Araştırma Makalesi

PATH PLANNING CONSIDERING DRIVER PREFERENCES USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES

Cilt: 33 Sayı: 3 19 Aralık 2025
PDF İndir
TR EN

PATH PLANNING CONSIDERING DRIVER PREFERENCES USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES

Öz

Sustainable transportation and green logistics are becoming increasingly important, and the efficient use of electric vehicles (EVs) plays a critical role. However, efficient path planning for EVs remains a major challenge due to limited driving range and the need for optimised charging strategies. Usually, path recommendations are made based on a single criterion. However, drivers may want to consider multiple criteria for path selection. This study focuses on building a multi-criteria path planning algorithm that incorporates driver preferences by considering total travel time, energy consumption and travelling distance. To obtain the appropriate recommendation, these three criteria are evaluated using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Dijkstra algorithm is used to identify roads that take into account driver preferences. Johnson technique was used to remove negative energy weights due to energy recovery and solved the incompatibility problem of the Dijkstra algorithm with negative edge weights. The results have shown the proposed algorithm can efficiently generate solutions designed based on driver preferences and is suitable for EV routing applications. This study presents a method to increase user satisfaction by aiming at the widespread adoption of EVs and emphasizes the importance of multi-criteria decision making in addressing the unique challenges of EVs.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Electric vehicle, Path planning, Driver preference, Analytical Hierarchy Process, Dijkstra algorithm

Destekleyen Kurum

Key Digital Technologies Joint Undertaking (KDT JU) from the European Union’s Horizon Europe Programme and the National Authorities

Proje Numarası

101097267, 222N269

Teşekkür

This paper is supported by the OPEVA project that has received funding within the Key Digital Technologies Joint Undertaking (KDT JU) from the European Union’s Horizon Europe Programme and the National Authorities (France, Belgium, Czechia, Italy, Portugal, Turkey, Switzerland), under grant agreement 101097267. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or KDT JU. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. This work is supported by the Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK), Contract No 222N269, project title: “OPtimization of Electric Vehicle Autonomy (OPEVA)".

Kaynakça

  1. Abidin, S. Z., Abidin, N. I. Z., & Daud, H. (2025). Decision-Making Support in Vehicle Routing Problems: A Review of Recent Literature. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 44(2), 124-134. doi: https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.44.2.124134
  2. Ahmed, S., Ibrahim, R. F., & Hefny, H. A. (2018). Mobile-based routes network analysis for emergency response using an enhanced Dijkstra’s algorithm and AHP. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 11(6), 252–260. doi: https://doi.org/10.22266/IJIES2018.1231.25
  3. Alizadeh, M., Wai, H. T., Scaglione, A., Goldsmith, A., Fan, Y. Y., & Javidi, T. (2014). Optimized path planning for electric vehicle routing and charging. In 2014 52nd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton) (pp. 25–32). Monticello, IL, USA: IEEE. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ALLERTON.2014.7028431
  4. Artmeier, A., Haselmayr, J., Leucker, M., & Sachenbacher, M. (2010). The shortest path problem revisited: Optimal routing for electric vehicles. In KI 2010: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 309–316). Karlsruhe, Germany: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16111-7_35
  5. Bellman, R. (1958). On a routing problem. Quarterly of applied mathematics, 16(1), 87-90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1090/qam/102435
  6. Bouakouk, M. R., Abdelli, A., Mokdad, L., & Othman, J. B. (2022). Dealing with complex routing requirements using an MCDM-based approach. In 2022 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC) (pp. 1256–1261). Dubrovnik, Croatia: IEEE. doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/IWCMC55113.2022.9825024
  7. Bozkurt, S., Yazici, A., & Keskin, K. (2012). A multicriteria route planning approach considering driver preferences. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES 2012) (pp. 324–328). Istanbul, Turkey: IEEE. doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/ICVES.2012.6294270
  8. Dijkstra, E. W. (1959). A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik, 1(1),269–271. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01386390
  9. Ding, D., Li, J., Tu, P., Wang, H., Cao, T., & Zhang, F. (2020). Electric vehicle charging warning and path planning method based on spark. IEEE Access, 8, 8543-8553. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2964307
  10. Eisner, J., Funke, S., & Storandt, S. (2011). Optimal route planning for electric vehicles in large networks. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 25(1), 1108–1113. San Francisco, CA, USA. doi: https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v25i1.7991

Kaynak Göster

APA
Arıkan, M., Bozkurt Keser, S., Sarıçiçek, İ., & Yazici, A. (2025). PATH PLANNING CONSIDERING DRIVER PREFERENCES USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(3), 2054-2065. https://doi.org/10.31796/ogummf.1698018
AMA
1.Arıkan M, Bozkurt Keser S, Sarıçiçek İ, Yazici A. PATH PLANNING CONSIDERING DRIVER PREFERENCES USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES. ESOGÜ Müh Mim Fak Derg. 2025;33(3):2054-2065. doi:10.31796/ogummf.1698018
Chicago
Arıkan, Mehmet, Sinem Bozkurt Keser, İnci Sarıçiçek, ve Ahmet Yazici. 2025. “PATH PLANNING CONSIDERING DRIVER PREFERENCES USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 33 (3): 2054-65. https://doi.org/10.31796/ogummf.1698018.
EndNote
Arıkan M, Bozkurt Keser S, Sarıçiçek İ, Yazici A (01 Aralık 2025) PATH PLANNING CONSIDERING DRIVER PREFERENCES USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 33 3 2054–2065.
IEEE
[1]M. Arıkan, S. Bozkurt Keser, İ. Sarıçiçek, ve A. Yazici, “PATH PLANNING CONSIDERING DRIVER PREFERENCES USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES”, ESOGÜ Müh Mim Fak Derg, c. 33, sy 3, ss. 2054–2065, Ara. 2025, doi: 10.31796/ogummf.1698018.
ISNAD
Arıkan, Mehmet - Bozkurt Keser, Sinem - Sarıçiçek, İnci - Yazici, Ahmet. “PATH PLANNING CONSIDERING DRIVER PREFERENCES USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 33/3 (01 Aralık 2025): 2054-2065. https://doi.org/10.31796/ogummf.1698018.
JAMA
1.Arıkan M, Bozkurt Keser S, Sarıçiçek İ, Yazici A. PATH PLANNING CONSIDERING DRIVER PREFERENCES USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES. ESOGÜ Müh Mim Fak Derg. 2025;33:2054–2065.
MLA
Arıkan, Mehmet, vd. “PATH PLANNING CONSIDERING DRIVER PREFERENCES USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 33, sy 3, Aralık 2025, ss. 2054-65, doi:10.31796/ogummf.1698018.
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Arıkan, Sinem Bozkurt Keser, İnci Sarıçiçek, Ahmet Yazici. PATH PLANNING CONSIDERING DRIVER PREFERENCES USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES. ESOGÜ Müh Mim Fak Derg. 01 Aralık 2025;33(3):2054-65. doi:10.31796/ogummf.1698018