İklim Politikası Belirsizliği ve ESG Tabanlı Sürdürülebilirlik Belirsizliği: ABD Karbon Yoğun Sektör Endekslerinin Analizi

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, İklim Politikası Belirsizliği (CPU) ile ESG-tabanlı Sürdürülebilirlik Belirsizlik Endeksi (ESGUI) ve karbon yoğun Dow Jones sektör endeksleri arasındaki ilişkileri incelemektir. Dalgacık Yaklaşımı kullanılarak gerçekleştirilen analiz bulguları, değişkenler arasındaki etkileşimlerin zaman ve frekans boyutlarına göre farklılık gösterdiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Sonuçlar, CPU’nun hem ESGUI hem de sektör endeksleri üzerinde öncül ve yönlendirici bir rol üstlendiğini göstermektedir. Elde edilen bulgular yatırımcıların portföy stratejilerinde CPU ve ESGUI göstergelerine önem vermeleri, politika yapıcıların ise belirsizliği azaltan, sürdürülebilir ve öngörülebilir politikalar geliştirmelerinin gerekliliğini vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• iklim politikası belirsizliği
• ESG tabanlı sürdürülebilirlik belirsizliği
• dalgacık analizi

Climate Policy Uncertainty and ESG-Based Sustainability Uncertainty: Analysis of US Carbon-Intensive Sector Indices

Öz

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationships between Climate Policy Uncertainty (CPU) and the ESG-based Sustainability Uncertainty Index (ESGUI) and carbon-intensive Dow Jones sector indices. Findings from the analysis conducted using Wavelet Approach reveal that interactions between variables differ across time and frequency dimensions. The results show that CPU plays a leading and guiding role on both ESGUI and sector indices. The findings emphasize the need for investors to consider CPU and ESGUI indicators in their portfolio strategies and for policymakers to develop sustainable and predictable policies that reduce uncertainty.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• climate policy uncertainty
• ESG-based sustainability uncertainty
• wavelet approach

Kaynakça

1. Agbakwuru, V., Onyenahazi, O. B., Antwi, B. O., & Oyewale, K. (2024). The impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting on corporate financial performance. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5(9), 3629–3644. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.5.0924.2710
2. Akadiri, S. S., & Özkan, O. (2025). Navigating uncertainty: The impact of ESG factors on clean energy markets and investment dynamics. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 33(1), 1270–1285. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70227
3. Al-Hiyari, A., & Kolsi, M. C. (2021). How do stock market participants value ESG performance? Evidence from Middle Eastern and North African countries. Global Business Review, 25(4), 934–956. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509211001511
4. Aydoğdu, A., & Doğan, M. (2026). Mapping the asymmetric dynamics between ESG uncertainty and clean energy: A quantile–wavelet framework. Journal of Environmental Management, 398, 128434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.128434
5. Białkowski, J., & Sławik, A. (2022). Does companies ESG performance make a difference for New Zealand’s stock market investors during the COVID-19 Pandemic? Sustainability, 14(23), 15841. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315841
6. Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.008
7. Boungou, W., & Yatié, A. (2022). Climate change and global stock market returns. Economics Bulletin, 42(4), 1888–1900. https://hal.science/hal-04745793v1
8. Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2008). Social responsibility disclosure: A study of proxies for the public visibility of Portuguese banks. The British Accounting Review, 40(2), 161–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2008.02.004

9. Calice, P. & Miguel, F. (2021). Climate-related and environmental risks for the banking sector in Latin America and the Caribbean: A preliminary assessment (Policy Research Working Paper No. 9694). The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9694
10. Capelle‐Blancard, G., & Petit, A. (2017). Every little helps? ESG news and stock market reaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(2), 543–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3667-3
11. Chan, K. F., & Malik, I. (2022). Climate policy uncertainty and the cross-section of stock returns. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4075528
12. Chen, M., Yang, D., Zhang, W., & Qi-jun, W. (2023). How does ESG disclosure improve stock liquidity for enterprises – empirical evidence from China? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 98, 106926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106926
13. Chen, Y., & Sharma, A. (2024). How much does climate-related risk impact stock and commodity markets: A comparative study of the US and China. Finance Research Letters, 62, 105134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105134
14. Chen, Y., Zheng, Y., Lv, G., Gu, Y., & Zhang, W. (2024). Quantifying the effect of ESG-related news on Chinese stock movements. Journal of Environmental Management, 354, 120301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120301
15. Chenet, H. (2021). Climate change and financial risk. In C. Zopounidis, R. Benkraiem, & I. Kalaitzoglou (Eds.), Financial risk management and modeling (pp. 393–419). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66691-0_12
16. Crowley, P. M. (2007). A guide to wavelets for economists. Journal of Economic Surveys, 21(2), 207–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2006.00502.x
17. Deng, X., & Cheng, X. (2019). Can ESG indices improve the enterprises’ stock market performance? –An empirical study from China. Sustainability, 11(17), 4765. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174765
18. Dutta, A. (2026). Impact of sustainability uncertainty on the volatility dynamics of digital asset class. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 12(1), 100717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2026.100717
19. El Ouadghiri, I., Guesmi, K., Peillex, J., & Ziegler, A. (2021). Public attention to environmental issues and stock market returns. Ecological Economics, 180, 106836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106836
20. European Commission. (2023). Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: The EU’s environmental policy tool for fair carbon emissions pricing. Taxation and Customs Union. Retrieved July 13, 2025, from https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism_en
21. Gaies, B., Chaâbane, N., Adeosun, O. A., & Sahut, J. (2025). Climate transition risks, ESG sentiment, and market value: Insights from the European stock market. Energy Economics, 148, 108605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108605
22. Gavriilidis, K. (2021). Measuring climate policy uncertainty. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3847388
23. Ghani, U., Zhu, B., Ma, F., & Ghani, M. (2024a). Climate change and volatility forecasting: Novel insights from sectoral indices. Journal of Climate Finance, 6, 100034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclimf.2024.100034
24. Ghani, U., Zhu, B., Qin, Q., & Ghani, M. (2024b). Forecasting U.S. stock market volatility: Evidence from ESG and CPU indices. Finance Research Letters, 59, 104811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104811
25. He, F., Feng, Y., & Hao, J. (2023). Corporate ESG rating and stock market liquidity: Evidence from China. Economic Modelling, 129, 106511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106511
26. Hill, J. (2020). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing: A balanced analysis of the theory and practice of a sustainable portfolio. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2018-0-03866-9
27. Işık, C., Sirakaya-Turk, E., & Ongan, S. (2019). Testing the efficacy of the economic policy uncertainty index on tourism demand in USMCA: Theory and evidence. Tourism Economics, 26(8), 1344–1357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816619888346
28. Işık, C., Ongan, S., Islam, H., Pinzón, S., & Jabeen, G. (2024a). Navigating sustainability: Unveiling the interconnected dynamics of ESG factors and SDGs in BRICS‐11. Sustainable Development, 32(5), 5437–5451. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2977
29. Işık, C., Ongan, S., Islam, H., Jabeen, G., & Pinzón, S. (2024b). Is economic growth in East Asia Pacific and South Asia ESG factors based and aligned growth? Sustainable Development, 32(5), 4455–4468. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2910
30. Işık, C., Ongan, S., & Islam, H. (2024c). A new pathway to sustainability: Integrating economic dimension (ECON) into ESG factors as (ECON-ESG) and aligned with sustainable development goals (SDGs). Journal of Ekonomi, 6(1), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.58251/ekonomi.1450860
31. Işık, C., Ongan, S., Kuziboev, B., & İmamoğlu, İ. K. (2025a). Does climate change vulnerability cause energy vulnerability in sustainable development? Sustainable Development, 34(S2), 1170–1181. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70390
32. Işık, C., Ongan, S., Aydın, R., & İmamoğlu, İ. K. (2025b). Economic, environmental, social, and governance (ECON ‐ ESG) strategies for sustainable development: Theory and a holistic evidence from Germany. Business Strategy and the Environment, 35(4), 5133–5157. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70342
33. Kevser, M., Tunçel, M. B., Gürsoy, S., & Zeren, F. (2024). The impact of environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores on stock market: Evidence from G7 countries. Journal of Global Responsibility, 15(3), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-04-2023-0070
34. Kitzmueller, M., & Shimshack, J. (2012). Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(1), 51–84. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.1.51
35. Köycü, E., & Ege, İ. (2025). Finansal varlık yatırımlarını etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 20(2), 552–580. https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.1582322
36. Kulalı, G. (2022). Çevresel, sosyal ve kurumsal yönetim (ESG) performansının piyasa değeri üzerindeki etkisi: Firma büyüklüğünün rolü. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 17(3), 787–809. https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.1098419
37. Landi, G., & Sciarelli, M. (2018). Towards a more ethical market: The impact of ESG rating on corporate financial performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2017-0254
38. Lasisi, L., Omoke, P. C., & Salisu, A. A. (2024). Climate policy uncertainty and stock market volatility. Asian Economics Letters, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.46557/001c.37246
39. Li, C., Liu, Y., & Pan, L. (2024). A study of impact of climate change on the U.S. stock market as exemplified by the NASDAQ 100 index constituents. Scientific Reports, 14, 15468. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66109-7
40. Li, H., Guo, H., Hao, X., & Zhang, X. (2023). The ESG rating, spillover of ESG ratings, and stock return: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 80, 102091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102091
41. Liu, L., Nemoto, N., & Lu, C. (2023). The effect of ESG performance on the stock market during the COVID-19 pandemic - evidence from Japan. Economic Analysis and Policy, 79, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.06.038
42. Mitsuyama, N., & Shimizutani, S. (2015). Stock market reaction to ESG-oriented management: An event study analysis on a disclosing policy in Japan. Economics Bulletin, 35(2), 1098–1108. https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-15-00118.html
43. Müller, L. M., & Joubrel, M. (2025). A novel approach to sustainable mean-variance portfolio optimization: Accounting for ESG-related uncertainty. Finance Research Letters, 85, 108056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108056
44. Naseer, M. M., Guo, Y., Bagh, T., & Zhu, X. (2024). Sustainable investments in volatile times: Nexus of climate change risk, ESG practices, and market volatility. International Review of Financial Analysis, 95, 103492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103492
45. Nazlıoğlu, Ş., Gormus, N. A., & Soytaş, U. (2016). Oil prices and real estate investment trusts (REITs): Gradual-shift causality and volatility transmission analysis. Energy Economics, 60, 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.09.009
46. Nazlıoğlu, Ş., Gormus, A., & Soytas, U. (2019). Oil prices and monetary policy in emerging markets: Structural shifts in causal linkages. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1434072
47. Olanrewaju, V. O., Adebayo, T. S., & Uzun, B. (2025). Navigating the impact of ESG sustainability uncertainty on fossil fuel prices: Evidence from wavelet cross-quantile regression. Applied Economics, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2025.2535552
48. Olasehinde-Williams, G., Özkan, O., & Akadiri, S. S. (2023). Effects of climate policy uncertainty on sustainable investment: A dynamic analysis for the U.S. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 55326–55339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26257-1
49. Ongan, S., Işık, C., Aydın, R., İmamoğlu, İ. K., Alvarado, R., & Ahmad, M. (2025a). Measuring sustainability under uncertainty: Introducing net ESG (N‐ESG) performance. Business Strategy and the Environment. 35(2), 1735–1755. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70246
50. Ongan, S., Gocer, I., & Işık, C. (2025b). Introducing the new ESG‐based sustainability uncertainty index (ESGUI). Sustainable Development, 33(3), 4457–4467. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3351
51. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910
52. Özkan, N. (2024). İklim politikası belirsizliği ile jeopolitik belirsizliğin BIST Gıda ve İçecek Endeksi üzerindeki etkisi. JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, 9(2), 198–209. https://izlik.org/JA32PG64RT
53. Özkan, O., Adebayo, T. S., & Usman, O. (2024). Dynamic connectedness of clean energy markets, green markets, and sustainable markets: The role of climate policy uncertainty. Energy, 303, 131957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131957
54. Özkan, O., Uche, E., Nwani, C., & Okere, K. I. (2025a). Critical minerals volatility under ESG uncertainty: Implications for the clean energy transition. Resources Policy, 108, 105678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105678
55. Özkan, O., Naimoğlu, M., & Dam, M. M. (2025b). The impact of ESG-related, financial, and geopolitical uncertainties on the renewable energy transition in the United States. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(6), 7864–7877. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70004
56. Pandey, D. K., Kumari, V., Palma, A., & Goodell, J. W. (2024). Impact of ESG regulation on stock market returns: Investor responses to a reasonable assurance mandate. Finance Research Letters, 64, 105412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105412
57. Pástor, L., & Veronesi, P. (2013). Political uncertainty and risk premia. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(3), 520–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.08.007
58. Polat, O., Demirer, R., & Ekşi, İ.H. (2024). What drives green betas? Climate uncertainty or speculation. Finance Research Letters, 60, 104870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104870
59. Rua, A., & Nunes, L. C. (2009). International comovement of stock market returns: A wavelet analysis. Journal of Empirical Finance, 16(4), 632–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2009.02.002
60. Rubbaniy, G., Khalid, A. A., Rizwan, M. F., & Ali, S. (2021). Are ESG stocks safe-haven during COVID-19? Studies in Economics and Finance, 39(2), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-08-2021-0320
61. Saka Ilgın, K. (2024). İklim politikası ve enerji belirsizliklerinin borsa üzerindeki etkilerinin analizi: Türkiye ve Amerika örneği. Press Academia Procedia, 20(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2024.1922
62. Schleicher, C. (2002). An introduction to wavelets for economists. Bank of Canada. https://doi.org/10.34989/SWP-2002-3
63. Sun, Y., Song, Y., Long, C., Qin, M., & Lobonţ, O. (2023). How to improve global environmental governance? Lessons learned from climate risk and climate policy uncertainty. Economic Analysis and Policy, 80, 1666–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.11.010
64. Talan, G., Sharma, G. D., Pereira, V., & Muschert, G. W. (2024). From ESG to holistic value addition: Rethinking sustainable investment from the lens of stakeholder theory. International Review of Economics and Finance, 96, 103530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103530
65. Tay, B. (2023). Climate change and stock market: A review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1151(1), 012021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1151/1/012021
66. Tedeschi, M., Foglia, M., Bouri, E., & Dai, P. (2024). How does climate policy uncertainty affect financial markets? Evidence from Europe. Economics Letters, 234, 111443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111443
67. Tjernström, E., & Tietenberg, T. (2008). Do differences in attitudes explain differences in national climate change policies? Ecological Economics, 65(2), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.06.019
68. Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1-2), 225–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01616-8
69. Torrence, C., & Compo, G. P. (1998). A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 79(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0061:APGTWA>2.0.CO;2
70. Torrence, C., & Webster, P. J. (1999). Interdecadal changes in the ENSO–monsoon system. Journal of Climate, 12(8), 2679–2690. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<2679:ICITEM>2.0.CO;2
71. Treepongkaruna, S., Chan, K. F., & Malik, I. (2023). Climate policy uncertainty and the cross-section of stock returns. Finance Research Letters, 55, 103837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103837
72. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2025). Sources of carbon dioxide emissions. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/carbon-dioxide-emissions
73. Uyar, U. (2019). Sistematik risk davranışında yatırım döngüsü: Wavelet analizi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(1), 135–168. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.347775
74. Wang, J., Hu, X., & Zhong, A. (2023). Stock market reaction to mandatory ESG disclosure. Finance Research Letters, 53, 103402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103402
75. Wilkens, K., Thomas, N. D., & Fofana, M. S. (2004). Stability of technology stock prices: Evidence of rational expectations or irrational sentiment? Managerial Finance, 30(12), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350410769380
76. Xu, X. E., Chen, Y., Zhao, J., & Wang, J. (2022). The effect of ESG news on the Chinese stock market. Journal of Global Information Management, 30(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.313916
77. Xu, X., Huang, S., Lucey, B. M., & An, H. (2023). The impacts of climate policy uncertainty on stock markets: Comparison between China and the US. International Review of Financial Analysis, 88, 102671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102671
78. Yaman, S., & Tunçel, M. B. (2025). The benefits of sectoral diversification for investors with different risk perceptions. Borsa Istanbul Review, 25(3), 597–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2025.02.008
79. Yang, K., Huang, X., Yu, W., & Wei, Y. (2025). The impacts of climate policy uncertainty on stock market extreme risk spillovers. Finance Research Letters, 85(Part B), 107983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107983
80. Yao, K., Ma, X., & Zhang, J. (2024). Green disguise or real action? The truth behind corporate greenwashing under stringent climate policy. Energy Economics, 108059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108059
81. Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., & Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(10), 3635. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103635
82. Zeren, F., Dogan, M., & Eryilmaz, S. (2025). Determinants of ESG‐related sustainability uncertainty: Asymmetric Fourier evidence from G7 countries. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 33(1), 1479–1492. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70246
83. Zhai, P., Fan, Y., Ji, Q., & Ma, Y. (2024). Climate risks and financial markets: A review of the literature. Climate Change Economics, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010007824400086
84. Zhang, X., Ma, L., & Zhang, M. (2024). Investor perception of ESG performance: Examining investment intentions in the Chinese stock market with social self-efficacy moderation. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(4), 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17040166