AESTHETIC ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLIC BUILDING DESIGN COMPETITIONS IN TURKEY
Öz
Architectural competitions hold a pivotal role in shaping the global architectural discourse, including in Turkey, by fostering innovation and being the benchmark for contemporary aesthetic trends. Architectural aesthetics, a dynamic construct influenced by cultural, political, and technological shifts, are prominently reflected in these competitions. However, the definition of architectural aesthetics is elusive, shifting from a traditional emphasis on beauty to a contemporary focus on the multi-sensory perception of the spatial atmosphere evoked by structures. Therefore, this study endeavors to elucidate the often-implicit aesthetic dimensions and methodologies within public building design projects.
By examining the project description statements of award-winning entries in national architectural competitions held after 2020, this study aims to explore how subject-based and object-based aesthetic approaches are represented within contemporary architectural discourse and how the relationship between these approaches is constructed. Methodologically, we employed quantitative and qualitative content analysis on the textual descriptions of 106 award-winning public building designs and classified architects’ aesthetic orientations. In this study, compositional aesthetic approaches are defined as object-based design strategies that organize spatial form, programmatic relationships, circulation, and visual composition through principles such as scale, proportion, and hierarchy, while atmospheric aesthetic approaches are defined as subject-based expressions related to sensory experience, emotion, mood, and the experiential qualities of space. According to these studies, our findings indicate a dominance of compositional approaches over atmospheric ones, with few explicit references to the aesthetic context within either approach. By systematically examining award-winning projects within a defined contemporary timeframe, this study offers an empirically grounded account of how aesthetic priorities are articulated and normalized in recent public architectural practice in Turkey.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Aesthetics, Competitions, Public Buildings, Spatial Atmosphere, Visual Composition
Kaynakça
- Aesthetic. (2024). In Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/aesthetic
- Andersen, B., & Røe, P. G. (2017). The social context and politics of large scale urban architecture: Investigating the design of Barcode, Oslo. European Urban and Regional Studies, 24(3), 304-317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776416643751
- Andersson, J. E., Rönn, M., & Östman, L. (Eds.). (2013). Architectural competitions – Histories and practice. RIO Kulturkooperativ.
- Arnold, D., Altan Ergut, E., & Turan Özkaya, B. (Eds.). (2006). Rethinking architectural historiography. Vol. 15. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203008393
- Bahtiyar, T. B., & Yaldız, E. (2024). Iconic Buildings Constructed with Competition Projects in Turkey in the 20th Century. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, 12(1), 111-126. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/3806306
- Baumgarten, A. G. (1970). Prolegomena. In Aesthetica. Hildesheim, Georg Olms.
- Bembel, I. O. (2022). Mimesis as a Universal Principle the Form Making. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Искусствоведение, 12(3), 487-499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu15.2022.305
- Bern, A. (2017). Architecture competitions in an urban planning context. Journal of Urban Design, 23(2), 239-256. DOI:10.1080/13574809.2017.1336421
- Bern, A. (2023). Myths and imaginaries in architectural competitions. Journal of Urban Design, 28(3), 114-135. DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2022.2066513
- Bern, A., & Røe, P. G. (2022). Architectural competitions and public participation. Cities, 127, 103730. DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2022.103730