Aspir (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Çeşitlerinin Diyarbakır Ekolojik Koşullarında Tarımsal Performanslarının Belirlenmesi

Öz

Bu çalışma, 2016 ve 2017 yetiştirme sezonlarında, Diyarbakır'ın iklim koşullarına uygun aspir çeşitlerini belirlemek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Deneme, Tesadüf Blokları Deneme Desenine göre üç tekrarlı olarak tasarlanmıştır. Çalışmada Balcı, Dinçer, Linas, Olas ve Remzibey-05 çeşitleri kullanılmıştır. İki yıllık ortalamalardan elde edilen sonuçlara göre; en yüksek tohum verimi Balcı çeşidinden (236,0 kg/da) elde edilirken, en düşük tohum verimi Linas çeşidinden (201,5 kg/da) elde edildi. Diğer önemli bulgulara göre en yüksek yağ verimi Balcı çeşidinden (78,9 kg/da) elde edilirken, en düşük yağ verimi Linas çeşidinden (60,1 kg/da) ve en yüksek yağ oranı Olas çeşidinden (%34,6), en düşük yağ oranı ise Dinçer çeşidinden (%26,6) elde edilmiştir. Ayrıca, bitki boyu (108,2-119,0 cm), bitki başına tabla sayısı (15,2-16,1), tabla çapı (2,09-2,22 cm) ve bin tane ağırlığı (34,8-39,6 g) belirlenmiştir. İki yıllık bu çalışmanın sonuçlarına dayanarak, Diyarbakır’ın özel koşullarında ve gecikmiş kışlık aspir ekimlerinde Balcı çeşidini yetiştirmenin en uygun seçim olduğu görülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Aspir
• Yağ oranı
• Yağ verimi
• çeşit

Determination of Agricultural Performances of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Varieties Under Diyarbakır Ecological Conditions

Öz

This study aimed to identify suitable safflower cultivars for the climatic conditions of Diyarbakır, conducted over the 2016 and 2017 growing seasons. The experiment was designed using a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The cultivars used in this study were Balcı, Dinçer, Linas, Olas, and Remzibey-05. Based on the two-year average, the highest seed yield was obtained from the Balcı cultivar (2360 kg ha−1), while the Linas cultivar produced the lowest seed yield (2015 kg ha−1). Other key findings the highest oil yield was obtained from the Balcı cultivar (789 kg ha−1), while the Remzibey-05 cultivar produced the lowest oil yield (601 kg ha−1) and the highest oil ratio was obtained from the Olas cultivar (34,6 %), while the Dinçer cultivar produced the lowest oil ratio (26,6%). Besides, plant height (108,2-119,0 cm), head number per plant (15,2-16,1), head diameter (2,09-2,22 cm), and thousand seed weight (34,8-39,6 g) were determined. Based on the results of this two-year study, the Balcı cultivar seems to be the most suitable choice for cultivation under the specific conditions of Diyarbakır and in delayed winter safflower plantings.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Safflower
• Oil ratio
• Oil yield
• Cultivar

Kaynakça

1. Adalı M., Öztürk Ö. Determination of yield and some yield components of safflower of Konya Conditions. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences 2016; 3(2): 233–237.
2. Akgün M., Söylemez E. Determining the future trends of safflower plant in Türkiye. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, 2022; 6(1): 50-57.
3. Anonymous. Agricultural values measurement experiments technical instructions, 2002.
4. Anonymous. Turkish State Meteorological Service: Meteorological Data Information Sales and Presentation System, 2019.
5. Anonymous. Turkish Statistical Institute. 2023a; Agriculture/Crop Production Statistics. Source: [https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=92&locale=tr]. (Access Date: 13.6.2024).
6. Anonymous. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) 2023b; Source: [https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/?#data/QCL/visualize]. (Access date: 27.02.2025).
7. Arslan B., Çakır H., Culpan E. Yeni geliştirilen aspir (Carthamus tinctorius L.) çeşitlerinin bazı özellikleri bakımından karşılaştırılması. 2. Uluslararasi 19 Mayıs Yenilikçi Bilimsel Yaklaşimlar Kongresi, Uygulamalı Bilimler 2019; 113-121.
8. Arslan B., Culpan E. Melezleme ile geliştirilmiş bazı aspir (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotiplerinin tarımsal ve teknolojik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2020; 30(4): 742-750.

9. Aslan D., Sirat A. Gümüşhane (Kelkit) koşullarında bazı aspir (Carthamus tinctorius L.) çeşitlerinin verim ve kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi 2022; 11(2): 263-276.
10. Aslantaş Ş., Akınerdem F. Effects of different sowing dates on yield, yield component and quality of some winter safflower cultivars. Journal of Bahri Dagdas Crop Research 2020; 9(1): 21-28.
11. Atan M., Şahin CB., İşler N. Determination of yield, yield components and oil content of different safflower varieties grown under Hatay conditions. KSU J. Agric Nat 2019; 22(5): 678-684.
12. Babaoglu M., Guzel M. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) breeding activities at Trakya Agricultural Research Institute. Ekin J Crop Breed and Gen 2015; 1(1): 20-25.
13. Coşkun Y. Winter and summer sowing facilities of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 2014; 1(4): 462-468.
14. Çamaş N., Esendal E. Estimates of broad sense heritability for seed yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Hereditas 2006: 143: 55-57.
15. Dinçel NGK. Yağ bitkileri içinde kıymetli bir alternatif; Aspir (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 2024; 11(1): 195-203.
16. Eryılmaz T., Cesur C., Yesilyurt MM., Aydın E. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius l.). remzibey-05 seed oil methyl ester: fuel Properties for Potential Diesel Engine Application. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Science 2014; 1(1): 85-90.
17. Duru S. The current status of Türkiye vegetable oil foreign trade and analysis of the competitiveness. Customs Trade Journal 2024; 11(35): 25-39.
18. Eryılmaz T., Cesur C., Yesilyurt MM., Aydın E. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Remzibey-05 seed oil methyl ester: Fuel properties for potential diesel engine application. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Science 2014; 1(1): 85-90.
19. Ghorbanzadeh N., Rassam M., Dadkhah AR. Evaluation of yield and seed fatty acid compositions of safflower (carthamus tinctorius l.) cultivars in Shirvan region. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plant 2014; 39(3): 382-390.
20. Gürsoy M,, Başalma D., Nofouzi F. Effects of safflower cultivars (Carthamus tinctorius L.) on yield and yield components of different row and row spaces. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Science 2018; 32(1): 20-28.
21. Hatipoglu H., Arslan H., Karakus M., Köse A. Determination suitable sowing time of different safflower (Carthamus tinctorius l.) cultivars on Sanliurfa conditions. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University2012; 26(1): 1-16.
22. Hatipoğlu H., Nacar AS., Abrak S., Saraçoğlu M., Arslan H. Safflower Studies Specially in Şanlıurfa. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Science 2017; 31(2): 44–53.
23. Huth PJ., Fulgoni VL., Larson BT. A systematic review of high-oleic vegetable oilsubstitutions for other fats and oils on cardiovascular disease risk factors:implications for novel high-oleic soybean oils. Adv Nutr. 2015; 6(6): 674-693.
24. Kahraman Ş., Karaaslan D., Hatipoğlu A. Determination of suitable sowing date of safflower in Diyarbakır conditions. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 2025; 9(1): 27-33.
25. Katar D., Arslan Y., Kodas R., Subası I., Mutlu H. Determination of effect of different doses of boron on the yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty 2014; 11(2): 71-79.
26. Kayacetin F., Katar D., Arslan Y. Flower structure and biology of fertilization of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Field Crops 2012; 21(2): 75-80.
27. Knowles PF. Safflower. In: Röbbelen G, Downey RK., Ashri A (Editors)–Oilcrops ofthe world: their breeding and utilization. New York: McGraw Hill 1989; pp. 363–374.
28. Koç H., Güne A., Aydoğa S. Safflower breeding activities in Bahri Dagdas International Agricultural Research Institute. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences 2017; 31(3): 58–61.
29. Koç H. Aspir (Carthamus tinctorius L.) çeşitlerinin farklı yağış koşullarında verim ve yağ oranı bakımından değerlendirilmesi. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 2019; 6(3): 518-526.
30. Köse A., Koşar F., Bilir Ö. Agricultural performances of some safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) lines developed by single plant selection method. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2018; 1-11.
31. Köse A., Çelikoğlu Koşar F., Bilir Ö. Mutasyon ıslahı ile geliştirilmiş bazı aspir (Carthamus tinctorius L.) hatlarının tarımsal performansları. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 2021; 8(2): 262-273.
32. Oz M. Sowing time. Variety and yield relationship in safflower. Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Journal of Agriculture Faculty, 2016; 11 (1):71-81.
33. Ozek K. Feed value of safflower and the possibilities of using in farm animal nutrition: I. the using and effects in poultry nutrition. Iğdır University Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 2016;6(4): 171-180.
34. Sayılır C., Çınar VM., Ünay A. Determination of yield and yield components in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars under Menemen-Izmir ecological conditions. Journal of Aegean Agricultural Research Institute Journal of Agriculture Faculty 2019; 29(1): 71-75.
35. Shivani D., Sreelakshmi CH., Kumar CVS. Genetic divergence studies in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 2010; 1(5): 1354-1357.
36. Steel RGD., Torrie JH. Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometrical approach. 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 1980; pp. 20-90.
37. Subaşı İ., Arslan Y., Yasar M. Aspir (Carthamus tinctorus L.) and its nutraceutic potential.In book; Strategic Sector: Agriculture-2, Editor: M.Yasar, A.Akkaya, ISBN: 978-625-6404-81-6, Iksad Publications March, 2023.
38. Tahernezhad Z., Saba J., Zeinalabedini M., Pourdad SS., Ghaffari MR. Estimation of broad-sense heritability and variance components for seed yield and agronomic traits in native and exotic safflower (Carthamus tinctorius l.) genotypes. Bangladesh Journal of Botany 2018; 47(3): 501-508.
39. Yasar M., Sezgi̇n M. Investigation of yield and yield components of rapeseed (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera L.) genotypes in Trakya Region conditions. Revista de Investigaciones Universidad del Quindío 2022; 34(S5): 203-216.
40. Yasar M., Sezgin M. Evaluation of yield performance of some safflower varieties in different environments. 5 th International Cukurova Agriculture and Veterinary Congress 21-23 July 2023, p:976-983, Adana/Türkiye.
41. Yazdani AA., Saffari M., Ranjbar G. Effect of application of treated wastewater on seed yield and heavy metals content of safflower cultivars. Journal Agriculture Sciences Technology 2019; 21(5): 1277-1286.
42. Zarei G., Shamsi H., Fazeli F. Effect of planting density on yield and yield components of safflower cultivars in spring. International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 2011; 5(12): 118-120.