Bir Araştırma Nesnesi Olarak Habis Sorunlar ve Kamu Yönetimi Disiplini

Öz

Siyasiler ve kamu yöneticileri günümüzde çok karmaşık ve çözümü zor olduğu için habis olarak nitelendirilen bir takım sorunlarla uğraşmaktadır. Ortaya çıkışı ve gelişiminin ilk yılları zamanın büyük sorunlarına bir yanıt olarak görülen kamu yönetimi disiplinine de 21. yüzyılın habis sorunlarının çözümü noktasında büyük bir rol düştüğüne yönelik görüşler söz konusudur. Bu çalışmada literatürdeki çeşitli çalışmalar ve tartışmalar ışığında bir araştırma nesnesi olarak habis sorunlar bağlamında kamu yönetimi disiplini değerlendirilmiştir. Disiplinin gerek uygulayıcılara yol gösterici doğasından gerekse de koordinasyona, işbirliğine, ortaklığa, birlikte üretmeye yönelik sahip olduğu zengin teorik literatür sayesinde habis sorunların çözümüne önemli katkılar sağlama potansiyeline sahip olmasına rağmen habis sorunlara olan akademik ilginin az olduğu görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kamu Yönetimi Disiplini,Habis Sorunlar,Kamu Yönetimi Araştırmaları

Wicked Problems as a Research Objective and Public Administration Discipline

Öz

Currently, politicians and public administrators are dealing with some issues which are called “wicked problems” since they are very complex and difficult to solve. According to some, the public administration, which emerged as a panacea for the significant problems of its time, has a major role in solving wicked problems of 21st century. In this study, in the light of various studies and discussions in the literature, the public administration discipline is evaluated in the context of wicked problems as a research object. Although the discipline has the potential to make significant contributions to the solution of wicked problems through both its guiding nature for practitioners and the rich theoretical literature of coordination, cooperation, partnership, and co-production, it has been observed that there is not enough academic interest on the wicked problems.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Public Administration Discipline,Wicked Problems,Public Administration Research

Kaynakça

1. Agranoff, Robert (2007), Managing Within Networks: Adding Value to Public Organizations, Washington, DC.: Georgetown University Press.
2. Aksoy, Şinasi (2012)., “Yeni Sağ ve Devletin Değişimi”, (Ed.Burhan Aykaç, Şenol Durgun ve Hüseyin Yayman), Türkiye’de Kamu Yönetimi, II. Basım, Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi: 577-595.
3. Ansell, Chris; Gash, Alison (2008), “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 18, No. 4: 543-571.
4. Australian Public Service Commission (APSC) (2007), “Tackling Wicked Problems: A Public Policy Perspective”, https://www.apsc.gov.au/tackling-wicked-problems-public-policy-perspective, (Erişim: 22.12.2018).
5. Berkman, Ümit (2009), “Amme İdaresi Dergisi’nde Yayınlanan Makaleler ve Türk Yönetim Bilimi”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, C.4, S. 1: 25‐49.
6. Bogdanor, Vernon (2005), Joined-Up Government, Oxford:Oxford University Press.
7. Camillus, John C. (2008). “Strategy as a Wicked Problem”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 86, No. 4: 99-106.
8. Christensen, Tom; Lægreid, Per (2007), “The Whole of Government Approach to Public Sector Reforms”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 67, No.6: 1059–1066.

9. Davies, Jonathan S. (2009), “The Limits of Joined-up Government: Towards a Political Analysis”, Public Administration, Vol. 87, No. 1: 80–96.
10. Eryurt, Mehmet Ali;,Canpolat, Şebnem Beşe; Koç, İ. (2013), “Türkiye’de Nüfus ve Nüfus Politikaları: Öngörüler ve Öneriler”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, C.46, S.4: 129-156.
11. Hartley, Jean (2017), “Optimism of the Will in the Co-Creation and Use of Research by Academics and Practitioners”, Public Money and Management, Vol. 37, No. 4: 236-239.
12. Head, Brian W. (2008), “Wicked Problems in Public Policy”, Public Policy, Vol. 3, No.2: 101-118.
13. Head, Brian W. ve Alford, John (2015), “Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management”, Administration & Society, Vol. 47, No. 6: 711–739.
14. Intergovernmental Panel on Cimate Change (IPCC), (2013), “Climate Change 2013 The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change” http://www.climatechange2013.org, (Erişim: 02.02.2019).
15. Kocaoğlu, Mehmet (2018), “Günümüz Mülteci Krizi: Arendtçi Bir Eleştiri”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, C. 51, S.4: 21-50.
16. Koppenjan, Joop; Klijn, Erik--Hans (2004), Managing Uncertainties in Networks: A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making, London:Routledge.
17. Lægreid, Per (2017), "Getting to Norway – 30 Years of Public Management Research: Theoretical, Empirical And Practical Challenges", International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol.30, No. 6-7: 584-594.
18. McGuire, Michael (2006), “Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know it”, , Public Administration Review, Vol. 66, Special Issue: 33–43.
19. O'Flynn, Janine L.; Buick, Fiona; Blackman, Deborah Ann; Halligan, J. (2011), “You Win Some, You Lose Some: Experiments with Joined-up Government”, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 34, No. 4: 244-254.
20. Osborne, Stephen P. (2006), “The New Public Governance?”, Public Management Review, Vol. 8, No. 3: 377-387.
21. Provan, Keith G.; Kenis, Patrick (2008), “Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 18, No. 2: 229-252.
22. Pollitt, Christopher (2003), “Joined-up Government: a Survey”, Political Studies Review, Vol. 1, No. 1, 34–49.
23. Pollitt, Christopher (2014), “The Changing Face of Academic Public Administration”, http://snspa.ro/wpcontent/uploads/2018/06/Lectio_Prima_Christopher_Pollit.pdf, (Erişim: 10.11.2018).
24. Pollitt, Christopher (2015), “Wickedness Will Not Wait: Climate Change and Public Management Research”, Public Money and Management, Vol. 35, No. 3, 181-186.
25. Pollitt, Christopher (2016), “Be Prepared? an Outside-in Perspective on the Future Public Sector in Europe”, Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 31, No. 1: 3-28.
26. Pollitt, Christopher (2017), "Public Administration Research Since 1980: Slipping Away From the Real World?", International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 30, No. 6-7: 555-565.
27. Raadschelders, Jos C.N. (2011), “The Study Of Public Administration in the United States”, Public Administration, Vol. 89, No. 1: 140-155.
28. Raadschelders, Jos C.N.; Lee, Kwang-Hoon (2011), “Trends in the Study of Public Administration: Empirical and Qualitative Observations from Public Administration Review, 2000-2009”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 71, No. 1 : 19-33.
29. Radin, Beryl A. (2013), “Reclaiming Our Past: Linking Theory and Practice”, PS: Political Science and Politics (The 2012 John Gaus Lecture), Vol. 46, No. 1: 1-7.
30. Rittel, Horst W. J. ; Webber, Melvin M. (1973). “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning”, Policy Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 2: 155-169.
31. Roberts, Nancy C. (2000). “Wicked Problems and Network Approaches to Resolution”, International Public Management Review, Vol. 1, No. 1: 1-19.
32. Roberts, Alasdair (2014), “Large Forces: What's Missing in Public Administration”, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2424260, (Erişim: 22.11.2018).
33. Roberts, Alasdair (2017), “The Aims of Public Administration: Reviving the Classical View”, Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, Vol. XX, No. XX:1-13.
34. Saklı, Ali Rıza (2011), “Disiplinler Arası Bir Disiplin Olarak Kamu Yönetimi”, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, C. 13, S. 2: 97-120.
35. Sørensen, Eva; Torfing, Jacob (2007), Theories of Democratic Network Governance, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
36. Şaylan, Gencay (2012), “Kamu Yönetimi Disiplininde Bunalım ve Yeni Açmazlar Üzerine”, (Ed.Burhan Aykaç, Şenol Durgun ve Hüseyin Yayman), Türkiye’de Kamu Yönetimi, II. Basım, Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi: 607-631.
37. Vigoda, Eran, (2003), ”Rethinking the Identity of Public Administration: Interdisciplinary Reflections and Thoughts on Managerial Reconstruction”, Public Administration & Management: An Interactive Journal, Vol. 8, No. 1: 1-22.
38. Weber, Edward P.; Khademian, Anne M. (2008). “Wicked Problems, Knowledge Challenges, and Collaborative Capacity Builders in Network Settings”, Public Administration Review, Vol.68, No. 2: 334-349.
39. Wright, Bradley E., (2011), “Public Administration as an Interdisciplinary Field: Assessing its Relationship with the Fields of Law, Management, and Political Science”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 71, No. 1: 96-101.
40. Zengin, Ozan, (2007), “Türkiye’deki Kamu Yönetimi Disiplininin Özgüllük ve Saflık Sorunu,” (Ed. Şinasi Aksoy ve Yılmaz Üstüner), Kamu Yönetimi: Yöntem ve Sorunlar, Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık: 79-96.