The Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Project Planning Processes: Student Perspectives and Experiences

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1, 501 - 532, 17.03.2026

Ebru Polat

https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1754914

https://izlik.org/JA86LP96KA

Öz

This study aims to examine university students' perspectives and experiences with the use of various generative artificial intelligence tools during the project development and project planning process Designed using a qualitative research methodology, the study was conducted with 24 university students. A six-module training program based on the constructivist learning approach was implemented as part of the study. Following each module, semi-structured interviews were conducted. Findings indicate that participants effectively utilized generative AI tools at various stages of project development, including idea generation, method formulation, literature review, risk analysis, and text editing. These tools were found to foster original thinking, enhance time efficiency, and contribute creatively to the process. However, students also highlighted the importance of critically engaging with AI, ensuring ethical use, and maintaining human-AI collaboration.

Anahtar Kelimeler

project planning , generative artificial intelligence , constructivist approach

Proje Planı Hazırlama Sürecinde Üretken Yapay Zekâ Araçlarının Kullanımı: Öğrenci Görüşleri ve Deneyimleri

https://izlik.org/JA86LP96KA

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı üniversite öğrencilerinin proje geliştirme ve proje planı hazırlama sürecinde farklı üretken yapay zekâ araçlarını kullanımına yönelik görüşlerinin ve deneyimlerinin incelenmesidir. Nitel araştırma yöntemine göre tasarlanan çalışma, 24 üniversite öğrencisiyle gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında yapılandırmacı yaklaşım temel alınarak altı modülden oluşan bir eğitim süreci gerçekleştirilmiştir. Her modül sonrası yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda katılımcılar üretken yapay zekâ araçlarını proje hazırlama sürecinin fikir geliştirme, yöntem belirleme, literatür tarama, risk analizi ve metin düzenleme gibi pek çok aşamasında etkin şekilde kullanmıştır. Araçların özgün düşünmeyi teşvik ettiği, zaman kazandırdığı ve yaratıcı katkılar sunduğu görülmüştür. Bununla birlikte öğrenciler, yapay zekâya eleştirel yaklaşmanın, etik kullanımın ve insan-yapay zekâ iş birliğinin önemini vurgulamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

proje planı , üretken yapay zekâ , yapılandırmacı yaklaşım

Kaynakça

• Afzal, F., & Tumpa, R. J. (2025). Project-based group work for enhancing students learning in project management education: an action research. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 18(1), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-06-2024-0150
• Amri, S., & Salmiati, S. (2024). Exploring EFL Learners' Writing Introduction of Research Proposal: Difficulties and Solutions. EJI (English Journal of Indragiri): Studies in Education, Literature, and Linguistics, 8(2), 460-475. https://doi.org/10.61672/eji.v8i2.2822
• Bada, S. O., & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66-70.
• Bainey, K. (2024). AI-driven project management: Harnessing the power of artificial intelligence and ChatGPT to achieve peak productivity and success. John Wiley & Sons.
• Barbalho, S. C. M., Reis, A. C. B., Bitencourt, J. A., Leão, M. C. L. D. A., & Silva, G. L. D. (2017). A Project Based Learning approach for Production Planning and Control: analysis of 45 projects developed by students. Production, 27(spe), e20162259. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.225916
• Barcaui, A., & Monat, A. (2023). Who is better in project planning? Generative artificial intelligence or project managers?. Project Leadership and Society, 4, 100101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2023.100101
• Baskara, F. R. (2024). Generative AI as an Enabler of Sustainable Education: Theoretical Perspectives and Future Directions. British Journal of Teacher Education and Pedagogy, 3(3), 122-134. https://doi.org/10.32996/bjtep.2024.3.3.9
• Bhattacharjee, J. (2015). Constructivist approach to learning–an effective approach of teaching learning. International Research Journal of Interdisciplinary & Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(4), 23-28.
• Bijańska, J., & Wodarski, K. (2024). Use of chatgpt-4 to set the project's reserve budget. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization & Management/Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Slaskiej. Seria Organizacji i Zarzadzanie, (212). https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2024.212.2
• Borger, J. G., Ng, A. P., Anderton, H., Ashdown, G. W., Auld, M., Blewitt, M. E., ... & Naik, S. H. (2023). Artificial intelligence takes center stage: exploring the capabilities and implications of ChatGPT and other AI‐assisted technologies in scientific research and education. Immunology and Cell Biology, 101(10), 923-935. https://doi.org/10.1111/imcb.12689
• Boudreau, P. (2024). Applying artificial intelligence in project management. Stylus Publishing, LLC. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501519307
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
• Chapin, P. G. (2004). Research projects & research proposals. Cambridge.
• Chen, H. T. (2005). Practical program evaluation: Assessing and improving planning, implementation, and effectiveness. Sage Publications.
• Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
• Chen, M. S., Hsu, T. P., & Hsu, T. C. (2024, July). GAI-Assisted Personal Discussion Process Analysis. In International Conference on Innovative Technologies and Learning (pp. 194-204). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65884-6_20
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education (5th ed.). Routledge.
• Corvello, V. (2025). Generative AI and the future of innovation management: A human centered perspective and an agenda for future research. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 11(1), 100456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100456
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
• Cuthbert, K. (1995). Project planning and the promotion of self-regulated learning: From theory to practice. Studies in Higher Education, 20(3), 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079512331381545
• Davahli, M. R. (2020). The last state of artificial intelligence in project management. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.12262.
• DeLisi, J., Liu, E., & Fields, E. (2025). Implementing Project-Based Learning in Urban High School STEM Career Pathways. Urban Education, 60(5), 1361-1384. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859231214174
• DiCicco‐Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x
• Felicetti, A. M., Cimino, A., Mazzoleni, A., & Ammirato, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence and project management: An empirical investigation on the appropriation of generative Chatbots by project managers. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(3), 100545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100545
• Fostikov, A. (2023). First impressions on using AI powered chatbots, tools and search engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity and other-possibilities and usage. Pregled Nacionalnog Centra za Digitalizaciju, 42, 1-11.
• Girard, N., Cardona, A., & Fiorelli, C. (2024). Learning how to develop a research question throughout the PhD process: training challenges, objectives, and scaffolds drawn from doctoral programs for students and their supervisors. Higher Education, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01258-2
• Gisbert, J. P., & Chaparro, M. (2021). How to prepare a research proposal in the health science?. Gastroenterología y Hepatología (English Edition), 44(10), 730-740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastre.2020.07.028