Öz
Comparison of the alternatives by taking into consideration of many evaluation criteria together in the business activities is an inevitable condition. This results in the development of multi criteria decision making methods. Some of these multi criteria decision making methods use pairwise comparisons and some of these methods use normalization techniques. A standard normalization technique does not exist in multi criteria decisin making methods that utilizes normalization techniques. The purpose of this study is to review the effects of different normalization techniques over COPRAS (COmplex PRoportional ASsesment) method which is one of the multi criteria decision making method.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Normalization techniques Multi criteria decision making COPRAS method.
Kaynakça
- Aalami, H.A. Moghaddam, M.P. Yousefi, G.R. (2010), “Modeling and Prioritizing Demand Response Programs in Power Markets”, Electric Power Systems Research, 80, 426-435
- Ayala, J.G. (2012), “Selecting Irrigation Water Pricing Alternatives Using A MultiMethodological Approach”, Mathematical And Computer Modelling, 55, 861-883 Balezentis, A. Balezentis, T. ve Brauers, W.K.M. (2012), “Personnel Selection Based On Computing With Words And Fuzzy MULTIMOORA”, Expert Systems With Applications, 39, 7961-7967
- Banaitiene, N. Banaitis, A. Kaklauskas, A. Zavadskas, E. K. (2008), “Evaluating the life cycle of a building:A multivariant and multiple criteria approach”, Omega, 36, 429-441
- Chakraborty, S. (2011), “Applications Of The MOORA Method For Decision Making in Manufacturing Environment”, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 54, 1155-1166
- Chatterjee, P. Athawale, V. M. Chakraborty, S. (2011), “Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods”, Materials and Design, 32, 851-860
- Chatterjee, P. Chakraborty, S. (2012), “Material Selection Using Preferential Ranking Methods”, Materials And Design, 35, 384-393.
- Dai, L Wang, J. (2011), “Evaluation Of The Profitability Of Power Listed Companies Based On Entropy Improved TOPSIS Method”, Procedia Engineering, 15, 47284732
- Das, M. C. Sarkar, B. Ray, S. (2012), “A framework to measure relative performance of Indian technical institutions using integrated fuzzy AHP and COPRAS methodology”, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 46, 230-241
- Huang, W. Huang, Y.Y. (2012), “Research On The Performance Evaluation Of Chongqing Electric Power Supply Bureaus Based On TOPSIS”, Energy Procedia, 14, 899-90
- Kaklauskas, A. Zavadskas, E. K. Raslanas, S. Ginevicius, R. Komka, A. Malinauskas, P. (2006), “Selection of low-e windows in retrofit of public buildings by applying
Öz
İşletme faaliyetlerinin planlanma süreçlerinde, alternatifler içinden bir seçim yapılması ve çok sayıda değerlendirme ölçütünün bir arada göz önüne alınması kaçınılmaz bir durumdur. Bu durum, çok ölçütlü karar verme yöntemlerinin geliştirilmesi sonucunu doğurmuştur. Çok ölçütlü karar verme yöntemlerinden bazıları farklı ölçüm birimlerine sahip değerlendirme ölçütlerini bir araya getirebilmek için ikili karşılaştırmalar gerçekleştirirken, bazıları normalizasyon tekniklerinden yararlanmaktadır. Normalizasyon tekniklerinden yararlanan çok ölçütlü karar verme yöntemlerinde standart bir normalizasyon tekniği mevcut değildir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı normalizasyon tekniklerinin kullanıldığı çok ölçütlü karar verme yöntemlerinden biri olan COPRAS (COmplex PRoportional ASsesment – Karmaşık Nisbi Değerlendirme) üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektir.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Normalizasyon teknikleri Çok ölçütlü karar verme COPRAS yöntemi.
Kaynakça
- Aalami, H.A. Moghaddam, M.P. Yousefi, G.R. (2010), “Modeling and Prioritizing Demand Response Programs in Power Markets”, Electric Power Systems Research, 80, 426-435
- Ayala, J.G. (2012), “Selecting Irrigation Water Pricing Alternatives Using A MultiMethodological Approach”, Mathematical And Computer Modelling, 55, 861-883 Balezentis, A. Balezentis, T. ve Brauers, W.K.M. (2012), “Personnel Selection Based On Computing With Words And Fuzzy MULTIMOORA”, Expert Systems With Applications, 39, 7961-7967
- Banaitiene, N. Banaitis, A. Kaklauskas, A. Zavadskas, E. K. (2008), “Evaluating the life cycle of a building:A multivariant and multiple criteria approach”, Omega, 36, 429-441
- Chakraborty, S. (2011), “Applications Of The MOORA Method For Decision Making in Manufacturing Environment”, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 54, 1155-1166
- Chatterjee, P. Athawale, V. M. Chakraborty, S. (2011), “Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods”, Materials and Design, 32, 851-860
- Chatterjee, P. Chakraborty, S. (2012), “Material Selection Using Preferential Ranking Methods”, Materials And Design, 35, 384-393.
- Dai, L Wang, J. (2011), “Evaluation Of The Profitability Of Power Listed Companies Based On Entropy Improved TOPSIS Method”, Procedia Engineering, 15, 47284732
- Das, M. C. Sarkar, B. Ray, S. (2012), “A framework to measure relative performance of Indian technical institutions using integrated fuzzy AHP and COPRAS methodology”, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 46, 230-241
- Huang, W. Huang, Y.Y. (2012), “Research On The Performance Evaluation Of Chongqing Electric Power Supply Bureaus Based On TOPSIS”, Energy Procedia, 14, 899-90
- Kaklauskas, A. Zavadskas, E. K. Raslanas, S. Ginevicius, R. Komka, A. Malinauskas, P. (2006), “Selection of low-e windows in retrofit of public buildings by applying
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | Türkçe |
|---|---|
| Bölüm | Makaleler |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 1 Haziran 2013 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 2 Kasım 2014 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2013 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2 |