Teknoparklarda Sürdürülen İşbirliklerinin Yerleşimci Firmaların Teknoloji Transfer Performansına Etkisi

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 109 - 134, 01.04.2016

Tayfun Erün Ali Kılıç Hakan Eren

Öz

Bu araştırma ile teknopark bünyesinde faaliyet gösteren uyguladıkları işbirliklerinin onların teknoloji transfer performansları üzerindeki etkilerini tespit ederek, söz konusu işbirliği türlerinden hangisi veya hangilerinin diğerlerine göre etkili olduğu ve bu performansına sağlayacağı katkıların neler olduğu incelenmiştir. Saha araştırması, Ankara ilindeki beş teknopark bünyesinde faaliyet gösteren 151 firmanın katılımı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi neticesinde, teknopark yönetimi ve Teknoloji Transfer Ofisi TTO ile aracılık üniversite ile AR-GE ve insan kaynaklarına ilişkin işbirlikleri ve gayri resmi işbirliklerinin teknoloji transfer performansını pozitif yönde etkilediği tespit edilirken, altyapı kullanımına ilişkin işbirliklerinin ise beklenmedik bir şekilde negatif yönde etkilediği, üniversite ile eğitime ilişkin işbirliklerinin anlamlı bir etkiye sahip olmadığı tespit edilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Teknoparklar, Teknopark İçi İşbirliği, Teknoloji Transferi, Teknoloji Transfer Performansı.

The Effects Of Ongoing Cooperation In Technoparks On The Technology Transfer Performance Of Resident Firms

Öz

This study examines that which collaboration type or types are superior to others and what are the contributions of these effects on firm technology transfer performance by determining the probable implemented technoparks. Field research was carried out with the participation of 151 firms operating within five technoparks located Ankara. As a result of multiple linear regression analysis, it has been identified collaboration with technopark management and TTO, firm-firm collaborations, collaboration about R&D and human resources with university and informal collaborations have a positive and significant performance, collaboration on the use of infrastructure has a negative effect and collaboration about education with university has no significant effect

Anahtar Kelimeler

Technoparks, Collaboration Within Technoparks, Technology Transfer, Technology Transfer Performance.

Kaynakça

• Akgün, A.E., H. Keskin ve A. Günsel (2005), “Bilgi Ekonomisi Kapsamında Teknoloji Transferinin Bilgi Transferine Dönüşümüne Dair Bir Yazın Alanı Taraması”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 19(1), 227-242.
• Almeida, A., C. Santos ve M. Rui-Silva (2008), Bridging Science to Economy: The Role of Science and Technologic Parks in Innovation Strategies in “Follower” Regions, FEP Working Papers N.302, Faculdade de Economia, Universidade Do Porto.
• Amesse, F. ve P. Cohendet. “Technology Transfer Revisited from the Perspective of the Knowledge-Based Economy”, Research Policy, 30, 2001, 1459-1478.
• Anderson, T.R., T.U. Daim ve F.F. Lavoie (2007), “Measuring the Efficiency of University Technology Transfer”, Technovation, 27, 306-318.
• Arvanitis, S., N. Sydov ve M. Woerter (2008), “Do Specific Forms of UniversityIndustry Knowledge Transfer Have Different Impacts on the Performance of Private Enterprises? An Empirical Analysis Based on Swiss Firm Data”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 504-533.
• Bartelle (2007),“Characteristics and Trends in North American Research Parks: 21st Century Directions, Bartelle Technology Partnership Practice, Columbus, Ohio. (Erişim: 15.12.2014).
• Basile, A. (2011), “Networking System and Innovation Outputs: The Role of Science and Technology Parks”, Int. Journal of Business and Management, 6(1), 3- 15.
• Bennet, J.P.H., M. Polkınghorne ve J.F. Pearce. “Quantifying the Effectiveness of an Academia-Industry Technology Transfer Initiative in a Low Prosperity Region of The UK”, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Management of Technology, Orlando, Florida, 1998, 16-20.
• Betts, S.C. ve M.D. Santoro (2009), “Controlling Industry-University Relationships for Initial and Continuing Success”, Proceedings of the Academy of Strategic Management, Allied Academies International Conference, New Orleans, 8(1), 12- 17.
• Bozeman, B. (2000), “Technology Transfer and Public Policy: A Review of Research and Theory”, Research Policy, 29, 627-655.
• Buratti, N. ve L. Penco (2001), “Assisted Technology Transfer to SMEs: Lessons from an Exemplary Case”, Technovation, 21, 35-43.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006), “Anket Geliştirme”, Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 133- 151.
• Carlsson, B. ve A.C. Fridth (2002), “Technology Transfer in United States Universities a Survey and Statistical Analysis”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12, 199-232.
• Chan, K.Y.A., L.A.G. Oerlemans ve M.W. Pretorius (2010), “Knowledge Flows and Innovative Performances of NTBFs in Gauteng, South Africa: An Attempt to Explain Mixed Findings in Science Park Research”, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 66, 138-152.
• Chiang, H.C. ve C.H. Wang (2008), “Factors Influencing Performance of Technology Transfer: A Study on Taiwan’s Universities”, Business and Information 2008, Seoul.
• Chung, H., W. Ritter ve N. Sharif (2011), “The Value of Networks in Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks: An Empirical Study on Network Linkages”, XXVIII IASP World Conference on Science and Technology Parks, 1-19.
• Cohen, W.M. ve D.A. Levinthal (1990), “Absorptive Capacity:A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
• Coşkunkasap, G. (2010), “Teknoloji Transferi”, F.O. Çelikpaça ve S.Y. Kaygusuz (Ed.), Teknoloji Yönetimi, Bursa, Dora Yayınları.
• Deeds, D., D.L. Decarolis ve J.E. Coombs (2000), “The Determinants of Research Productivity in High Technology Ventures: An Empirical Analysis of New Biotechnology Firms”, Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2), 211-229.
• Eren, H. (2010), Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Sosyal Yenilikçilik Kapasitelerinin Teknolojik Yenilikçilik Eğilimlerine Etkisini Ölçmeye Yönelik Bir Model Önerisi, (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Ankara, KHO Savunma Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Esham, M. (2008), Strategies to Develop University Industry Linkages in Sri Lanka, Study Series No:4, Sri Lanka.
• Etzkowitz, H. ve L. Leydesdorff (2000), “The Dynamics of Innovation: from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of University-Industry Government Relations”, Research Policy, 29, 109-123.
• Günsel, A. (2004), Bilgi Ekonomisinde Teknoloji Transferinin Bilgi Transferine Dönüşümü ve Etkin Bir Bilgi Transferi Süreci, (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Gebze, Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Hair, J.F., R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham ve W.C. Black (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis, Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice-Hall.
• Jarvelin, A.M. ve H. Koskela (2004), “The Role of Science Parks in Developing Company Networks”, Frontiers of e-Business Research, 2(8), 507-519.
• Kalaycı, Ş. (2006), SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri, Ankara, Asil Yayın Dağıtım Ltd. Şti.
• Karasar, N. (2010), Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi, Ankara, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Kaufmann, A. ve F. Tödtling (2001), “Science-Industry Interaction in the Process of Innovation: The Importance of Boundary-Crossing Between Systems”, Research Policy, 30, 791-804.
• Keleş, M.K. ve M.Z. Tunca (2010) “Türkiye’deki Teknokentlerin Mevcut Durumun İncelenmesi”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11, 1-22.
• Khalil, T.M. (2000), Management of technology: The Key to Competitiveness and Wealth Creation, Boston, McGraw Hill.
• Kılıç, A. (2009), Ankaradaki Teknoparklarda Türk Savunma Sanayi Tarafından Sürdürülen Teknoloji Transfer Uygulamalarının Analizi: ODTÜ Teknopark ve Bilkent Cyberpark Uygulamaları, (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Ankara, KHO Savunma Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
• Kim, Y. (2013), “The Ivory Tower Approach to Entrepreneurial Linkage: Productivity Changes in University Technology Transfer”, Journal of Technology Transfer,38(2), 180-197.
• Kordal, R. ve L.K. Guice (2008), “Assesing Technology Transfer Performance”, Research Management Review, 16(1), 1-13.
• Lee, J. ve H.N. Win (2004), “Technology Transfer Between University Research Centers and Industry in Singapore”, Technovation, 24, 433-442.
• Lin, J.L., S.C. Fang, S.R. Fang ve F.S. Tsai (2009), “Network Embeddedness and Technology Transfer Performance in R&D Consortia in Taiwan”, Technovation, 29, 763-774.
• Lindelöf, P. ve H. Lofsten (2004), “Proximity as a Resource Base for Competitive Advantage: University-Industry Links for Technology Transfer”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 311-326.
• Link, A.N. ve J.T. Scott (2003), “U.S. Science Parks: The Diffusion of an Innovation and Its Effects on the Academic Missions of Universities”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1323-1356.
• Löfsten, H. ve P. Lindelöf (2002), “Science Parks and the Growth of New Technology-Based Firms Academic-Industry Links, Innovation and Markets”, Research Policy, 31, 859-876.
• McAdam, M. ve S. Marlow (2008), “A Preliminary Investigation into Networking Activities within the University Incubator”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 14(4), 219-241.
• Meyer-Krahmer, F. ve U. Schmoch (1998), “Science-Based Technologies: University-Industry Interactions in Four Fields”, Research Policy, 27, 835-851.
• Monck, C.S.P., R.B. Porter, P. Quintas, D.J. Storey ve P. Wynarczyk (1988), Science Parks and the Growth of High Technology Firms, London, Croom Helm.
• Miotti, L. ve F. Sachwald (2003), “Co-operative R&D: Why and with Whom? An Integrated Framework of Analysis”, Research Policy, 32, 1481-1499.
• Montoro-Sanchez, A., Eva Mª Mora-Valentin ve Luis Angel Guerras-Martin (2006), “R&D Cooperative Agreements Between Firms and Research Organisations: A Comparative Analysis of the Characteristics and Reasons Depending on the Nature of the Partner”, International Journal of Technology Management, 35(1), 156-181.
• Mu, Q. (2009), The Chinese Universities’ Experience of Forging Links with Industrial Firms: A Comparative Study of Beijing and Shangai, EADN working paper No:42, Shanghai, China.
• Nelson, R.R. (1991), “Why Do Firms Differ and How Does it Matter?”, Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), 61-74.
• Nunez-Sanchez, R., A. Barge-Gil ve A. Modrego-Rico (2010), “Performance of Knowledge Interactions Between Public Research Centres and Industrial Firms in Spain: A Project-Level Analysis”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-25.
• Özkan, H. (2008), Teknoloji Transfer Yöntemlerinin Teknolojik Yeniliğe Etkisi, (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Gebze, Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Pekol, Ö. ve B.Ç. Erbaş (2011), “Patent Sisteminde Türkiye’deki Teknoparkların Yeri”, Ege Akademik Bakış, 11(1), 1327-1346.
• Quintas, P. (1996), “Evaulating Science Park Linkages”, K. Guy (Ed.), The Science Park Evaulation Handbook, Brighton.
• Quintas, P. (1992),“Academic-Industry Links and Innovation: Questioning the Science Park Model”, Technovation, 12, 161-175.
• Radosevic, S. (1999), International Technology Transfer and Catch Up in Economic Development, UK, Edward Elgar Limited.
• Sakarya, F. (2012), Teknopark İçerisindeki, Teknoloji Transferini Artırmaya Dönük İşbirlikleri ve Teknopark Destek Faaliyetlerinin, Firmaların Özümseme Kapasitesi Üzerine Etkileri, (Yayımlanmamış Y.Lisans Tezi), Ankara, KHO Savunma Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
• Santoro, M.D. ve S. Gopalakrishnan (2000), “The Institutionalization of Knowledge Transfer Activities within Industry-University Collaborative Ventures”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17, 3-4, 299-319.
• Sazali A.W., Raduan C.R., Jegak U. &Haslinda A. (2010) Age Of Joint Venture, InterFirm Technology Transfer And Local Firms' Performance. International Journal of Business and Management, Vol.5, 3, 89-100.
• Siegel, D.S., P. Westhead ve M. Wright (2003), “Science Parks and The Performance of New Technology Based Firms: A Review of Recent UK Evidence and an Agenda for Future Research”, Small Business Economics, 20, 177-184.
• Swamidass, P.M. ve V. Vulasa (2009), “Why University Inventions Rarely Produce Income? Bottlenecks in University Technology Transfer”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 34, 343-363.
• Teasley, R. ve R. Robinson (2005), “Understanding Technology Transfer Effectiveness in Japanese Organizations: A Test of Contingency Theory”, Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 4, 77-97.
• Techakanont, K. ve T. Terdudomtham (2004), “Evolution of Inter-Firm Technology Transfer and Technological Capability Formation of Local Parts Firms in the Thai Automobile Industry”, Journal of Technology Innovation, 12(2), 151-183.
• Tsamis, A. (2006),“Science and Technology Parks in Two Lagging Regions of Spain: A Comparative Evaluation Using an Innovation Network Approach”, ERSA Conference Papers.
• TTGV, (2010). Üniversite-Sanayi İşbirliğinde Önemli Bir Araç: Teknoloji Transfer Arayüzleri. Ankara: İşkur Matbaacılık.
• Vedovello, C. (2000), “Science Parks and University Industry Links: A Comparative Analysis Between a British and a Portuguese Experience”, International Journal Services Technology and Management, 1(4), 358-374.
• Wayne, K.T. (2010), “Determinants of Commercial Innovation for University Technology Transfer”, Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business, 1-22.
• Wessner, C.W. (2009), “Crossing the Walley of Death”, HSS Visiting Speaker Program, Washington, July 24.
• Yusof, M., M.S. Siddiq ve L.M. Nor (2009), “An Integrated Model of a University’s Entrepreneurial Ecosystem”, Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 5(1), 57-77.
• Zahra, S. ve G. George (2002), “Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension”, Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.