Spor Merkezine Üye Bireylerin Rekreasyon Fayda Düzeylerinin Bazı Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, spor merkezine üye bireylerin rekreasyon fayda düzeylerinin cinsiyet ve algıladıkları egzersiz şiddetine göre incelenmesidir. Çalışmaya Konya ilinde Fitness merkezine üye, 147 kadın, 342 erkek olmak üzere toplam 489 (ortyaş 22,76± 3,11) yetişkin birey katılmıştır. Araştırma kesitsel tarama modelindedir. Verilerin toplanmasında araştırmacılar tarafından düzenlenen ‘Kişisel Bilgi Formu’ ve ‘Rekreasyon Fayda Ölçeği (RFÖ)’ kullanılmıştır. Veriler; betimsel istatistik yöntemler, bağımsız gruplar t testi ve ANOVA testleri kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Katılımcıların rekreasyon fayda ölçeğinden elde ettikleri puanların cinsiyet değişkeni açısından farklılaşmadığı görülmüştür (p>0,05). Spor merkezinde aktivitelere hafif, orta ve şiddetli yoğunlukta katılım gösterdiklerini ifade eden katılımcıların fiziksel ve psikolojik fayda alt boyut ve toplam puanlarında anlamlı bir fark bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir (p<0,05). Sonuç olarak, fitness aktivitesine hafif şiddette katılanların algıladıkları rekreasyon faydalarının, orta ve şiddetli düzeyde katılanlara göre daha fazla olduğu söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Rekreasyonel fayda
• Spor Merkezi
• Cinsiyet
• Algılanan Aktivite Şiddeti

Öz

The aim of this study was to investigate sports center members’ leisure benefits with regard to gender and perceived uals who were fitness center member in Konya. The research was a cross-sectional survey model. Demographic information form was created by the researchers and ‘Leisure Benefits Scale’ was used to data collection. The data were analyzed usiexercise intensity. The sample of the study consisted of 147 female and 342 male in total 489 (mean 22,76 ± 3,13) adult individng descriptive statistical methods, t test and ANOVA test. It was observed that the leisure benefits scores obtained from participants did not differ in terms of gender variable (p>0,05). It was found that there was a significant difference physical and psychological benefit subscales and total scores of the participants who stated that they participated in activities in sports center in mild, moderate and high intensity (p<0,05). It can be concluded that the perceived leisure benefits of mild intensity level participants were more than moderate and high intensity level participants.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Leisure Benefits
• Sports Center,
• Gender
• Perceived exercise intensity

Kaynakça

1. 1. Steinbach D, Graf C. Leisure Time Physical Activity and Sedentariness. In: Kirch W. (eds) Encyclopedia of Public Health. Springer, Dordrecht, 2008.
2. 2. McKinney J, Lithwick DJ, Morrison BN, Nazzari H, Isserow SH, Heilbron B, Krahn AD. The health benefits of physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness. British Columbia Medical Journal, 2016; 58: 131–137.
3. 3. Zhao M, Veeranki SP, Li S, et al., Beneficial associations of low and large doses of leisure time physical activity with all-cause, cardiovascular disease and cancer mortality: a national cohort study of 88,140 US adults, British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2019; 53: 1405-1411.
4. 4. Asztalos M, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Cardon G. The relationship between physical activity and mental health varies across activity intensity levels and dimensions of mental health among women and men. Public Health Nutr, 2009; 13(8):1207-1214.
5. 5. Tyson Ph, Wilson K, Crone D, Brailsford R, Laws K. Physical activity and mental health in student population. Journal of Mental Health, 2010; 19: 492–499.
6. 6. Holtermann A, Hansen JV, Burr H, Søgaard K, Sjøgaard G. The health paradox of occupational and leisure-time physical activity. Br J Sports Med, 2012; 46(4): 291-295.
7. 7. Holtermann A, Krause N, Van Der Beek AJ, Straker L. The physical activity paradox: six reasons why occupational physical activity (OPA) does not confer the cardiovascular health benefits that leisure time physical activity does. 2018:149-150.
8. 8. Li J, Loerbroks A, Angerer P. Physical activity and risk of cardiovascular disease: what does the new epidemiological evidence show?. Current opinion in cardiology, 2013; 28(5): 575-583.

9. 9. Chang PJ, Wray L, Lin Y. Social relationships, leisure activity, and health in older adults. Health Psychology, 2014; 33(6): 516-523.
10. 10. Chang YC, Yeh TM, Pai FY, Huang TP. Sport activity for health!! The effects of karate participants’ involvement, perceived value, and leisure benefits on recommendation intention. International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health, 2018; 15(5): 953.
11. 11. Yeh TM, Chang YC, Lai MY. The relationships among leisure experience, leisure benefits and leisure satisfaction of you bike users. J. Sport Leis. Hosp. Res. 2017; 12:67–97.
12. 12. Wankel LM, Berger BG. The personal and social benefits of sport and physical activity. İn B. L. Driver, P.J. Brown, & G.L. Peterson (Eds.) Benefits of Leisure, 1991; 121-144.
13. 13. Heintzman P. The spiritual benefits of leisure. Leisure/Loisir, 2009; 33(1): 419-445.
14. 14. Hung HJ. A study on leisure benefits breaking through leisure activities. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University, 2012; 3(4): 77-92.
15. 15. Mensink GB, Ziese T, Kok FJ. Benefits of leisure-time physical activity on the cardiovascular risk profile at older age. International Journal of Epidemiology, 1999; 28(4), 659-666.
16. 16. Yue GJ. The Relationship between Leisure Involvement of Remote Control Plane Activities and Leisure Benefits. Unpublished Master Thesis). University of the Great Leaf, School of Management, 2012.
17. 17. Mannel RC, Stynes DJ. A retrospective: the benefits of leisure. In B. L. Driver, P. J. Brown & G. L. Peterson (Eds.), Benefits of leisure (pp. 461- 473). PA: Venture, 1991.
18. 18. Driver BL, Brown PJ, Peterson GL. Benefits of leisure. In Preliminary drafts of the chapters in this volume were presented at a workshop of the authors in Snowbird, Utah; Venture Publishing: 1991.
19. 19. Ho TK. A study of leisure attitudes and benefits for senior high school students at Ping Tung City and country in Taiwan (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). United States Sports, 2008.
20. 20. Chao CC. The relationship among leisure involvement, leisure benefits, and happiness of elementary schoolteachers in Tainan County. International Research in Education, 2013; 1(1): 29-51.
21. 21. Philipp SF. Race, gender, and leisure benefits. Leisure Sciences, 1997; 19(3): 191-207.
22. 22. Kim C, Scott D, Oh CO. Effects of acculturation, leisure benefits, and leisure constraints on acculturative stress and self-esteem among Korean immigrants. Loisir et Société/Society and Leisure, 2005; 28(1): 265-296.
23. 23. Eskiler E, Yıldız Y, Ayhan C. The effect of leisure benefits on leisure satisfaction: Extreme sports. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 2019; 21(1):16-20.
24. 24. Ayyıldız Durhan T, Karaküçük S. Çocuklarıyla baby gym aktivitelerine katılan ebeveynlerin rekreasyon fayda düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2017; 2 (4): 43-53, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gaunjss/issue/32639/346920.
25. 25. Thidemann A, Rekdal KE. Treningssenterbransjen. VIRKE Trening, 2016.
26. 26. Kirkegaard KL, Østerlund K. Fitnesskultur mellem forening og forretning: aktive fitnessudøveres træningsmotiver, tilfredshed og selvvurderede sundhed. Idrættens Analyseinstitut, 2010.
27. 27. Kikuga N, Matsushita M, Sawada SS, Gando Y, Matsuoka H, Odagiri Y, Inoue S. Factors associated with the benefit sought in leisure time and fitness club experiences: A cross-sectional study of japanese adults. Journal of Japan Society of Sports Industry, 2017; 27(1): 1-11.
28. 28. Akgül BM, Ertüzün E, Karaküçük S. Rekreasyon fayda ölçeği: Geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2018; 23(1): 25-34.
29. 29. Lee CJ, Tseng CC, Liu MY. Study on community Tai Chi Chuan participants' leisure benefits and well-being: Using Taoyuan City as an example. Technology and Health Care, 2016; 24(1): 289-295.
30. 30. Adams KB, Leibbrandt S, & Moon H. A critical review of the literature on social and leisure activity and wellbeing in later life. Ageing & Society, 2011; 31(4): 683-712.
31. 31. Csikszentmihalyi M, Hunter J. Happiness in everyday life: The uses of experience sampling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2003;4:185–199.
32. 32. Hills P, Argyle M. Positive moods derived from leisure and their relationship to happiness and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 1998;25:523–535.
33. 33. Parfitt G, Eston RG. The relationship between children’s habitual activity level and psychological well-being. Acta Paediatrica, 2005;94: 1791–1797.