Changes in Mineral Composition of Different Peanut Varieties Exposed to Leaf Damage

Öz

This study was conducted in the Eastern Mediterranean conditions in 2020 and 2021 to determine the effect of different leaf damage (LD) ratios (0, 25%, 50%, and 75%) applied at different developmental stages (flowering, gynophore formation, and pod formation) of two different peanut cultivars (NC 7 and Halisbey) on some macro and micronutrients. In the study, the main plots consisted of cultivars (NC 7 and Halisbey), subplots comprised of application stage (R1, R2, R3) and sub-sub-plots consisted of leaf losses ratios (0, 25%, 50%, and 75%). In the study, the highest content of K, Fe, Cu, Mn, and Na elements was found in 75% LD treatment while the control group was found to be the lowest. At the same time, in 75% LD treatment, it was found that the Cu, Mn, Na and Li element content of the seed was the highest and the control group was the lowest. It was observed that as the leaf damage rate increased in peanuts, the K, Fe, Cu, Mn and Na element values in the leaf and the Mn, Na and Li element values in the seed increased.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Peanut
• variety
• leaf damage
• macro and micro elements

Destekleyen Kurum

Hatay Mustafa Kemal University (HMKU) Coordinatorship of Scientific Research Projects for providing financial assistance (Project number: 19.M.045),

Proje Numarası

19.M.045

Teşekkür

Part of the data in the study is taken from the first author’s PhD thesis. We thank the Oil Seed Research Institute for providing genotypes, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University (HMKU) Coordinatorship of Scientific Research Projects for providing financial assistance (Project number: 19.M.045), HMKU Technology and Research & Development Center, Dr. Merve Olukman Sahin (PhD), and Mr. Serbay Bucak (MSc) for their help with nutrient analysis. This study has been presented as an oral presentation in the 7th Asia Pacific International Modern Sciences Congress. We’ll always remember Mr. Serbay Bucak, who lost his life along with Dr. Celile Demirbilek Bucak (PhD) and their beloved kids Zehra and Yusuf due to the earthquake that struck Türkiye on February 6, 2023.

Farklı Yerfıstığı Çeşitlerinde Yaprak Zararının Mineral Bileşimindeki Değişimler

Öz

Bu çalışma, iki farklı yerfıstığı çeşidinin (NC 7 ve Halisbey) farklı gelişme dönemlerinde (çiçeklenme zamanı, ginofor oluşum zamanı ve meyve oluşum zamanı) farklı yaprak zararı (YZ) uygulamalarının (%0, %25, %50, %75) bazı makro ve mikro besin elementleri üzerine etkisini belirlemek amacıyla 2020 ve 2021 yıllarında Doğu Akdeniz Geçit uşağı ekolojisinde yürütülmüştür. Çalışmada ana parseller çeşitlerden (NC 7 ve Halisbey), alt parseller uygulama zamanından (R1, R2, R3) ve alt alt parseller ise yaprak kaybı oranlarından (%0, %25, %50 ve %75) oluşmuştur. Çalışmada K, Fe, Cu, Mn, Na element içeriklerinin en yüksek %75 YZ uygulamasında bulunduğu, kontrol grubunun ise en düşük olduğu bulunmuştur. Aynı zamanda %75 YZ uygulamasında tohumun Cu, Mn, Na ve Li element içeriklerinin en yüksek, kontrol grubunun ise en düşük olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Yerfıstığında yaprak zarar oranı artıkça yapraktaki K, Fe, Cu, Mn ve Na element değeri; tohumda ise Mn, Na ve Li element değerlerinin artığı görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yerfıstığı
• Çeşit
• Yaprak zararı
• Makro ve mikro besin elementleri

Destekleyen Kurum

Hatay Mustafa Kemal University Coordinatorship of Scientific Research Projects

Proje Numarası

19.M.045

Teşekkür

Part of the data in the study is taken from the first author’s PhD thesis. We thank the Oil Seed Research Institute for providing genotypes, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University (HMKU) Coordinatorship of Scientific Research Projects for providing financial assistance (Project number: 19.M.045), HMKU Technology and Research & Development Center, Dr. Merve Olukman Sahin (PhD), and Mr. Serbay Bucak (MSc) for their help with nutrient analysis. This study has been presented as an oral presentation in the 7th Asia Pacific International Modern Sciences Congress. We’ll always remember Mr. Serbay Bucak, who lost his life along with Dr. Celile Demirbilek Bucak (PhD) and their beloved kids Zehra and Yusuf due to the earthquake that struck Türkiye on February 6, 2023.

Kaynakça

1. Abadia J., Vazquez S., Rellan-Alvarez R., El-Jendoubi H., Abadia A., Alvarez-Fernandez A., Lopez-Millan AF. Towards a knowledge-based correction of iron chlorosis. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 2011; 49(5): 47-482.
2. Asibuo J., Akromah R., Adu-Dapaah HK., Safo-Kantanka O. Evaluation of nutritional quality of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) from Ghana. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development 2008; 8(2): 133-150.
3. Asik FF., Asik BB. Macro and micro element composition of some peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties in Turkey. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2023; 29(1): 38-46.
4. Arioglu HH. The oil seed crops growing and breeding. Adana-Türkiye: Adana The Publication of University of Cukurova, Faculty of Agriculture; 2014.
5. Arioglu H., Bakal H., Gulluoglu L., Bihter O., Cemal K. The effect of harvesting dates on some agronomic and quality characteristics of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties grown as a main crop in Mediterranean region (Turkey). Turkish Journal of Field Crops 2018; 23(1): 27-37.
6. Asar M., Yalçın S., Yücel G., Nadaroğlu Y., Erciyas H. Agricultural meteorology textbook. Anakara-Türkiye: Publication of DMI General Directorate Agricultural Meteorology Branch Directorate; 2007.
7. Bolonhezi D., Santos RC., Godoy IJ. Manejo cultural do amendoim. In: Santos, RC. (Ed.). O agronegocio do amendoim no Brasil. Campina Grande: Embrapa Algodao. 2005; 2(6): 451-475.
8. Brar MS., Singh B., Sekhon GS. Leaf analysis for monitoring the fertilizer requirements of peanut. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2008; 11(4): 335-346.

9. Chonkar AK., Chandel AS. Effect of iron and molybdenum on nitrogenase activity and nitrogen fixation in soybean Glycine max grown in alluvial soils of North India. Indian Journal of Agronomy 1991; 36(1): 124-128.
10. FAO. Food and agriculture data, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC, (Accessed September 9, 2024).
11. Gao L., Shi Y. Genetic differences in resistance to iron deficiency chlorosis in peanut. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2007; 30(1): 37-52.
12. Gomez B. Degradation of vegetation and agricultural productivity due to natural disasters and land use strategies to mitigate their impacts on agriculture, rangelands and forestry. In Natural Disasters and Extreme Events in Agriculture: Impacts and Mitigatio. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2005.
13. Hammons RO., Herman D., Stalker HT. Origin and early history of the peanut. USA: American Oil Chemists' Society Press; 2016.
14. Fahad S., Adnan M., Saud S. Improvement of plant production in the era of climate change. USA: CRC Press; 2022.
15. Isler N., Gozuyesil R. The problems of peanut cultivation in Osmaniye province detection. Biotech Studies 2016; 25(2): 36-41.
16. Klongová L., Kyseľ M., Fialková V., Fernández-Cusimamani E., Kovacik A., Ziarovska J. Utilization of cddp markers in analysis of genetic variability of Arachis hypogaea L. Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences 2023; e9884-e9884.
17. Kolte SJ. Diseases of annual edible oilseed crops: Volume I: Peanut Diseases. USA: CRC Press; 2019.
18. Liliane TN., Charles MS. Factors affecting yield of crops. Pakistan: Agronomy-climate change & food security; 2020.
19. List GR. Processing and food uses of peanut oil and protein. In peanuts genetics, processing, and utilization. USA: American Oil Chemists' Society Press; 2016.
20. Sivakumar MVK. Climate extremes and impacts on agriculture. Agroclimatology: Linking Agriculture to Climate 2020; 60(1): 621-647.
21. Mupunga I., Mngqawa P., Katerere DR. Peanuts, aflatoxins and undernutrition in children in Sub-Saharan Africa. Nutrients 2017; 9(12): 1287.
22. Ozcan M., Seven S. Physical and chemical analysis and fatty acid composition of peanut, peanut oil and peanut butter from COM and NC 7 cultivars. Grasas y Aceites 2003; 54(1): 12-18.
23. Praveen B., Sharma P. A review of literature on climate change and its impacts on agriculture productivity. Journal of Public Affairs 2019; 19(4): e1960.
24. Sabir A., Kucukbasmaci A., Taytak M., Bilgin OF., Jawshle AIM., Mohammed MM., Gayretli Y. Sustainable viticulture practices on the face of climate change. Agricultural Research Technology Open Access Journal 2018; 17(4):133-137.
25. Sahin CB., Isler N. Effects of foliar fertilizer applications on leaf area, chlorophyll and nutritional content at different growth stages of soybean. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty 2022; 19(4): 712-723.
26. Shubo W., Caibin W., Pinji Z., Xinhua G., Bo C., Mingxin W. Optimized disposition of intercropping date and planting density for wheat-peanut cropping system. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences 2004; 26(4): 55-58.
27. Smartt J. The groundnut crop: A scientific basis for improvement. UK: Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
28. Stalker HT., Tallury SP., Seijo GR., Leal-Bertioli SC. Biology, speciation, and utilization of peanut species. In Peanuts. USA: AOCS Press; 2016.
29. Steel RGD., Torrie JH. Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach. 2. ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Publication Company; 1980.
30. Suleman D., Bashir S., Hassan Shah FU., Ikram A., Zia Shahid M., Tufail T., Hassan Mohamed M. Nutritional and functional properties of cookies enriched with defatted peanut cake flour. Cogent Food & Agriculture 2023; 9(1), 2238408.
31. Taiz L., Zeiger E. Plant physiology. California: The Benjamin/Cummigs Publishing; 2013.
32. Terry RE., Jolley VD. Nitrogenase activity is required for the activation of iron‐stress response in iron‐inefficient T203 soybean. Journal of plant nutrition 1994; 17(8): 1417-1428.
33. TUIK. Crop production statistics. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/, (Accessed September 9, 2024).
34. Valko M., Morris H., Cronin MTD. Metals, toxicity and oxidative stress. Current Medicinal Chemistry 2005; 12(10): 1161-1208.