BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Relationship between the Board Size and Financial Performance: Literature Review

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, - , 14.01.2015
https://doi.org/10.17541/oeybd.17415

Öz

The Cadbury Report (1992), a pioneer in outlining the financial aspects of corporate governance, was the first to put the spotlight on corporate boards of directors. Around the same time, academic work started to gain impetus with the Hermalin and Weisbach (1991) study. The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between the number of members of the board of directors with accounting and market-based performance indicators empirical research in the national and international literature. For this purpose, all studies conducted in the early 1990s up to the present day are classified examined in a systematic way. A significant part of the board of directors of the studies indicated a negative relationship between financial performance.

Kaynakça

  • Ahmed, K., Hossain, M. & Adams, M. B. (2006). The Effects of Board Composition and Board Size on the Informativeness of Annual Accounting Earnings. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(5), 418-431.
  • Akdoğan, Y. E. & Boyacıoğlu, M. A. (2010). Corporate Governance In Turkey: An Overview. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 24, 11-30.
  • Andres, de P. A., Azofra, V. & Lopez, F. (2005). Corporate Boards in Some OECD Countries: Size, Composition, Functioning and Effectiveness. Corporate Governance. An International Review, 13, 197- 210.
  • Anne, H. C. & Williams, M. S. (2003). International Comparative Analysis of the Association Between Board Structure and The Efficiency of Value Added by a Firm from its Physical Capital and İntellectual Capital Resources. The International Journal of Accounting, 38, 465- 491.
  • Arosa B., Iturralde T. & Maseda A. (2010). Outsiders on The Board of Directors and Firm Performance: Evidence from Spanish Non-Listed Family Firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1, 236– 245.
  • Arosa B., Iturralde T. & Maseda A. (2013). The Board Structure and Firm Performance in Smes: Evidence from Spain. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 19, 127– 135.
  • Aygün, M., İç, S. & Sayın, C. (2011). Yönetim Kurulu Büyüklüğünü Belirleyen Faktörler ve Yönetim Kurulu Büyüklüğü İle Firma Performansı Arasındaki İlişki. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10 , 77-92.
  • Baptista, M. A. A., Klotzle, M.C. & Melo, M.A.C. (2011). Ceo Duality and Firm Performance in Brazil: Evidence From 2008. Revista Persamento Contemporaneo em Aministracao, UFF, 11, 36- 55.
  • Barnhart, S. W. & Roseinstein, S. (1998). Board Composition, Managerial Ownership and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis. The Financial Review, 33, 1- 16.
  • Bhagat, S. & Black, B. (2002). The Non-Correlation Between Board İndependence And Long Term Firm Performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 27, 231– 274.
  • Bhagat, S. & Bolton, B. (2013). Director Ownership, Governance and Performance. Journal of Financial and Quantıtatıve Analysis, 48(1), 1- 33.
  • Beiner, S., Drobetz, W., Schmid, F. & Zimmermann, H. (2003). Is Board Size Anindependent Corporate Governance Mechanism?. Kyklos, 57, 327- 356.
  • Beiner, S., Drobetz, W., Schmid, M. M. & Zimmermann, H. (2006). An İntegrated Framework of Corporate Governance and Firm Valuation, European Financial Management, 12, 249- 283.
  • Bennedsen, M., Kongsted, H. C. & Nielsen, K. M. (2008). The Causal Effect of Board Size in the Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Firms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32, 1098- 1109.
  • Birnbaum, P. H. (1984). The Choice of Strategic Alternatives Under Increasing Regulation in High Technology Industries. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 489- 510.
  • Bouaziz, Z. & Triki, M. (2012). The İmpact of The Board of Directors on the Financial Performance of Tunisian Companies. Universal Journal of Marketing and Business Research, 1(2), 56- 71.
  • Bozec, R. (2005). Boards of Directors, Market Discipline and Firm Performance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32(9), 1921- 1960.
  • Bøhren, Ø. (2013). Board Size in Private Firms. Master of Science in Business & Economics, Major in Finance, BI Norwegian Business School.
  • Cadbury, A. (1992). Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. London: Gee Publishing.
  • Carter, D. A., Simskins, B. J. & Simpson, W. G. (2003). The Gender and Ethnic Diversity of US Boards and Board Committees and Firm Financial Performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396–414.
  • Cavaco, S., Challe, E., Crifo, P., Reberioux, A. & Roudaut, G. (2013). Board Independence and Operating Performance: Analysis On (French) Company and Individual Data. Departement D'economie, Ecole Polytechnique Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique, http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/drmwpaper/2014-2.htm, 01.07.2014.
  • Chen, E-T. & Nowland, J. (2010). Optimal Monitoring in Family-Owned Companies? Evidence from Asia. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18, 3- 17.
  • Chen, Z.L., Cherung, Y.L., Stouraitis & Wong, A. W. S. (2005). Ownership Concentration, Firm Performance and Dividend Policy in Hong Kong. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13 (4), 431- 449.
  • Cheng, S. (2008). Board Size and the Variability of Corporate Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 87, 157– 176.
  • Cheng, S., Evans III J. H. & Nagarajan, N. (2008). Board Size and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effects of the Market for Corporate Control, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, forthcoming, DOI: 10.1007/s11156-007-0074-3, 31(2), 121-145.
  • Choi, J. J., Park, S.W. & Yoo, S. S. (2007). The Value of Outside Directors: Evidence from Corporate Governance Reform in Korea. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42(4), 941- 962.
  • Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D. & Naveen, L. (2008). Boards: Does One Size Fit All?. Journal of Financial Economics, 87, 329- 356.
  • Conyon, J. M. & Peck, I. S. (1998). Board Size and Corporate Performance: Evidence from European Countries. The European Journal of Finance, 4, 291- 304.
  • Cook, R. (2013). The Relationship between Corporate Governance Practices and Firm Performance in the Junior Canadian Life Sciences Sector, Saint Mary’s University, Master of Business Administration, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
  • Cornett, M. M., Marcus A. J., Saunders, A. & Tehranian, H. (2007). The Impact of Institutional Ownership on Corporate Operating Performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31, 1771– 1794.
  • Dalton, R. D., Daily, M. C., Johnson, L. J. & Ellstarnd, A. E. (1999). Number of Directors and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 674- 686.
  • Davila, J. P. (2013). Board Characteristics and Firm Value: Evidence from Colombia. http://world-finance-conference.com/papers_wfc2/329.pdf, 11.02.2014.
  • Dehaene, A., Vuyst, V. D. & Ooghe, H. (2001). Corporate Performance and Board Structure in Belgian Companies. Long Range Planning, 34, 383- 393.
  • Ehikioya, B. I. (2009). Corporate Governance Structure and Firm Performance in Developing Economies: Evidence from Nigeria. Corporate Governance, 9(3), 231- 243.
  • Eisenberg, T., Sundgren, S. & Wells, M. T. (1998). Larger Board Size and Decreasing Firm Value in Small Firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 48, 35- 54.
  • Ekşi, C. (2009). Yönetim Kurulu Üyeliği ve Şirket Performansı: Türk Firmaları İçin Bulgular. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Elsayed, K. (2011). Board Size and Corporate Performance: The Missing Role of Board Leadership Structure. Journal of Management & Governance, 15(3), 415- 446.
  • Fama, E. F. & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
  • Fauzi, F. & Locke, S. (2012). Board Structure, Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: A Study of New Zealand Listed-Firms. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 8(2), 43– 67.
  • Ghabayen, M. A. (2012). Board Characteristics and Firm Performance: Case of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 2(2), 168- 200.
  • Gill, A. & Mathur, N. (2011a). Board Size, CEO Duality, and the Value of Canadian Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 1(3), 1- 13.
  • Gill, A. & Mathur, N. (2011b). The Impact of Board Size, CEO Duality and Corporate Liquidity on the Profitability of Canadian Service Firms. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 1(3), 83- 95.
  • Gill, A. & Obradovich, J. D. (2013). The Impact of Corporate Governance and Financial Leverage on the Value of American Firms. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, Issue: 91, 1- 13.
  • Goodstein, J., Gautam, K. & Boeker, W. (1994). The Effects Of Board Size and Diversity on Strategic Change. Strategic Management Journal, 15(3), 241- 250.
  • Guest, P. M. (2009). The Impact of Board Size on Firm Performance: Evidence From The UK. The European Journal of Finance. 15(4), 385- 404.
  • Haniffa, R. & Hudaib, M. (2006). Corporate Governance Structure and Performance of Malaysian Listed Companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33, 1034- 1062.
  • Harrison, J. R. (1987). The Strategic Use of Corporate Board Committees. California Management Review, 30, 109- 125.
  • Hermalin, E. B. & Weisbach M. S. (1991). The Effect of Board Composition and Direct Incentives on Firm Performance. Financial Management, 20, 101- 112.
  • Herman, E. (1981). Corporate Control, Corporate Power. New York: Cambridge University Pres.
  • Horváth, R. & Spirollari, P. (2012). Do the Board of Directors´ Characteristics Influence Firm´s Performance? The U.S. Evidence. Prague Economic Papers, 4, 470- 486.
  • Huse, M. (2004). Boards, Governance and Value Creation: The Human Side of Corporate Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Huther, J. (1997). An Empirical Test of The Effect of Board Size on Firm Efficiency”, Economics Letters, 54, 259- 264.
  • Jensen, C. M. (1993). The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit and the Failure of Internal Control Systems. Journal of Finance, 48, 831– 880.
  • Jensen, M.C. & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305- 359.
  • Joecks, J., Pull, K. & Vetter K. (2013). Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass”?. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 61- 72.
  • Kiel, G. C. & Nicholson, G. J. (2003). Board Composition and Corporate Performance: How the Australian Experience Informs Contrasting Theories of Corporate Governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 189- 205.
  • Kim, Y. (2007). The Proportion and Social Capital of Outside Directors and Their Impacts on Firm Value: Evidence from Korea. Corporate Governance, 15(6), 1168- 1176.
  • Kim, K. H. (2013). Deep Structures in CEO Duality-Firm Performance Linkage. International Management Review, 9(2), 11- 23.
  • Koerniadi, H. & Tourani-Rad A. (2012). Does Board Independence Matter? Evidence from New Zealand. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal, 6(2), 3- 18.
  • Kumar, N. & Singh, J.P. (2013). Effect of Board Size and Promoter Ownership on Firm Value: Some Empirical Findings from India. Corporate Governance, 13(1), 88- 98.
  • Kyereboah-Coleman, A. (2007). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Africa: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis, http://wuhjkww.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/2768a80048a7e7cbad47ef6060ad5911/Kyereboah-Coleuhjkman%2B %2BCorporate%2BGovernance.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&ContentCache=NONE, 13.01.2014.
  • Lam, T. Y. & Lee, S. K. (2008). CEO Duality and Firm Performance: Evidence From Hong Kong. Corporate Governance, 8(3), 299- 316.
  • Larmou, S. & Vafeas, N. (2009). The Relation Between Board Size and Firm Performance in Firms with a History of Poor Operating Performance. Journal of Management Governance, 14(1), 61- 85.
  • Lasfer, M. A. (2004). On the Monitoring Role of the Board of Directors: The Case of the Adoption of Cadbury Recommendations in the UK. Advances in Financial Economics, 9, 287- 326.
  • Latif, B., Shahid, M. N., Haq, M. Z. U., Waqas, H. M. & Arshad, A. (2013). Impact of Corporate Governance on Firm Performance: Evidence from Sugar Mills of Pakistan. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(1), 51- 59.
  • Lefort, F. & Urzúa, F. (2008). Board Independence, Firm Performance and Ownership Concentration: Evidence from Chile. Journal of Business Research, 61, 615-622.
  • Liao, J. & Young, M. (2013). Firm Uncertainty and Board Size in China, http://economics finance.massey.ac.nz/documents/seminarseries/manawatu/Firm%20Uncertainty%20and%20Board%20Size%20in%20China.pdf, 14.12.2013.
  • Lipton, M. & Lorsch, W. J. (1992). A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance. Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59- 77.
  • Lückerath-Rovers, M. (2010). Women on Board and Firm Performance. Journal of Corporate Governance, 1– 30, DOI 10.1007/s10997-011-9186-1, http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/96/art%253A10.1007%252Fs10997-011-9186-1.pdf?auth66=1416167068_199cc40999f7e7d4a7f2ca741f611a7b&ext=.pdf, 20.05.2014.
  • Mak, Y. T. & Kusnadi, Y. (2005). Size Really Matters: Further Evidence on the Negative Relationship between Board Size and Firm Value. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13, 301- 318.
  • Masulis, R. W., Wang, C. & Xie, F. (2012). Globalizing The Boardroom-The Effects of Foreign Directors on Corporate Governance and Firm Performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53, 527– 554.
  • Moscu, R. G. (2013). The Relationship between Firm Performance and Bord Characteristics in Romania. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 2(1), 167- 175.
  • O’Connell, V. & Cramer, N. (2010). The Relationship Between Firm Performance and Board Characteristics In Ireland. European Management Journal, 28, 387– 399.
  • Oxelheim, L. & Randøy, T. (2003). The Impact of Foreign Board Membership on Firm Value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27, 2369– 2392.
  • Özsalih, A. (2009). Yönetim Kurulu Yapısının İşletmelerin Finansal ve Sosyal Sorumluluk Performansı Üzerindeki Etkisi. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 218– 228.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1973). Size, Composition and Function on Hospital Board of Directors: A study of Organization-Environmental Linkage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18(3), 349-356.
  • Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Postma, T. J. B. M., Ees H. V. & Sterken, E. (2003). Board Composition and Firm Performance in the Netherlands. Eastern Economic Journal, 29, 41- 58.
  • Priya, K. & Nimalathasan, B. (2013). Board of Directors’ Characteristics and Financial Performance: A Case Study of Selected Hotels and Restaurants in Sri Lanka. Merit Research Journal of Accounting, Auditing, Economics and Finance, 1(2), 018- 025.
  • Provan, K. G. (1980). Board Power and Organizational Effectiveness Among Human Service Agencies. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 221- 236.
  • Rad F. H., Rajeh K. Z. S., Botyari E. & Bezminabadi G. N. (2013). The Impact of Corporate Governance on Firm’s Financial Performance: A Comparison between Iranian and Malaysian Listed Companies. Life Science Journal, 10(6s), 49- 55.
  • Ramdani, D. & Witteloostuijn, A. (2010). The Impact Board Independence and CEO Duality on Firm Performance: A Quantile Regression Analysis for Indonesia, Malaysia, South Korea and Thailand. British Journal of Management, 21, 607- 626.
  • Ramezani A., Pouraghajan A., Mansourinia E. & Kheili M. K. M. (2013). The Impact of Board of Director Size and Managing Director Duality on Market Value of Firms: Evidences from Tehran Stock Exchange. World of Sciences Journal, 04, 217- 215.
  • Rashid A., Zoysa A. D., Lodh S. & Rudkin K. (2010). Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal, 4(1), 76- 95.
  • Rehman, A. & Shah S. Z. A. (2013). Board Independence, Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research In Business, 5(3), 832- 845.
  • Reyna, J. M. S. M. & Encalada, J. A. D. (2012). Ownership Structure, Firm Value and Investment Opportunities Set: Evidence from Mexican Firms. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation (JEMI), 8(3), 35- 57.
  • Samuel, E. A. (2013). The Impact of Bigger Board Size on Financial Performance of Firms: The Nigerian Experience. Journal of Research in International Business and Management, 3(3), 85- 90.
  • Saravanan, P. (2012). Corporate Governance and Company Performance- A Study With Reference to Manufacturing Firms in India. http://www.nfcgindia.org/pdf/cor_gover_manu_firms.pdf, 10.12.2013.
  • Swastika, D. L. T. (2013). Corporate Governance, Firm Size, and Earning Management: Evidence in Indonesia Stock Exchange. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), e-ISSN: 2278-487X, p-ISSN: 2319-7668, 10(4), 77-82.
  • SPK (2011) http://www.spk.gov.tr/apps/teblig/displayteblig.aspx?id=435, 01.08.2014.
  • Şener, İ. (2011). Örgütsel Çevre Bağlamında Yönetim Kurulları Ve Yönetim Kurulu Üyelerini Özelliklerinin Örgüt Performansına Etkisi. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Başkent Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Tian, J. J. & Lau, C. M. (2001). Board Composition, Leadership Structure and Performance in Chinese Shareholding Companies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18, 245– 263.
  • Topal Y. & Doğan M. (2014). Impact of Board Size on Financial Performance: The Case of BIST Manufacturing Industry, International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research(IJBMER), Vol 5(4), 74-79.
  • Uchida, K. (2011). Does Corporate Board Downsizing Increase Shareholder Value? Evidence from Japan. International Review of Economics and Finance, 20, 562– 573.
  • Ujunwa, A. (2012). Board Characteristics and the Financial Performance of Nigerian Quoted Firms. Corporate Governance, 12(5), 1- 30.
  • Vafeas, N. & Theodorou, E. (1998). The Relationship between Board Structure and Firm Performance in the UK. British Accounting Review, 30, 383- 407.
  • Velnampy, T. (2013). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Study of Sri Lankan Manufacturing Companies. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 4(3), 228- 235.
  • Vo, D. & Phan, T. (2013). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence From Vietnam, http://www.murdoch.edu.au/School-of-Management-and-Governance/_document/Australian-Conference-of-Economists/Corporate-governance-and-firm-performance.pdf, 03.12.2013.
  • Wang, Y-C., Tsai J-J. & Lin H-W. W. (2013). The Influence of Board Structure on Firm Performance. The Journal of Global Business Management, 9(2), 7- 14.
  • Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S. & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the Dynamics of Internal Corporate Governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105, 581-606.
  • Yermack, D. (1996) Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185- 221.
  • Younas, Z.I., Mahmood, H. & Saeed, A. (2013). Effect of Firm Performance on Corporate Governance a Panel Data Analysis. Asian Journal of Empirical Research, 3(1), 1- 8.
  • Yu, M. (2008). CEO Duality and Firm Performance for Chinese Shareholding Companies. 19th Chinese Economic Association (UK) Annual Conference, http://www.ceauk.org.uk/2008-conference-papers/YU-mei-CEO-duality-firm-performance-Chinese-shareholding-companies.pdf, 07.01.2014.
  • Zahra, S. A. & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model. Journal of Management, 15, 291-334.

Yönetim Kurulu Büyüklüğü ile Finansal Performans Arasındaki İlişkiye Yönelik Literatür Taraması

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, - , 14.01.2015
https://doi.org/10.17541/oeybd.17415

Öz

Şirket yönetim kurullarının mercek altına alınması, kurumsal yönetimin finansal boyutunu ilk kez ortaya koyan Cadbury (1992) raporu ile gerçekleşmiştir. Bu alandaki akademik çalışmalar aynı dönemde Hermalin ve Weisbach (1991)’ın çalışmaları ile hız kazanmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı ulusal ve uluslararası literatürde yönetim kurulu üye sayısı ile muhasebe ve piyasa esaslı performans göstergeleri arasındaki ilişkiyi inceleyen ampirik araştırmaları irdelemektir. Bu amaçla 1990’lı yılların başından günümüze kadar yapılmış olan bütün çalışmalar sistematik bir şekilde incelenerek sınıflandırılmıştır. Yapılan çalışmaların önemli bir bölümünde yönetim kurulu büyüklüğü artışı ile finansal performans arasında negatif ilişkiler tespit edilmiştir.

Kaynakça

  • Ahmed, K., Hossain, M. & Adams, M. B. (2006). The Effects of Board Composition and Board Size on the Informativeness of Annual Accounting Earnings. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(5), 418-431.
  • Akdoğan, Y. E. & Boyacıoğlu, M. A. (2010). Corporate Governance In Turkey: An Overview. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 24, 11-30.
  • Andres, de P. A., Azofra, V. & Lopez, F. (2005). Corporate Boards in Some OECD Countries: Size, Composition, Functioning and Effectiveness. Corporate Governance. An International Review, 13, 197- 210.
  • Anne, H. C. & Williams, M. S. (2003). International Comparative Analysis of the Association Between Board Structure and The Efficiency of Value Added by a Firm from its Physical Capital and İntellectual Capital Resources. The International Journal of Accounting, 38, 465- 491.
  • Arosa B., Iturralde T. & Maseda A. (2010). Outsiders on The Board of Directors and Firm Performance: Evidence from Spanish Non-Listed Family Firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1, 236– 245.
  • Arosa B., Iturralde T. & Maseda A. (2013). The Board Structure and Firm Performance in Smes: Evidence from Spain. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 19, 127– 135.
  • Aygün, M., İç, S. & Sayın, C. (2011). Yönetim Kurulu Büyüklüğünü Belirleyen Faktörler ve Yönetim Kurulu Büyüklüğü İle Firma Performansı Arasındaki İlişki. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10 , 77-92.
  • Baptista, M. A. A., Klotzle, M.C. & Melo, M.A.C. (2011). Ceo Duality and Firm Performance in Brazil: Evidence From 2008. Revista Persamento Contemporaneo em Aministracao, UFF, 11, 36- 55.
  • Barnhart, S. W. & Roseinstein, S. (1998). Board Composition, Managerial Ownership and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis. The Financial Review, 33, 1- 16.
  • Bhagat, S. & Black, B. (2002). The Non-Correlation Between Board İndependence And Long Term Firm Performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 27, 231– 274.
  • Bhagat, S. & Bolton, B. (2013). Director Ownership, Governance and Performance. Journal of Financial and Quantıtatıve Analysis, 48(1), 1- 33.
  • Beiner, S., Drobetz, W., Schmid, F. & Zimmermann, H. (2003). Is Board Size Anindependent Corporate Governance Mechanism?. Kyklos, 57, 327- 356.
  • Beiner, S., Drobetz, W., Schmid, M. M. & Zimmermann, H. (2006). An İntegrated Framework of Corporate Governance and Firm Valuation, European Financial Management, 12, 249- 283.
  • Bennedsen, M., Kongsted, H. C. & Nielsen, K. M. (2008). The Causal Effect of Board Size in the Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Firms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32, 1098- 1109.
  • Birnbaum, P. H. (1984). The Choice of Strategic Alternatives Under Increasing Regulation in High Technology Industries. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 489- 510.
  • Bouaziz, Z. & Triki, M. (2012). The İmpact of The Board of Directors on the Financial Performance of Tunisian Companies. Universal Journal of Marketing and Business Research, 1(2), 56- 71.
  • Bozec, R. (2005). Boards of Directors, Market Discipline and Firm Performance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32(9), 1921- 1960.
  • Bøhren, Ø. (2013). Board Size in Private Firms. Master of Science in Business & Economics, Major in Finance, BI Norwegian Business School.
  • Cadbury, A. (1992). Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. London: Gee Publishing.
  • Carter, D. A., Simskins, B. J. & Simpson, W. G. (2003). The Gender and Ethnic Diversity of US Boards and Board Committees and Firm Financial Performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396–414.
  • Cavaco, S., Challe, E., Crifo, P., Reberioux, A. & Roudaut, G. (2013). Board Independence and Operating Performance: Analysis On (French) Company and Individual Data. Departement D'economie, Ecole Polytechnique Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique, http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/drmwpaper/2014-2.htm, 01.07.2014.
  • Chen, E-T. & Nowland, J. (2010). Optimal Monitoring in Family-Owned Companies? Evidence from Asia. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18, 3- 17.
  • Chen, Z.L., Cherung, Y.L., Stouraitis & Wong, A. W. S. (2005). Ownership Concentration, Firm Performance and Dividend Policy in Hong Kong. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13 (4), 431- 449.
  • Cheng, S. (2008). Board Size and the Variability of Corporate Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 87, 157– 176.
  • Cheng, S., Evans III J. H. & Nagarajan, N. (2008). Board Size and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effects of the Market for Corporate Control, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, forthcoming, DOI: 10.1007/s11156-007-0074-3, 31(2), 121-145.
  • Choi, J. J., Park, S.W. & Yoo, S. S. (2007). The Value of Outside Directors: Evidence from Corporate Governance Reform in Korea. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42(4), 941- 962.
  • Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D. & Naveen, L. (2008). Boards: Does One Size Fit All?. Journal of Financial Economics, 87, 329- 356.
  • Conyon, J. M. & Peck, I. S. (1998). Board Size and Corporate Performance: Evidence from European Countries. The European Journal of Finance, 4, 291- 304.
  • Cook, R. (2013). The Relationship between Corporate Governance Practices and Firm Performance in the Junior Canadian Life Sciences Sector, Saint Mary’s University, Master of Business Administration, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
  • Cornett, M. M., Marcus A. J., Saunders, A. & Tehranian, H. (2007). The Impact of Institutional Ownership on Corporate Operating Performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31, 1771– 1794.
  • Dalton, R. D., Daily, M. C., Johnson, L. J. & Ellstarnd, A. E. (1999). Number of Directors and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 674- 686.
  • Davila, J. P. (2013). Board Characteristics and Firm Value: Evidence from Colombia. http://world-finance-conference.com/papers_wfc2/329.pdf, 11.02.2014.
  • Dehaene, A., Vuyst, V. D. & Ooghe, H. (2001). Corporate Performance and Board Structure in Belgian Companies. Long Range Planning, 34, 383- 393.
  • Ehikioya, B. I. (2009). Corporate Governance Structure and Firm Performance in Developing Economies: Evidence from Nigeria. Corporate Governance, 9(3), 231- 243.
  • Eisenberg, T., Sundgren, S. & Wells, M. T. (1998). Larger Board Size and Decreasing Firm Value in Small Firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 48, 35- 54.
  • Ekşi, C. (2009). Yönetim Kurulu Üyeliği ve Şirket Performansı: Türk Firmaları İçin Bulgular. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Elsayed, K. (2011). Board Size and Corporate Performance: The Missing Role of Board Leadership Structure. Journal of Management & Governance, 15(3), 415- 446.
  • Fama, E. F. & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
  • Fauzi, F. & Locke, S. (2012). Board Structure, Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: A Study of New Zealand Listed-Firms. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 8(2), 43– 67.
  • Ghabayen, M. A. (2012). Board Characteristics and Firm Performance: Case of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 2(2), 168- 200.
  • Gill, A. & Mathur, N. (2011a). Board Size, CEO Duality, and the Value of Canadian Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 1(3), 1- 13.
  • Gill, A. & Mathur, N. (2011b). The Impact of Board Size, CEO Duality and Corporate Liquidity on the Profitability of Canadian Service Firms. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 1(3), 83- 95.
  • Gill, A. & Obradovich, J. D. (2013). The Impact of Corporate Governance and Financial Leverage on the Value of American Firms. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, Issue: 91, 1- 13.
  • Goodstein, J., Gautam, K. & Boeker, W. (1994). The Effects Of Board Size and Diversity on Strategic Change. Strategic Management Journal, 15(3), 241- 250.
  • Guest, P. M. (2009). The Impact of Board Size on Firm Performance: Evidence From The UK. The European Journal of Finance. 15(4), 385- 404.
  • Haniffa, R. & Hudaib, M. (2006). Corporate Governance Structure and Performance of Malaysian Listed Companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33, 1034- 1062.
  • Harrison, J. R. (1987). The Strategic Use of Corporate Board Committees. California Management Review, 30, 109- 125.
  • Hermalin, E. B. & Weisbach M. S. (1991). The Effect of Board Composition and Direct Incentives on Firm Performance. Financial Management, 20, 101- 112.
  • Herman, E. (1981). Corporate Control, Corporate Power. New York: Cambridge University Pres.
  • Horváth, R. & Spirollari, P. (2012). Do the Board of Directors´ Characteristics Influence Firm´s Performance? The U.S. Evidence. Prague Economic Papers, 4, 470- 486.
  • Huse, M. (2004). Boards, Governance and Value Creation: The Human Side of Corporate Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Huther, J. (1997). An Empirical Test of The Effect of Board Size on Firm Efficiency”, Economics Letters, 54, 259- 264.
  • Jensen, C. M. (1993). The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit and the Failure of Internal Control Systems. Journal of Finance, 48, 831– 880.
  • Jensen, M.C. & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305- 359.
  • Joecks, J., Pull, K. & Vetter K. (2013). Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass”?. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 61- 72.
  • Kiel, G. C. & Nicholson, G. J. (2003). Board Composition and Corporate Performance: How the Australian Experience Informs Contrasting Theories of Corporate Governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 189- 205.
  • Kim, Y. (2007). The Proportion and Social Capital of Outside Directors and Their Impacts on Firm Value: Evidence from Korea. Corporate Governance, 15(6), 1168- 1176.
  • Kim, K. H. (2013). Deep Structures in CEO Duality-Firm Performance Linkage. International Management Review, 9(2), 11- 23.
  • Koerniadi, H. & Tourani-Rad A. (2012). Does Board Independence Matter? Evidence from New Zealand. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal, 6(2), 3- 18.
  • Kumar, N. & Singh, J.P. (2013). Effect of Board Size and Promoter Ownership on Firm Value: Some Empirical Findings from India. Corporate Governance, 13(1), 88- 98.
  • Kyereboah-Coleman, A. (2007). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Africa: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis, http://wuhjkww.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/2768a80048a7e7cbad47ef6060ad5911/Kyereboah-Coleuhjkman%2B %2BCorporate%2BGovernance.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&ContentCache=NONE, 13.01.2014.
  • Lam, T. Y. & Lee, S. K. (2008). CEO Duality and Firm Performance: Evidence From Hong Kong. Corporate Governance, 8(3), 299- 316.
  • Larmou, S. & Vafeas, N. (2009). The Relation Between Board Size and Firm Performance in Firms with a History of Poor Operating Performance. Journal of Management Governance, 14(1), 61- 85.
  • Lasfer, M. A. (2004). On the Monitoring Role of the Board of Directors: The Case of the Adoption of Cadbury Recommendations in the UK. Advances in Financial Economics, 9, 287- 326.
  • Latif, B., Shahid, M. N., Haq, M. Z. U., Waqas, H. M. & Arshad, A. (2013). Impact of Corporate Governance on Firm Performance: Evidence from Sugar Mills of Pakistan. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(1), 51- 59.
  • Lefort, F. & Urzúa, F. (2008). Board Independence, Firm Performance and Ownership Concentration: Evidence from Chile. Journal of Business Research, 61, 615-622.
  • Liao, J. & Young, M. (2013). Firm Uncertainty and Board Size in China, http://economics finance.massey.ac.nz/documents/seminarseries/manawatu/Firm%20Uncertainty%20and%20Board%20Size%20in%20China.pdf, 14.12.2013.
  • Lipton, M. & Lorsch, W. J. (1992). A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance. Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59- 77.
  • Lückerath-Rovers, M. (2010). Women on Board and Firm Performance. Journal of Corporate Governance, 1– 30, DOI 10.1007/s10997-011-9186-1, http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/96/art%253A10.1007%252Fs10997-011-9186-1.pdf?auth66=1416167068_199cc40999f7e7d4a7f2ca741f611a7b&ext=.pdf, 20.05.2014.
  • Mak, Y. T. & Kusnadi, Y. (2005). Size Really Matters: Further Evidence on the Negative Relationship between Board Size and Firm Value. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13, 301- 318.
  • Masulis, R. W., Wang, C. & Xie, F. (2012). Globalizing The Boardroom-The Effects of Foreign Directors on Corporate Governance and Firm Performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53, 527– 554.
  • Moscu, R. G. (2013). The Relationship between Firm Performance and Bord Characteristics in Romania. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 2(1), 167- 175.
  • O’Connell, V. & Cramer, N. (2010). The Relationship Between Firm Performance and Board Characteristics In Ireland. European Management Journal, 28, 387– 399.
  • Oxelheim, L. & Randøy, T. (2003). The Impact of Foreign Board Membership on Firm Value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27, 2369– 2392.
  • Özsalih, A. (2009). Yönetim Kurulu Yapısının İşletmelerin Finansal ve Sosyal Sorumluluk Performansı Üzerindeki Etkisi. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 218– 228.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1973). Size, Composition and Function on Hospital Board of Directors: A study of Organization-Environmental Linkage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18(3), 349-356.
  • Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Postma, T. J. B. M., Ees H. V. & Sterken, E. (2003). Board Composition and Firm Performance in the Netherlands. Eastern Economic Journal, 29, 41- 58.
  • Priya, K. & Nimalathasan, B. (2013). Board of Directors’ Characteristics and Financial Performance: A Case Study of Selected Hotels and Restaurants in Sri Lanka. Merit Research Journal of Accounting, Auditing, Economics and Finance, 1(2), 018- 025.
  • Provan, K. G. (1980). Board Power and Organizational Effectiveness Among Human Service Agencies. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 221- 236.
  • Rad F. H., Rajeh K. Z. S., Botyari E. & Bezminabadi G. N. (2013). The Impact of Corporate Governance on Firm’s Financial Performance: A Comparison between Iranian and Malaysian Listed Companies. Life Science Journal, 10(6s), 49- 55.
  • Ramdani, D. & Witteloostuijn, A. (2010). The Impact Board Independence and CEO Duality on Firm Performance: A Quantile Regression Analysis for Indonesia, Malaysia, South Korea and Thailand. British Journal of Management, 21, 607- 626.
  • Ramezani A., Pouraghajan A., Mansourinia E. & Kheili M. K. M. (2013). The Impact of Board of Director Size and Managing Director Duality on Market Value of Firms: Evidences from Tehran Stock Exchange. World of Sciences Journal, 04, 217- 215.
  • Rashid A., Zoysa A. D., Lodh S. & Rudkin K. (2010). Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal, 4(1), 76- 95.
  • Rehman, A. & Shah S. Z. A. (2013). Board Independence, Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research In Business, 5(3), 832- 845.
  • Reyna, J. M. S. M. & Encalada, J. A. D. (2012). Ownership Structure, Firm Value and Investment Opportunities Set: Evidence from Mexican Firms. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation (JEMI), 8(3), 35- 57.
  • Samuel, E. A. (2013). The Impact of Bigger Board Size on Financial Performance of Firms: The Nigerian Experience. Journal of Research in International Business and Management, 3(3), 85- 90.
  • Saravanan, P. (2012). Corporate Governance and Company Performance- A Study With Reference to Manufacturing Firms in India. http://www.nfcgindia.org/pdf/cor_gover_manu_firms.pdf, 10.12.2013.
  • Swastika, D. L. T. (2013). Corporate Governance, Firm Size, and Earning Management: Evidence in Indonesia Stock Exchange. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), e-ISSN: 2278-487X, p-ISSN: 2319-7668, 10(4), 77-82.
  • SPK (2011) http://www.spk.gov.tr/apps/teblig/displayteblig.aspx?id=435, 01.08.2014.
  • Şener, İ. (2011). Örgütsel Çevre Bağlamında Yönetim Kurulları Ve Yönetim Kurulu Üyelerini Özelliklerinin Örgüt Performansına Etkisi. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Başkent Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Tian, J. J. & Lau, C. M. (2001). Board Composition, Leadership Structure and Performance in Chinese Shareholding Companies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18, 245– 263.
  • Topal Y. & Doğan M. (2014). Impact of Board Size on Financial Performance: The Case of BIST Manufacturing Industry, International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research(IJBMER), Vol 5(4), 74-79.
  • Uchida, K. (2011). Does Corporate Board Downsizing Increase Shareholder Value? Evidence from Japan. International Review of Economics and Finance, 20, 562– 573.
  • Ujunwa, A. (2012). Board Characteristics and the Financial Performance of Nigerian Quoted Firms. Corporate Governance, 12(5), 1- 30.
  • Vafeas, N. & Theodorou, E. (1998). The Relationship between Board Structure and Firm Performance in the UK. British Accounting Review, 30, 383- 407.
  • Velnampy, T. (2013). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Study of Sri Lankan Manufacturing Companies. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 4(3), 228- 235.
  • Vo, D. & Phan, T. (2013). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence From Vietnam, http://www.murdoch.edu.au/School-of-Management-and-Governance/_document/Australian-Conference-of-Economists/Corporate-governance-and-firm-performance.pdf, 03.12.2013.
  • Wang, Y-C., Tsai J-J. & Lin H-W. W. (2013). The Influence of Board Structure on Firm Performance. The Journal of Global Business Management, 9(2), 7- 14.
  • Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S. & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the Dynamics of Internal Corporate Governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105, 581-606.
  • Yermack, D. (1996) Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185- 221.
  • Younas, Z.I., Mahmood, H. & Saeed, A. (2013). Effect of Firm Performance on Corporate Governance a Panel Data Analysis. Asian Journal of Empirical Research, 3(1), 1- 8.
  • Yu, M. (2008). CEO Duality and Firm Performance for Chinese Shareholding Companies. 19th Chinese Economic Association (UK) Annual Conference, http://www.ceauk.org.uk/2008-conference-papers/YU-mei-CEO-duality-firm-performance-Chinese-shareholding-companies.pdf, 07.01.2014.
  • Zahra, S. A. & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model. Journal of Management, 15, 291-334.
Toplam 105 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Mesut Doğan

Yusuf Topal Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 14 Ocak 2015
Gönderilme Tarihi 14 Ocak 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2015 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Doğan, M., & Topal, Y. (2015). Yönetim Kurulu Büyüklüğü ile Finansal Performans Arasındaki İlişkiye Yönelik Literatür Taraması. Optimum Ekonomi Ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.17541/oeybd.17415
AMA Doğan M, Topal Y. Yönetim Kurulu Büyüklüğü ile Finansal Performans Arasındaki İlişkiye Yönelik Literatür Taraması. OEYBD. Ocak 2015;2(1). doi:10.17541/oeybd.17415
Chicago Doğan, Mesut, ve Yusuf Topal. “Yönetim Kurulu Büyüklüğü Ile Finansal Performans Arasındaki İlişkiye Yönelik Literatür Taraması”. Optimum Ekonomi Ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi 2, sy. 1 (Ocak 2015). https://doi.org/10.17541/oeybd.17415.
EndNote Doğan M, Topal Y (01 Ocak 2015) Yönetim Kurulu Büyüklüğü ile Finansal Performans Arasındaki İlişkiye Yönelik Literatür Taraması. Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi 2 1
IEEE M. Doğan ve Y. Topal, “Yönetim Kurulu Büyüklüğü ile Finansal Performans Arasındaki İlişkiye Yönelik Literatür Taraması”, OEYBD, c. 2, sy. 1, 2015, doi: 10.17541/oeybd.17415.
ISNAD Doğan, Mesut - Topal, Yusuf. “Yönetim Kurulu Büyüklüğü Ile Finansal Performans Arasındaki İlişkiye Yönelik Literatür Taraması”. Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi 2/1 (Ocak 2015). https://doi.org/10.17541/oeybd.17415.
JAMA Doğan M, Topal Y. Yönetim Kurulu Büyüklüğü ile Finansal Performans Arasındaki İlişkiye Yönelik Literatür Taraması. OEYBD. 2015;2. doi:10.17541/oeybd.17415.
MLA Doğan, Mesut ve Yusuf Topal. “Yönetim Kurulu Büyüklüğü Ile Finansal Performans Arasındaki İlişkiye Yönelik Literatür Taraması”. Optimum Ekonomi Ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 2, sy. 1, 2015, doi:10.17541/oeybd.17415.
Vancouver Doğan M, Topal Y. Yönetim Kurulu Büyüklüğü ile Finansal Performans Arasındaki İlişkiye Yönelik Literatür Taraması. OEYBD. 2015;2(1).

Google Scholar istatistiklerimiz için tıklayınız.