common character and behavior features of contender types and
their relations with other types in Classical Turkish Poem with the sample
texts.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Ahmed Paşa Divanı, hzl.: Ali Nihat Tarlan (1992). Ankara: Akçağ Yay.
- Ahmedî Dîvânı, hzl.: Yaşar Akdoğan, http://ekitap.kulturturizm.gov.tr /TR,78357/ahmedi-divani.html, ET: 15.09.2016.
- Azmî-zâde Hâletî Dîvânı. hzl.: Bayram Ali Kaya, https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/metinbankasi/files. Sep. 2. 2008 versiyonu.
- Beyânî Dîvânı. hzl.: Fatih Başpınar. http://ekitap.kulturturizm.gov.tr/TR,78363/beyani-divani.html. ET: 15.09.2016.
- Bursalı Rahmî Dîvânı. hzl.: Mustafa Erdoğan. http://ekitap.kulturturizm.gov.tr/TR,78364/bursali-rahmi-divani.html. ET: 15.09.2016.
- Cebecioğlu, E. (2005). Tasavvuf Terimleri ve Deyimleri Sözlüğü. İstanbul: Anka Yay.
- Dede Ömer Rûşenî Dîvânı. hzl.: Orhan Kemâl Tavukçu http://ekitap.kulturturizm.gov.tr/TR,78365/dede-omer-ruseni-divani.html. ET: 15.09.2016.
- Edincikli Ravzî Dîvânı. hzl.: Yaşar Aydemir. http://ekitap.kulturturizm.gov.tr/TR,78366/edincikli-ravzi-
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
Türkçe
Konular
Sanat ve Edebiyat
Bölüm
Sanat ve Edebiyat
Yazarlar
Yayımlanma Tarihi
22 Aralık 2016
Gönderilme Tarihi
22 Aralık 2016
Kabul Tarihi
11 Aralık 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2016 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3