Milliyetçilik-Göç İlişkisi Üzerine Teorik Bir Perspektif

Öz

Milliyetçilik, ulusal kimlik inşasına dayanmaktadır. Bu inşa süreci biz ve öteki ayrımıyla gerçekleşmekte ve göç edenler ulusal kimliğin ötekisini oluşturmaktadır. Bu çerçevede göç güvenlik meselesi olarak ön plana çıkmakta, göç edenlerin oluşturduğu tehdit algısı milliyetçiliği yükseltmektedir. Bunun karşısında göçmenler de gittikleri yerlerde milliyetçiliği diasporalar vasıtasıyla sürdürebilmektedir. Etnik dönüş göçleri ise milliyetçiliğin kurucu bir gücü olarak görülebilir. Sonuç itibariyle göç, milliyetçilik açısından hem bir meydan okuma hem de onu üretmesi yönüyle önemli işleve sahiptir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Göç
• Milliyetçilik
• Etnik Dönüş Göçleri
• Diaspora
• Güvenlik.

A Theoretical Perspective on the Nationalism-Migration Relationship

Öz

Nationalism is based on the construction of national identity. This construction process takes place with the distinction between us and the other, and the immigrants constitute the other of the national identity. In this framework, migration comes to the forefront as a security issue, and the perception of threat created by immigrants raises nationalism. On the other hand, immigrants can continue their nationalism through diasporas wherever they go. Ethnic return migrations can be seen as a founding force of nationalism. As a result, immigration has an important function in terms of both a challenge and producing it in terms of nationalism.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Migration
• Nationalism
• Ethnic Return Migrations
• Diaspora
• Security.

Kaynakça

1. Ayata, A., & Sütçü, E. (2022), Avrupa’da Bir Güvenlikleştirme Konusu Olarak Göç, Ankara: İksad Yayınevi.
2. Bieber, F. (2018), “Is Nationalism on the Rise? Assessing Global Trends”, Ethnopolitics, Vol. 17, No. 5: 519–540.
3. Blake, M. (2013), “Immigration, Jurisdiction and Exclusion”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 41, No. 2, 103-130.
4. Bora, T. (1995), “Türk milliyetçiliği ve Kıbrıs”, Birikim, Sayı 77, https://birikimdergisi.com/dergiler/birikim/1/sayi-77-eylul-1995/2275/turk-milliyetciligi-ve-kibris/2772, (Erişim: 21.09.2022).
5. Brubaker, R. (2005), “The ‘diaspora’ diaspora”, Ethnic and Racial Studies, No. 28: 1–19.
6. Esposito, J. L. (1980), “Pakistan: Quest for Islamic Identity”, (Ed. J. L. Esposito), Islam and Development: Religion and Sociopolitical Change, New York: Oxford University Press: 62-139.
7. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/member-states, (Erişim: 12.09.2022).
8. Ichijo, A. (2019), “Japon Milliyetçiliğine Alternatif Yaklaşımlar”, (Ed. G. Yücel), Milliyetçiliğin Coğrafyaları, Ankara: A Kitap: 177-2014.

9. Jaskułowski, K. (2019), The Everyday Politics of Migration Crisis in Poland: Between Nationalism, Fear and Empathy, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
10. Joppke, C. (2005), Selecting by Origin: Ethnic Migration in the Liberal State, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
11. Kapur, D. (2014), “Political Effects of International Migration”, Annual Review of Political Science, No. 17: 479–502.
12. “Kazakistan'da nüfus politikası meyvesini vermeye başladı”, https://www.trtavaz.com.tr/haber/tur/avrasyadan/kazakistanda-nufus-politikasi-meyvesini-vermeye-basladi/603b55fe01a30af60c8bf0b9, (Erişim: 18.09.2022).
13. Khan, A. (2002), “Pakistan's Sindhi Ethnic Nationalism: Migration, Marginalization, and the Threat of "Indianization"”, Asian Survey, Vol. 42, No. 2: 213-229.
14. Kibria, N. (2011), Islam and National Identity in the Bangladeshi Diaspora, New Brunswick & New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
15. Kulu, H. (1998), “Ethnic Return Migration: An Estonian Case”, International Migration, Vol. 36, No. 3: 313-336.
16. Kuşçu, I. (2014), “Ethnic Return Migration and Public Debate: The Case of Kazakhstan”, International Migration, Vol. 52, No. 2: 178-197.
17. Landau, J. M. (2001), “Diaspora Nationalism”, (Ed. A. S. Leoussi), Encyclopaedia of Nationalism, New Brunswick & London: Transaction Publishers: 46-50.
18. Levy, D. (2002), “Introduction: Changing Configurations of German and Israeli Immigration Regimes-a Comparative Perspective”, (Ed D. Levy and Y. Weiss), Challenging Ethnic Citizenship: German and Israeli Perspectives on Immigration, New York & Oxford: Berghahn Books: 1–15.
19. Mavroudi, E. (2010), “Nationalism, the Nation and Migration: Searching for Purity and Diversity”, Space and Polity, Vol. 14, No. 3: 219 – 233.
20. Miller, D. (2007), National Responsibility and Global Justice, New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Moldovan, I. D. & Mihaescu, A. (2018), “Structural Changes in Nationalism – Migration and Insecurity”, Journal of Research and Science Today, Vol. 2, No. 16: 33-41.
22. Sager, A. (2016), “Methodological Nationalism, Migration and Political Theory”, Political Studies, Vol. 64, No. 1: 42-59.
23. Smith, A. D. (2017), Etno-Sembolizm ve Milliyetçilik, Çev. Bilge Firuze Çallı, İstanbul: Alfa Yayıncılık.
24. Smith, A. D. (2010), Nationalism: Theory, Ideology, History, Cambridge-Malden: Polity Press.
25. Talat Zrilli, A. (2019), “Ethno-nationalism, state building and migration: the first wave of migration from Turkey to North Cyprus”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, Vol. 19, No. 3: 493-510.
26. Thiranagama, S. (2014), “Making Tigers from Tamils: Long-Distance Nationalism and Sri Lankan Tamils in Toronto”, American Anthropologist, Vol. 116, No. 2: 265–278.
27. Triandafyllidou, A. (2020), “Nationalism in the 21st century: Neo-tribal or plural?”, Nations and Nationalism, No. 26: 792–806.
28. Tsuda, T. (2010), “Ethnic return migration and the nation-state: encouraging the diaspora to return ‘home’”, Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 16, No. 4: 616:636.
29. Vertovec, S. (2005), “The Political Importance of Diasporas”, Centre on Migration, Policy and Society, Working Paper No. 13, Oxford: University of Oxford.
30. Vollmer, B., & Karakayalı, S. (2017), “The volatility of the discourse on refugees in Germany”, Journal of Immigrant & Refugee, Vol. 16, No. 1-2: 118-139.
31. Waterbury, M. A. (2020), “Populist Nationalism and the Challenges of Divided Nationhood: The Politics of Migration, Mobility, and Demography in Post-2010 Hungary”, East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, Vol. 34, No. 4: 962-983.
32. Wimmer, A., & Schiller, N. G. (2003), “Methodological Nationalism, the Social Sciences, and the Study of Migration: An Essay in Historical Epistemology”, The International Migration Review, Vol. 37, No. 3: 576-610.