Din Dili

Öz

Genelde felsefe, özelde ise din felsefesi geleneğinde Tanrı’yı konuşmak önde gelen ve önemli konuların başındadır. Bu makalede Janet Soskice din dili konusunda ortaya atılan düşünceleri David Hume, Musa ibn Meymun vs. gibi filozofların düşünceleri ve tenzihi dil bağlamında özetledikten sonra, görülebilen ve yansıyabilen yönü olan ameli boyutuyla bağlantı kurmaya çalışmıştır.   

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Din Dili,Tenzihi Dil,Tanrı,Ameli

Religious Language

Öz

In general, talking about God in the philosophy, and in particular the philosophy of religion, is preliminary and uttermost of the issues. In this article, Janet Soskice after summarizing the thoughts of philosophers like David Hume, Maimonides etc. on religious language in the context of apophatic language, she tries to make a connection with the reflective and visible part of it- performative.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• God,Religious Language,Apophatic Language,Performative

Kaynakça

1. Alston, W. P., Divine Nature and Human Language, Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press. 1989.
2. Burrell, D. B., Freedom and Creation in Three Traditions, Notre Dame IN: Notre Dame University Press. 1993.
3. Candler, P. M., Theology, Rhetoric, Manuduction: Or Reading Scripture Together on the Path to God, Grand Rapids MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2006.
4. Coward, H. and Forshay, T. (eds.), Derrida and Negative Theology, Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992.
5. Dickens, C., Great Expectations, London: Penguin Books, 1996.
6. Faur , J., Homo Mysticus: A Guide to Maimonides ’ s Guide for the Perplexed, Syracu-se NY: Syracuse University Press, 1999.
7. Fodor , J., Christian Hermeneutics: Paul Ricoeur and the Refi guring of Theology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
8. Jantzen , G. M., Becoming Divine: Towards a Feminist Philosophy of Religion. Manchester : Manchester University Press, 1998.

9. Mitchell , B. (ed.), The Philosophy of Religion, London: Oxford University Press, 1971.
10. Ochs , P., “Morning Prayer as Redemptive Thinking” in Liturgy, Time and the Politics of Redemption, London: SCM Press, 2006.
11. Ochs , P., Peirce, Pragmatism, and the Logic of Scripture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
12. Pickstock, C., After Writing: On the Liturgical Consummation of Philosophy, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1998.
13. Pseudo – Dionysius, The Complete Works, Classics of Western Spirituality New York and Mahwah: Paulist Press, 1987.
14. Seeskin, K. “Sanctity and Silence: The Religious Significance of Maimonides’ Negative Theology,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 2002, 76 (1), 7 – 24.
15. Seeskin, K., Searching for a Distant God: the Legacy of Maimonides, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
16. Smith, J. K. A. (2002). Speech and Theology: Language and the Logic of the Incarna-tion. Routledge : London.
17. Soskice, J. M. (2007). The Kindness of God: Metaphor, Gender and Religious Langua-ge. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
18. Soskice , J. M. (1985). Metaphor and Religious Language. Oxford : Oxford Univer-sity Press.
19. Te Velde, R. (2006). Aquinas on God: The “Divine Science” of the Summa Theologiae. Aldershot : Ashgate.
20. Turner, D. (1995). The Darkness of God: Negativity in Christian Mysticism. Camb-ridge : Cambridge University Press.