Dynamics in the Diffusion and Institutionalization of Site-Based Management Reform in the United States of America

Kubilay Gök; Yücel Sayılar

EN TR

Dynamics in the Diffusion and Institutionalization of Site-Based Management Reform in the United States of America

Öz

This study is examined research question: “How does the diffusion of SBM over time and space resemble the broader social dynamics associated with diffusion of educational policy innovations in particular, and other public policy innovations in general?” Data comes from various secondary data sources. Study generates several conclusions. First, institutional theory helps explain the diffusion of SBM. The analysis provides support for institutional theory that pressures to adopt a “fashionable” practice builds gradually over time. It’s also revealed that when isomorphic pressures are absent in a region, diffusion may be explained by nationwide institutional dynamics. Study points to possible learning effects in the regional diffusion process when mimetic pressures are absent. Finally, surprisingly more liberal states can be less likely to move quickly to adopt some policies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Site-Based, Management, Institutional Theory, Public Policy Diffusion, Event History Analysis, Educatinal Reform

Kaynakça

Allison, Paul (1995). SAS manual on the survival analysis, SAS Publications, CA.
Bacharach, S. B., Masters, W. F., and Mundell, B. (1995). Institutional theory and the politics of institutionalization: Logics of action in school reform. Advances in Research and Theories of School Management and Educational Policy, 3, 83-122.
Balla, S. J. (2001). Interstate professional associations and the diffusion of policy innovations. Ame- rican Politics Research, 29(3), pp.221-245.
Baron, J. N., Dobbin, F.R., and Jennings, P. D. (1986). War and peace: The evolution of modern personnel administration in U.S. industry. American Journal of Sociology.
Baum, L. and Canon, Bradley (1981). Patterns of adoption of tort law innovations: An application of diffusion theory to judicial doctrines. American Political Science Review, 75, 975-987.
Berry, F. S. and Berry, W. D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis, American Political Science Review, 84(2), 395-415.
Berry, F. S. (1994). Sizing up state policy innovation research. Policy Studies Journal, 22(3), 442- 456.
Berry, F. S. and Berry, W. D. (1999). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research, In P.A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theoretical Lenses on Public Policy, Boulder, Co: Westview.169-200.
Berry, F. S. and Berry, W. D. (1992). Tax innovation in the states: Capitalizing on political Opportu- nity, American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 715-742.
Berry, F. S. (1994). Innovation in public management: The adoption of strategic planning, Public Administration Review, 54(4), p.322-330

Bidwell, C. E. (2001). Analyzing schools as organizations: Long-term permanence and short-term change. Sociology of Education Extra Issue, 100-114.
Bloodgood, J. M. & Morrow, J. L. (2000). Strategic organizational change within an institutional framework. Journal of Managerial Issues, 12(2), 208-226.
Bloosfeld, Hans-Peter & Golsch, K., & Rohwer, G. (2007). Techniques of Event History Modeling: New Approaches to Casual Analysis. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Boehmke, F. J. & Witmer, R. (2004). Disentangling diffusion: The effects of social learning and economic competition on state policy innovation and expansion, Political Research Quarterly, 57 (1), 39-51.
Briggs, K. L. & Wohlstetter, p. (2003). Key elements of a successful school-based management strategy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(3), 351-372.
Burns, L. R. and Wholey, D. R. (1993). Adoption and abandonment of Matrix management Prog- rams: Effects of organizational characteristics and inter- organizational Networks. Academy of Management Journal. 36(1), 106-138.
Burstein, P. (1991). Policy Domains: Organization, Culture, and Policy Outcomes, Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 327-350.
Bybee, C. R. & Comadena, M. (1984). Information sources and state legislators: Decision-Making and dependency. Journal Broadcasting, 28(3), 333-340.
Cebon, P. & Love, E.G. (2003). Two lenses on a process: Categorization and conformity during institutionalization. Paper presented at Melbourne Business School.
Chrispeels, J. H., Brown, J. & Castillo, S. (2000). School leadership teams: A process model of team development. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(1), 20-56
Cibulka, J. G. (1995). The institutionalization of public schools: The decline of legitimating myths and the politics of organizational instability. Advances in Research and Theories of School Ma- nagement and Educational Policy, 3, 123-157.
Dacin, M. Tina (1997). Isomorphism in context: The power and prescription of institutional Norms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 46-81.
David, J. L. (1989). Synthesis of research on school based management. Educational Leadership, 46(8), 42-53.
Deal, T. and Wiske, M. (1983). Planning, plotting, and playing in education's era of decline. In J. V. Baldridge and T. Deal (Eds.) The dynamic of change in education. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing.
Dimaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited. Institutional isomorphism, and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
Doyle, W. R. (2006). Adoption of merit-based student grant programs: An event history analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(3), 259-285.
Edelman, Lauren B. (1990). Legal environments and organizational governance: The expansion of due process in the American work place. American Journal of Sociology, 95 (6), 1401-1440.
Edelman, Lauren B. (1992). Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: organizational mediation of civil rights. American Journal of Sociology, 97(6), 1531-1576.
Fligstein, Neil (1985). The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919-1979. Ameri- can Sociological Review, 50(3), 377-391.
Galaskiewicz, J. (1985). Professional networks and the institutionalization of a single mind set. American Sociological Review, 50 (10), pp.639-658.
Goldring, E. B. (1995). School restructuring: Responding to external environments. Advances in Research and Theories of School Management and Educational Policy, 3, 43-67.
Granovetter, M. (1981). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological The- ory, Chapter 7, pp.200-233.
Grattet, R., Jenness, V., and Cury, T. R. (1998). The homogenization and differentiation of hate crime law in the United States: 1978-1995: Innovation and diffusion in the criminilization of bigotry. American Sociological Review, 63, 286-307.
Grossback, L.J., Nicholson-Crotty, S. & Peterson, D. A. M. (2004). Ideology and learning in policy diffusion. American Politics Research, 32(5), 521-545.
Greenwood, R.,Suddaby, R. & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Jour- nal, 45(1), 58-80.
Guler, I., Guillen M. & MacPherson, J.M. (2002). Global Competition, Institutions, and the Diffu- sion of Organizational Practices: The International Spread of the ISO 9000 Quality Certificates, Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 207-232.
Guthrie, J. W. (1986). School based management: The next needed education reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 68(4), 305-309.
Hannan, Michael T. and Freeman, John H. (1989). Organizational Ecology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.
Hays, S. P. & Glick, H. R. (1997). The role of agenda setting in policy innovation: An event history analysis of living-will laws. American Politics Quarterly, 25(4),497-516.
Hess, F. M. (1999). A Political explanation of policy selection: The case of urban school Reform. Policy Studies Journal, 27(3), 459-473.
Jensen, J. L. (2003). Policy diffusion through institutional legitimation: State lotteries. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13 (4), 521-541.
Kanter, R. M. (1979). Power failure in management circuits. Harvard Business Review, Jully- August.
Katz, E. (1999). Theorizing diffusion: Tarde and Sorokin revisited. The Annals of the American Aca- demy, 566, 144-155.
Kelly, E. &Dobbin, F. (1999). Civil rights law at work: Sex discrimination and the rise of maternity leave policies. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 455-92.
Knoke, David (1982). The spread of municipal reform: Temporal, spatial, and social dynamics. American Journal of Sociology, 87(6), 1314-1339.
Lounsbury, M. (2001). Institutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and university recycling programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 29-56.
March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (1983). The New institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. The American Political Science Review, 78.pp.734.
McLendon, M. K., Hearn, J. C. & Deaton, R. (2006). Called to account: Analyzing the origins and spread of state performance-accountability policies for higher education. Educational Evalua- tion and Policy Analysis, 28(1), 1-24.
McLendon, M. K., Heller, D. E. & Young, S. P. (2005). State postsecondary policy innovation: Poli- tics, competition, and the interstate migration of policy ideas. The Journal of Higher Education. 76(4), 363-400.
Meyer, J. M. and Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
Mintrom, Michael (1997). Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 738-770.
Mintrom, Michael (1997). The State-local nexus in policy innovation diffusion: The case of school choice. The Journal of Federalism, 27(3), 41-59.
Mintrom, M, & Vergari, S. (1998). Policy networks and innovation diffusion: The case of state education reforms. The Journal of Politics, 60(1), 126-48.
Mooney, C. Z. (2001). Modeling regional effects on state policy diffusion. Political Research Quar- terly, 54(1), 103-124.
Murphy, J. (1990). The Educational Reform Movementof the 1980s. McCutchan Publishing Corpo- ration. Berkeley, California.
Nisbet, M. C. & Huge, M. (2006). Attention cycles and frames in the plant biotechnology debate: Managing power and participation through the press/ policy connection. The Harvard Inter- national Journal of Press/Politics, 11/3, 3-40.
Ogawa, R. T. (1993). The Institutional sources of educational reform: The case of school-based management. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 519-548.
Palmer, D. A., Jennings, P. D., and Zhou, X. (1993). Late adoption of the multidivisional form by large U.S. corporations: Institutional, political, and economic accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 100-131.
Paris, D. (1994). Schools, scapegoats, and skills: Educational reform and the economy. Policy Stu- dies Journal, 22(1), 1-13.
Powell, W. W. (2007). The new institutionalism. The International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies, Sage Publishers.
Renzulli, L. A, & Roscigno, V. J. (2005). Charter school policy, implementation, and diffusion across the United States, Sociology of Education, 78(10), 344-366.
Riffe, D. (1990). Media roles and legislators’ news media use. Journalism Quarterly, 67(2), 323-329.
Robertson, M., Swan, J. & Newell, S. (1996). The role of networks in the diffusion of technological innovation. Journal of Management Studies, 33(3), 333-359.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
Rowan, B. (1995). Institutional analysis of educational organizations: Lines of theory and directions for research, Advances in Research and Theories of School Management and Educational Po- licy, 3, 1-20.
Roy, C. & Sequin, F. (2000). The Institutionalization of efficiency- oriented approaches for public service improvement. Public Productivity& Management Review, 23(4), 449-468.
Savage, Robert L. (1978). Policy innovativeness as a trait of American states. The Journal of Politics, 40(1), 212-224.
Schneiberg, M. & Lounsbury, M. (2007). Social movements and institutional analysis. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, Chapter 27, pp.648-670.
Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organizations. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Shih, T., Wijaya, R., & Brossard, D. (2008). Media coverage of public health epidemics: Linking framing and issue attention cycle toward an integrated theory of print news coverage of epi- demics. Mass Communication &Society, 11:141-160.
Singer, J. D. & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling change andevent occurrence. Oxford University Express.
Soule, S. A. & Earl, J. (2001). The enactment of state-level hate crime law in the United States: Intrastate and Interstate factors. Sociological Perspectives, 44(3), 281-305.
Spell, C. S. & Blum, T. C. (2005). Adoption of workplace substance abuse prevention programs: Strategic choice and institutional perspectives. Academy of Management Journal. 48(6), 1125- 1142.
Strang, D. & Meyer, J. (1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society. 22,pp.487- 511.
Strang, D. and Soule, Sarah A. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 265-290.
Swan, J. A. & Newell, S. (1995). The role of professional associations in technology diffusion. Or- ganizational Studies, 16/5, 847-874.
Thornton, P. H. & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, Chapter 3, pp.99-129.
Tolbert, P. and Zucker, L. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organi- zations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 22-39.
Tolbert, P. and Zucker, L. (1996). The institutionalization of institutional theory. Handbook of Or- ganizational Studies, pp, 175-190.
Tuma, N. (1980).When Can Interdependence in a Dynamic System of Qualitative Variables Be Ignored?, Sociological Methodology, 11, 358-391.
Tuttle, B. & Dillard, J. (2007). Beyond competition: Institutional isomorphism in U.S. accounting research. Accounting Horizons, 21(4), 387-409.
Tyack, D. (1990). Restructuring in historical perspective: Tinkering toward utopia. Teachers College Record, 92, 170-191.
Volden, C. (2006). States as policy laboratories: Emulating success in the children’s health insuran- ce program. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 294-312.
Walker, Jack L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American States. The American Political Science Review, 63, 880-899.
Wejnert, B. (2002). Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: A conceptual framework. The Annual Review of Sociology, 28:297-326.
Westphal, J. D., Gulati, R. & Shortell, S. M. (1997). Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 366-394.
Wirt, F. (1978).School Policy Culture and State Decentralization, Policy Studies Review Annual, 2, 458-481.
Wiske, M. S. (1983). Collaboration among School Districts, Harvard University, ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing.
Wong, K, & Shen, F. X. (2002). Politics of state-led reform in education: Market competition and electoral dynamics. Educational Policy, 16(1), 161-192.
Wright, G. C.; Erikson, R. S.; and Mciver, J. P. (1985). Measuring state partisanship and ideology with survey data. The Journal of Politics, 47(2), 469-489.
Yanovitzky, I. (2002). Effects of news coverage on policy attention and actions. Communication Research, 29(4), 422-451.
Zhou, X. (1993). Occupational power, state capacities, and the diffusion of licensing in the Ameri- can states: 1890 to 1950. American Sociological Review, 58(8): 536-552.
Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443-64.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Kubilay Gök Bu kişi benim

Yücel Sayılar Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Mart 2013

Gönderilme Tarihi

12 Aralık 2014

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2013 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA49YY84LK

APA

Gök, K., & Sayılar, Y. (2013). Dynamics in the Diffusion and Institutionalization of Site-Based Management Reform in the United States of America. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(1), 21-47. https://izlik.org/JA49YY84LK

AMA

1.Gök K, Sayılar Y. Dynamics in the Diffusion and Institutionalization of Site-Based Management Reform in the United States of America. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2013;14(1):21-47. https://izlik.org/JA49YY84LK

Chicago

Gök, Kubilay, ve Yücel Sayılar. 2013. “Dynamics in the Diffusion and Institutionalization of Site-Based Management Reform in the United States of America”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 14 (1): 21-47. https://izlik.org/JA49YY84LK.

EndNote

Gök K, Sayılar Y (01 Mart 2013) Dynamics in the Diffusion and Institutionalization of Site-Based Management Reform in the United States of America. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 14 1 21–47.

IEEE

[1]K. Gök ve Y. Sayılar, “Dynamics in the Diffusion and Institutionalization of Site-Based Management Reform in the United States of America”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 14, sy 1, ss. 21–47, Mar. 2013, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA49YY84LK

ISNAD

Gök, Kubilay - Sayılar, Yücel. “Dynamics in the Diffusion and Institutionalization of Site-Based Management Reform in the United States of America”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 14/1 (01 Mart 2013): 21-47. https://izlik.org/JA49YY84LK.

JAMA

1.Gök K, Sayılar Y. Dynamics in the Diffusion and Institutionalization of Site-Based Management Reform in the United States of America. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2013;14:21–47.

MLA

Gök, Kubilay, ve Yücel Sayılar. “Dynamics in the Diffusion and Institutionalization of Site-Based Management Reform in the United States of America”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 14, sy 1, Mart 2013, ss. 21-47, https://izlik.org/JA49YY84LK.

Vancouver

1.Kubilay Gök, Yücel Sayılar. Dynamics in the Diffusion and Institutionalization of Site-Based Management Reform in the United States of America. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi [Internet]. 01 Mart 2013;14(1):21-47. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA49YY84LK

Dynamics in the Diffusion and Institutionalization of Site-Based Management Reform in the United States of America

Dynamics in the Diffusion and Institutionalization of Site-Based Management Reform in the United States of America

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nde Eğitim Sisteminde Yerelleşme Reformunun Yayılım ve Kurumsallaşma Dinamikleri

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

IZ

Kaynak Göster