Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of Physical Fitness Parameters by Birth Weight Status in Children Participating in Regular Training

Cilt: 17 Sayı: 3 29 Eylül 2026
PDF İndir
TR EN

Comparison of Physical Fitness Parameters by Birth Weight Status in Children Participating in Regular Training

Öz

The purpose of this study was to compare physical fitness parameters across birth-weight groups in boys aged 7–12 years who regularly participated in sports training. The study sample consisted of 170 volunteer boys who regularly participated in training at sports schools in Çanakkale, Türkiye. Participants were classified into low (<10th percentile), normal (10th–90th percentile), and high (>90th percentile) birth-weight-for-gestational-age groups.  Anthropometric characteristics and physical fitness levels were assessed using the EUROFIT test battery. For data analysis, one-way ANOVA was used to compare the groups, LSD post-hoc tests were applied to identify significant differences, and ANCOVA was performed to control for the effects of age and training age. After controlling for age and training age, no statistically significant differences were found among the Low, Normal, and High groups in any of the physical fitness parameters assessed (p > .05). The results indicate that balance, flexibility, upper-limb movement speed, muscular strength and endurance, agility, and sprint performance were similar across the birth-weight groups. In conclusion, birth-weight status was not significantly associated with physical fitness performance in regularly trained boys aged 7–12 years. These findings suggest that differences in birth-weight status may not be a prominent factor in explaining physical fitness among children with a regular training background.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Birth weight, Children, Physical fitness, Sports, Training

Etik Beyan

The study protocol was approved by the Scientific Research Ethics Committee of the Graduate School, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University (Ref. No.: E-84026528-050.01.04-2200106577; Decision: 11/06; Date: 26 May 2022; Project code: 2022-YÖNP-0466). All procedures complied with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Kaynakça

  1. American College of Sports Medicine. (2021). ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
  2. Alter, M. J. (2004). Science of flexibility (3rd ed.). Human Kinetics.
  3. Bompa, T. O., & Buzzichelli, C. (2019). Periodization: Theory and methodology of training (6th ed.). Human Kinetics.
  4. Boreham, C. A., Murray, L., Dedman, D., Davey Smith, G., Savage, J. M., & Strain, J. J. (2001). Birthweight and aerobic fitness in adolescents: The Northern Ireland Young Hearts Project. Public Health, 115(6), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ph.1900800
  5. Burns, Y., O’Callaghan, M., McDonell, B., & Rogers, Y. (2004). Movement and motor development in ELBW infants at 1 year is related to cognitive and motor abilities at 4 years. Early Human Development, 80, 19–29.
  6. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2024). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (36. baskı). Pegem Akademi.
  7. Chang, F., Qian, D., Zong, S., & Shen, Y. (2024). The effect of different resistance and assistance loads on 30-m sprint kinematics. PLOS ONE, 19(3), e0298517. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298517
  8. Cormie, P., McGuigan, M. R., & Newton, R. U. (2011). Developing maximal neuromuscular power: Part 1—Biological basis of maximal power production. Sports Medicine, 41(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.2165/11537690-000000000-00000
  9. Council of Europe, Committee for the Development of Sport. (1983). Testing physical fitness: EUROFIT—Experimental battery, provisional handbook. Council of Europe.
  10. Curhan, G. C., Willett, W. C., Rimm, E. B., Spiegelman, D., Ascherio, A. L., & Stampfer, M. J. (1996). Birth weight and adult hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and obesity in US men. Circulation, 94(12), 3246–3250. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.94.12.3246

Kaynak Göster

APA
Özen, G., & Özer, D. (2026). Comparison of Physical Fitness Parameters by Birth Weight Status in Children Participating in Regular Training. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 17(3), 413-426. https://doi.org/10.17155/omuspd.1808471
AMA
1.Özen G, Özer D. Comparison of Physical Fitness Parameters by Birth Weight Status in Children Participating in Regular Training. SPD. 2026;17(3):413-426. doi:10.17155/omuspd.1808471
Chicago
Özen, Gökmen, ve Doğukan Özer. 2026. “Comparison of Physical Fitness Parameters by Birth Weight Status in Children Participating in Regular Training”. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi 17 (3): 413-26. https://doi.org/10.17155/omuspd.1808471.
EndNote
Özen G, Özer D (01 Eylül 2026) Comparison of Physical Fitness Parameters by Birth Weight Status in Children Participating in Regular Training. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi 17 3 413–426.
IEEE
[1]G. Özen ve D. Özer, “Comparison of Physical Fitness Parameters by Birth Weight Status in Children Participating in Regular Training”, SPD, c. 17, sy 3, ss. 413–426, Eyl. 2026, doi: 10.17155/omuspd.1808471.
ISNAD
Özen, Gökmen - Özer, Doğukan. “Comparison of Physical Fitness Parameters by Birth Weight Status in Children Participating in Regular Training”. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi 17/3 (01 Eylül 2026): 413-426. https://doi.org/10.17155/omuspd.1808471.
JAMA
1.Özen G, Özer D. Comparison of Physical Fitness Parameters by Birth Weight Status in Children Participating in Regular Training. SPD. 2026;17:413–426.
MLA
Özen, Gökmen, ve Doğukan Özer. “Comparison of Physical Fitness Parameters by Birth Weight Status in Children Participating in Regular Training”. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 17, sy 3, Eylül 2026, ss. 413-26, doi:10.17155/omuspd.1808471.
Vancouver
1.Gökmen Özen, Doğukan Özer. Comparison of Physical Fitness Parameters by Birth Weight Status in Children Participating in Regular Training. SPD. 01 Eylül 2026;17(3):413-26. doi:10.17155/omuspd.1808471