EVALUATION ACREAGE, PRODUCTION AND YIELD ON BARLEY BY KRIGGING METHOD IN TURKEY

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 3, 141 - 149, 05.10.2013

Murat Olgun , Saffet Erdoğan , İmren Kutlu , Nazife Gözde Ayter , Zekiye Budak Başçıftçı

https://doi.org/10.7161/anajas.2013.28.3.141

Öz

The purpose of this study was to classification similarities/dissimilarities of provinces and to determine the potential of provinces on barley for acreage, production and yield by using Krigging method in Turkey. Results revealed that barley is important crop in Turkey and could play important role in crop production, food industry and animal husbandry whether it is given greater importance in production marketing and valorization. Climatic conditions have significant effect on barley yield and production. Adverse effect of climatic factors could be diminished by using cultivars, more tolerant to drought and have a shorter growing period allowing rapid development. Significant relationship coexists between acreage, production and crop yield. Besides in the long run, strong relationship occurs between barley area planted and barley price, significantly affecting barley acreage.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

Barley, Acreage, Crop production, Crop yield, Krigging method

Murat OLGUN1 Saffet ERDOĞAN2 İmren KUTLU*1 Nazife GÖZDE AYTER1

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, arpada Krigging metodunu kullanarak Türkiye için iller bazında ekiliş, üreim ve veriminin benzerlik/farklılıklarının sınıflandırılmasıdır. Sonuçlara göre, arpanın Türkiye’de önemli bir bitki olduğu ve hayvancılık ve gıda endüstrisinde önemli bir yer tuttuğu belirlenmiştir. Öte yandan iklim koşulları arpada verim ve üretimi etkileyen önmeli faktörlerden biridir. Iklim faktörlerinin olumsuz etkilerini kısa gelişme periyoduna sahip, kurağa toleranslı bitkilerin kullanımıyla gidermek mümkün olabilir. Ayrıca verim, ekiliş alanı ve üretim arasında önemli bir ilişki mevcuttur. Uzun periyotta arpa ekim alanlarıyla arpanın fiyatı arasındaki kuvvetli ilişki, arpanın ekiliş alanını etkileyen önemli bir unsur olarak ortaya çıkacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Arpa, Ekim alanı, Üretim, Verim, Krigging metodu.

Kaynakça

• Anonymous, 2006. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) 2006 FAO Statistical Databases Available from: http://faostat.fao.org
• Anonymous, 2012. TUIK (Turkey Statistical Institution) TUIK Statistical Databases Available from: http://tuik.gov.tr
• Benaouda, H., El Mourid, M., Ameziane, T. 1992. Place de l'orge dans les systèmes des cultures des zones arides et semi-arides du maroc occidental. Projet. IFAD/ICARDA/Maghreb.
• Bielek, P. 2001. História poľnohospodárskej vedy a vıskumu na slovensku. (In Demo A I., Dejiny Poľnohospodárstva Na Slovensku). 493-536.
• Chmielewski, F.M., Kohn, W. 1999. Impact of weather on yield components of spring cereals over 30 years. Agric. For. Meteorol., 96: 49-58.
• Erdogan, S. 2010. Modelling the spatial distribution of dem error with geographically weighted regression: an experimental study. Computers and Geosciences, 36: 34–
• Fisunoğlu, M. 1998. Agricultural Production, Population and Environment Population. Environment And Development Conference, 55-70, 13–14 November, Ankara.
• Gençtan, T., Birsin, M., Balkan, A. 2006. Cereal and legumes production and problems. National Agriculture Congress, 15-17 November, Adana.
• Kara, A., Kadıoğlu, S., Küçüközdemir, Ü., Yıldırım, T., Olgun, M., Küçük, N. 2008. Barley Farming and Related Problems in Northeastern Anatolia. National Grain Symposium. 2-5 June, Konya.
• Karing, P., Kallis, A., Tooming, H. 1999. Adaptation principles of agriculture to climate change. Climate Research, 12: 175–183
• Kınacı, E., Kınacı, G., Alp, A., Kutlu, İ. 2010. Opportunities to increase the production of cool season crops. VII. Turkey Agriculture Engineering Technical Congress, 11-15 January, Ankara.
• Koornneef, M., Alonso-Blanc, C., Peeters, A.J.M. 1997. Genetic approaches in plant physiology. New Phytol., 137: 1–
• Kovacevic, V. 2005. Wheat yield variations among the years in the Eastern Croatia. In: Proceedings of the XL Cro-atian
• Symposium on Agriculture with International Participation (Kovacevic V. and Jovanovac Sonja Eds.), 453-454, 15-18 February, Opatija, Croatia. Kubinec, S., Kovát, K. 1998. Progresìvne technolñgie pestovania jatmena jarného. 82. Pieštany, Slovakia: VÚRV.
• Kün, E. 1988. Cold Climate Cereals. Course Book: 299, AU Faculty Of Agriculture Pub. No:1032, Ankara.
• Ludlow, M.M., Muchow, R.C. 1990. A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water limited environments. Adv.Agron. , 43:107-153.
• Macak, M., Zak, S., Birkas, M., Djalovic, I., Slamka, P. 2008.
• The influence of an ecological and low input system on yield and yield componets of spring barley. In Cereal Research Communications, 36: 1343-1346.
• Malekiani, A., Jafarzadeh, A. A. 2011. Qualitative land suitability evaluation of the khajeh research station for wheat, barley, alfalfa, maize and safflower. Research in Plant Biology, 1(5): 33-40
• Molnarova J. 2008. The influence of non-root nutrition and growing season on the yield formation process and yield amount in spring barley. Protectia Mediului, 13(13): 1571
• Paunović, A., Madić, M., Knežević, D., Biberdžić, M. 2008. Nitrogena and seed density effects on spike length and grain weight per spike in barley. Cereal Res. Comm., 36: 75Poehlman, M.I. 1985. Adaptation and distribution, barley. American Society of Agronomy, Number 26 in the Series, Madison, Wisconsin.
• Procházková, B., Dovrtel, J., Suškevit, M. 1997. Systémy Zpracovánì Pudy V Kukuritné Vyrobnì Oblasti. In: AGROREGION 97, Problems Of Today's Agriculture And Case Studies, 165-168. Teské Budejovice, Czech Republic. ISBN 80-7040-232-6.
• Sleziak, E., Horevaj, V. 2000. Perspektivy Pestovania Sladovnickeho Jaemeria Na Slovensku. In Pestovanie A Vyulitie Obilnin Na Prelome Milenia, 68-72. Nitra, Slovakia: SPU Nitra, ISBN - 7137- 783 -X.
• Špánık, F. 2008. Klimatické Zmeny A İch Vplyv Na Poľnohospodárstvo. In Líška A İ. Všeobecná Rastlinná Vıroba , 65-69, ISBN 978-80-552-0016-3
• Špánık, F., Šıška, B. 2004. Predpokladaná Zmena Klímy V 21.
• Storočí A Poľnohospodárstvo. In: Agrochémia, 8(44): 22