Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Gelenekten Estetikleştirmeye: Instagram’da Türkiye Aile İmgeleri ve Kültürel Kodlar

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 26 Sayı: Özel Sayı, 1834 - 1858, 30.12.2025

Öz

Aile, toplumsal yapının temel kurumu olarak kimlik inşası, sosyalizasyon ve kültürel aktarımda merkezi bir rol üstlenirken, dijitalleşme bu temsilleri dönüştürerek yeni ifade biçimleri yaratmaktadır. Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de #bayramsofrası, #annelergünü ve #babalargünü etiketleriyle paylaşılan 500 herkese açık Instagram gönderisini içerik analiziyle incelemektedir. Bulgular, üç ana temayı ortaya koymaktadır: geleneksel aile yapılarının görsel performansı, nostaljinin dijital estetikleşmesi ve illüstratif duygusal babalık. Instagram, hem geleneğin yeniden üretildiği hem de platforma özgü estetik ve algoritmik mantıklarla yeniden uyarlandığı hibrit bir kültürel alan olarak işlev görmektedir. Çalışma, toplumsal cinsiyet rolleri, kültürel kodlar ve duygusal hafızanın sosyal medyada nasıl performatif biçimde sergilendiğini ve yeniden yorumlandığını ortaya koyarak aileyi anlamaya yönelik güncel bir dijital medya perspektifi sunmaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Abidin, C. (2016). “Aren’t these just young, rich women doing vain things online?”: Influencer selfies as subversive frivolity. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 2056305116641342. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641342
  • Abidin, C. (2017). #familygoals: Family influencers, calibrated amateurism, and justifying young digital labor. Social Media + Society, 3(2), 2056305117707191. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117707191
  • Ahmed, S. (2013). The cultural politics of emotion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203700372
  • Aktaş, G. (2019). Günümüz toplumlarında anneliğin değişen biçimlerini sosyal medya kullanıcıları üzerinden değerlendirmek. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 36(2), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.32600/huefd.441402
  • Assmann, J., & Czaplicka, J. (1995). Collective memory and cultural identity. New German Critique, (65), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.2307/488538
  • Bakhshi, S., Shamma, D. A., & Gilbert, E. (2014, April). Faces engage us: Photos with faces attract more likes and comments on Instagram. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 965–974).
  • Barış, Ö., & Yeşilyurt, S. (2025). Sosyal medyada ailelerin medyatikleşmesi: Popüler aileler örneği. TRT Akademi, 10(24), 624–651. https://doi.org/10.37679/trta.1666392
  • Barnwell, A., Neves, B. B., & Ravn, S. (2023). Captured and captioned: Representing family life on Instagram. New Media & Society, 25(5), 921–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211012791
  • Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Bazin, A. (1967). What is cinema? (H. Gray, Trans.). University of California Press.
  • Berger, P., & Kellner, H. (1964). Marriage and the construction of reality: An exercise in the microsociology of knowledge. Diogenes, 12(46), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/039219216401204601
  • Boym, S. (2008). The future of nostalgia. Basic Books.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018). The affordances of social media platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 233–253). SAGE.
  • Cabalquinto, E. C. (2020). ‘They could picture me, or I could picture them’: ‘Displaying’ family life beyond borders through mobile photography. Information, Communication & Society, 23(11), 1608–1624. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1602663
  • Chae, J. (2015). “Am I a better mother than you?” Media and 21st-century motherhood in the context of social comparison theory. Communication Research, 42(4), 503–525.
  • Chalfen, R. (1987). Snapshot versions of life. University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Costa, E. (2016). Social media in southeast Turkey. UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781910634547
  • Couldry, N. (2008). Mediatization or mediation? New Media & Society, 10(3), 373–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808089414
  • Damkjaer, M. S. (2018). Sharenting = good parenting?: Four parental approaches to sharenting on Facebook.
  • DataReportal. (2025). Digital 2025: Global overview report. https://datareportal.com/social-media-users
  • Dobson, A. S., Carah, N., & Robards, B. (2018). Digital intimate publics and social media. In Digital intimate publics and social media (pp. 3–27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97607-5_1
  • Duck, S. (1990). Relationships as unfinished business. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407590071001
  • Erll, A. (2011). Memory and culture. In Memory in culture (pp. 95–112). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230321670_4
  • Finch, J. (2007). Displaying families. Sociology, 41(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507072284
  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
  • Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory (L. A. Coser, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.

From Tradition to Aestheticization: Family Imagery and Cultural Codes on Instagram in Türkiye

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 26 Sayı: Özel Sayı, 1834 - 1858, 30.12.2025

Öz

As a foundational social institution, the family plays a central role in identity formation, socialisation, and cultural transmission, while digitalisation transforms these representations and generates new modes of expression. This study analyses 500 public Instagram posts from Türkiye on Eid feasts, Mother’s Day and Father’s Day. Findings reveal three key themes: the visual performance of traditional family structures, the digital aestheticization of nostalgia, and illustrated emotional fatherhood. Instagram emerges as a hybrid cultural arena where tradition is both reproduced and adapted within platform-specific aesthetic and algorithmic logics. By examining how gender roles, cultural codes, and emotional memory are performed and reinterpreted online, the study offers a contemporary digital media perspective for understanding the family in a changing sociocultural context.

Kaynakça

  • Abidin, C. (2016). “Aren’t these just young, rich women doing vain things online?”: Influencer selfies as subversive frivolity. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 2056305116641342. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641342
  • Abidin, C. (2017). #familygoals: Family influencers, calibrated amateurism, and justifying young digital labor. Social Media + Society, 3(2), 2056305117707191. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117707191
  • Ahmed, S. (2013). The cultural politics of emotion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203700372
  • Aktaş, G. (2019). Günümüz toplumlarında anneliğin değişen biçimlerini sosyal medya kullanıcıları üzerinden değerlendirmek. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 36(2), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.32600/huefd.441402
  • Assmann, J., & Czaplicka, J. (1995). Collective memory and cultural identity. New German Critique, (65), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.2307/488538
  • Bakhshi, S., Shamma, D. A., & Gilbert, E. (2014, April). Faces engage us: Photos with faces attract more likes and comments on Instagram. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 965–974).
  • Barış, Ö., & Yeşilyurt, S. (2025). Sosyal medyada ailelerin medyatikleşmesi: Popüler aileler örneği. TRT Akademi, 10(24), 624–651. https://doi.org/10.37679/trta.1666392
  • Barnwell, A., Neves, B. B., & Ravn, S. (2023). Captured and captioned: Representing family life on Instagram. New Media & Society, 25(5), 921–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211012791
  • Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Bazin, A. (1967). What is cinema? (H. Gray, Trans.). University of California Press.
  • Berger, P., & Kellner, H. (1964). Marriage and the construction of reality: An exercise in the microsociology of knowledge. Diogenes, 12(46), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/039219216401204601
  • Boym, S. (2008). The future of nostalgia. Basic Books.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018). The affordances of social media platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 233–253). SAGE.
  • Cabalquinto, E. C. (2020). ‘They could picture me, or I could picture them’: ‘Displaying’ family life beyond borders through mobile photography. Information, Communication & Society, 23(11), 1608–1624. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1602663
  • Chae, J. (2015). “Am I a better mother than you?” Media and 21st-century motherhood in the context of social comparison theory. Communication Research, 42(4), 503–525.
  • Chalfen, R. (1987). Snapshot versions of life. University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Costa, E. (2016). Social media in southeast Turkey. UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781910634547
  • Couldry, N. (2008). Mediatization or mediation? New Media & Society, 10(3), 373–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808089414
  • Damkjaer, M. S. (2018). Sharenting = good parenting?: Four parental approaches to sharenting on Facebook.
  • DataReportal. (2025). Digital 2025: Global overview report. https://datareportal.com/social-media-users
  • Dobson, A. S., Carah, N., & Robards, B. (2018). Digital intimate publics and social media. In Digital intimate publics and social media (pp. 3–27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97607-5_1
  • Duck, S. (1990). Relationships as unfinished business. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407590071001
  • Erll, A. (2011). Memory and culture. In Memory in culture (pp. 95–112). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230321670_4
  • Finch, J. (2007). Displaying families. Sociology, 41(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507072284
  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
  • Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory (L. A. Coser, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
Toplam 27 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Gazetecilik Çalışmaları, İletişim Çalışmaları, İletişim ve Medya Çalışmaları (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Semra Demirdiş 0000-0003-1929-614X

Gönderilme Tarihi 13 Ağustos 2025
Kabul Tarihi 4 Kasım 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Aralık 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 26 Sayı: Özel Sayı

Kaynak Göster

APA Demirdiş, S. (2025). From Tradition to Aestheticization: Family Imagery and Cultural Codes on Instagram in Türkiye. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 26(Özel Sayı), 1834-1858.
AMA Demirdiş S. From Tradition to Aestheticization: Family Imagery and Cultural Codes on Instagram in Türkiye. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. Aralık 2025;26(Özel Sayı):1834-1858.
Chicago Demirdiş, Semra. “From Tradition to Aestheticization: Family Imagery and Cultural Codes on Instagram in Türkiye”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 26, sy. Özel Sayı (Aralık 2025): 1834-58.
EndNote Demirdiş S (01 Aralık 2025) From Tradition to Aestheticization: Family Imagery and Cultural Codes on Instagram in Türkiye. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 26 Özel Sayı 1834–1858.
IEEE S. Demirdiş, “From Tradition to Aestheticization: Family Imagery and Cultural Codes on Instagram in Türkiye”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 26, sy. Özel Sayı, ss. 1834–1858, 2025.
ISNAD Demirdiş, Semra. “From Tradition to Aestheticization: Family Imagery and Cultural Codes on Instagram in Türkiye”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 26/Özel Sayı (Aralık2025), 1834-1858.
JAMA Demirdiş S. From Tradition to Aestheticization: Family Imagery and Cultural Codes on Instagram in Türkiye. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2025;26:1834–1858.
MLA Demirdiş, Semra. “From Tradition to Aestheticization: Family Imagery and Cultural Codes on Instagram in Türkiye”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 26, sy. Özel Sayı, 2025, ss. 1834-58.
Vancouver Demirdiş S. From Tradition to Aestheticization: Family Imagery and Cultural Codes on Instagram in Türkiye. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2025;26(Özel Sayı):1834-58.