Agile and Lean Supply Chain: Research Trends (2017-2021)

Gülay Ekren

doi:10.17494/ogusbd.1181826

TR EN

Çevik ve Yalın Tedarik Zinciri: Araştırma Eğilimleri (2017-2021)

Öz

Günümüzde endüstriyel sektörlere etkileri nedeniyle çeviklik ve yalınlık terimlerine literatürde sıklıkla karşılaşılmaktadır. Bunlar işletmelerin strateji oluşturmalarına ve rekabet avantajı elde etmelerine yardımcı olan iki temel paradigmadır. Bu çalışma, son yıllarda çevik ve yalın tedarik zinciri (TZ) paradigmalarına yönelik yeni araştırma konularını ve ana araştırma eğilimlerini ve bu iki paradigmanın birbiriyle ilişkisini keşfetmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada, kelime eş-oluşum analizi tekniği kullanılmıştır. Web of Science veri tabanından elde edilen 526 yayından oluşan veri seti analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, 2018 yılından bu yana TZ stratejisi, yeşil TZ, TZ çevikliği gibi bir dizi konunun araştırma trendleri arasında yer aldığını göstermektedir. Bunun yanı sıra, TZ tasarımı, iş birliği, soğuk TZ, yalın ve çevik TZ, ve TZ risk yönetimi son zamanlarda ortaya çıkan yeni konulardır. En yaygın araştırma alanları; çevik TZ'deki çevresel riskler, yalın TZ'yi çevik TZ ile birleştirme, leagile TZ stratejileri, TZ risk yönetimi ve TZ entegrasyonunda çeviklik şeklindedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kelime eş-Oluşum Analizi, Çevik Tedarik Zinciri, Yalın Tedarik Zinciri, Tedarik Zinciri Stratejisi, Word Co-occurrence Analysis, Agile Supply Chain, Lean Supply Chain, Supply Chain Strategy

Agile and Lean Supply Chain: Research Trends (2017-2021)

Öz

Today, the two terms - agility and leanness are frequently encountered in the literature due to their effects on industrial sectors. They are the two basic paradigms of the businesses that help them to build strategies and to gain a competitive advantage. This study aimed to explore the emerging research topics and the main research trends within agile and lean supply chain (SC) paradigms in recent years and to explore the interrelationships between them. A word co-occurrence analysis technique was adopted in this study. A data set of 526 publications, obtained from the Web of Science database, had been analyzed. The findings show that many topics such as SC strategy, green SC, and SC agility are present since 2018. Besides, the topics such as SC design, collaboration, cold SC, lean and agile SC, and SC risk management were emerging topics. The most common research areas revealed are; environmental risks in the agile SC, combining lean SC with agile SC, leagile SC strategies, SC risk management, and agility in SC integration.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Word Co-occurrence Analysis, Agile Supply Chain, Lean Supply Chain, Supply Chain Strategy

Kaynakça

Abdelilah, B., El Korchi, A., & Amine Balambo, M. (2021). Agility as a combination of lean and supply chain integration: how to achieve a better performance. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 1-29.
Agus, A., & Hajinoor, M. S. (2012). Lean production supply chain management as driver towards enhancing product quality and business performance: Case study of manufacturing compa-nies in Malaysia. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 29(1), 92-121.
Ahn, H. J., Childerhouse, P., Vossen, G., & Lee, H. (2012). Rethin-king XML-enabled agile supply chains. International Journal of Information Management, 32(1), 17-23.
Ali, I., & Gölgeci, I. (2019). Where is supply chain resilience research heading? A systematic and co-occurrence analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 49(8), 798-815.
Alzoubi, H., Ahmed, G., Al-Gasaymeh, A., & Kurdi, B. (2020). Empirical study on sustainable supply chain strategies and its impact on competitive priorities: The mediating role of supply chain collaboration. Management Science Letters, 10(3), 703-708.
Baramichai, M., Zimmers, E. W., & Marangos, C. A. (2007). Agile supply chain transformation matrix: an integrated tool for creating an agile enterprise. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(5), 334-348.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9(2), 27-40. Buyens, D., & Vandenbroucke, A. (2017). Agility in today's dynamic business environment. Part 1: agility in search of the origin and conceptual clarity. Retrieved from https://repository.vlerick.com/handle/20.500.12127/5755 (5.09.2022).
Carvalho, H., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2011). Integrating lean, agile, resilience and green paradigms in supply chain management (LARG_SCM). Retrieved from https://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/82532/1/Integrating%20Lean%2C%20Agile%2C%20Resilience%20and%20Green.pdf (06.09.2022).
Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Ertz, M. (2020). Agile supply chain management: where did it come from and where will it go in the era of digital transformation? Industrial Marketing Management, 90, 324-345.
Chen, J. C., Cheng, C. H., & Huang, P. B. (2013). Supply chain management with lean production and RFID application: A case study. Expert Systems with applications, 40(9), 3389-3397.

Christopher, M. (2000). The agile supply chain: competing in volatile markets. Industrial marketing management, 29(1), 37-44. Christopher, M., & Towill, D. (2001). An integrated model for the design of agile supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 31(4), 235-246.
Christopher, M., & Holweg, M. (2011). “Supply Chain 2.0”: Managing supply chains in the era of turbulence. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 41(1), 63-82.
Craighead, C. W., Ketchen Jr, D. J., & Darby, J. L. (2020). Pandemics and supply chain management research: Toward a theoretical toolbox. Decision Sciences, 51(4), 838-866.
Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. British journal of nursing, 17(1), 38-43.
Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809-1831.
Flynn, B., Huo, B., and Zhao, X. (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), 58-71.
Jain, V., & Benyoucef, L. (2008). New approaches for modeling and evaluating agility in integrated supply chains. In Supply Chain, The Way to Flat Organisation (Eds: Yanfang Huo and Fu Jia). INTECH Open Access Publisher: I-Tech, Vienna, Austria. Jobber, D., & Simpson, P. (1988). A citation analysis of selected marketing journals. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 5(2), 137-142.
Garcia-Buendia, N., Moyano-Fuentes, J., & Maqueira, J. M. (2021a). Mapping the lean supply chain management research through citation classics. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 13(2), 428-456.
Garcia-Buendia, N., Moyano-Fuentes, J., Maqueira-Marín, J. M., & Cobo, M. J. (2021b). 22 Years of lean supply chain management: a science mapping-based bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 59(6), 1901-1921.
Goldsby, T. J., Griffis, S. E., & Roath, A. S. (2006). Modeling lean, agile, and leagile supply chain strategies. Journal of business logistics, 27(1), 57-80.
Gosling, J., Purvis, L., & Naim, M. M. (2010). Supply chain flexibility as a determinant of supplier selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 128(1), 11-21.
Harzing, A. W. K., & Van der Wal, R. (2008). Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in science and environmental politics, 8(1), 61-73.
Hassani, Y., Biţan, G. E., & Ştefănescu, R. (2020). Possibilities For Improving of Supply Chain Performance in the Context of Sustainable Development. In: R. Pamfilie, V. Dinu, L. Tăchiciu, D. Pleșea, C. Vasiliu eds. 6th BASIQ International Conference on New Trends in Sustainable Business and Consumption. Messina, Italy, 4-6 June 2020. Bucharest: ASE, pp. 966-973.
Hou, J., Yang, X., & Chen, C. (2018). Emerging trends and new developments in information science: A document co-citation analysis (2009–2016). Scientometrics, 115(2), 869-892.
Kessler, M.M. (1963), Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers, American Documentation, 14(1), 10-25.
Kraus, S., Filser, M., Eggers, F., Hills, G. E., & Hultman, C. M. (2012). The entrepreneurial marketing domain: a citation and co‐citation analysis. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 14(1), 6-26.
Lis, A. (2018). Keywords co-occurrence analysis of research on sustainable enterprise and sustainable organisation. Journal of Corporate Responsibility and Leadership, 5(2), 47-66.
Lis, A., Sudolska, A., & Tomanek, M. (2020). Mapping research on sustainable supply chain management. Sustainability, 12(10), 3987.
Mangiaracina, R., Marchet, G., Perotti, S., & Tumino, A. (2015). A review of the environmental implications of B2C e-commerce: a logistics perspective. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 45(6), 566-591.
Marshakova, I.V. (1973), A system of document connection based on references, Scientific and Technical Information Serial of VI-NITI, 6(2), 3-8.
Martínez-Jurado, P. J., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2014). Lean management, supply chain management and sustainability: a literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 134-150.
Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J. B. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega, 73, 37-48.
Mistry J. (2005). Supply chain management: a case study of an integrated Lean and agile model. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 2(2), 193–215.
Moyano-Fuentes, J., Bruque-Cámara, S., & Maqueira-Marín, J. M. (2019). Development and validation of a lean supply chain management measurement instrument. Production Planning & Control, 30(1), 20-32.
Naylor, J.B., Naim, M.M. & Berry, D. (1999). Legibility: interfacing the lean and agile manufacturing paradigm in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 62, 107-18.
Nouri Koupaei, M., Mohammadi, M., & Naderi, B. (2016). An integrated enterprise resources planning (ERP) framework for flexible manufacturing systems using business intelligence (BI) tools. International Journal of Supply and Operations Management, 3(1), 1112-1125.
Oliveira-Dias, D., Garcia-Buendia, N., Maqueira-Marín, J. M., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2021). Information technologies and lean and agile supply chain strategies: a bibliometric study through science mapping. International Journal of Business Environment, 12(4), 338-363.
Osareh, F. (1996). Bibliometrics, Citation Analysis and Co-Citation Analysis. Libri, 46(3), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.1996.46.3.149 Pournader, M., Kach, A., & Talluri, S. (2020). A review of the existing and emerging topics in the supply chain risk management lite-rature. Decision Sciences, 51(4), 867-919.
Power, D. J., Sohal, A. S., & Rahman, S. U. (2001). Critical success factors in agile supply chain management-An empirical study. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 31(4), 247-265.
Raji, I. O., Rossi, T., & Strozzi, F. (2021). A dynamic literature review on lean and agile supply chain integration using bibliometric tools. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 40(2), 253-285.
Ramdhani, A., Ramdhani, M. A., & Amin, A. S. (2014). Writing a Literature Review Research Paper: A step-by-step approach. International Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 3(1), 47-56.
Rejeb, A., Simske, S., Rejeb, K., Treiblmaier, H., & Zailani, S. (2020). Internet of Things research in supply chain management and logistics: A bibliometric analysis. Internet of Things, 12, 100318.
Qi, Y., Zhao, X. and Sheu, C. (2011), “The impact of competitive strategy and supply chain strategy on business performance: the role of environmental uncertainty”, Decision Sciences Journal, 42(2), 371-389.
Qrunfleh, S., & Tarafdar, M. (2013). Lean and agile supply chain strategies and supply chain responsiveness: the role of strategic supplier partnership and postponement. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(6), 571-582.
Sedighi, M. (2016). Application of word co-occurrence analysis met-hod in mapping of the scientific fields (case study: the field of Informetrics). Library Review, 66(1/2), 52-64.
Shukor, A. A. A., Newaz, M. S., Rahman, M. K., & Taha, A. Z. (2020). Supply chain integration and its impact on supply chain agility and organizational flexibility in manufacturing firms. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2021.1972949
Small, H. (1973), Co-citation in scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between publications, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24 (4), 265-269.
Srinivasan, M., Srivastava, P., & Iyer, K. N. (2020). Response strategy to environment context factors using a lean and agile approach: Implications for firm performance. European Management Journal, 38(6), 900-913.
Steinman, M. A., Bero, L. A., Chren, M. M., & Landefeld, C. S. (2006). Narrative review: the promotion of gabapentin: an analysis of internal industry documents. Annals of Internal Medicine, 145(4), 284-293.
Tang, O., & Musa, S. N. (2011). Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management. International journal of production economics, 133(1), 25-34.
Tsai, K. M., & Pawar, K. S. (2018). Special issue on next-generation cold supply chain management: research, applications and challenges. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 29(3), 786-791.
Tseng, Y. H., & Lin, C. T. (2011). Enhancing enterprise agility by deploying agile drivers, capabilities and providers. Information Sciences, 181(17), 3693-3708.
Taghipour, A., Hoang, P., & Cao, X. (2020). Just in time/lean purchasing approach: an investigation for research and applications. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 8(2).
Wang, N., Liang, H., Jia, Y., Ge, S., Xue, Y., & Wang, Z. (2016). Cloud computing research in the IS discipline: A citation/co-citation analysis. Decision Support Systems, 86, 35-47.
Yu, Y., Wang, X., Zhong, R. Y., & Huang, G. Q. (2016). E-commerce logistics in supply chain management: Practice perspective. Procedia Cirp, 52, 179-185.
Zekhnini, K., Cherrafi, A., Bouhaddou, I., Chaouni Benabdellah, A., & Bag, S. (2021). A model integrating lean and green practices for viable, sustainable, and digital supply chain performance. International Journal of Production Research, 1-27.
Zhao, X., Huo, B., Flynn, B., &Yeung, J. (2008). The impact of power and relationship commitment on the integration between manufacturers and customers in a supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 26(3), 368-388.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Gülay Ekren ^*
0000-0003-1226-7039
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

19 Aralık 2022

Gönderilme Tarihi

29 Eylül 2022

Kabul Tarihi

15 Kasım 2022

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2022 Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1181826

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA35EH23FT

APA

Ekren, G. (2022). Agile and Lean Supply Chain: Research Trends (2017-2021). Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(2), 357-375. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1181826

AMA

1.Ekren G. Agile and Lean Supply Chain: Research Trends (2017-2021). Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2022;23(2):357-375. doi:10.17494/ogusbd.1181826

Chicago

Ekren, Gülay. 2022. “Agile and Lean Supply Chain: Research Trends (2017-2021)”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 23 (2): 357-75. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1181826.

EndNote

Ekren G (01 Aralık 2022) Agile and Lean Supply Chain: Research Trends (2017-2021). Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 23 2 357–375.

IEEE

[1]G. Ekren, “Agile and Lean Supply Chain: Research Trends (2017-2021)”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 23, sy 2, ss. 357–375, Ara. 2022, doi: 10.17494/ogusbd.1181826.

ISNAD

Ekren, Gülay. “Agile and Lean Supply Chain: Research Trends (2017-2021)”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 23/2 (01 Aralık 2022): 357-375. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1181826.

JAMA

1.Ekren G. Agile and Lean Supply Chain: Research Trends (2017-2021). Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2022;23:357–375.

MLA

Ekren, Gülay. “Agile and Lean Supply Chain: Research Trends (2017-2021)”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 23, sy 2, Aralık 2022, ss. 357-75, doi:10.17494/ogusbd.1181826.

Vancouver

1.Gülay Ekren. Agile and Lean Supply Chain: Research Trends (2017-2021). Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 01 Aralık 2022;23(2):357-75. doi:10.17494/ogusbd.1181826

Cited By

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Knowledge Structure of Reflective Learning in the Health Sciences

Journal of Innovative Healthcare Practices

https://doi.org/10.58770/joinihp.1438416

Çevik ve Yalın Tedarik Zinciri: Araştırma Eğilimleri (2017-2021)

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Agile and Lean Supply Chain: Research Trends (2017-2021)

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster

Cited By

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Knowledge Structure of Reflective Learning in the Health Sciences