EARLY PERFORMANCE OF SLENDER SPINDLE AND VERTICAL AXIS TRAINING SYSTEMS IN APPLES

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 2, 100 - 105, 11.06.2014

Emine Küçüker , Yakup Özkan

https://doi.org/10.7161/anajas.2014.29.2.100-105

Öz

Training system is the most important factor where high crop yield is expected. It also has direct effect on good quality fruits and early productivity expected from the orchard. In this study that had been carried out during 2008-2009, it was aimed that the effects of different cultivation systems on Fuji, Jonagold, Granny Smith (Granny S) and Golden Reinder (Golden R) apple cultivars grafted on M9 apple rootstock in Horticultural Department of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University would be revealed. Slender Spindle (Slender S.), Vertical Axis (Vertical A) training systems were applied on the trees were planted in 2007 October. The vegetative growth, yield and fruit quality performances of the trees constituted on wire-stake combination system were analyzed during two years. In second yield year (2009), the highest yield values were detected on Vertical A. training system and the Golden R. cultivar. At the same year, Fuji cultivar gave the highest values in trunk cross-sectional area (TCA) and canopy volume. While TCA was the same for both training systems, canopy volume was higher in Vertical Axis system. Fruit mass and chemical properties showed difference only between varieties.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Apple, M9, training system, growth, yield and fruit quality

ELMALARDA SLENDER SPINDLE VE VERTICAL AXIS TERBİYE SİSTEMLERİNİN ERKEN DÖNEM PERFORMANSI ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ

Öz

Terbiye prensibi yüksek verimin hedeflendiği yerlerde en önemli etmendir ve meyve bahçesinden beklenen erkenci üretim ve yüksek meyve kalitesini doğrudan etkiler. 2008-2009 yılları içerisinde yürütülen çalışmada, GOÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Araştırma ve Uygulama Bahçesi’nde bulunan M9 anacına aşılı Fuji, Jonagold, Granny Smith (Granny S) ve Golden Reinder (Golden R) elma çeşitlerinde farklı terbiye sistemlerinin etkilerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada 2007 yılı Kasım ayında dikilen fidanlara Slender Spindle (Slender S) ve Vertical Axis (Vertical A) terbiye sistemleri uygulandı. Tel-herek kombinasyonu üzerinde geliştirilen ağaçların; vegetatif gelişimi, verim ve meyve kalite performansları 2 yıl süreyle incelendi. İkinci ürün yılında (2009), en yüksek verim değerleri Vertical A terbiye sisteminde ve Golden R çeşidinde saptandı. Aynı yılda, Fuji çeşidi en yüksek gövde kesit alanı (TCA) ve taç hacmi oluşturdu. TCA terbiye sistemleri arasında fark oluşturmazken taç hacmi, Vertical A sisteminde daha yüksekti. Meyve ağırlığı ve kimyasal özellikler yalnızca çeşitler arasında farklılık gösterdi.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Elma, M9, terbiye sistemi, büyüme, verim ve meyve kalitesi

Kaynakça

• Allen, R.A., Rom, C.R. 1998. Light distribution in three apple training systems an affected by cultivar and rootstock. Hortscience 33: 601.
• Antognozzi. E., Proietti, P., Famiani, F. 1993. Effects of rootstocks and training systems on growth and yield of two apple cultivars. Acta Hort. 349: 187-190.
• Barritt, B.H. 1987. Orchard systems research with Decidious trees: a. Brief introduction, HortScience 22 (4): 548-549.
• Barritt, B. H., 1989. Influence of orchard system on canopy development, light interception and production of third year Granny Smith apple trees, Acta Hort. 243: 121-130.
• Barritt, B. H. 1992. Intensive Orchard Management, Good Fruit Grower. Yakima, WA.
• Barritt, B.H. 1998. Orchard management systems for fuji apples. Compact Fruit Tree. 31(1): 10-12.
• Barritt, B.H. 2000. The hytec (hybrid tree cone) orchard system for apples. Acta Hort. 513: 303-309.
• Barritt, B.H., Konishi, B., Dilley, M. 2008. Performance of four high density apple orchard systems with Fuji and Braeburn, Acta Hort. 7772: 389-394.
• Buler, Z., Mika. A., Treder. W., Chlebowska, D. 2001. Influence of new training systems of dwarf and semidwarf apple trees on yield, its quality and canopy illumination. Acta Hort. 557: 253-259.
• Callesen, O. 1993. Influence of apple tree height on yield and fruit quality. Acta Hort. 349: 111-115.
• Crassweller, R.M., Smith, D.E., 2004. Will high density work for processing apples? Acta Hort. 636: 661-665.
• Hampson, C., Quamme, H.A., Brownlee, R. 2002. Canopy growth, yield and fruit quality of Royal Gala apple trees grown for eight years in five tree training systems. HortScience. 37: 627-631.
• Hampson C.R., Quamme H.A., Kappel F., Brownlee R.T. 2004. Varying density with constant rectangularity: I. Effects on apple tree growth, and light interception in three training systems over ten years. HortScience. 39: 501-506.
• Heinicke, D.R. 1975. High Density Apple Orchards Planning, Training and Pruning. U.S. Dept. Agr. Hdbk. 458.
• James, R., Schupp, J.R. 1993. effect of training system and ınrow spacing on early performance of apple, HortScience 28: 474.
• Küçüker, E., Özkan, E., Yıldız, K. 2011. Farklı Terbiye Sistemleri Uygulanmış, M9 Anacına Aşılı Gala (Malus domestica Borkh.) Elma Çeşidinde Erken Dönem Performansının Belirlenmesi, Batı Akdeniz Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Derim Dergisi, 28(1): 25-36.
• Lauri, P.E., Lespinasse, J.M. 2000. The Vertical Axis and SolAxe systems in France. Act Hort. 513: 287-296.
• Lespinasse, J.M., Delort, J.F. 1986. Apple tree management in Vertical Axis, appraisal after ten years of experiments. Acta Hort. 160: 139-155.
• Otaga, R. 1990. An 11-year trial of high density planting od apple trees. Cab. Abst. 06-0848 (C579883).
• Palmer, J.W. 1989. The effects of row orientation, tree height, time of year and latitude on light interception and distribution in model apple hedgerow canopies. J. Hort. Sci. 64: 137-145.
• Robinson, T. L., Lakso A.N., Carpenter, S.G. 1991. Canopy development, yield, and fruit quality of 'empire' and 'delicious' apple trees grown in four orchard production systems for ten years. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116: 179-187.
• Robinson, T.L. 2003. Apples: Botany, Production and Uses (eds D.C. Ferree and I.J. Warrington) CAB International. 345-407.
• Szczygie, A., Mika, A. 2003. Effects of high density planting and two training methods of dwarf apple trees grown in sub-carpathian region. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. 11: 45-51.
• Wagemakers, P., Callesen, O. 1995. Light distribution in apple orchard systems in relation to production and fruit quality. journal of Horticulturae Science 70: 935-948.
• Wertheim, S.J., Wagenmakers, P.S., Bootsma, J.H., Groot, M.J. 2001. Orchard systems for apple and pear: conditions for success. Acta Hort. 557: 209-227.
• Westwood, M.N. 1995. Temperate-Zone Pomology Physiology and Culture, Third Edition. Timber Press. Portland, Oregon.
• Widmer, A., Krebs, C. 2001. Influence of planting density and tree form on yield and fruit quality of “Golden Delicious” and “Royal Gala” apples. Acta Hort. 557: 235-241.
• Yıldırım, F. 2002. M9 anacı üzerine aşılı bazı elma çeşitlerinde tek, çift ve üç sıralı dikim sistemlerinin karşılaştırılması, Doktora tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Bil. Enst. Ankara.
• Yıldırım, F.A., Çelik M. 2003. M9 anacı üzerine aşılı bazı elma çeşitlerinde tek, çift ve üç sıralı dikim sistemlerinin karşılaştırılması, Türkiye IV. Bahçe Bitkileri Kongresi: S(22), Antalya.