Yapay Zekâ Teknolojilerinde Etkili Faktörler Üzerine Bir Model Denemesi: En Başarılı Ülkelerle Panel Veri Analizi

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, yapay zekâ teknolojilerinde en başarılı ülkelerin bu başarılarındaki etkili faktörleri araştırmaktır. Bu amaçla yapay zekâ teknolojilerinde en başarılı ülkelere ilişkin 2005-2017 dönemi verileri esas alınarak yapay zekâ patentlerinin, Ar-Ge harcamaları, araştırmacı sayıları ve bilimsel yayın sayıları ile ilişkisini tespit etmek maksadıyla dinamik bir model kurulmuştur. Bu model S-GMM yöntemiyle tahmin edilerek söz konusu faktörlerin ilişkisi araştırılmıştır. Ekonometrik analiz sonucunda, yapay zekâ teknolojilerinde Ar-Ge harcamalarının, bilimsel yayın sayılarının ve araştırmacı sayısının pozitif yönlü ilişkisi ampirik olarak ortaya konulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yapay Zekâ
• Ar-Ge
• Patent
• S-GMM
• Bölgesel Çalışmalar.

A Model Experiment on Effective Factors in Artificial Intelligence Technologies: A Panel Data Analysis with the Most Successful Countries

Öz

The aim of this study is to investigate the effective factors in the success of the most successful countries in AI technologies. For this purpose, a dynamic model has been established in order to determine the relationship between AI patents, R&D expenditures, number of researchers and scientific publications, based on the 2005-2017 period data on the most successful countries in AI technologies. This model was estimated by the S-GMM method and the relationship of these factors was investigated. As a result of the econometric analysis, the positive relationship between R&D expenditures, the number of scientific publications and researchers in AI technologies has been empirically revealed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Artificial Intelligence
• R&D
• Patent
• S-GMM
• Regional Studies.

Kaynakça

1. Abdih, Y.; Joutz, F. (2008), “The impact of public capital, human capital, and knowledge on aggregate output”, IMF Working Paper, WP/08/218.
2. Acemoğlu, D. (2020), IMF Conference, Sixth Richard Goode Lecture: Remaking the Post-COVID World, December 4, 2020, https://www.imf.org/en/News/ Seminars/Conferences/2020/11/18/sixth-richard-goode-lecture-remaking-thepost-covid-world (Erişim: 10.11.2021).
3. Acemoğlu, D; Restrepo, P. (2019), “The Wrong Kind of AI? Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Labor Demand”, IZA Discussion Paper No: 12704, Institute of Labor Economics.
4. Aguilera, A.; Barrera, M. G. R. (2016), “Technological Unemployment: an Approximation to the Latin American Case”, AD-Minister, No. 29: 59-78.
5. Ali, A.; Sinha, K. (2014), “Exploring the opportunities and challenges in nanotechnology innovation in India”, J. Soc. Sci. Poli. Imp, Vol. 2, No. 2: 227-251.
6. Altuzarra, A. (2019), “R&D and patents: Is it a two way street?”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 28, No.2: 180–196.
7. Anderson, T. W.; Hsiao, C. (1981), “Estimation of Dynamic Models with Error Components”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, No. 76: 598-606.
8. Anderson, T. W.; Hsiao, C. (1982), “Formulation and Estimation of Dynamic Models u-Using Panel Data”, Journal of Econometrics, No. 18: 47-82.

9. Arellano, M. (2003), Panel Data Econometrics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Arellano, M.; Bond, S. (1991), “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations”, Review of Economic Studies, No. 58: 277-297.
11. Arellano, M.; Bover, O. (1995), “Another Look at the Instrumental Variables Estimation of Error Component Models”, Journal of Econometrics, No. 68: 29-51.
12. Arrow, K. J. (1962), “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing”, Readings in the Theory of Growth, (Ed. F.H. Hahn), Macmillan St Martin’s Press: London: 131-149.
13. Baltagi, B. H. (2005), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 3rd Edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
14. Baruffaldi, S.; van Beuzekom, B.; Dernis, H.; Harhoff, D.; Rao, N.; Rosenfeld, D.; Squicciarini, M. (2020), “Identifying and measuring developments in artificial intelligence: Making the impossible possible”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2020/05, OECD Publishing, Paris.
15. Barro, R. J. (1990), “Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 5: 103-125.
16. Becker, G. S.; Murphy, K. M.; Tamura, R. (1990), “Human Capital, Fertility and Economic Growth”, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 5: 12-37.
17. Bloom, N.; Van Reenen, J. (2002), “Patents, real options and firm performance”, The Economic Journal, No. 112: 97-116.
18. Blundell, R.; Bond, S. (1998), “Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models”, Journal of Econometrics, No. 87: 115-143.
19. Bond, S.; Bowsher, C.; Windmeijer. F. (2001), “Criterion-based Inference for GMM in Autoregressive Panel Data Models”, Economic Letters, No. 73: 379-388.
20. Brouwer, E.; Kleinknecht, A.; Reijnen, J. O. N. (1993), “Employment Growth and Innovation at the Firm Level”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, No. 3: 153-159.
21. Chen, Z.; Zhang, J. (2019), “Types of patents and driving forces behind the patent growth in China”, Economic Modelling, No. 80: 294-302.
22. Chen, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zi, Y. (2021), “A cost-benefit analysis of R&D and patents: Firm-level evidence from China”, European Economic Review, Vol. 133, No. 103633: 1-28.
23. Cohen, W. M.; Nelson, R. R.; Walsh, J. P. (2002), “Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D”, Management Science, Vol. 48, No.1: 1-23.
24. Crépon, B.; Duguet, E.; Mairessec, J. (1998), “Research, Innovation And Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 7, No. 2: 115-158.
25. Czarnitzki, D.; Fier, A. (2003), “Publicly funded R&D collaborations and patent outcome in Germany”, Centre for European Economic Research, Discussion Paper No. 03-24.
26. Dağlı, İ.; Ezanoğlu, Z. (2021), “Ar-Ge, Patent ve İleri Teknoloji İhracatının Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkileri: OECD Ülkeleri İçin Dinamik Panel Veri Analizi”, İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, C. 10, S. 1: 438-460.
27. Dağlı, İ.; Kösekahyaoğlu, L. (2021), “Bilim ve Teknoloji Politikaları Bağlamında Teknoloji-İşsizlik İlişkisi: Ampirik Bir İnceleme”, Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, C. 16, S. 63: 1237-1255.
28. Dalton, D. M.; Burke, T. P.; Kelly, E. G.; Curtin, P. D. (2016), “Quantitative analysis of technological innovation in knee arthroplasty: using patent and publication metrics to identify developments and trends”, The Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 31, No.6: 1366-1372.
29. Das, R. C. (2020), “Interplays among R&D spending, patent and income growth: new empirical evidence from the panel of countries and groups”, Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 9, No.1: 1-22.
30. De Rassenfosse, G.; De la Potterie, B. V. P. (2009), “A policy insight into the R&D–patent relationship”, Research Policy, Vol. 38, No.5: 779-792.
31. Dosi, G. (1988), “The Nature of the Innovative Process”, Technical Change and Economic Theory, (Eds. Giovanni Dosi, Christopher Freeman, Richard Nelson, Gerald Silverberg, Luc Soete), New York: Pinter Publishers.
32. Eberhardt, M.; Helmers, C.; Yu, Z. (2016), “What can explain the Chinese patent explosion?”, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 69, No.1: 239-262.
33. Faems, D.; Subramanian, A. M. (2013), “R&D manpower and technological performance: The impact of demographic and task-related diversity”, Research Policy, Vol. 42, No.9: 1624-1633.
34. Fonseca, T.; De Faria, P.; Lima, F. (2019), “Human capital and innovation: the importance of the optimal organizational task structure”, Research Policy, Vol. 48, No. 3: 616-627.
35. Frietsch, R.; Wang, J. (2007), “Intellectual property rights and innovation activities in China: evidence from patents and publications”, Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers-Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis, No. 13.
36. Gennaioli, N.; La Porta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A. (2013), “Human capital and regional development”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 128, No. 1: 105-164.
37. Griliches, Z. (1979), “Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth”, The Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 10, No.1: 92-116.
38. Griliches, Z. (1998), Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey, in R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence.
39. Griliches, Z.; Pakes, A.; Hall, B. H. (1987), “The Value of Patents as Indicatiors of Inventive Activity”, Economic Policy and Technical Performance, (Eds. P. Dasgupta and P. Stoneman), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Grossman, G. M.; Helpman, E. (1993), “Endogenous Innovatıon in the Theory of Growth”, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper, No. 4527.
41. Hall, B. H.; Griliches, Z.; Hausman, J. A. (1986), “Patents and R and D: Is there a lag?”, International Economic Review, Vol. 27, No. 2: 265-283.
42. Hall, B. H; Griliches, Z; Hausman, J. A. (1986), "Patents and R&D: Is There A Lag?", International Economic Review, Vol. 27, No. 2: 265-284.
43. Hall, B.; Harhoff, D. (2012), “Recent research on the economics of patents”, NBER Working Paper, No. 17773.
44. Hall, B.; Helmers, C.; Rogers, M.; Sena, V. (2013), “The importance (or not) of patents to UK firms”, Oxford Economic Papers, No. 65, 603–629.
45. Hansen, L. P. (1982), “Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators”, Econometrica, No. 50: 1029-1054.
46. Hauk, W. R.; Wacziarg, R. (2009), “A Monte Carlo Study of Growth Regressions”, Journal of Economic Growth, No. 14: 103-147.
47. Heinze, T. (2004), “Nanoscience and nanotechnology in Europe: Analysis of Publications and patent Applications including Comparisons with the United States”, Nanotech. L. & Bus., Vol. 1, No. 4: 427-445.
48. Hullmann, A.; Meyer, M. (2003), “Publications and patents in nanotechnology”, Scientometrics, Vol. 58, No. 3: 507-527.
49. Kelly, K. (2016), Büyük Teknolojik Dönüşüm: Geleceğimizi Şekillendirecek 12 Teknolojik Kuvvet, İstanbul: Türk Hava Yolları Yayınları adına Optimist Yayınları.
50. Kianto, A.; Sáenz, J.; Aramburu, N. (2017), “Knowledge-based human resource management practices, intellectual capital and innovation”, Journal of Business Research, No. 81: 11-20.
51. Kneller, R.; Stevens, P. A. (2006), “Frontier technology and absorptive capacity: Evidence from OECD manufacturing industries”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 68, No. 1: 1-21.
52. Kortum, S. S. (1997), “Research, Patenting, and Technological Change”, Econometrica, Vol. 65, No. 6: 1389-1419.
53. Lanjouw, J. O.; Schankerman, M. (2004), "Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation With Multiple Indicators", Economic Journal, Vol. 114, No. 495: 441-465.
54. Licht, G.; Zoz, K. (2000), “Patents and R&D An Econometric Investigation Using Applications for German, European and US Patents by German Companies”, The Economics and Econometrics of Innovation, Springer, Boston, MA: 307-338.
55. Lucas, R. E. Jr. (1988), “On the Mechanics of Economic Development”, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 22, No. 1: 3-42.
56. Mansfield, E. (1984), R&D and Innovation: Some Empirical Findings, in R&D, Patents and Productivity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57. Mao, P. H.; Zhou, Y. H.; Huang, X.; Xia, Z. Q. (2011), “The Effect of Human Capital on Corporate R&D Activities from the Angle of Patent Output: Evidence from Large and Medium-sized Enterprises”, Shanghai [J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 12.
58. McGuirk, H.; Lenihan, H.; Hart, M. (2015), “Measuring the impact of innovative human capital on small firms’ propensity to innovate”, Research Policy, Vol. 44, No. 4: 965-976.
59. Mileva, E. (2007), Using Arellano-Bond Dynamic Panel GMM Estimators in Stata, New York: Fordham University.
60. Nelson, A. J. (2009), “Measuring knowledge spillovers: What patents, licenses and publications reveal about innovation diffusion”, Research Policy, Vol. 38, No. 6: 994-1005.
61. Nguyen, A. L.; Liu, W.; Khor, K. A.; Nanetti, A.; Cheong, S. A. (2020), “The golden eras of graphene science and technology: Bibliographic evidences from journal and patent publications”, Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 14, No. 4: 1-18.
62. Nickell, S. (1981), “Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects”, Econometrica, No. 49: 1417–1426.
63. Numenta (2020), Numenta Demonstrates 50x Speed Improvements on Deep Learning Networks Using Brain-Derived Algorithms, Numenta Press Release, 249 https://numenta.com/press/2020/11/10/Numenta-Demonstrates-50xPerformance-Acceleration-Deep-Learning-Networks (Erişim: 01.12.2021).
64. OECD (2009), OECD Patent Statistics Manual, Paris: OECD Publishing.
65. OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239012-en.
66. OECD (2016), Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2016, Paris: OECD Publishing.
67. OECD (2017), Tapping Nanotechnology's Potential To Shape The Next Production Revolution, The Next Production Revolution: Implications for Governments and Business, Paris: OECD Publishing.
68. OECD (2018), Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2018: Adapting to Technological and Societal Disruption, Paris: OECD Publishing.
69. OECD (2020), OECD Main Science and Technology Indicators. R&D Highlights in the February 2020 Publication, Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation, www.oecd.org/sti/msti2020.pdf.
70. OECD (2021), Main Science and Technology Indicators, Volume 2021, Issue 1, Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/eea67efc-en.
71. OECD Stat (2021), OECD Stat Statistics, https://stats.oecd.org/.
72. Özbay, F.; Oğuztürk, B. S.; Sezgin, A . (2020), “Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan G20 Ülkelerinin İnovasyon Çıktılarını Etkileyen Faktörlerin Bilgi Üretim Fonksiyonu ile Analizi”, İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, C.9, S.5: 3874-3900.
73. Pakes, A; Griliches, Z. (1984), Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Look, in R&D, Patents, and Productivity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
74. Pantanowitz, L.; Quiroga-Garza, G. M.; Bien, L.; Heled, R.; Laifenfeld, D.; Linhart, C.; ...; Dhir, R. (2020), “An Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Whole Slide Images of Core Needle Biopsies: A Blinded Clinical Validation and Deployment Study”, The Lancet Digital Health, Vol. 2, No. 8: 407-416.
75. Porter, M. E.; Stern, S. (2000), “Measuring the ‘Ideas’ Production Function: Evidence from International Patent Output”, NBER Working Paper, No. 7891.
76. Raymond, W.; Mairesse, J.; Mohnen, P.; Palm, F. (2015), “Dynamic models of R & D, innovation and productivity: Panel data evidence for Dutch and French manufacturing”, European Economic Review, No. 78: 285-306.
77. Rebelo, S. T. (1991), “Long-Run Policy Analysis and Long-Run Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 99, No. 3: 501-521.
78. Romer, P. M. (1986), “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, No. 5: 1002-1037.
79. Romer, P. M. (1990), “Endogenous technological change”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 5: 71-102.
80. Roodman, D. M. (2009), “How to do xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata”, The Stata Journal, Vol. 9, No, 1: 86-136.
81. Sampath, B.; Ziedonis, A. (2004), “Patent citations and the economic value of patents: A preliminary assessment”, (Eds. H. Moed, W. Glanzel, U. Schmoch), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, Boston: Kluwer, Academic Publishers.
82. Sargan, J. D. (1958), “The Estimation of Economic Relationships Using Instrumental Variables”, Econometrica, No. 26: 393-415.
83. Say, C. (2018), 50 Soruda Yapay Zekâ, İstanbul: 7 Renk Basım Yayıncılık.
84. Schumpeter, J. A., (1934), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle, translated from the German by Redvers Opie, New Brunswick (U.S.A) and London (U.K.): Transaction Publishers.
85. Schumpeter, J. A., (1939), Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, (Ed.Rendigs Fels), 1964, New York and London: McGraw-Hill.
86. Schumpeter, J. A., (1943), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New York: Harper Collins.
87. Schwab, K. (2016), Dördüncü Sanayi Devrimi (Çev. Z. Dicleli), 2018, İstanbul: Optimist Kitap.
88. Schwab, K. (2018), Dördüncü Sanayi Devrimini Şekillendirmek (Çev. N. Özata), 2019, İstanbul: Optimist Kitap.
89. Shapira, P.; Kwon, S. (2018), Synthetic Biology Research and Innovation Profile 2018. Publications and Patents, bioRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/485805.
90. Sierotowicz, T. (2015), “Patent activity as an effect of the research and development of the business enterprise sectors in the countries of the European Union”, Journal of International Studies, Vol. 8, No. 2: 101-113.
91. Singh, A.; Wong, P. K.; Ho, Y. P. (2015), “The role of universities in the national innovation systems of China and the East Asian NIEs: An exploratory analysis of publications and patenting data”, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol. 23, No. 2: 140-156.
92. Solow, R. B. (1957), “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 39, No. 3: 312-320.
93. Soul Machines (2018), Digital Gene Pool Makes It Easy to Produce Highly Realistic Digital Humans in Minutes, Media Release, December 13, https://www.soulmachines.com/2018/12/hot-off-the-press-soul-machineslaunches-digital-dna-a-critical-component-in-the-future-of-customerexperience/ (Erişim: 18.11.2021)
94. Squicciarini, M. P.; Voigtländer, N. (2015), “Human capital and industrialization: Evidence from the age of enlightenment”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 130, No. 4: 1825-1883.
95. Stokes, J. M.; Yang, K.; Swanson, K.; Jin, W.; Cubillos-Ruiz, A.; Donghia, N. M.; ...; Collins, J. J. (2020), “A Deep Learning Approach to Antibiotic Discovery”, Cell, Vol. 180, No. 4: 688-702.
96. Subramaniam, M.; Youndt, M. A. (2005), “The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 48, No. 3: 450-463.
97. Sumitomo (2020), Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., https://www.dspharma.com/ir/news/2020/20200130.html (Erişim: 13.11.2021).
98. Sun, X.; Li, H.; Ghosal, V. (2020), “Firm-level human capital and innovation: Evidence from China”, China Economic Review, No. 59, No. 101388: 1-15.
99. Tatoğlu, Y. F. (2018), İleri Panel Veri Ekonometrisi: Stata Uygulamalı, 3. Baskı. İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık.
100. Teslenko, V.; Melnikov, R.; Bazin, D. (2021), “Evaluation of the impact of human capital on innovation activity in Russian regions”, Regional Studies, Regional Science, Vol. 8, No. 1: 109-126.
101. Thomas, V. J.; Sharma, S.; Jain, S. K. (2011), “Using patents and publications to assess R&D efficiency in the states of the USA”, World Patent Information, Vol. 33, No. 1: 4-10.
102. TÜBİTAK (2016), Yeni Sanayi Devrimi: Akıllı Üretim Sistemleri Teknoloji Yol Haritası, https://www.tubitak.gov.tr/sites/default/files/akilli_uretim_sistemleri_tyh_ v27 aralik2016.pdf.
103. USPTO (2018), The United States Patent and Trademark Office, https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/patent-policy/ip5 Vancauteren, M. (2018), “The effects of human capital, R&D and firm’s innovation on patents: a panel study on Dutch food firms”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 43, No. 4: 901-922.
104. Vivarelli, M. (2014), “Innovation, Employment and Skills in Advanced and Developing Countries: A Survey of Economic Literature”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 48, No. 1: 123-154.
105. Vivarelli, M. (2015), “Innovation and Employment”, IZA World of Labor, No. 154: 1-10.
106. Wang, N.; Hagedoorn, J. (2014), “The lag structure of the relationship between patenting and internal R&D revisited”, Research Policy, Vol. 43, No. 8: 1275-1285.
107. WEF (2017), The Global Risks Report 2017, World Economic Forum, Insight Report, 12 th Edition.
108. WEF (2020), Jobs of Tomorrow: Mapping Opportunity in the New Economy, World Economic Forum, Platform for Shaping the Future of the New Economy and Society, January 2020.
109. WIPO (2021), Global Innovation Index 2021: Tracking Innovation through the COVID-19 Crisis. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.
110. Windmeijer, F. (2005), “A Finite Sample Correction for the Variance of Linear Efficient Two-Step Gmm Estimators” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 126: 25-51.
111. Wong, C. Y.; Mohamad, Z. F.; Keng, Z. X.; Azizan, S. A. (2014), “Examining the patterns of innovation in low carbon energy science and technology: Publications and patents of Asian emerging economies”, Energy Policy, Vol. 73: 789-802.
112. Yaman, H.; Çetin, D.; Dulupçu, M. A. (2020), “OECD Ülkelerinde Ar-Ge Harcamaları ve İleri Teknoloji İhracatı: Bir Panel Veri Analizi”, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, C. 20, S. 3: 193-208.
113. Yang, C. H.; Matsuura, T.; Ito, T. (2019), “R&D and patenting activities of foreign firms in China: The case of Japan”, Japan and the World Economy, Vol. 49: 151-160.