FIELD STUDY ON DETERMINING PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

Süleyman Ersöz; Emel Yontar

doi:10.31796/ogummf.734292

EN TR

FIELD STUDY ON DETERMINING PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

Abstract

The most important factors for the sustainability of supply chain management are economic, social and environmental factors. In order to maintain sustainability in this field, companies need to see areas where they can improve by performing performance evaluation. For this purpose, in this study, it is aimed to determine the criteria to be used in the performance evaluation of sustainable supply chain management. In this respect, firstly, the performance criteria of supply chain management and reverse supply chain management studied in the literature are examined separately; these main criteria have been defined by taking into account economic, social and environmental factors. As a result of the literature review, 46 sub-criteria are determined which are in line with the main economic, social and environmental criteria. It is planned to make priority ranking of these criteria and to use the criteria which are obtained at a high rate according to their importance levels in performance evaluation. Representatives and academicians from the sector are asked to score 46 performance evaluation criteria according to their importance level. With the findings obtained, it is aimed to determine the criteria of high importance by performing Pareto Analysis. As a result of the studies carried out, nine new criteria can be added to the literature and a total of 33 criteria have been determined for performance evaluation. The criteria that companies can use for performance evaluation in the field of sustainable supply chain management are finalized and it is aimed to gain value for the sectors to improve themselves.

Keywords

Sustainability,Supply Chain Management,Performance Evaluation

SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİ PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRME KRİTERLERİNE YÖNELİK ALAN ARAŞTIRMASI

Öz

Tedarik zinciri yönetiminin sürdürülebilirliği için en önemli faktörler ekonomik, sosyal ve çevresel faktörlerdir. Bu alanda sürdürülebilirliği korumak için şirketlerin performans değerlendirmesi yaparak gelişebilecekleri alanları görmeleri gerekmektedir. Bu amaçla, bu çalışmada sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri yönetiminin performans değerlendirmesinde kullanılacak kriterlerin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu bağlamda, öncelikle, literatürde incelenen tedarik zinciri yönetimi ve tersine tedarik zinciri yönetiminin performans kriterleri ayrı ayrı incelenmiştir ve ana kriterler ekonomik, sosyal ve çevresel faktörler dikkate alınarak tanımlanmıştır. Literatür taraması sonucunda ekonomik, sosyal ve çevresel kriterlere uygun 46 alt kriter belirlenmiştir. Ardından bu kriterlerin öncelik sıralamalarının yapılması ve önem düzeylerine göre yüksek oranda çıkan kriterlerin performans değerlendirmede kullanılması planlanmıştır. Sektörden temsilciler ve akademisyenlerden önem düzeylerine göre 46 performans değerlendirme kriterlerini önem düzeyince puanlaması istenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgularla Pareto Analizi yapılarak yüksek öneme sahip kriterlerin belirlenmesi istenmiştir. Yapılan çalışmalar sonucunda literatüre dokuz yeni kriter kazandırılarak, toplam 33 performans değerlendirme kriteri belirlenmiştir. Şirketlerin sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri yönetimi alanında performans değerlendirmesi için kullanabileceği kriterler sonuçlandırılmıştır ve sektörlerin kendilerini geliştirmeleri için çalışmalarına değer kazandırılması hedeflenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sürdürülebilirlik,Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi,Performans Değerlendirme

Kaynakça

Ağar F., (2010). Tedarik zinciri yönetiminde SCOR modeli, tedarik süreci performans değerlendirmesi ve SCORCARD uygulaması, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
Alomar, M., & Pasek, Z. J. (2014). Linking supply chain strategy and processes to performance improvement. Procedia CIRP, 17, 628-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.144
Anand, N., & Grover, N. (2015). Measuring retail supply chain performance: Theoretical model using key performance indicators (KPIs). Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22(1), 135-166. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2012-0034
Angerhofer, B. J., & Angelides, M. C. (2006). A model and a performance measurement system for collaborative supply chains. Decision Support Systems, 42(1), 283-301, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2004.12.005
Aramyan, L. H., Oude Lansink, A. G., Van Der Vorst, J. G., & Van Kooten, O. (2007). Performance measurement in agri-food supply chains: a case study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(4), 304-315, https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540710759826
Arif-Uz-Zaman, K., & Nazmul Ahsan, A. M. M. (2014). Lean supply chain performance measurement. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(5), 588-612, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-05-2013-0092
Arun, K. V. G., Jose, S., & Chandar, C. S. (2011). Methodology for performance evaluation of reverse supply chain. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 3(3), 213-224.
Ayçın E., ve Özveri O. (2015). Bulanık modelleme ile tedarik zinciri performansının değerlendirilmesi ve imalat sektöründe bir uygulama, Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences 17(1), 51-60. DOI NO: 10.5578/jeas.9711.
Aydoğdu F. (2011). Tedarik zinciri yönetiminde SCOR modeli ve veri zarflama analizi entegrasyonu, Gazi Üniversitesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
Bagchi, P. K. (1996). Role of benchmarking as a competitive strategy: the logistics experience. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics, 26, 4–22, https://doi.org/10.1108/09600039610113173

Bansia, M., Varkey J. K., & Agrawal S. (2014). Development of a reverse logistics performance measurement system for a battery manufacturer, 3rd International Conference on Materials Processing and Characterisation, Procedia Materials Science 6, 1419 – 1427, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.121
Beamon, B. M. (1998). Supply chain design and analysis: models and methods, International Journal of Production Economics, 55(3), 281-294, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00079-6
Beamon, B. M., (1999). Measuring supply chain performance, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(3), 275-292, https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579910249714
Beierlein, J. G., Miller, C. A. (2000). Performance measures, and measurement ın supply chains in the food system, Food Industry Report.
Bozkurt, R. (1998). Kalite iyileştirme araç ve yöntemleri (630), Milli Prodüktivite Merkezi Yayınları.
Brewer, P. C. (2000). Using the balanced scorecard to measure supply chain performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 21(1), 75-93.
Bullinger, H. J., Kühner, M., & Van Hoof, A. (2002). Analysing supply chain performance using a balanced measurement method. International Journal of Production Research, 40(15), 3533-3543, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540210161669
Butar, M. B., Sanders, D., & Frei, R. (2016). Measuring performance of reverse supply chains in a carpet manufacturer. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 4(2), 152-158.
Butzer, S., Schötz, S., Petroschke, M., & Steinhilper, R. (2017). Development of a performance measurement system for international reverse supply chains. Procedia Cirp, 61, 251-256, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.264
Cai, J., Liu, X., Xiao, Z., & Liu, J. (2009). Improving supply chain performance management: A systematic approach to analyzing iterative KPI accomplishment. Decision support systems, 46(2), 512-521, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2008.09.004
Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S., A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 38(5), 360-387, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810882816
Carvalho, H., Azevedo, S. G., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2012). Agile and resilient approaches to supply chain management: influence on performance and competitiveness. Logistics research, 4(1-2), 49-62, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-012-0064-2
Chae, B. (2009). Developing key performance indicators for supply chain: an industry perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(6), 422-428, https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540910995192.
Chan, F. T., Qi, H. J., Chan, H., Lau, H. C., & Ip, R. W. (2003). A conceptual model of performance measurement for supply chains. Management decision, 41(7), 635-642, https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740310495568
Chimhamhiwa, D., van der Molen, P., Mutanga, O., & Rugege, D. (2009). Towards a framework for measuring end to end performance of land administration business processes–A case study. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33(4), 293-301, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.04.001
Cho, D. W., Lee, Y. H., Ahn, S. H., & Hwang, M. K. (2012). A framework for measuring the performance of service supply chain management. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62(3), 801-818, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2011.11.014
De Toni, A., & Tonchia, S. (2001). Performance measurement systems-models, characteristics and measures. International journal of operations & production management, 21(1/2), 46-71, https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570110358459
Deva, N. K., Shankar, R., Gupta, R., & Dong, J. (2019). Multi-criteria evaluation of real-time key performance indicators of supply chain with consideration of big data architecture. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 128, 1076-1087, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.04.012
Dissanayake, C. K., & Cross, J. A. (2018). Systematic mechanism for identifying the relative impact of supply chain performance areas on the overall supply chain performance using SCOR model and SEM. International Journal of Production Economics, 201, 102-115, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.04.027.
Elrod, C., Murray, S., & Bande, S. (2013). A review of performance metrics for supply chain management. Engineering Management Journal, 25(3), 39-50, https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2013.11431981.
Fernandes, S. M., Rodriguez, C. M. T., Bornia, A. C., Trierweiller, A. C., Silva, S. M. D., & Freire, P. D. S. (2018). Systematic literature review on the ways of measuring the of reverse logistics performance. Gestão & Produção, 25(1), 175-190, https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x3177-16.
Fitzgerald, L., Johnston, R., Brignall, S., Silvestro, R., & Voss, C. (1991). Performance Measurement in Service Businesses, CIMA. Journal of Computers in Industry, 58, 474-485.
Fredendall, L.D. and Hill, E., Basics of Supply Chain Management, St Lucie Press, APICS, Delray Beach, FL, 2001.
Fleisch, E., & Tellkamp, C. (2005). Inventory inaccuracy and supply chain performance: a simulation study of a retail supply chain. International journal of production economics, 95(3), 373-385, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.02.003
Gamme, N. I. C. L. A. S., & Johansson, M. A. R. T. I. N. (2015). Measuring supply chain performance through KPI identification and evaluation. Chalmers University of Technology.
Ganga, G. M. D.; Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2011). A fuzzy logic approach to supply chain performance management, International Journal of Production Economics 134, 177–187, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.06.011
Golrizgashti, S. (2014). Supply chain value creation methodology under BSC approach. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 10(3), 67-82, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-014-0067-5
Guimarães da Silveira, J. L., & Salomon, V. A. P. (2015). ANP applied to the evaluation of performance indicators of reverse logistics in footwear industry. Procedia Computer Science, 55, 139-148, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.021
Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., & McGaughey, R. E. (2004). A framework for supply chain performance measurement. International journal of production economics, 87(3), 333-347, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.08.003
Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., & Tirtiroglu, E. (2001). Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. International journal of operations & production Management, 21(1/2), 71-87, https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570110358468
Hall, G. M. (Ed.)., Fish processing: sustainability and new opportunities (No. 637.33 HALfi). Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
Hernández, C. T., Marins, F. A. S., da Rocha, P. M., & Automobiles, P. P. C. (2009). Using AHP and ANP To Evaluate The Relation Between Reverse Logistics And Corporate Performance in Brazilian Automotive Industry. Proceeding of Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process Multi-criteria Decision Making held at Pennsylvania, USA.
Huang, C. W. (2018). Assessing the performance of tourism supply chains by using the hybrid network data envelopment analysis model. Tourism Management, 65, 303-316, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.10.013
J. Hall, D., R. Huscroft, J., T. Hazen, B., & B. Hanna, J. (2013). Reverse logistics goals, metrics, and challenges: perspectives from industry. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43(9), 768-785, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2012-0052
Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1997). Balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press.
Kocaoğlu, B. (2009). Tedarik zinciri performansı ölçümü için stratejik ve operasyonel hedefleri ve bütünleştiren SCOR Modeli temelli bir yapı (Doctoral dissertation, YTÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü).
Kozarević, S., & Puška, A. (2018). Use of fuzzy logic for measuring practices and performances of supply chain. Operations Research Perspectives, 5, 150-160, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2018.07.001
Li, Z., Xu, X., & Kumar, A. (2007, September). Supply chain performance evaluation from structural and operational levels. In 2007 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (EFTA 2007) (pp. 1131-1140). IEEE, DOI: 10.1109/EFTA.2007.4416909
Lima-Junior, F. R., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2017). Quantitative models for supply chain performance evaluation: a literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 113, 333-346, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.09.022
Momeni, E., Tavana, M., Mirzagoltabar, H., & Mirhedayatian, S. M. (2014). A new fuzzy network slacks-based DEA model for evaluating performance of supply chains with reverse logistics. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 27(2), 793-804, DOI: 10.3233/IFS-131037.
Moshtaghfard R., Arbabshirani B., & Alinaghian M. (2016). Reverse Logistics Performance Measurement by Integrated Balanced Scorecard and Data Envelopment Analysis (Case Study in Pak Dairy Co.), International Journal of Advances in Management Science (IJ-AMS), 5.
Narasimhan, R., & Jayaram, J. (1998). Causal linkages in supply chain management: an exploratory study of North American manufacturing firms. Decision sciences, 29(3), 579-605, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1998.tb01355.x
Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda. International journal of operations & production management, 15(4), 80-116, https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510633639.
Nizaroyani, S. (2010). Performance measurement for reverse and closed-loop supply chains (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham).
Olugu, E. U., & Wong, K. Y. (2011). Fuzzy logic evaluation of reverse logistics performance in the automotive industry. Scientific Research and Essays, 6(7), 1639-1649, DOI: 10.5897/SRE11.110.
Otto, A., & Kotzab, H. (2003). Does supply chain management really pay? Six perspectives to measure the performance of managing a supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 144(2), 306-320, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00396-X
Özalp Ö. (2016). Tedarik zinciri performansının ölçümü: ekonomik katma değer yönteminin analizi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İzmir.
Özbakır S. (2010). Tedarik zincirinde dengeli performans kartı yaklaşımı, İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul.
Özgüvenç, D. (2011). Kalite problemlerinin sınıflandırılmasında çok kriterli Pareto Analizi (Doctoral dissertation, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü).
Pandian G. (2014). Performance evaluation of a reverse logistics enterprise - an agent-based modelling approach, A Thesis the Degree of Master of Applied Science University of Windsor, Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Canada.
Persson, F., & Olhager, J. (2002). Performance simulation of supply chain designs. International journal of production economics, 77(3), 231-245, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00088-8
Pires, S. R., & Aravechia, C. H. (2001, March). Measuring Supply Chain Performance, Proceedings of The Twelfth Annual Conference of The Production And Operations Management Society, Pom-2001, Orlando FL.
Quality Control Circles (QCC), (1984). Yönetim Geliştirme Merkezi Seminer Notları, İstanbul.
Ramezankhani, M. J., Torabi, S. A., & Vahidi, F. (2018). Supply chain performance measurement and evaluation: A mixed sustainability and resilience approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 126, 531-548, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.09.054
Rodriguez-Rodriguez, R., Saiz, J. J. A., Bas, A. O., Carot, J. M., & Jabaloyes, J. M. (2010). Building internal business scenarios based on real data from a performance measurement system. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(1), 50-62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.07.006
Sangwan, K. S. (2017). Key activities, decision variables and performance indicators of reverse logistics. Procedia CIRP, 61, 257-262, DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.185
Sellitto, M. A., Pereira, G. M., Borchardt, M., da Silva, R. I., & Viegas, C. V. (2015). A SCOR-based model for supply chain performance measurement: application in the footwear industry. International Journal of Production Research, 53(16), 4917-4926, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1005251
Şen, E. (2006). KOBİ’lerin uluslararası rekabet güçlerini artırmada tedarik zinciri yönetiminin önemi. TC Başbakanlık Dış Ticaret Müsteşarlığı İhracatı Geliştirme Etüd Merkezi, 4.
Shafiee, M., & Shams-e-Alam, N. (2011). Supply chain performance evaluation with rough data envelopment analysis. In 2010 International Conference on Business and Economics Research (Vol. 1).
Shaik M. N., (2014). Comprehensive performance measurement methodology for reverse logistics enterprise, Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Windsor, Canada. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/5247
Shaik, M., & Abdul-Kader, W. (2012). Performance measurement of reverse logistics enterprise: a comprehensive and integrated approach. Measuring Business Excellence, 16(2), 23-34, https://doi.org/10.1108/13683041211230294
Shepherd, C. & Günter, H. (2006). Measuring supply chain performance: current research and future directions, in J. C. Fransoo (Eds.). Behavioral Operations in planning and scheduling. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13382-4_6
Shi W. & Gao T. (2016). Supply chain performance evaluation model based on unascertained clustering. Rev. Téc. Ing. Univ. Zulia. Vol. 39(6), 195- 201. DOI: doi:10.21311/001.39.6.24
Sillanpää, I. (2015). Empirical study of measuring supply chain performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22(2), 290-308, https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-01-2013-0009
Sisco C., Chorn B. & Pruzan-Jorgensen P. M. (2010). Tedarik zinciri sürdürülebilirliği sürekli iyileştirme için pratik rehber, BM Küresel İlkeler Sözleşmesi Ofisi ve BSR. https://docplayer.biz.tr/1224073-Tedarik-zinciri-surdurulebilirligi-surekli-iyilestirme-icin-pratik-rehber.html
Stock, J. R., & Mulki, J. P. (2009). Product returns processing: an examination of practices of manufacturers, wholesalers/distributors, and retailers. Journal of business logistics, 30(1), 33-62, https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2009.tb00098.x
Sun, J., Wang, C., Ji, X., & Wu, J. (2017). Performance evaluation of heterogeneous bank supply chain systems from the perspective of measurement and decomposition. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 113, 891-903, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.05.028
Tao, X. (2009). Performance evaluation of supply chain based on fuzzy matter-element theory. In 2009 International Conference On Information Management, Innovation Management And Industrial Engineering (Vol. 1, pp. 549-552). IEEE, DOI: 10.1109/ICIII.2009.138
Tonanont A. (2009). Performance evaluation in reverse logistics with data envelopment analysis. Doctor Of Phılosophy Thesis, The University of Texas at Arlington, http://hdl.handle.net/10106/1904
Van Hoek, R. I. (1998). “Measuring the unmeasurable”-measuring and improving performance in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 3(4), 187-192, https://doi.org/10.1108/13598549810244232
Wang, J. C. (2006). Corporate performance efficiency investigated by data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard. Journal of American Academy of Business, 9(2), 312-318.
Xu, J., Li, B., & Wu, D. (2009). Rough data envelopment analysis and its application to supply chain performance evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics, 122(2), 628-638, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.06.026
Yang, J., (2010). On the construction and implementation methods for performance measurement of reverse supply chain. Seventh International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, PP. 899-903, 2010, DOI: 10.1109/FSKD.2010.5569111.
Yang, J., Zang, L., & Hao, Z. (2009). Study on the performance evaluation system of reverse supply chain based on BSC and triangular fuzzy number AHP. In 2009 International Conference on Information Engineering and Computer Science(pp. 1-4). IEEE, DOI: 10.1109/ICIECS.2009.5364327.
Yavuz O., & Ersoy A. (2013). Tedarik zinciri performansının değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan değişkenlerin yapay sinir ağı yöntemiyle değerlendirilmesi, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 15(2), 209-256.
Yellepeddi, S. (2006). An Analytical Network Process (ANP) approach for the development of a reverse supply chain performance index in consumer electronics industry. Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The University of Texas at Arlington
Yellepeddi, S. S., Rajagopalan, S., & Liles, D. H. (2005). A balanced scorecard approach for an effective reverse supply chain in electronics industry. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of International Journal of Industrial Engineering, Clearwater, Florida, USA, December (pp. 4-7).
Yeong-Dong Hwang, Lin, Y. C., & Lyu Jr, J. (2008). The performance evaluation of SCOR sourcing process-The case study of Taiwan's TFT-LCD industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 115(2), 411-423, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.09.014
Zhu, J., (2010). Evaluation of supply chain performance based on BP neural network, Computer Engineering And Technology (Iccet), 2010 2nd International Conference On, V1-495- V1-499, DOI: 10.1109/ICCET.2010.5486013.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Endüstri Mühendisliği

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Süleyman Ersöz
0000-0002-7534-6837
Türkiye

Emel Yontar ^*
0000-0001-7800-2960
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Ağustos 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

8 Mayıs 2020

Kabul Tarihi

21 Ağustos 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31796/ogummf.734292

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA55EH46RY

APA

Ersöz, S., & Yontar, E. (2020). FIELD STUDY ON DETERMINING PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(2), 194-209. https://doi.org/10.31796/ogummf.734292

AMA

1.Ersöz S, Yontar E. FIELD STUDY ON DETERMINING PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT. ESOGÜ Müh Mim Fak Derg. 2020;28(2):194-209. doi:10.31796/ogummf.734292

Chicago

Ersöz, Süleyman, ve Emel Yontar. 2020. “FIELD STUDY ON DETERMINING PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 28 (2): 194-209. https://doi.org/10.31796/ogummf.734292.

EndNote

Ersöz S, Yontar E (01 Ağustos 2020) FIELD STUDY ON DETERMINING PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 28 2 194–209.

IEEE

[1]S. Ersöz ve E. Yontar, “FIELD STUDY ON DETERMINING PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT”, ESOGÜ Müh Mim Fak Derg, c. 28, sy 2, ss. 194–209, Ağu. 2020, doi: 10.31796/ogummf.734292.

ISNAD

Ersöz, Süleyman - Yontar, Emel. “FIELD STUDY ON DETERMINING PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 28/2 (01 Ağustos 2020): 194-209. https://doi.org/10.31796/ogummf.734292.

JAMA

1.Ersöz S, Yontar E. FIELD STUDY ON DETERMINING PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT. ESOGÜ Müh Mim Fak Derg. 2020;28:194–209.

MLA

Ersöz, Süleyman, ve Emel Yontar. “FIELD STUDY ON DETERMINING PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 28, sy 2, Ağustos 2020, ss. 194-09, doi:10.31796/ogummf.734292.

Vancouver

1.Süleyman Ersöz, Emel Yontar. FIELD STUDY ON DETERMINING PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT. ESOGÜ Müh Mim Fak Derg. 01 Ağustos 2020;28(2):194-209. doi:10.31796/ogummf.734292

FIELD STUDY ON DETERMINING PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

Abstract

Keywords

SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİ PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRME KRİTERLERİNE YÖNELİK ALAN ARAŞTIRMASI

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster