Araştırma Makalesi

Konumu Geçmişi ve Kimliği ile Anavarza

Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3 22 Aralık 2016
  • Hasan Buyruk
PDF İndir
EN TR

Anazarbus with its Location, Past and Identity

Abstract

Anazarbus, on which Dilekkaya village is partly existent today, is situated 70 km northeast of Adana, 35 km southeast of Kozan which it is within the borders. Though founded on a mass of rock of 230 meters high, on a plain with 33 meters altitude and an area of 1145 decares, it is not certain when and by whom the city was founded first. Besides, it is known that the city was left after it was conquered by Memluks in 1375. After Anazarbus was included into the Roman Empire from the hands of local kingdom Tarcondiomotus in the first century BC, numerous changes have been taken place on the status and architecture of the city in the 2.nd and early3rd centuries AD. As Tarsus was the capital city of Kilikya Region until the time of Septimus Severus, the status of Anazarbus was changed into metropolis and has gained the equal status together with Mopsuhestia (Misis). The city which survived during the time of Byzantium Empire, has greatly been affected by the earthquakes. The city, being collapsed by the earthquakes, was rebuilt and was named Justinapolis and Justinianpolis, the names of the emperors of the time.

                As Anazarbus was a buffer zone between Byzantines and Muslim Arabs, it has been governed by these from time to time. The city which was taken by the Arabs at the end of 8th century, has been rebuilt and named after as Ayn Zarba. It was taken by Byzantine again in 964. The Armenians who fled to southeast following the Battle of Manzikert in 1071, has made Anazarbus in Kilikya Plain their capital city in 1100.

                The publications started with Charles Texier (1833) and went on with Michael Gough (1952) today consist mainly of definitions. The dates of construction and period have not been dealt with. In the present study, the civilizations in Anazarbus have been investigated together with their architectural contributions and the phases of Anazarbus have been determined. Besides this, its Byzantium identity was focused on and the impact of Byzantine on Anavarza has been stressed.


Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Abu’l-Farac G.( 1999). Abu’l Farac Tarihi, (Çev. Ö. Rıza Doğrul) C.I, Ankara, 1999.
  2. Buyruk H.( 2011) Sis’i (Kozan) Akdeniz’den Kapadokya’ya Bağlayan Kervanyolu Kaleleri, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Erzurum,.
  3. Cicci E. C. (2013). “The Bathing Complexes of Anazarbos and the Baths of Cilicia” Adalya XVI, ss. 141-166.
  4. Durukan M. (2015). “Anazarbus, Aegeaı ve Tarsus Kentlerinin Ticaret Yollarıyla Bağlantısı”, Çukurova Araştırmaları Dergisi, C.1, S.1, Kış 2015.
  5. Edwards R. W. (1987). The Fortificiations of Armenian Clicia, Washington.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Arkeoloji

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Hasan Buyruk Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

22 Aralık 2016

Gönderilme Tarihi

22 Aralık 2016

Kabul Tarihi

21 Kasım 2016

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2016 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Buyruk, H. (2016). Konumu Geçmişi ve Kimliği ile Anavarza. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(3), 695-710. https://izlik.org/JA47WB55HC

Bilginin ışığında aydınlanmak dileğiyle…

ODÜSOBİAD