Negatif ve pozitif etkilerin üniversite öğrencilerinin eğilimsel iyimserliği ve yaşam memnuniyeti arasındaki ilişkisi üzerine etkileri

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3, 550 - 562, 31.07.2022

Can Mavruk

Öz

Bu çalışma, 855 Çukurova Üniversitesi öğrenci anketine dayanarak pozitif ve negatif etkilerin, eğilimsel iyimserlikile yaşam memnuniyeti arasındaki ilişkiye aracılık edip etmediğini ve moderatör olup olmadıklarını araştırmaktadır. Bu amaçla, pozitif ve negatif etkilerin dolaylı ve etkileşim etkilerinin anlamlılığı hesaplanmıştır. Parametrik olmayan Spearman korelasyon analizi, eğilimsel iyimserliğin ve duygulanımların yaşam memnuniyeti ile anlamlı bir ilişkiye sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Pozitif ve negatif etkilerin potansiyel aracı ve moderatör olup olmadığını belirlemek için hiyerarşik regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Eğilimsel iyimserlik ile yaşam memnuniyeti ilişkisini pozitif ve negatif etki bileşenleri üzerinden gösteren yapısal bir model tahmin edilmiştir. Etkilerin aracılık rolünü incelemek için eğilimsel iyimserliğin dolaylı etkilerinin anlamlılığı test edilmiştir. Hiyerarşik regresyon analizi sonuçları, pozitif ve negatif etkilerin iyimserliğin üstünde ve ötesinde yaşam memnuniyetini anlamlı bir şekilde yordadığını göstermiştir (F(2,851)=76.21, ∆R2=.120, p<.001). Maksimum olabilirlik tahmin sonuçları, iyimserliğin dolaylı etkisinin pozitif ve negatif etkiler yoluyla anlamlı olduğunu göstermiştir. Yani, pozitif ve negatif etkilerin iyimserlik ve yaşam memnuniyeti arasında anlamlı (z=11.12, p<.001) bir aracı rolü olduğunu göstermektedir. Hiyerarşik regresyon analizi, bu arabuluculuğun kısmi olduğunu ve ayrıca PA'nın moderatör olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Marginal analiz, özellikle orta derecede alert ve hevesli olmanın moderatör olduklarını göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

yaşam memnuniyeti, iyimserlik, duygulanım, yapısal denklemler, yükseköğretim

The effects of affectivites over the relationship of dispositional optimism with life satisfaction of university students

Öz

This study investigates whether positive and negative affects (affectivities) mediate and moderate the relationship between dispositional optimism and life satisfaction based on a survey of 855 Çukurova University students. For this purpose, the significance of indirect and interaction effects of positive and negative affects are estimated. Nonparametric Spearman correlation analysis showed significant correlations between optimism,affects and life satisfaction. Hierarchical regression analysis is performed to determine whether the affect is potential mediator and moderator variable. A structural model which shows the life satisfaction relationship with optimism through components of positive and negative affects estimated. The significance of the indirect effects of optimismistested to examine the mediating role of the affects. Hierarchical regression analysis results showed that the affects significantly predicted life satisfaction above and beyond optimism(F(2,851)=76.21, ∆R2=.120, p<.001). The maximum likelihood estimation results indicated significance of indirect effect of optimismvia affects. That is, the affects significantly mediated optimism(z=11.12, p<.001) over life satisfaction. Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that the mediation was partial and that PA was a moderator. Marginal analysis further showed that particularly being moderately alert and being moderately enthusiastic were moderators.

Kaynakça

• Bayrami, M., Abada, T. H. N., Ghoradela, J. A., Daneshfara, S., Heshmatib, R., & Moslemifaret, M. (2012). The role of positive and negative affectivity, optimism, pessimism and information processing styles in student psychological adjustment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 306-310.
• Bienvenu, O. J., & Stein, M. B. (2003). Personality and anxiety disorders: A review. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17, 139–151.
• Chang, E. C., Sanna, L. J., & Yang, K. (2003). Optimism, pessimism, affectivity, and psychological adjustment in US and Korea: a test of a mediation model. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(7), 1195-1208.
• Chang, E. C., & Sanna, L. J. (2001). Optimism, pessimism, and positive and negative affectivity in middle-aged adults: A test of a cognitive-affective model of psychological adjustment. Psychology and Aging, 16(3), 524–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.16.3.524
• Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
• Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.
• Daukantaité, D., & Zukauskiene, R. (2012). Optimism and Subjective Well-Being: Affectivity Plays a Secondary Role in the Relationship Between Optimism and Global Life Satisfaction in the Middle-Aged Women. Longitudinal and Cross-Cultural Findings. J Happiness Stud, 13, 1-16.
• Duy, B., & Yıldız, M. A. (2019). The Mediating Role of Self-Esteem in the Relationship Between Optimism and Subjective Well-Being. Current Psychology, 38, 1456-1463.
• Ferguson, S. J., & Goodwin, A.D. (2010). Optimism and Well-Being in Older Adults: The Mediating Role of Social Support and Perceived Control. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 71(1), 43-68.
• Fujita, F., Diener, E., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: The case for emotional intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 427–434.
• Ho, M. Y., Cheung, F. M., & Cheung, S. F. (2008). Personality and life events as predictors of adolescents’ life satisfaction: Do life events mediate the link between personality and life satisfaction? Soc Indic Res, 89, 457–471.
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.
• Jiang, W., Li, F., Jiang, H., Yu, L., Liu, W., Li, Q., & Zuo, L. (2014). Core self-evaluations mediate the associations of dispositional optimism and life satisfaction. PLOS ONE, 9(6): e97752.
• Joshanloo, M., & Afshari, S. (2011). Big five personality traits and self-esteem as predictors of life satisfaction in Iranian Muslim University students. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 105-113.
• Kapikiran, N. A. (2012). Positive and Negative Affectivity as Mediator and Moderator of the Relationship between Optimism and Life Satisfaction in Turkish University Students, Soc Indic Res, 106, 333–345.
• Leung B.W.-C., Moneta, G. B., & McBride-Chang, C. (2005). Think Positively and Feel Positively: Optimism and Life Satisfaction in Late Life. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 61(4), 335-365. doi:10.2190/FQTB-EBAJ-H9WP-LMYA
• Oriol X., Miranda R., Bazán C., & Benavente E. (2020). Distinct Routes to Understand the Relationship Between Dispositional Optimism and Life Satisfaction: Self-Control and Grit, Positive Affect, Gratitude, and Meaning in Life. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(907), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00907
• Rezaei, A., & Khosroshahi, B. J. (2018). Optimism, Social Intelligence and Positive Affect as Predictors of University Students’ Life Satisfaction. European Journal of Mental Health, 2, 150-162.
• Shi, D., Lee, T., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2019). Understanding the model size effect on SEM fit indices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79(2), 310–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164418783530
• Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, Coping, and Health: Assessment and Implications of Generalized Outcome Expectancies. Health Psychology, 4(3), 219-247.
• Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self mastery and self esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1063-1078.
• Uğurlu, O. (2013). The Mediator effects of Positive and Negative Affectivity on the Relationship between Optimism-Pessimism and Satisfaction with Life. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28, 497-504.
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063.
• Xavier, O., Miranda, R., Bazán., C., & Benavente, E. (2020). Distinct Routes to Understand the Relationship Between Dispositional Optimism and Life Satisfaction: Self-Control and Grit, Positive Affect, Gratitude, and Meaning in Life. Front. Psychol., 11, 907.doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00907.
• Xia, Y., & Yang, Y. (2019). RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 409–428. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2.
• Zhang, J., Miao, D., Sun, Y., Xiao, R., Ren, L., Xiao, W., Peng, J. (2014). The Impacts of Attributional Styles and Dispositional Optimism on Subject Well-Being: A Structural Equation Modelling Analysis. Soc Indic Res., 119, 757–769.DOI 10.1007/s11205-013-0520-7.