Sanat ve Edebiyat

Klasik Türk Şiirinde Müddeî

Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3 22 Aralık 2016
PDF İndir
EN TR

Contender in the Classical Turkish Poem

Öz

Positive and negative human types are united around their specific character features in The Classical Turkish Poetry. Main character features of positive types are various virtues such as sincerity, loyalty and ingenuity. On the other hand negative types have bad character features such as hypocrisy, selfishness and lying. Poets compare these types with theirs characteristics, try to clarify ideal person and his relevant conceptions by sampling.

Positive ideal types are man of heart, especially lover, wise and optimistic persons. They live in a way that is away from selfishness and have no problem of showing themselves like and proving their superior qualifications to the others. From other side, negative types such as opponent, ascetic and preacher found their lives upon selfishness and claim that have been equipped with various virtues in their attitudes, behaviors and words as a requirement of this reaching the benefits of world with glory, fame, authority, property and possessions. These types are called contender (muddeî) because their lives are shaped within this framework in general. This (muddeî) name is their upper identity almost.

Contender is a person that claims that he has ideal persons’ features, but has none of these. His inner and external worlds and self and words are not the same. Every move and act misleading. His words are always lies. He regulates his relations according to world benefits and so descends forever. Although there is not a conflict interest among them, he treats man of heart as an enemy. He condemn him in every oppotinity to shows that he is worthless, and so tries to glorify himself in the eyes of the other peoples.

Except for his being talentless and ignorance main reason for these worst features is to be far from love and affection. Because a person that is far from these can not live the states of abandonment and absence that are necessary for ingenuity and truth because of addition to ego and desires. Contender has not an effort in this direction. Based on own opinion, the contender thinks that he had lived these status and reached to all targets whole, ignores the suggestions of the man of heart about these subjects. Thus, he chases his suspicion and dreams, claims that they are truth and tries to prove this case with various tricks.

This study aims to display concept of contender and common character and behavior features of contender types and their relations with other types in Classical Turkish Poem with the sample texts.


Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Ahmed Paşa Divanı, hzl.: Ali Nihat Tarlan (1992). Ankara: Akçağ Yay.
  2. Ahmedî Dîvânı, hzl.: Yaşar Akdoğan, http://ekitap.kulturturizm.gov.tr /TR,78357/ahmedi-divani.html, ET: 15.09.2016.
  3. Azmî-zâde Hâletî Dîvânı. hzl.: Bayram Ali Kaya, https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/metinbankasi/files. Sep. 2. 2008 versiyonu.
  4. Beyânî Dîvânı. hzl.: Fatih Başpınar. http://ekitap.kulturturizm.gov.tr/TR,78363/beyani-divani.html. ET: 15.09.2016.
  5. Bursalı Rahmî Dîvânı. hzl.: Mustafa Erdoğan. http://ekitap.kulturturizm.gov.tr/TR,78364/bursali-rahmi-divani.html. ET: 15.09.2016.
  6. Cebecioğlu, E. (2005). Tasavvuf Terimleri ve Deyimleri Sözlüğü. İstanbul: Anka Yay.
  7. Dede Ömer Rûşenî Dîvânı. hzl.: Orhan Kemâl Tavukçu http://ekitap.kulturturizm.gov.tr/TR,78365/dede-omer-ruseni-divani.html. ET: 15.09.2016.
  8. Edincikli Ravzî Dîvânı. hzl.: Yaşar Aydemir. http://ekitap.kulturturizm.gov.tr/TR,78366/edincikli-ravzi-

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Sanat ve Edebiyat

Bölüm

Sanat ve Edebiyat

Yayımlanma Tarihi

22 Aralık 2016

Gönderilme Tarihi

22 Aralık 2016

Kabul Tarihi

11 Aralık 2016

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2016 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Eren, A. (2016). Klasik Türk Şiirinde Müddeî. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(3), 607-614. https://izlik.org/JA82EZ52ZT
AMA
1.Eren A. Klasik Türk Şiirinde Müddeî. ODÜSOBİAD. 2016;6(3):607-614. https://izlik.org/JA82EZ52ZT
Chicago
Eren, ABDULLAH. 2016. “Klasik Türk Şiirinde Müddeî”. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi 6 (3): 607-14. https://izlik.org/JA82EZ52ZT.
EndNote
Eren A (01 Aralık 2016) Klasik Türk Şiirinde Müddeî. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi 6 3 607–614.
IEEE
[1]A. Eren, “Klasik Türk Şiirinde Müddeî”, ODÜSOBİAD, c. 6, sy 3, ss. 607–614, Ara. 2016, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA82EZ52ZT
ISNAD
Eren, ABDULLAH. “Klasik Türk Şiirinde Müddeî”. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi 6/3 (01 Aralık 2016): 607-614. https://izlik.org/JA82EZ52ZT.
JAMA
1.Eren A. Klasik Türk Şiirinde Müddeî. ODÜSOBİAD. 2016;6:607–614.
MLA
Eren, ABDULLAH. “Klasik Türk Şiirinde Müddeî”. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 6, sy 3, Aralık 2016, ss. 607-14, https://izlik.org/JA82EZ52ZT.
Vancouver
1.ABDULLAH Eren. Klasik Türk Şiirinde Müddeî. ODÜSOBİAD [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2016;6(3):607-14. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA82EZ52ZT

Bilginin ışığında aydınlanmak dileğiyle…

ODÜSOBİAD