Göç Alan Ülke Sınıflandırması İçin Metodolojik Çerçeve Analizi

Öz

Geleneksel göç alan ülke sınıflandırmaları, yakın dönemde yoğun göç alan yeni ülkeleri kapsamamaktadır. Yeni hedef ülkelerde yürütülecek saha araştırmalarının literatür ile bütünleşebilmesi ve ülkelerarası karşılaştırmalı araştırmaların yapılabilmesi için metodolojik sınırlılıkları aşmak gerekmektedir. Bu makalede göç alan ülke tipolojileri oluşturulurken yaygın olarak kullanılan ulus-devlet oluşumu, yurttaşlık rejimleri ve göç politikaları tarihsel ve kuramsal olarak analiz edilmiştir. Birbiriyle ilişkili değişkenlerin bir ülkenin göç profilini belirlemede kullanılabilecek; tarihsel, yasal ve politik düzlemde izlenebilecek metodolojik araçlar olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Uluslararası Göç
• Ulus-Devlet
• Yurttaşlık
• Göç Politikaları

Methodological Framework Analysis for Migration Receiving Country Classification

Öz

Traditional classifications of immigration countries are inefficient in covering new destination countries that recently received high numbers of immigrants. It is necessary to overcome methodological limitations in order to integrate field research in new destination countries with the literature and to conduct cross-national research. In this article, nation-state formation, citizenship regimes and migration policies, which are widely used when creating immigration country typologies, have been analyzed historically and theoretically. It has been concluded that, those interrelated variables can be used as methodological tools to determine the migration profile of a country and be traced through historical, legal and political levels.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• International Migration
• Nation-State
• Citizenship
• Immigration Policies

Kaynakça

1. Alba, R. D.; Nee, V. (1997), “Rethinking Assimilation Theory for a New Era of Immigration”, The International Migration Review, Vol. 31, No. 4: 826-874.
2. Balibar, E. (1988), “Propositions on Citizenship”, Ethics, Vol. 98, No. 4: 723-730.
3. Bellamy, R. (2008), Citizenship: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bloemraad, I., Korteweg, A.; Yurdakul, G. (2008), “Citizenship and Immigration: Multiculturalism, Assimilation, and Challenges to the Nation-State”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 34, No. 1: 153-179.
5. Boucher, A.; Gest, J. (2015), “Migration Studies at a Crossroads: A Critique of Immigration Regime Typologies”, Migration Studies, Vol. 3, No. 2: 182-198.
6. Brubaker, R. (1992), Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Callinicos, A. (2022), Toplum Kuramı: Tarihsel Bir Bakış, Çev: Yasemin Tezgiden, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
7. Castles, S. (1995), “How Nation‐States Respond to Immigration and Ethnic Diversity”, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3: 293-308.
8. Castles, S. (2004a), “The Factors That Make and Unmake Migration Policies”, The International Migration Review, Vol. 38, No. 3: 852-884.

9. Castles, S. (2004b), “Why Migration Policies Fail”, Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 27, No. 2: 205-227.
10. Castles, S.; Davidson, A. (2000), Citizenship and Migration: Globalization and the Politics of Belonging, New York: Routledge.
11. Castles, S.; Miller, M. J. (2008), Göçler Çağı: Modern Dünyada Uluslararası Göç Hareketleri, Çev. B. U. Bal & İ. Akbulut, İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
12. Czaika, M.; De Haas, H. (2013), “The Effectiveness of Immigration Policies”, Population Council, Vol. 39, No. 3: 487-508.
13. De Haas; H., Czaika, M.; Flahaux, M. L.; Mahendra, E.; Natter, K.; Vezzoli, S.; Villares-Varela, M. (2019), “International Migration: Trends, Determinants, and Policy Effects”, Population and Development Review, Vol. 45, No. 4: 885-922.
14. Duman, B. (2011), “Çokkültürlülükten Ricat mı?”, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, Vol. 3, No. 23: 207-239.
15. Erbaş, H. (2008), “Identity Dilemma: Gender and a Sense of Belonging or of Alienization”, Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol. 48, No. 1: 1-26.
16. Erbaş, H. (2009), Küreselleşme, Kapitalizm ve Toplumsal Dönüşümler, Ankara: Palme Yayıncılık.
17. Erbaş, H. (2019), Gidişlerden Kaçışlara Göç ve Göçmenler: Kuram, Yöntem ve Alan Yazıları, Ankara: Phoenix Yayınevi.
18. Freeman, G. P. (1995), “Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal Democratic States”, The International Migration Review, Vol. 29, No. 4: 881-902.
19. Gordon, M. M. (1961), “Assimilation in America: Theory and Reality”, Daedalus, Vol. 90, No. 2: 263-285.
20. Gordon, M. M. (1964), Assimilation in American Life the Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins, Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
21. Heater, D. (2004), A Brief History of Citizenship, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
22. Hollifield, J.; Martin, P. L.; Orrenius, P. (2014), Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective, California: Stanford University Press.
23. Isin, E. F.; Turner, B. S. (2002), Handbook of Citizenship Studies, London: Sage.
24. Joppke, C. (1999), Immigration and the Nation-State: The United States, Germany, and Great Britain, New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Kartal, F. (Ed.), (2010), Yurttaşlık Tartışmaları: Yeni Yaklaşımlar, Ankara: TODAİE.
26. Keely, C. B. (1996), “How Nation-States Create and Respond to Refugee Flows” International Migration Review, Vol. 30, No. 4: 1046-1066.
27. Kohn, M. L. (1987), “Cross-National Research as an Analytic Strategy: American Sociological Association, 1987 Presidential Address”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 52, No. 6: 713-731.
28. Marshall, T. H. (1950), Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays, Cambridge: The Syndics Of The Cambridge University Press.
29. Massey, D. S. (1999), “International Migration at the Dawn of the Twenty-First Century: The Role of the State”, Population and Development Review, Vol. 25, No. 2: 303-322.
30. Massey, D. S., Durand, J.; Pren, K. A. (2016), “Why Border Enforcement Backfired”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 121, No. 5: 1557-1600.
31. McAuliffe, M.; Triandafyllidou, A. (2021), World Migration Report 2022, Geneva: International Organization for Migration (IOM).
32. Meyers, E. (2000), “Theories of International Immigration Policy-A Comparative Analysis”, The International Migration Review, Vol. 34, No. 4: 1245-1282.
33. Özkazanç, A. (2009), “Toplumsal Vatandaşlik ve Neo-liberalizm Sorunu”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Vol. 64, No. 1: 247-274.
34. Park, R. E.; Burgess, E. W. (1921), Introduction to the Science of Sociology, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
35. Portes, A.; Zhou, M. (1993), “The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and its Variants”, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 530, No. 1: 74-96.
36. Riesenberg, P. N. (1992), Citizenship in the Western Tradition: Plato to Rousseau, Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
37. Sassen, S. (1996), “Beyond Sovereignty: Immigration Policy Making Today”, Social Justice, Vol. 23, No. 3: 9-20.
38. Schuck, P. H. (2002), “Liberal Citizenship”, (Ed.) E. F. Isin & B. S. Turner, Handbook of Citizenship Studies London: Sage Publications: 131-144.
39. Smith, R. M. (2001), “Citizenship and the Politics of People-Building”, Citizenship Studies, Vol. 5, No. 1: 73-96.
40. Song, S. (2017), “Multiculturalism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017), (ed.) Edward N. Zalta, URL = . (Erişim: 01.11.2023).
41. Steiner, N. (2009), International Migration and Citizenship Today, Abingdon: Routledge.
42. Turner, B. S. (1990), “Outline of a Theory of Citizenship”, Sociology, Vol. 24, No. 2: 189-217.
43. Turner, B. S. (1997), “Citizenship Studies: A General Theory”, Citizenship Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1: 5-18.
44. Voutira, E. (2012), “Jus Sanguinis and Jus Soli: Aspects of Ethnic Migration and Immigration Policies in EU States: European Perspectives”, An Introduction to International Migration Studies, (Ed. M. Martiniello & J. Rath), Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press: 131-154.
45. Weil, P. (2001), “Access to Citizenship: A Comparison of Twenty-Five Nationality Laws”, Citizenship Today: Global Perspectives and Practices, (Ed. T. A. Aleinikoff & D. Klusmeyer), Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press: 17-35.
46. Wimmer, A.; Feinstein, Y. (2010), “The Rise of the Nation-State across the World, 1816 to 2001”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 75, No. 5: 764-790.
47. Zolberg, A. R. (1978), “lnternational Migration Policies in a Changing World System”, Human Migration: Patterns and Policies, (Ed. W. H. l McNeil & R. S. Adams), Indiana: Indiana University Press: 241-286.
48. Zolberg, A. R. (1981), “International Migrations in Political Perspective”, International Migration Review, Vol. 15, No. 1: 3-27.