Üçüncü Yer Olarak Mekân Oluşturmada İnsan Ölçeğinde Mahalleler

Öz

Kentin ekosistemin bir parçası olduğu gerçeğini göz ardı eden kent politikalarının kültürel dokuyu tek boyutlu bir tasarım paradigmasına indirgemesi, kent sakinlerinin dayatılan mekânsal forma yabancılaşmasına ve zamanla çevreye karşı kayıtsızlaşmasına yol açmaktadır. Kentsel sürdürülebilirliğin sağlanması amacıyla, Ray Oldenburg’un Üçüncü Yer Teorisi’nden hareketle ev ve iş dışında, özellikle mahalle ölçeğinde açık alanlarda aktif bir kamusal yaşamın mümkün olduğu savunulmaktadır. Fred Kent’in öncülüğünde gelişen placemaking hareketi çerçevesinde hayata geçirilen uygulamalar, karar süreçlerine halkın katılımının kent mekânını dönüştürücü etkisini göstermektedir. İnsan ölçeğini esas alan ve planlama süreçlerinde yerel aktörleri güçlendiren bu yaklaşımın, mahalleleri kademeli biçimde dönüştürerek kentleri doğal ekosistemle yeniden bütünleştirme potansiyeli taşıdığı değerlendirilmektedir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mekân Oluşturma
• Üçüncü Yer Teorisi
• Sürdürülebilir Kentler
• İnsan Ölçeği
• Halk Katılımı

Human-Scale Neighborhoods in Placemaking as a Third Place

Öz

Urban policies that disregard the fact that the city is part of the ecosystem and reduce cultural fabric to a single-dimensional design paradigm lead urban residents to become alienated from imposed spatial forms and, over time, indifferent to their environment. In pursuit of urban sustainability, this study draws on Ray Oldenburg’s Third Place Theory to argue that an active public life is possible outside home and work, particularly in open spaces at the neighborhood scale. Practices implemented within the framework of the placemaking movement, advanced by Fred Kent, demonstrate the transformative impact of public participation in decision-making processes on urban space. This approach, which prioritizes human scale and empowers local actors in planning processes, is evaluated as having the potential to incrementally transform neighborhoods and reintegrate cities with the natural ecosystem. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Placemaking
• Third Place Theory
• Sustainable Cities
• Human Scale
• Public Participation

Kaynakça

1. Akbarishahabi, L. (2022). İnsan ölçeğinde tasarlanan kentsel mekanlar ve kent sakinlerinin aidiyet duyguları üzerine bir değerlendirme. Kent Akademisi, 15(1), 136-154. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.991918
2. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press.
3. Boutreux, T., Bourgeois, M., Bellec, A., Commeaux, F., & Kaufmann, B. (2024). Addressing the sustainable urbanism paradox: Tipping points for the operational reconciliation of dense and green morphologies. npj Urban Sustainability, 4(1), Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-024-00176-7
4. Breuste, J. (2022). The green city: Urban nature as an ideal, provider of services and conceptual urban design approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63976-4
5. Canniffe, E. (2006). Urban ethic: Design in the contemporary city. Routledge.
6. Churkina, G., Grote, R., Butler, T. M., & Lawrence, M. (2015). Natural selection? Picking the right trees for urban greening. Environmental Science and Policy, 47, 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.014
7. Collins, R. M., Spake, R., Brown, K. A., Ogutu, B. O., Smith, D., & Eigenbrod, F. (2020). A systematic map of research exploring the effect of greenspace on mental health. Landscape and Urban Planning, 201, Article 103823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103823
8. Cracknell, D. (2024). Placemaking in 12 minutes. Placemaking.Education. https://placemaking.education/p/placemaking-in-12-minutes

9. Demir, G. (2017). Oldenburg’un üçüncü mekân paradigması bağlamında kütüphane mekânının sorgulanması. Bilgi Dünyası, 18(2), 195–223. https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2017.628
10. Fairbairn, A. J., Meyer, S. T., Mühlbauer, M., Jung, K., Apfelbeck, B., Berthon, K., Frank, A., Guthmann, L., Jokisch, J., Kerler, K., Obster, C., Unterbichler, M., Webersberger, J., Matejka, J., Depner, P., & Weisser, W. W. (2024). Urban biodiversity is affected by human-designed features of public squares. Nature Cities, 1, 706–715. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-024-00126-5
11. Friedman, A. (2021). Fundamentals of sustainable urban design. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60865-1
12. Giridharan, R., Ganesan, S., & Lau, S. (2004). Daytime urban heat island effect in high-rise and high-density residential developments in Hong Kong. Energy and Buildings, 6(36), 525-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2003.12.016
13. Givoni, B. (2008). Climate considerations in building and urban design. Wiley.
14. Göregenli, M. (2010). Çevre psikolojisi: İnsan mekân ilişkileri. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
15. Göregenli, M., Karakuş, P., Özgen Kösten, E. Y., & Umuroğlu, İ. (2014). Mahalleye bağlılık düzeyinin kent kimliği ile ilişkisi içinde incelenmesi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 29(73), 73–85.
16. Jacobs, J. (2011). Büyük Amerikan şehirlerinin ölümü ve yaşamı. Metis Yayınları.
17. Kaźmierczak, A., Armitage, R., & James, P. (2010). Urban green spaces: Natural and accessible? The case of Greater Manchester, UK. In N. Müller, P. Werner, & J. G. Kelcey (Eds.), Urban biodiversity and design (pp. 383–405). Wiley-Blackwell.
18. Kent, F., Panova, T., & Madden, K. (2024a, June 24). What New Yorkers lost: Dining sheds that supported vibrant sidewalk life and social hubs in NYC. Social Life Project. https://www.sociallifeproject.org/dining-sheds-social-hubs-and-sidewalk-life-in-nyc/
19. Kent, F., Madden, K., Walljasper, J., & Hinshaw, M. (2024b, July 29). Paris: A city where social life thrives. Social Life Project. https://www.sociallifeproject.org/paris-is-the-world-capital-of-affection-comfort-joy/
20. Le Corbusier. (1985). Towards a new architecture. Dover Publications.
21. Liebenberg, A. (2022). Exploring the opportunities for street furniture to contribute to climate resilience and sustainability. UBC Sustainability Scholars.
22. Madanipour, A. (2006). Roles and challenges of urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 11(2), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800600644035
23. Marselle, M. R., Lindley, S. J., Cook, P. A., & Bonn, A. (2021). Biodiversity and health in the urban environment. Current Environmental Health Reports, 8(2), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-021-00313-9
24. Mata, L., Ramalho, C. E., Kennedy, J., Parris, K. M., Valentine, L., Miller, M., Bekessy, S., Hurley, S., & Cumpston, Z. (2020). Bringing nature back into cities. People and Nature, 2(2), 350–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10088
25. McKinney, M. L. (2002). Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation: The impacts of urbanization on native species are poorly studied, but educating a highly urbanized human population about these impacts can greatly improve species conservation in all ecosystems. BioScience, 52(10), 883–890. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0883:UBAC]2.0.CO;2
26. Moataz, M. (2024, October 10). Third Place Theory: Creating community spaces. Urban Design Lab. https://urbandesignlab.in/third-place-theory-creating-community-spaces/
27. Moskell, C., & Allred, S. B. (2013). Residents’ beliefs about responsibility for the stewardship of park trees and street trees in New York City. Landscape and Urban Planning, 120, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.08.002
28. Mostafa, A., Sobh, H., & Ahmed, E.-K. (2004). Urban landscape impact on human behavior. In F. Alberti, P. Gallo, A. R. Matamanda, & E. J. Strauss (Eds.), Resilient planning and design for sustainable cities (pp. 95–106). Springer.
29. Moughtin, C. (2003). Urban design: Street and square. Architectural Press.
30. Novak, M. (2021, September 22). The psychological effects of greenery on modern city dwellers. CityChangers.org. https://citychangers.org/psychological-effects-of-greenery/
31. Oldenburg, R. (2001). Celebrating the third place: Inspiring stories about the “great good places” at the heart of our communities. Marlowe & Company.
32. Project for Public Spaces. (2007). What is placemaking? https://www.pps.org/article/what-is-placemaking
33. Rega-Brodsky, C. C., Nilon, C. H., & Warren, P. S. (2018). Balancing urban biodiversity needs and resident preferences for vacant lot management. Sustainability, 10(5), Article 1679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051679
34. Town Team Movement. (2024a). 20 quick wins: A recipe book for community-led placemaking. Placemaking.Education. Placemaking.Education. https://placemaking.education/p/20-quick-wins
35. Town Team Movement. (2024b). Case Study 4 – The Bike Hub. https://www.townteammovement.com/case-study-4-the-bike-hub/
36. Town Team Movement. (2024c). Safer speeds & better places community toolkit. Placemaking.Education. https://placemaking.education/p/safer-speeds-and-better-places-community-toolkit
37. Urban Design Lab. (2023, March 28). Placemaking in urban design. Urban Design Lab. https://urbandesignlab.in/placemaking-in-urban-design/
38. Vakhovskaya, M. Y., Tsvetkova, I. I., & Yachmeneva, V. M. (2021). Some aspects of urban green areas organization and management in Russia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 876, 012079. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/876/1/012079
39. Whyte, W. H. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. Project for Public Spaces.