Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Fiziksel Aktivite Düzeyi, Akıllı Telefon Bağımlılığı ve Yaşam Kalitesinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Çalışmanın amacı üniversite öğrencilerinin fiziksel aktivite düzeyi, akıllı telefon bağımlılığı ve yaşam kalitesinin incelenmesi ve aralarındaki ilişkiyi belirlemektir. Çalışmaya 216 kadın ve 181 erkek olmak üzere toplam 397 katılımcı katılmıştır. Katılımcılar uluslararası fiziksel aktivite ölçeği (kısa form), akıllı telefon bağımlılığı ve yaşam kalitesi ölçeklerini doldurmuştur. Verilerin analizinde SPSS 24 istatistik programı aracılığıyla tanımlayıcı istatistiklerin yanı sıra, normal dağılım sonucuna göre bağımsız ikili değişkenlerin karşılaştırılması için Bağımsız T testi, değişkenler arasındaki ilişki için Pearson korelasyon testi uygulanmıştır. Çalışma sonunda katılımcıların çoğunluğunun fiziksel aktivite düzeylerinin orta düzeyde olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca yaşam kalitesi, fiziksel aktivite düzeyi ve akıllı telefon bağımlılığı cinsiyet açısından karşılaştırıldığında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark olduğu tespit edilmiştir (p<0,05). Katılımcıların fiziksel aktivite puanları ile yaşam kalitesi puanları arasında pozitif yönde anlamlı bir ilişki bulunurken, yaşam kalitesi ile akıllı telefon bağımlılığı puanları arasında negatif yönde çok anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Akıllı telefon, internet vb. bağımlılıklar hakkında seminer ya da eğitimler verilerek üniversite öğrencilerinin bilinçlendirilmesi ve bu sayede yaşam kalitelerinin iyileştirilmesine yardımcı olunabilir. Bunun yanı sıra kampüs içi rekreatif alanlarının oluşturulması veya arttırılmasıyla fiziksel aktivite yapma motivasyonu veya alışkanlığı arttırılabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Fiziksel aktivite
• Akıllı telefon bağımlılığı
• Yaşam kalitesi
• Üniversite öğrencisi

Investigation of Physical Activity Level, Smartphone Addiction and Quality of Life of University Students

Öz

The aim of the study is to examine the physical activity level, smartphone addiction and quality of life of university students and to determine the relationship between them. A total of 397 participants, 221 women and 182 men participated in the study. Participants filled out the international physical activity scale (short form), smartphone addiction, and quality of life scales. In the analysis of the data, in addition to descriptive statistics through SPSS 24 statistical program, Independent T test was applied for the comparison of independent binary variables according to the result of normal distribution, and Pearson correlation test was applied for the relationship between variables. At the end of the study, it was seen that the majority of the participants had a moderate level of physical activity. In addition, when quality of life, physical activity level, and smartphone addiction were compared in terms of gender, it was determined that there was a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). While there was a significant positive correlation between the participants' physical activity scores and quality of life scores, a very significant negative correlation was found between quality of life and smartphone addiction scores (p<0.05). By providing seminar and similar training on smartphone, internet and similar addictions, university students can be made aware of and their quality of life can be improved. In addition, by creating or increasing recreational areas on campus, motivation or habits for physical activity can be increased.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Physical activity
• Smartphone addiction
• Quality of life
• University student

Kaynakça

1. Alaca, N. (2020). The impact of internet addiction on depression, physical activity level and trigger point sensitivity in Turkish university students. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 33(4), 623-630.
2. Al-Mohaimeed, A., Alharbi, M., & Mahmood, F.M. (2022). Problematic smartphone usage and quality of life among Saudi adults. European Review for Medical & Pharmacological Sciences, 26(15).
3. Álvarez-Bueno, C., Pesce, C., Cavero-Redondo, I., Sánchez-López, M., Garrido-Miguel, M., & Martínez-Vizcaíno, V. (2017). Academic achievement and physical activity: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 140(6).
4. Awasthi, S., Kaur, A., Solanki, H. K., Pamei, G., & Bhatt, M. (2020). Smartphone use and the quality of life of medical students in the Kumaun Region, Uttarakhand. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 9(8), 4252-4258.
5. Baloğlu, M., Şahin, R., & Arpaci, I. (2020). A review of recent research in problematic internet use: gender and cultural differences. Current Opinion in Psychology, 36, 124-129.
6. Basu S, Garg S, Singh M. M., & Kohli C. (2018). Addiction-like behavior associated with mobile phone usage among medical students in Delhi. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine 40, 446–51.
7. Büke, M., Egesoy, H., & Unver, F. (2021). The effect of smartphone addiction on physical activity level in sports science undergraduates. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 28, 530-534.
8. Cha, S.S., & Seo, B.K. (2018). Smartphone use and smartphone addiction in middle school students in Korea: Prevalence, social networking service, and game use. Health Psychology Open, 5(1), 2055102918755046.

9. Chraif, M., & Dumitru, D. (2015). Gender differences on wellbeing and quality of life at young students at psychology. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 1579-1583.
10. Costa, D.S., Mercieca-Bebber, R., Rutherford, C., Tait, M.A., & King, M.T. (2021). How is quality of life defined and assessed in published research? Quality of Life Research, 30, 2109-2121
11. Craig C.L, Marshall A.L, Sjostrom M, Bauman A.E, Booth M. L., & Ainsworth B.E. (2003). International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 35:1381-1395.
12. Çiçek, G. (2018). Quality of Life and Physical Activity among University Students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(6), 1141-1148.
13. De Greeff, J. W., Bosker, R. J., Oosterlaan, J., Visscher, C., & Hartman, E. (2018). Effects of physical activity on executive functions, attention and academic performance in preadolescent children: a meta-analysis. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 21(5), 501-507.
14. Driskell, J.A, Kim Y.N, & Goebel, K.J. (2005). Few differences found in the typical eating and physical activity habits of lower-level and upper-level university students. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 7(14), 328-359.
15. Efendi, V., Özalevli, S., Naz, İ., & Kılınç, O. (2018). The effects of smoking on body composition, pulmonary function, physical activity and health-related quality of life among healthy women. Tuberk Toraks, 66(2), 101-108.
16. Erdoğanoğlu, Y., & Arslan, B.Ç. (2019). “Gençlerde akıllı telefon kullanımının fiziksel kapasite üzerine etkisi”. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 20(5), 499-505.
17. Francis K.T. (1999). Status of the year 2000 health goals for physical activity and fitness. Physical Therapy, 79(4), 405–414.
18. Frontera, W. (2010). DeLisa fiziksel tıp ve rehabilitasyon (5. Baskı). Güneş Yayınları
19. Ge, Y., Xin, S., Luan, D., Zou, Z., Liu, M., Bai, X., … et al. (2019). Association of physical activity, sedentary time, and sleep duration on the health-related quality of life of college students in Northeast China. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17, 1-8.
20. IPAQ Research Committee. (2005). Guidelines for data processing and analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) – Short and Long Forms. https://sites.google.com/view/ipaq/score
21. Haripriya, S., Samuel, S. E., & Megha, M. (2019). Correlation between smartphone addiction, sleep quality and physical activity among young adults. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 5–9.
22. Sahimi, H. M. S., Norzan, M. H., Nik-Jaafar, N. R., Sharip, S., Ashraf, A., Shanmugam, K., … et al. (2022). Excessive smartphone use and its correlations with social anxiety and quality of life among medical students in a public university in Malaysia: A cross-sectional study. Front Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.956168
23. Kargün, M., Togo, O.T., Biner, M., & Pala, A. (2016). Üniversite öğrencilerinin fiziksel aktivite düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Marmara Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1), 61-72.
24. Kartal, M., & Balcı, E. (2018). Harran Üniversitesi öğrencilerinin fiziksel aktivite düzeyleri ve ilişkin faktörler. Sağlık Akademisyenleri Dergisi, 5(4), 301-310.
25. Koçyiğit, H., Aydemir, Ö., Fişek, G., Ölmez, N., & Memiş, A. (1999). SF36’ nın Türkçe için güvenilirliği ve geçerliliği. İlaç ve Tedavi Dergisi, 12(2), 102-106.
26. Kwon, M., Kim D.J., Cho, H., & Yang, S. (2013). The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PloS One, 8(12), e83558.
27. Lee, K. E., Kim, S. H., Ha, T.Y., Yoo, Y. M., Han, J. J., Jung, J. H., … et al. (2016). Dependency on smartphone use and its association with anxiety in Korea. Public Health Reports, 131(3), 411-419.
28. Liao, Y.H., Kao, T. W., Peng, T. C., & Chang, Y.W. (2021). Gender differences in the association between physical activity and health-related quality of life among community-dwelling elders. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 33, 901-908.
29. Manuela, P., & Gheorghe, P.A. (2020). Report on the level of physical activity among students. Sci Mov. Health, 312-317.
30. Marquez, D. X., Aguiñaga, S., Vásquez, P. M., Conroy, D. E., Erickson, K. I., Hillman, C., … et al. (2020). A systematic review of physical activity and quality of life and well-being. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 10(5), 1098-1109.
31. Miles, L. (2007), Physical activity and health. Nutrition Bulletin, 32, 314-363
32. Nikitara, K., Odani, S., Demenagas, N., Rachiotis, G., Symvoulakis, E., & Vardavas, C. (2021). Prevalence and correlates of physical inactivity in adults across 28 European countries. European Journal of Public Health, 31(4), 840-845.
33. Noyan, C. O., Enez-Darçın, A., Nurmedov, S., Yılmaz, O., & Dilbaz, N. (2015). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version among university students. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 16, 73-81.
34. Peterson, N. E., Sirard, J. R., Kulbok, P. A., DeBoer, M. D., & Erickson, J. M. (2018). Sedentary behavior and physical activity of young adult university students. Research in Nursing & Health, 41(1), 30-38.
35. Saglam M, Arikan H, Savci S, Inal-Ince D, Bosnak-Guclu M, Karabulut E, et al. (2010). International physical activity questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Percept Mot Skills, 111, 278–84.
36. Savcı, S., Öztürk, M., Arıkan, H., İnal İnce, D., & Tokgözoğlu, L. (2006). Physical activity levels of university students. Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology, 34(3), 166-172.
37. Sekaran, U. (1992). Research methods in business. John Willey & Sons.
38. Shahrestanaki, E., Maajani, K., Safarpour, M., Ghahremanlou, H. H., Tiyuri, A., & Sahebkar, M. (2020). The relationship between smartphone addiction and quality of life among students at Tehran University of medical sciences. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 7(1), 23-32.
39. Sinha, B.R.K. (2019). Introduction: An overview of the concept of quality of life. Multidimensional Approach to Quality of Life Issues: A Spatial Analysis, 3-23.
40. Taywade, A., & Khubalkar, R. (2019). Gender differences in smartphone usage patterns of adolescents. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 7(4), 516-523.
41. Ulutaş, E., Çilli, A., Aydın, A., Muratdağı, G., & Ekerbiçer, H. (2020). Sakarya Üniversitesi öğrencilerinin akıllı telefon kullanma düzeyleri ve yaşam kalitesi düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Sakarya Tıp Dergisi, 10(Özel Sayı), 24-32.
42. Vanhees, L., Lefevre, J., Philippaerts, R., Martens, M., Huygens, W., Troosters, T., et al. (2005). How to assess physical activity? How to assess physical fitness? European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation, 12(2), 102-114.
43. Warburton, D.E., & Bredin, S.S. (2016). Reflections on physical activity and health: what should we recommend? Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 32(4), 495-504.
44. Ware, J. E. J., & Sherbourne, C.D. (1992). The MOS 36-itemshort-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual frame work and item selection. MedCare, 30(6), 473-483.