Toplum 5.0 ve Anomi: Teknolojik Dönüşümün Toplumsal Normlar ve Birey-Toplum İlişkileri Üzerindeki Etkileri

Öz

Bu çalışma, Émile Durkheim’ın anomi kavramını Japonya’nın insan odaklı Toplum 5.0 paradigmasıyla birleştirerek teknolojik dönüşümlerin toplumsal normlar ve birey-toplum ilişkileri üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektedir. Araştırma, Toplum 5.0’ın yaşam kalitesini artırma vaadine rağmen teknolojik eşitsizlikler ve normatif belirsizlikler nedeniyle anomik riskler barındırdığını ortaya koymaktadır. Émile Durkheim’ın, Robert Putnam’ın ve Pierre Bourdieu’nun teorilerini birleştiren çalışma, teknolojinin toplumsal bütünleşme üzerinde hem birleştirici hem de ayrıştırıcı etkisi olduğunu ve Toplum 5.0’ın başarısının, teknolojik yeniliklerle toplumsal uyumun dengesine bağlı olduğunu vurgulamaktadır. Bunun yanı sıra, araştırma, klasik sosyoloji teorilerinin güncel teknolojik paradigmalarla ilişkilendirildiğinde hem akademik hem de pratik düzeyde anlamlı iç görüler sunabileceğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Toplum 5.0
• anomi
• teknoloji ve toplum
• toplumsal normlar
• toplumsal paradigma

Society 5.0 and Anomie: The Effects of Technological Transformation on Social Norms and Individual-Society Relationships

Öz

This study explores how technological transformation affects social norms and individual-society relationships by linking Durkheim's anomie concept with Japan's human-centric Society 5.0 paradigm. Despite Society 5.0's promise of improved quality of life, the research identifies anomic risks stemming from technological inequalities and normative uncertainties. Drawing on Durkheim, Putnam, and Bourdieu, the study highlights technology's dual role in both unifying and fragmenting social integration. It further argues that contextualizing classical sociological theories within contemporary technological paradigms yields valuable academic and practical insights.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Society 5.0
• anomie
• technology and society
• social norms
• social paradigm

Kaynakça

1. Althabhawi, N. M., Zainol, Z. A., & Bagherib, P. (2022). Society 5.0: A new challenge to legal norms. Sriwijaya Law Review, 6(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol6.Iss1.1415.pp41-54
2. Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54(15), 2787-2805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010
3. Bourdieu, P. (2018). The forms of capital. In M. Granovetter, & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The sociology of economic life (pp. 78-92). Routledge.
4. Bozdag, E., & Van Den Hoven, J. (2015). Breaking the filter bubble: Democracy and design. Ethics and Information Technology, 17(4), 249-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-015-9380-y
5. Brubaker, R. (1985). Rethinking classical theory: The sociological vision of Pierre Bourdieu. Theory and Society, 14(6), 745-775. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174049
6. Carraz, R., & Harayama, Y. (2018). Japan’s innovation systems at the crossroads: Society 5.0. Digital Asia, 13(12), 33-45. https://researchmap.jp/g0000218027/published_papers/20013396/attachment_file.pdf
7. Chen, M., Mao, S., & Liu, Y. (2014). Big data: A survey. Mobile Networks and Applications, 19(2), 171-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-013-0489-0
8. Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.

9. De, S., Zhou, Y., Larizgoitia Abad, I., & Moessner, K. (2017). Cyber–physical–social frameworks for urban big data systems: A survey. Applied Sciences, 7(10), 1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7101017
10. De Villiers, C. (2024). The impact of society 5.0 on curriculum development in higher education. Journal of Ethics in Higher Education, (4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.26034/fr.jehe.2024.5953
11. Deflem, M. (2017). Anomie, strain, and opportunity structure: Robert K. Merton's paradigm of deviant behavior. In R. A. Triplett (Ed.), The handbook of the history and philosophy of criminology (pp. 140-155). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011385.ch8
12. DiCristina, B. (2016). Durkheim’s theory of anomie and crime: A clarification and elaboration. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 49(3), 311-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865815585391
13. Durkheim, É. (2023). The division of labour in society. In W. Longhofer, & D. Winchester (Eds.), Social theory re-wired (pp. 15-34). Routledge.
14. Durkheim, É. (2005). Suicide: A study in sociology. Routledge.
15. Ferreira, C. M., & Serpa, S. (2018). Society 5.0 and social development: Contributions to a discussion. Management and Organizational Studies, 5(4), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.5430/mos.v5n4p26
16. Fukuda, K. (2020). Science, technology and innovation ecosystem transformation toward society 5.0. International Journal of Production Economics, 220, 107460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.033 Fukuyama, M. (2017). Society 5.0: Aiming for a new human-centered society. Hitachi Review, 66(6), 554-559. https://www.hitachihyoron.com/rev/archive/2017/r2017_06/pdf/p08-13_TRENDS.pdf
17. Gittell, R., & Vidal, A. (1998). Community organizing: Building social capital as a development strategy. Sage Publications.
18. Gobinath, T. (2024). Society 5.0 the next revolution in human progress. Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities, 11(3), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v11i3.6898 Goffman, E. (1978). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth.
19. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
20. Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination. Sage.
21. Humphrey, D. (2024). Japan’s society 5.0 and the organizational vision of ‘human-centric’ AI. Asiascape: Digital Asia, 11(1-2), 32-55. https://doi.org/10.1163/22142312-bja10055
22. Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015). Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science, 349(6245), 255-260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8415
23. Keidanren (Japan Business Federation) (2016, April 19). Toward realization of the new economy and society: Reform of the economy and society by the deepening of Society 5.0. https://www.keidanren.or.jp/en/policy/2016/029_outline.pdf
24. Messner, S. F. (1988). Merton’s ‘social structure and anomie’: The road not taken. Deviant Behavior, 9(1), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.1988.9967766
25. Onday, O. (2019). Japan’s society 5.0: Going beyond industry 4.0. Business and Economics Journal, 10(2), 1-6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333139463_Japan's_Society_50_Going_Beyond_Industry_40
26. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.
27. Patrikakis, C., & Law, K. (2022). Society 5.0: Human centric, decentralized, and hyperautomated. IT Professional, 24(3), 16-17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2022.3177281
28. Pereira, A. G., Lima, T. M., & Santos, F. C. (2020). Industry 4.0 and society 5.0: Opportunities and threats. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(5), 3305–3308. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.D8764.018520
29. Pfeiffer, S. (2016). Robots, Industry 4.0 and humans, or why assembly work is more than routine work. Societies, 6(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc6020016
30. Potočan, V., Mulej, M., & Nedelko, Z. (2021). Society 5.0: Balancing of industry 4.0, economic advancement and social problems. Kybernetes, 50(3), 794-811. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2019-0858
31. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.
32. Radanliev, P., De Roure, D., Van Kleek, M., Santos, O., & Ani, U. (2021). Artificial intelligence in cyber physical systems. AI & Society, 36(3), 783-796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01049-0
33. Roring, R. S., & How, B. C. (2022). Towards society 5.0: A pilot study on costless smart transportation business model. International Journal of Business & Society, 23(1), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.4599.2022
34. Salah, K., Rehman, M. H. U., Nizamuddin, N., & Al-Fuqaha, A. (2019). Blockchain for AI: Review and open research challenges. IEEE Access, 7, 10127-10149. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2890507
35. Salgues, B. (2018). Society 5.0: Industry of the future, technologies, methods and tools. John Wiley & Sons.
36. Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321-326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
37. Tyagi, A. K., Lakshmi Priya, R., Mishra, A. K., & Balamurugan, G. (2023). Industry 5.0: Potentials, issues, opportunities, and challenges for society 5.0. In A.K. Tyagi (Ed.), Privacy preservation of genomic and medical data (pp. 409-432). Wiley-Scrivener. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394213726.ch17
38. van Dijk, J. A. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.
39. Verma, S. (2019). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Vikalpa, 44(2), 97-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090919853933
40. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs.