Öz
Bugünün en önemli tartışmalarından biri Enerji dönüşüm teknolojileri ve temiz enerjidir. Son on yılda, enerji dönüşüm teknolojilerinin hızlı gelişimi gözlenmektedir. Bu gelişme sırasında birçok enerji üretim teknolojisi bulunmuş ve araştırılmıştır. Bunlardan biri, piroliz ve gazlaştırma gibi biyokütle termal dönüşümdür. Bununla birlikte, bu tür dönüşüm sistemleri ile ilgili önemli bir sorun, ürün gazı yan ürünü olan katran miktarı ve konsantrasyonudur. Katran, gazlaştırma ve piroliz gibi termal dönüşüm sistemlerinin yan ürünü olarak ortaya çıkan sistemlerde sorunlara neden olan istenmeyen bir yan üründür. Katran sistemde, çiğleşme noktasının altındaki sıcaklıklarda yoğuşarak reaktör, boru ekipmanları ve diğer sistem ekipmanları üzerinde birikerek ısı kayıplarına, korozyona, kurum oluşumuna, katalitik zehirlenmeye ve boru ve kanallarda tıkanıklığa neden olur. Bu çalışmada, biyogaz ve piroliz sistemlerinin kombine çalışması ile yeni bir katran parçalanması sistemi tasarlanmıştır. Piroliz reaktörü ve biyogaz reaktörü sistemde birbiriyle bağlantılı olarak çalıştırılır. Katran miktarı, 10, 20 ve 30 L'lik piroliz gazında sırasıyla 0.159, 0.194 ve 0.165 g / L olarak gravimetrik analiz yöntemi ile belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, literatüre yeni bir katran parçalanmasını sağlayan biyolojik arıtım yönteminin kazandırılmasıdır. Bu sistemde katran yan ürünü ve piroliz gazı biyogaz reaktöründen geçirilerek verim %55.08 , %56.01 ve %56.09 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Burada en yüksek verim %56.09 olarak tespit edilmiştir.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Sentez gazı Tar Biyolojik arıtım Arıtma Teknolojileri Gazlaştırma
Destekleyen Kurum
EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Kaynakça
- Anis, S., Zainal, Z.A. (2011). Tar reduction in biomass producer gas via mechanical, catalytic and thermal methods: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(5), 2355-2377.
- Asadullah, M. (2014). Barriers of commercial power generation using biomass gasification gas: A review Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, 201-215.
- Shen, Y. (2015). Chars as carbonaceous adsorbents catalysts for tar elimination during biomass pyrolysis or gasification. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 281-295.
- A.M.A Ahmed, A. Salmiaton, T.S.Y Choong, W.A.K.G. Wan Azlina, December (2015). Review of kinetic and equilibrium concepts for biomass tar modeling by using Aspen Plus, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Volume 52, Pages 1623–1644.
- Paethanom, A., Nakahara, S., Kobayashi, M., Prawisudha, P., Yoshikawa, K. (2012). Performance of tar removal by absorption and adsorption for biomass gasification. Fuel Processing Technology, 104 (Supplement C), 144-154.
- Milne, T.A., Abatzoglou, N., Evans, R.J. (1998). Biomass gasifier" tars": Their nature, formation, and conversion. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, CO.
- Suzuki K., Li C., (2009). Tar property, analysis, reforming mechanism and model for biomass gasification- An overview, Renew Sust Energy, 13(3), 594-604pp.
- Paethanom, A., Nakahara, S., Kobayashi, M., Prawisudha, P., Yoshikawa, K. (2012). Performance of tar removal by absorption and adsorption for biomass gasification. Fuel Processing Technology, 104(Supplement C), 144-154.
- R.García, C. Pizarro, A. G. Lavín, Julio L. Bueno, (2017). Biomass sources for thermal conversion. Techno- economical overview, Fuel, Volume 195, Pages 182–189.
- Mayerhofer, M., Mitsakis, M., Meng, X., Jong, W., Spliethoff, H., Gaderer, G. (2012). Influence of pressure, temperature and steam on tar and gas in allothermal fluidized bed gasification, Fuel, 99, Germany, 204-209pp.
- Narváez, I., Orío, A., Aznar, M.P., and Corella, J. (1996). Biomass gasification with air in an atmospheric bubbling fluidized bed. Effect of six operational variables on the quality of the produced raw gas, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 35, 2110-2120pp.
- Milne, T.A, Evans R.J, Abatzoglou N., 1998, Biomass gasifier “tars”: their nature, formation and conversion. Report no.NREL/TP-570-25357,NREL, Golden, Colorado, USA, 121. Basu P. (2010), Biomass gasification and pyrolysis: practical design and theory, Published by Elsevier Inc., Burlington, USA, 540.
- Dalia A. Ali, Mamdouh A. Gadalla, Omar Y. Abdelaziz, Christian P. Hulteberg, Fatma H. Ashour (2017). Co- gasification of coal and biomass wastes in an entrained flow gasifier: Modelling, simulation and integration opportunities, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 37, Pages 126–137.
- Patuzzi, F., Roveda, D., Mimmo, T., Karl, J., Baratieri, M., (2013). A comporison between on-line and off-line tar analysis methods applied to common reed pyrolysis, Fuel (111), 689-695pp.
Öz
One of the most significant current discussions in today is the Energy conversion Technologies and clean energy suppliers. The past decade has been viewed the rapid development of energy conversion technologies. During this development, many energy production technologies have been found and researched. One of them is biomass thermal conversion systems, which are examined under three titles as pyrolysis, gasification and combustion. However, the major problem of thermal conversion systems is tar amount and composition in the product gas. The tar is a side product and causes problems in the systems emerging as the by-product of thermal conversion systems such as gasification and pyrolysis. Tar is condensed below dew point temperature and accumulated in the system and causes heat losses, corrosion, soot formation, catalytic poisoning, and congestion in pipes and ducts. In this study, a new tar removal system has been designed with the hybrid operation of biogas and pyrolysis systems. The pyrolysis reactor and the biogas reactor are operated in connection with each other in the system. The amount of tar was determined via gravimetric analysis method as 0.159, 0.194 and 0.165 g/L respectively in the pyrolysis gas of 10, 20 and 30 L. The main purpose of this study is to examine the effects of biological treatment method, which is a new method in tar treatment, and also to add a new hybrid treatment method to the literature. In this system, the pyrolysis gas, which has tar content, was passed through the biogas reactor and the yield was calculated as 55.08 %, 56.01 % and 56.09%. The highest yield was calculated as 56.09 %.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Anis, S., Zainal, Z.A. (2011). Tar reduction in biomass producer gas via mechanical, catalytic and thermal methods: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(5), 2355-2377.
- Asadullah, M. (2014). Barriers of commercial power generation using biomass gasification gas: A review Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, 201-215.
- Shen, Y. (2015). Chars as carbonaceous adsorbents catalysts for tar elimination during biomass pyrolysis or gasification. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 281-295.
- A.M.A Ahmed, A. Salmiaton, T.S.Y Choong, W.A.K.G. Wan Azlina, December (2015). Review of kinetic and equilibrium concepts for biomass tar modeling by using Aspen Plus, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Volume 52, Pages 1623–1644.
- Paethanom, A., Nakahara, S., Kobayashi, M., Prawisudha, P., Yoshikawa, K. (2012). Performance of tar removal by absorption and adsorption for biomass gasification. Fuel Processing Technology, 104 (Supplement C), 144-154.
- Milne, T.A., Abatzoglou, N., Evans, R.J. (1998). Biomass gasifier" tars": Their nature, formation, and conversion. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, CO.
- Suzuki K., Li C., (2009). Tar property, analysis, reforming mechanism and model for biomass gasification- An overview, Renew Sust Energy, 13(3), 594-604pp.
- Paethanom, A., Nakahara, S., Kobayashi, M., Prawisudha, P., Yoshikawa, K. (2012). Performance of tar removal by absorption and adsorption for biomass gasification. Fuel Processing Technology, 104(Supplement C), 144-154.
- R.García, C. Pizarro, A. G. Lavín, Julio L. Bueno, (2017). Biomass sources for thermal conversion. Techno- economical overview, Fuel, Volume 195, Pages 182–189.
- Mayerhofer, M., Mitsakis, M., Meng, X., Jong, W., Spliethoff, H., Gaderer, G. (2012). Influence of pressure, temperature and steam on tar and gas in allothermal fluidized bed gasification, Fuel, 99, Germany, 204-209pp.
- Narváez, I., Orío, A., Aznar, M.P., and Corella, J. (1996). Biomass gasification with air in an atmospheric bubbling fluidized bed. Effect of six operational variables on the quality of the produced raw gas, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 35, 2110-2120pp.
- Milne, T.A, Evans R.J, Abatzoglou N., 1998, Biomass gasifier “tars”: their nature, formation and conversion. Report no.NREL/TP-570-25357,NREL, Golden, Colorado, USA, 121. Basu P. (2010), Biomass gasification and pyrolysis: practical design and theory, Published by Elsevier Inc., Burlington, USA, 540.
- Dalia A. Ali, Mamdouh A. Gadalla, Omar Y. Abdelaziz, Christian P. Hulteberg, Fatma H. Ashour (2017). Co- gasification of coal and biomass wastes in an entrained flow gasifier: Modelling, simulation and integration opportunities, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 37, Pages 126–137.
- Patuzzi, F., Roveda, D., Mimmo, T., Karl, J., Baratieri, M., (2013). A comporison between on-line and off-line tar analysis methods applied to common reed pyrolysis, Fuel (111), 689-695pp.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | Türkçe |
|---|---|
| Konular | Kimya Mühendisliği, Malzeme Üretim Teknolojileri |
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makaleleri |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 31 Aralık 2020 |
| Kabul Tarihi | 3 Ekim 2020 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2020 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 3 |
