FARKLI HIZLARDA İP ATLAMA ANTRENMANLARININ ANAEROBİK GÜCE ETKİSİ

Yıl 2017, , 75 - 86, 01.07.2017

Gülşah Şahin

https://doi.org/10.17155/omuspd.322765

Cited By: 3

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı kadınlarda farklı
hızlarda ip atlama antrenmanlarının, dikey, 
yatay, ortalama ve zirve anaerobik güç üzerindeki etkisini
karşılaştırmaktır. Çalışmaya yavaş ip atlayan grup (n=10, yaş: 21,4±2,3 yıl, vücut
ağırlığı 54,30±6,03 kg, boy uzunluğu: 161,30±6,99 cm) ve hızlı ip atlayan grup
(n=10, yaş: 21±1,8 yıl, vücut ağırlığı: 56,50±5,91 kg, boy uzunluğu: 163,20±7,02
cm) olarak ayrılan toplamda 20 antrenmanlı 
kadın katılmıştır. İp atlama hızı metronom kullanılarak ayarlanmış ve tüm
katılımcılar bir hafta içinde farklı günlerde 50 metre sürat, dikey sıçrama ve
anaerobik teste katılmıştır. Ortalama ve zirve güç Wingate testi, yatay ve
dikey güç formül kullanılarak hesaplanmıştır. İp atlama antrenmanları
pazartesi, salı ve cuma günleri saat 14:00 ile 15:00 arasında gerçekleştirilmiştir.
Tüm katılımcılar haftada üç gün ve sekiz hafta ip atlama antrenmanına
katılmıştır. Antrenmandan önce yapılan testler sekiz hafta sonra tekrar
uygulanmıştır. Tüm katılımcılar bilgilendirmiş ve yazılı onamları alınmıştır.
Araştırma yöntemi ve içeriği Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Etik kurul komisyonu
tarafından onaylanmıştır. Antrenmandan sonra, yavaş ip atlayan grup ve hızlı ip
atlayan grup arasında ortalama güç, zirve güç, yatay ve dikey anaerobik güç
arasında anlamlı fark tespit edilmemiştir (p>0,05). Yavaş ip atlayan grubun
antrenmandan önce ve sonra ortalama güç, zirve güç ve yatay güçleri arasındaki
fark anlamlıdır (p<0,05), fakat dikey güç farkı anlamlı değildir
(p>0,05). Hızlı ip atlayan grubun antrenmandan önce ve sonra dikey güç ve
zirve güç gelişimi anlamlıdır (p<0,05), fakat yatay güç, ortalama güç
gelişimi anlamlı değildir (p>0,05). Sonuç olarak düşük ve yüksek hızda ip
atlama egzersizlerinin anaerobik güç üzerinde benzer şekilde etki edebileceği söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dikey güç, İp atlama, Ortalama güç, Yatay güç, Zirve güç

THE EFFECT OF ROPE JUMPING TRAINING OF DIFFERENT SPEEDS ON ANAEROBIC POWER

Öz

The objective of this study was to compare the effect of rope jumping
training on anaerobic vertical, horizontal, mean and peak power of rope jumping
at different speeds in trained females. The study was comprised of 20 trained
females as the low-speed jumping group (n=10, mean age 21.4±2.3 years, body weight
54.30±6.03 kg, height 161.30±6.99 cm) and the high-speed jumping group (n=10,
mean age 21±1.8 years, body weight: 56.50±5.91 kg, height 163.20±7.02 cm). The
jumping speed was adjusted using a metronome. All participants were asked to perform a 50 m
sprint test, vertical jumping test, and Wingate anaerobic tests (WAnT) on
different days in one week. Mean and peak powers were calculated by using Wingate
test; horizontal power and vertical power were calculated by using formula.  The rope jumping program was applied every
Monday, Tuesday and Friday, at 2 pm-3 pm. Thus, participants trained three
times per week throughout the 8weeks research program. All the tests were
administrated before and after eight weeks of training. The participants were
informed about the procedure and possible risks of study and informed consent
was obtained from all. The present study was performed in accordance with the
ethical standards approved by the Ethics Committee of Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart
University. There was no significant difference in horizontal power, vertical power,
mean power and peak power between low rope jumping group and high rope jumping
group in post-training(p>0.05). There was a significant
difference in mean power, peak power
and horizontal power, but no difference in vertical power between post and
pre-training in low rope jumping group. There was significant difference
in vertical power, peak power, but no
difference in horizontal power and mean power between pre and post-training in high
rope jumping group.  It can be
concluded that rope jumping at low and high speed may have the same effect on anaerobic
power.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Horizontal power, Mean power, Peak power, Rope jumping, Vertical power

Kaynakça

• Kawamori NK, Haff GG. The optimal training load for the development of muscular power, J Strength Cond Res, 2004; 18:675-84.
• Cormie P, McCaulley GO, McBride JM. Power versus strength-power jump squat training: influence on the load-power relationship, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2007; 39: 996-1003.
• Sleivert G, Taingahue M. The relationship between maximal jump-squat power and sprint acceleration in athletes, Eur J Appl Physiol, 2004; 91: 46-52.
• Sands WA, McNeal JR, Ochi MT, Urbanek TL, Jemni M, Stone MH. Comparison of the Wingate and Bosco anaerobic tests, J Strength Cond Res, 2004; 18:810–815.
• Lee B. Jump Rope Training, 2nd Edition, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2010.
• Brancazio PJ. Sport Science: Physical Laws and Optimum Performance. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1984.
• Trecroci A, Cavaggioni L, Caccia R, Alberti G. Jump Rope Training: Balance and Motor Coordination in Preadolescent Soccer Players, Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 2015; 14(4):792-798.
• Baker JA. Comparison of rope skipping and jogging as methods of improving cardiovascular efficiency of college men, Res Q Exercise Sport, 1968; 39(2): 240-243.
• Buyze MT, Foster C, Pollock ML, Sennett SM, Hare J, Sol N. Comparative training responses to rope skipping and jogging, The Physician And Sports Medicine , 1986; 14(1):11.
• Quirk JE, Sinning WE. Anaerobic and aerobic responses of male and female to rope skipping, Med Sci Sport Exer, 1982; 14: 26-29.
• Chen CC, Lin SY. The impact of rope jumping exercise on physical fitness of visually impaired students, Res Dev Disabil, 2011; 32: 25–29.
• Artnett MG, Lutz B. Effects of rope-jump training on the os calcis stiffness index of postpubescent girls, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 2002;34(12): 1913-1919.
• Kawano H, Motegi F, Ando T, Gando Y, Mineta M, Numao S, Miyashita M, Sakamoto S, Higuchi M. Appetite after rope skipping may differ between males and females, Obesity Research & Clinical Practice, 2012; 6(2):121–127.
• Masterson GL, Brown SP. Effects of weighted rope jump training on power performance in collegians, J Strength Cond Res, 1993;7:108–14.
• Beam W, Adams G. Exercise Physiology Laboratory Manual. 6th Edition. McGraw-Hill Humanities. 2010.
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd Edition. L. Erbaum Associates Publishing. Hillsdale NJ.1988.
• Makaruk H, Czaplicki A, Sacewicz T, Sadowski J. The effects of single versus repeated plyometrics on landing biomechanics and jumping performance in men, Biol Sport, 2014; 31: 9-14.
• Adams GM. Exercise Physiology Laboratory Manual, 3rd Edition. Boston, MA: McGraw- Hill. 1998.
• Changela PK, Bhatt S. The correlation study of the vertical jump test and Wingate cycle test as a method to assess anaerobic power in high school basketball players, IJSRP, 2012; 2: 1-5.
• Wisloff U, Castagna C, Helgerud J, Jones R, Hoff J. Strong correlation of maximal strength with sprint performance and vertical jump height in elite soccer players, Br J Sports Med, 2004; 38: 285-288.
• Sheppard JM, Cronin JB, Garbett TJ, McGuigan MR, Etxebarria N, Newton RU. Relative importance of strength, power, and anthropometric measures to jump performance of elite volleyball players, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2008; 22: 758-765.
• Young W, Wilson G, Byrne C. Relationship between strength qualities and performance in standing and run-up vertical jumps, Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 1999; 39, 285-293.
• DeVita P, Skelly WA. Effect of landing stiffness on joint kinetics and energetics in lower extremity, Med Sci Sport Exerc, 1992; 24: 108-115.
• Villarreal ESS, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ, Izquierdo M. Low and moderate plyometric training frequency produces greater jumping and sprinting gains compared with high frequency, J Strength Cond Res, 2008; 22: 715-725.
• Lyons TS, Navalta JW, Callahan ZJ. Evaluation of Metabolic Stress between Jumping at Different Cadences on the Digi-Jump Machine, International Journal of Exercise Science, 2010; 3(4):233-238.
• Nesser TW, Latin RW, Berg K, Prentice E. Physiological determinants of 40-meter sprint performance in young male athletes, J Strength Cond Res, 1996; 10: 263-267.
• Hennessy L, Kilty J. Relationship of the stretch-shortening cycle to sprint performance in trained female athletes, J Strength Cond Res, 2001; 15: 326-331.
• Partavi S. Effects of 7 weeks of rope-jump training on cardiovascular endurance, speed, and agility in middle school student boys, Sport Science, 2013; 6(2): 40‐43.
• Milanese C, Bertucco M, Zancanaro C. The effects of three different rear knee angles on kinematics in the sprint start, Biol Sport, 2014; 31(3): 209-215.
• Makaruk H. Acute effects of rope jumping warm-up on power and jumping ability in track and field athletes, Polish Journal of Sport Tourism, 2013; 20: 200-204.
• Orhan S. Effect of weighted rope jumping training performed by repetition method on the heart rate, anaerobic power, agility and reaction time of basketball players, Advance in Environmental Biology, 2013; 7: 945-951.