İnsan Faktörünün İş Kazaları Üzerindeki Etkilerinin ve Kaza Önleyici Sistemlerin İncelenmesi: Sistematik Bir İnceleme

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 544 - 564, 14.01.2026

Kübra Sezen Erküvün , Ali Fuat Guneri

https://doi.org/10.47495/okufbed.1666305

Öz

İş sağlığı ve güvenliği (İSG) çalışanların sağlığının ve güvenliğinin korunmasını, üretim güvenliğinin sağlanmasını, güvenli ve sağlıklı bir çalışma ortamının sürdürülmesini amaç edinen multidisipliner bir alandır. Çalışma ortamında, çalışanları ve işyerlerini doğrudan etkileyecek İSG tehlikeleriyle karşı karşıya kalınmaktadır. İSG tehlikelerinin önlenmesine yönelik tedbirler uygulamaya koyulamaz ise iş kazaları kaçınılmaz olmaktadır. İş kazalarına yol açan makine, ortam, insan ve yönetim gibi nedenler olmakla birlikte işyerlerinde gerçekleşen iş kazalarının önemli bir kısmı insan kaynaklı olarak gerçekleşmektedir. İnsan kaynaklı iş kazalarına yönelik proaktif yaklaşımla önleyici faktörlerin geliştirilmesi iş kazalarının azaltılması noktasında önemli bir katkı sunacaktır. Bu bağlamda çalışmada iş kazaları ile insan faktörü arasındaki ilişkinin ve insan faktörü etkenli iş kazalarının önlenmesine yönelik sistemlerin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Amaca yönelik olarak gerçekleştirilen sistematik taramada, Web of Science, Scopus ve Science Direct veri tabanlarında 2010-2024 yılları arasındaki literatür taranmıştır. Belirlenen anahtar kelimelere ve dahil etme kurallarına göre ulaşılan literatür, PRISMA modeli ile analiz edilmiş ve nihai olarak 61 çalışmaya ulaşılmıştır. Çalışmalar, insan faktörü ve iş kazası ilişkisini ele alış biçimlerine göre incelenmiştir. Çalışmaların genelinde, iş kazası ve insan faktörü ilişkisinin doğrulandığı ve insan faktörlü iş kazalarını önlemeye yönelik risk analizinin gerçekleştirildiği görülmüştür. İş kazası tahmin yöntemlerinin ve işyerlerinde sürekli izleme sistemlerinin geliştirildiği çalışmalara daha az rastlanmakla birlikte konuya verilecek önem ile iş kazalarının önlenmesi yönünde kritik bir adım atılacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İş Kazası , İnsan Faktörü , İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği

Investigation of the Effects of Human Factors on Occupational Accidents and Accident Prevention Systems

Öz

Occupational health and safety (OHS) is a multidisciplinary field that aims to protect the health and safety of employees, ensure production safety and maintain a safe and healthy working environment. OHS hazards that will directly affect workers and workplaces are encountered in the working environment. If measures to prevent OHS hazards cannot be implemented, occupational accidents are inevitable. Although there are reasons such as machinery, environment, human and management that cause occupational accidents, a significant portion of workplace occupational accidents are human-induced. Developing preventive factors with a proactive approach toward human-induced occupational accidents will significantly contribute to reducing occupational accidents. In this context, the study aims to examine the relationship between occupational accidents and human factors and systems for preventing occupational accidents caused by human factors. This systematic review searched the literature between 2010 and 2024 in Web of Science, Scopus and Science Direct databases. The literature accessed according to the determined keywords and inclusion rules was analyzed with the PRISMA model, and finally, 61 studies were found. The studies were analyzed according to how they addressed the relationship between human factors and occupational accidents. In most of the studies, it was observed that the relationship between occupational accidents and human factors was confirmed and risk analysis was carried out to prevent human factor occupational accidents. Although there are fewer studies in which occupational accident prediction methods and continuous monitoring systems in workplaces are developed, it is thought that a critical step will be taken towards preventing occupational accidents with the importance to be given to the subject.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Occupational Accident , Human Factor , Occupatinal Health and Safety

Kaynakça

• Aalipour M., Ayele YZ., Barabadi A. Human reliability assessment (HRA) in maintenance of production process: A case study. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management 2016; 7: 229-238.
• Abbaszadeh S., Jahangiri M., Abbasi M., Banaee S., Farhadi P. Risk assessment of probable human errors in the scaffold erection and dismantling procedure: A fuzzy approach. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 2022; 28(3): 1773-1778.
• Akpınar T., Çakmakkaya BY. İş sağlığı ve güvenliği açısından işverenlerin risk değerlendirme yükümlülüğü. Çalışma ve Toplum 2014; 1(40): 273-304.
• Akyuz E., Celik E. The role of human factor in maritime environment risk assessment: A practical application on Ballast Water Treatment (BWT) system in ship. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 2018; 24(3): 653-666.
• Albar BÖ. İş kazalarının önlenmesinde kaza sebep teorilerinin önemi. EJONS International Journal on Mathematic, Engineering and Natural Sciences 2024; 8(1): 174-182.
• Aliabadi MM., Askaripoor T., Ghamari F., Aghaei H. An investigation of the relationship between human and organizational factors in occupational accidents using Bayesian network approach: A case study in mining accidents. Journal of Occupational Hygiene Engineering 2020; 8(2): 8-15.
• Aydın M., Uğurlu Ö., Boran M. Assessment of human error contribution to maritime pilot transfer operation under HFACS-PV and SLIM approach. Ocean Engineering 2022; 266: 112830.
• Bayazit O., Kaptan M. Dynamic risk analysis of allision in port areas using DBN based on HFACS-PV. Ocean Engineering 2024; 298: 117183.
• Bussier MJP., Chong HY. Relationship between safety measures and human error in the construction industry: Working at heights. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 2022; 28(1): 162-173.
• Chen C., Hu J., Zhang L., Hu Y., Li X. Early warning method of unsafe behavior accidents for offshore drilling operators based on eye-tracking trajectory. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 2023; 177: 1506-1522.
• Chen W., Zhang Y., Khasawneh MT., Geng Z. Risk analysis on Beijing metro operation initiated by human factors. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security 2019; 11(6): 683-699.
• Chiba T., Aonuma S., Kusugami T. Research on method of human error analysis using 4M4E. JR East Technical Review 2005; 5: 59-65.
• Çınar N., Suzan ÖK. Sistematik derleme metodolojisi ve yazımı. Ankara: Akademisyen Kitabevi; 2022.
• Deacon T., Amyotte PR., Khan FI. Human error risk analysis in offshore emergencies. Safety Science 2010; 48(6): 803-818.
• Edem IE., Akinsola B. An approach to assessing human factors related occupational safety using behavioural observation-based indicators: The case of a construction site in Nigeria. Engineering and Applied Science Research 2022; 49(2): 133-145.
• Erdem P., Akyuz E., Aydin M., Celik E., Arslan O. Assessment of human error contribution to container loss risk under fault tree analysis and interval type-2 fuzzy logic-based SLIM approach. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment 2023; 238(3): 553-566.
• Es'haghi M., Nikravesh A., Fereydoni MJ., Shabani N. Understanding factors influencing workers’ unsafe behaviors through social network analysis in the mining industry. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 2022; 28(2): 863-871.
• Fan H., Enshaei H., Jayasinghe SG. Human error probability assessment for LNG bunkering based on fuzzy Bayesian network-CREAM model. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 2022; 10(3): 333.
• Febriyanto K., Rachman A., Rahman FF. The contribution of human error related to occupational accident among traditional divers. Gaceta Sanitaria 2021; 35: S27-S29.
• Ghasemi M., Nasleseraji J., Hoseinabadi S., Zare M. Application of SHERPA to identify and prevent human errors in control units of petrochemical industry. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 2013; 19(2): 203-209.
• Gnoni MG., Duraccio V., Iavagnilio R. A fuzzy AHP-based approach for assessing the faulty behaviour risk at workplace. International Journal of Business and Systems Research 2016; 10(2-4): 291-305.
• Gul M., Ak MF., Guneri AF. Occupational health and safety risk assessment in hospitals: A case study using two-stage fuzzy multi-criteria approach. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 2017; 23(2): 187-202.
• Güler M., Derin KH., Şahin NL. İş sağlığı ve güvenliği kültürü ve eğitimi ilişkisi. İş ve Hayat 2018; 4(8): 311-348.
• Hasanzadeh S., Esmaeili B., Dodd MD. Examining the relationship between construction workers’ visual attention and situation awareness under fall and tripping hazard conditions: Using mobile eye tracking. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2018; 144(7): 1-18.
• International Labour Organization (ILO). Technical and ethical guidelines for workers' health surveillance. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_publ_9221108287_en.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 10.04.2024).
• Kabanov EI., Tumanov MV., Smetanin VS., Romanov KV. An innovative approach to injury prevention in mining companies through human factor management. Journal of Mining Institute 2023; 263: 774-784.
• Kang S., Cho S., Yun S., Kim S. Semantic network analysis using construction accident cases to understand workers’ unsafe acts. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021; 18(23): 12660.
• Kaptan M. Estimating human error probability in transporting steel cargo with bulk carriers using a hybrid approach. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment 2022; 236(2): 303-314.
• Karevan A., Nadeau S. A comprehensive STPA-PSO framework for quantifying smart glasses risks in manufacturing. Heliyon 2024; 10(9): e30162.
• Kavgacı Y., Çiçek H. Kamu hastanelerinde iş sağlığı ve güvenliği uygulamalarının çalışanların iş performansına etkisi: Burdur ili örneği. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2019; 11(28): 306-331.
• Khaleghi P., Akbari H., Alavi NM., Kashani MM., Batooli Z. Identification and analysis of human errors in emergency department nurses using SHERPA method. International Emergency Nursing 2022; 62: 101159.
• Khan RU., Yin J., Mustafa FS., Wang S. Analyzing human factor involvement in sustainable hazardous cargo port operations. Ocean Engineering 2022; 250: 111028.
• Kirin S., Sedmak A., Li W., Brzaković M., Miljanović I., Petrović A., Sedmak S. Human factor risk management procedures applied in the case of open pit mine. Engineering Failure Analysis 2021; 126: 105456.
• Kirytopoulos K., Konstandinidou M., Nivolianitou Z., Kazaras K. Embedding the human factor in road tunnel risk analysis. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 2014; 92(4): 329-337.
• Koushik Balaji K., Alphin MS. Computer-aided human factors analysis of the industrial vehicle driver cabin to improve occupational health. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion 2016; 23(3): 240-248.
• La Fata CM., Giallanza A., Micale R., La Scalia G. Ranking of occupational health and safety risks by a multi-criteria perspective: Inclusion of human factors and application of VIKOR. Safety Science 2021; 138: 105234.
• La Fata CM., Adelfio L., Micale R., La Scalia G. Human error contribution to accidents in the manufacturing sector: A structured approach to evaluate the interdependence among performance shaping factors. Safety Science 2023; 161: 106067.
• Li Z., Wang X., Gong S., Sun N., Tong R. Risk assessment of unsafe behavior in university laboratories using the HFACS-UL and a fuzzy Bayesian network. Journal of Safety Research 2022; 82: 13-27.
• Liu Y., Ma X., Qiao W., Luo H., He P. Human factor risk modeling for shipyard operation by mapping fuzzy fault tree into Bayesian network. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021; 19(1): 297.
• Maternová A., Materna M., Dávid A., Török A., Švábová L. Human error analysis and fatality prediction in maritime accidents. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 2023; 11(12): 2287.
• Misiurek K., Misiurek B. Methodology of improving occupational safety in the construction industry on the basis of the TWI program. Safety Science 2017; 92: 225-231.
• Mohamed Shaffril HA., Samsuddin SF., Abu Samah A. The ABC of systematic literature review: The basic methodological guidance for beginners. Quality & Quantity 2021; 55: 1319-1346.
• Mollaoglu M., Bucak U., Demirel, H. A quantitative analysis of the factors that may cause occupational accidents at ports. Journal of ETA Maritime Science 2019; 7(4): 294-303.
• Morais C., Yung KL., Johnson K., Moura R., Beer M., Patelli E. Identification of human errors and influencing factors: A machine learning approach. Safety Science 2022; 146: 105528.
• Musavi F., Hekmatshoar R., Fallahi M., Moradi A., Yazdani-Aval M. Identifying and preventing human error in the sugar production process: A multi-stage approach using HTA, HEC and PHEA techniques. Heliyon 2024; 10(9): e29687.
• Mutlu H. Dijital sağlık diplomasisi: Sistematik derleme. Akademik Hassasiyetler 2024; 11(26): 173-193.
• Nightingale A. A guide to systematic literature reviews. Surgery (Oxford) 2009; 27(9): 381-384.
• Niu L., Zhao J., Yang J. Risk assessment of unsafe acts in coal mine gas explosion accidents based on HFACS-GE and Bayesian networks. Processes 2023; 11(2): 554.
• Noman MA., Alqahtani FM., Al-Harkan I., Alabdulkarim SA., Alasim F. A new integrated risk-assessment model for minimizing human-machine error consequences in a preventive maintenance system. IEEE Access 2023; 11: 25253-25265.
• Noroozi A., Khakzad N., Khan F., MacKinnon S., Abbassi R. The role of human error in risk analysis: Application to pre-and post-maintenance procedures of process facilities. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2013; 119: 251-258.
• Nwankwo CD., Arewa AO., Theophilus SC., Esenowo VN. Analysis of accidents caused by human factors in the oil and gas industry using the HFACS-OGI framework. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 2022; 28(3): 1642-1654.
• Nykänen M., Puro V., Tiikkaja M., Kannisto H., Lantto E., Simpura F., Teperi AM. Evaluation of the efficacy of a virtual reality-based safety training and human factors training method: Study protocol for a randomised-controlled trial. Injury Prevention 2020; 26(4): 360-369.
• Olcay ZF., Erdem B. İş kazalarının önlenmesinde güvenlik kültürü. Pearson Journal 2021; 6(14): 82-88.
• Önal O., Dandıl E. Unsafe-Net: YOLO v4 and ConvLSTM based computer vision system for real-time detection of unsafe behaviours in workplace. Multimedia Tools and Applications 2024; 1-27.
• Özkılıç Ö. İş sağlığı ve güvenliği, yönetim sistemleri ve risk değerlendirme metodolojileri. Ankara: Türkiye İşveren Sendikaları Konfederasyonu Yayınları; 2005.
• Petrillo A., Falcone D., De Felice F., Zomparelli F. Development of a risk analysis model to evaluate human error in industrial plants and in critical infrastructures. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 2017; 23: 15-24.
• Reason J. Human error: Models and management. BMJ 2000; 320(7237): 768-770.
• Reyes RM., de la Riva J., Maldonado A., Woocay A. Association between human error and occupational accidents’ contributing factors for hand injuries in the automotive manufacturing industry. Procedia Manufacturing 2015; 3: 6498-6504.
• Sabet PGP., Aadal H., Jamshidi MHM., Rad KG. Application of domino theory to justify and prevent accident occurance in construction sites. Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering 2013; 6(2): 72-76.
• Sadeghi-Yarandi M., Torabi-Gudarzi S., Asadi N., Golmohammadpour H., Ahmadi-Moshiran V., Taheri M., ... Alimohammadi B. Development of a novel electrical ındustry safety risk ındex (EISRI) in the electricity power distribution industry based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). Heliyon 2023; 9(2): e13155.
• Shakerian M., Nami M., Jahangiri M., Hasanzadeh J., Alimohammadlou M., Choobineh A. Validating the effectiveness of a self-report tool to predict unsafe behavior of industrial workers: A QEEG analysis. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 2024; 30(2): 624-634.
• Si W., Niu L. Enhancing human reliability prediction in smart tower crane ınterfaces: A refined approach using simplified plant analysis risk–human reliability assessment and the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory–analytic network process. Buildings 2024; 14(4): 1083.
• Sivapragasam C., Ajith S., Arumugaprabu V. A conceptual framework for minimizing construction site accidents using Task-Personnel Nexus Matrix. International Journal of Construction Management 2023; 23(9): 1603-1610.
• Sosyal Güvenlik Kurumu (SGK). İş kazası istatistikleri. https://www.sgk.gov.tr/Istatistik/Yillik/fcd5e59b-6af9-4d90-a451-ee7500eb1cb4 (Erişim tarihi: 04.08.2025).
• Spasojević Brkić V., Golubović T., Brkic A., Alsharif AM. Influence of human factors on risk associated with pressure equipment. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 2023; 29(2): 651-660.
• Stojiljkovic E., Glisovic S., Grozdanovic M. The role of human error analysis in occupational and environmental risk assessment: A Serbian experience. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 2015; 21(4): 1081-1093.
• Sun Z., Zhu Z., Xiong R., Tang P., Liu Z. Dynamic human systems risk prognosis and control of lifting operations during prefabricated building construction. Developments in the Built Environment 2023; 14: 100143.
• Suprapto VH., Pujawan IN., Dewi RS. Effects of human performance improvement and operational learning on organizational safety culture and occupational safety and health management performance. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 2022; 28(4): 2455-2467.
• T.C. Cumhurbaşkanlığı Mevzuat Bilgi Sistemi. İş sağlığı ve güvenliği kanunu. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuatmetin/1.5.6331.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 29.04.2024).
• Taheri MR., Mortazavi SB., Asilian H., Ahmadi O., Sogandi F. Investigating human error in Iran’s copper mines using the CREAM based on human cognitive reliability analysis. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 2023; 29(4): 1423-1428.
• Tong R., Li H., Zhang B., Yang X., Ma X. Modeling of unsafe behavior risk assessment: A case study of Chinese furniture manufacturers. Safety Science 2021; 136: 105157.
• Uflaz E., Akyuz E., Arslan O., Gardoni P., Turan O., Aydin M. Analysing human error contribution to ship collision risk in congested waters under the evidential reasoning SPAR-H extended fault tree analysis. Ocean Engineering 2023; 287: 115758.
• Wang Y., Liu J., Qian G. Hierarchical FFT-LSTM-GCN based model for nuclear power plant fault diagnosis considering spatio-temporal features fusion. Progress in Nuclear Energy 2024; 171: 105178.
• Wiegmann DA., Shappell SA. A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: The human factors analysis and classification system. London: Routledge; 2017.
• Wong L., Wang Y., Law T., Lo CT. Association of root causes in fatal fall-from-height construction accidents in Hong Kong. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2016; 142(7): 1-12.
• Yıldız A. Bir araştırma metodolojisi olarak sistematik literatür taramasına genel bakış. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2022; 22(Özel Sayı 2): 367-386.
• Yılmaz C., Turan AH. The causes of occupational accidents in human resources: The human factors theory and the accident theory perspective. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 2023; 29(2): 796-805.
• Zahiri Harsini A., Ghofranipour F., Sanaeinasab H., Amin Shokravi F. A randomised controlled trial of an educational intervention to promote safe behaviours in petrochemical workers: A study protocol. BMC Public Health 2019; 19: 1-8.
• Zhao D., McCoy A., Kleiner B., Feng Y. Integrating safety culture into OSH risk mitigation: A pilot study on the electrical safety. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 2016; 22(6): 800-807.
• Zheng Q., Liu X., Wang W., Han S. A hybrid HFACS model using DEMATEL-ORESTE method with linguistic Z-number for risk analysis of human error factors in the healthcare system. Expert Systems with Applications 2024; 235: 121237.