Kompaksiyon Yönteminin Farklı Tip Geri Dönüştürülmüş Agregalar Üzerindeki Etkilerinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Son yıllarda inşaat ve yıkıntı atıklarının dönüştürülerek tekrar kullanılması, çevresel kaygılar ve ekonomik sebeplerden dolayı artarak önem kazanmıştır. Bu çalışmada farklı inşaat ve yıkıntı atıklarından dolgu inşa edebilmek için sıkıştırılmasında kompaksiyon yönteminin etkisi araştırılmıştır. Bu doğrultuda önce beş farklı yıkıntı atığı dönüştürülerek granüler dolgu malzemesi haline getirilmiş ve su emme gibi fiziksel özellikleri belirlenmiştir. Daha sonra bu atık agregalar üzerinde ayrı ayrı düşen tokmak ve titreşimli tokmak kullanarak kompaksiyon deneyleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ayrıca kompaksiyon deneyleri öncesi ve sonrası elek analizleri ile danelerin kompaksiyon yöntemine göre parçalanma durumları araştırılmıştır. Bu deneyler atık agregaları kıyaslama amacı ile bir çeşit doğal agrega üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Çalışma sonucunda atık agregaların su emmelerinin limit değerlerden yüksek olduğu ve tuğla bazlı atık agregaların su emme değerlerini daha da yükselttiği görülmüştür. Ayrıca atık agregaların titreşimli tokmaklarla sıkıştırılmasının danelerin parçalanmasını azaltacağından faydalı olacağı öne sürülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İnşaat ve yıkıntı atıkları
• Kompaksiyon yöntemi
• Atık agregalar
• Sürdürülebilirlik
• Geri dönüşüm
• Dolgular
• Construction and demolition wastes
• Compaction method
• Waste aggregates
• Sustainability
• Recycling

The Investigation of the Effects of Compaction Method on Different Types of Recycled Aggregates

Öz

In recent years, the recycling and reuse of construction and demolition wastes have become increasingly important due to environmental concerns and economic reasons. In this study, the effect of the compaction method on the compaction of different construction and demolition wastes in order to build a filling was investigated. Accordingly, firstly, five different debris wastes were converted into granular filling material and their physical properties such as water absorption were determined by laboratory tests. After that, compaction tests were carried out on these waste aggregates using separately falling hammers and vibrating hammers. Besides, sieve analyzes were conducted before and after the compaction tests, and so the disintegration of the particles according to the compaction method was investigated. These tests were performed on a type of natural aggregate to compare waste aggregates. As a result of the study, it was observed that the water absorption values of the waste aggregates were greater than the limit values, and also the brick-based waste aggregates were caused to more increase water absorption value. It was also put forward due to the fact that compacting the waste aggregates with vibratory rammers will be beneficial as it will reduce the degradation of the particles.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Construction and demolition wastes
• Compaction method
• Waste aggregates
• Sustainability
• Recycling
• Fillings

Kaynakça

1. Akan R., Sıddıka Nilay Keskin S. N. Kompaksiyon yönteminin kohezyonlu zeminlerin serbest basınç mukavemetine etkisi. Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi 2018; 6(2): 250-257.
2. Al-Radi H., Al-Bukhaiti K., Wei J. L. Comparison between static and dynamic laboratory compaction methods. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 2017; 1(1): 34-47.
3. Arulrajah A., Piratheepan J., Aatheesan T., Bo M.W. Geotechnical properties of recycled crushed brick in pavement applications. J Mater Civ Eng 2011; 23(10):1444–52.
4. Arulrajah A., Piratheepan J., Disfani M.M., Bo M.W. Geotechnical and geoenvironmental properties of recycled construction and demolition materials in pavement subbase applications. J Mater Civ Eng 2013; 25(8):1077–88.
5. ASTM C 127-01. Standard Test Method for Density, Relative Density (Specific Gravity), and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate. West Conshohocken, USA: ASTM International; 2001.
6. ASTM C 128-01. Standard Test Method for Density, Relative Density (Specific Gravity), and Absorption of Fine Aggregate. West Conshohocken, USA: ASTM International; 2001.
7. ASTM D 1241-00. Specification for Materials for Soil-aggregate Sub-base, Base and Surface Courses. West Conshohocken, USA: ASTM International; 2005.
8. ASTM D 1557. Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort. West Conshohocken, USA: ASTM International; 2012..

9. ASTM D 2487-11. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). West Conshohocken, USA: ASTM International; 2011.
10. ASTM D 422-63. Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils. West Conshohocken, USA: ASTM International; 2009.
11. ASTM D 854-02. Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer. West Conshohocken, USA: ASTM International; 2009.
12. ASTM D7382. Test Methods for Determination of Maximum Dry Unit Weight and Water Content Range for Effective Compaction of Granular Soils Using a Vibrating Hammer. West Conshohocken, USA: ASTM International; 2008.
13. Bennert T., Papp W., Maher A., Gucunski N. Utilization of Construction and Demolition Debris under Traffic-Type Loading in Base and Subbase Applications. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2000; 1714: 33–39.
14. Cerni G., Cardone F., Bocci M. Permanent deformation behaviour of unbound recycled mixtures. Constr Build Mater 2012; 37:573–80.
15. Çolakoğlu H., Ok B., Sarıcı T. (2021). Geri Dönüştürülmüş Farklı Tip İnşaat ve Yıkıntı Atıklarının Kompaksiyon Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi. Academic Perspective Procedia, 4 (2), 166-176.
16. Das B. M., Sobhan K. (2010). Principles of Geotechnical Engineering Eighth Edition. SI, USA: Cengage Learning, Lampiran, 1.
17. Holtz R. D., Kovacs W.D. 1981, (Çeviri: Erken, A,, 2015). Geoteknik Mühendisliğine Giriş. Second edition, Nobel Kitabevi, Ankara, 866.
18. Ji X., Lu H.,1, Dai C., Ye Y., Cui Z., Xiong Y. Characterization of properties of soil–rock mixture prepared by the laboratory vibration compaction method. Sustainability 2021;13:1-18.
19. Jimenez J. R., Ayuso J., Agrela F., López M., Galvín A.P. Utilisation of unbound recycled aggregates from selected CDW in unpaved rural roads. Resour Conserv Recycl 2012;58:88–97.
20. Karayolları Teknik Şartnamesi. Ulaştırma Denizcilik ve Haberleşme Bakanlığı Karayolları Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, Türkiye; 2013.
21. Leite F.C., Motta R.S., Vasconcelos K.L., Bernucci L. Laboratory Evaluation of Recycled Construction and Demolition Waste for Pavements. Constr. Build.Mater. 2011; 25:2972–2979.
22. Mehrjardi G.T., Azizi A., Haji-Azizi A., Asdollafardi G. Evaluating and improving the construction and demolition waste technical properties to use in road construction. Transportation Geotechnics 2020; 23, 100349,
23. Molenaar A.A., van Niekerk A.A. Effects of gradation, composition, and degree of compaction on the mechanical characteristics of recycled unbound materials. Transportation Research Record 2002; 1787: 73-82.
24. Nataatmadja A., Tan Y.L. Resilient response of recycled concrete road aggregates. Journal of Transportation Engineering 2001; 127(5): 450-453.
25. Ok B., Geosentetiklerle Güçlendirilmiş İnşaat ve Yıkıntı Atığı Dolguların Statik ve Tekrarlı Yükler Altındaki Davranışının İncelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2018.
26. Ok B., Sarici T., Talaslioglu T., Yildiz A. (2020). Geotechnical properties of recycled construction and demolition materials for filling applications. Transportation Geotechnics, 24, 100380.
27. Park T. Application of construction and building debris as base and subbase materials in rigid pavement, J Transp Eng 2003;129:558–63.
28. Poon C.S., Chan D. Feasible Use of Recycled Concrete Aggregates and Crushedclay Brick As Unbound Road Sub-Base. Constr. Build. Mater. 2006; 20:578–585.
29. Santos E.C.G., Vilar O.M. Use of Recycled Construction and Demolition Wastes (RCDW) As Backfill of Reinforced Soil Structures. In: Proceedings of the Fourth European Geosynthetics Conference, EUROGEO 4, September 7–10, Edinburg, Scotland; 2008.
30. Sarıcı T., Puzolan İle Güçlendirilmiş İnşaat Ve Yıkıntı Atıklarının Granüler Dolgu Olarak Kullanılabilirliğinin Değerlendirilmesi, Doktora Tezi, İnönü Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2019.
31. Sivakumar V., McKinley J.D., Ferguson D. Reuse of Construction Waste: Performance under Repeated Loading. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng. 2004; 157:91–96.
32. TS 2824 EN 1338. Zemin Döşemesi için Beton Kaplama Blokları - Gerekli Şartlar ve Deney 176 Metotları. TSE, Ankara, 2005.
33. TS EN 12390-3, (2010), Beton - Sertleşmiş beton deneyleri - Bölüm 3: Deney numunelerinin basınç dayanımının tayini, Türk Standartları Enstitüsü, Ankara
34. Vieira C.S., Pereira P.M. Use of recycled construction and demolition materials in geotechnical applications: A review. Resour Conserv Recycl 2015;103:192–204.
35. Yaghoubi E., Disfani M.M., Arulrajah A., Kodikara J. Impact of compaction method on mechanical characteristics of unbound granular recycled materials. Road Materials and Pavement Design 2018; 19(4):912-934.
36. Zvonaric, M., Barišic I., Galic M., Minažek K. Influence of laboratory compaction method on compaction and strength characteristics of unbound and cement-bound mixtures. Appl. Sci. 2021; 11: 1-12.