Asya-Avrupa Diyaloğu: Zirve Diplomasisi Bağlamında Bir Değerlendirme

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 189 - 205, 01.07.2022

Samet Yılmaz

Öz

Bu çalışma, zirve diplomasisi bağlamında, Asya-Avrupa Diyaloğu (Asia-Europe Meeting-ASEM) zirvelerinin, diyalog sürecine ve ASEM’in küresel yönetişim içerisindeki işlevlerine yönelik katkısını tartışmaktadır. Asya ile Avrupa arasındaki etkileşim kanallarından biri olan ASEM, bölgesel örgütler, devletler, çeşitli gruplar ve sivil toplumun dâhil olduğu, çok boyutlu ve çok aktörlü bir platformudur. Bu yapı içerisinde, katılımcı devletlerin devlet veya hükümet başkanları ile Avrupa Birliği (AB) Konseyi ve Avrupa Komisyonu Başkanlarının ve Güneydoğu Asya Uluslar Birliği (Association of Southeast Asian Nations-ASEAN) Genel Sekreteri’nin katılımıyla düzenlenen zirveler, kilit bir role sahiptir ve diyalog sürecine ivme kazandırmaktadır. ASEM’e siyasal liderlerin bizzat dâhil olması, katılımcı devletlerin ilgili etkileşim kanalının değerine (added value) yönelik farkındalığını göstermektedir. Bu bağlamda çalışmada, ASEM zirvelerinin, ASEM’in esnek ve enformel işleyişiyle uyumlu olduğu ve ASEM sürecinin küresel yönetişim içerisindeki işlevlerinin gerçekleştirilmesine destek verdiği ileri sürülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ASEM, Zirve diplomasisi, Diyalog, Küresel Yönetişim

Asia-Europe Meeting: An Evaluation in the Context of Summit Diplomacy

Öz

This study evaluates Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM), one of the channels of interaction between Asia and Europe, in the context of summit diplomacy. ASEM is a multi-dimensional and multi-actor interaction platform, including regional organizations, states, various groups and civil society. ASEM summits, the attendants of which are the heads of state or government of the participating states, the Presidents of the European Council and of the European Commission, and the Secretary-General of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, have a key position in this structure. But the effectiveness of ASEM, a flexible and informal platform, is controversial. It is stated that the political documents published after the summits do not turn into concrete results, and the effectiveness of ASEM in global governance is limited. However, ASEM, a form of interregional relations, presents an interaction channel for the actors in two continents, and the direct participation of political leaders in the process shows the awareness of the participating states towards this interaction channel. In this framework, the study discusses how the summits, which are compatible with the characteristics and functioning of ASEM, contribute to the dialogue process and global governance.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ASEM, Interregional relations, Summit diplomacy, Dialogue, Global Governance

Kaynakça

• Acharya, A. (2002). Regionalism and the emerging world order: Sovereignty, autonomy, identity. İçinde Breslin, C. W. Hughes, N. Phillips, & B. Rosamond (Eds.), New regionalisms in the global political economy (ss. 20-32). London: Routledge Press.
• Acharya, A. (2007). The emerging regional architecture of world politics. World Politics, 59, 629-652.
• AECF (The Asia-Europe Cooperation Framework). (2000). [Çevrim-içi: https://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/asem/docs/aecf_2000_en.pdf], Erişim Tarihi: 13.01.2022.
• Al, A., & Kılıç, B. (2017). Yeni küresel yönetişimde esnek diplomasinin rolü: G20 örneği. Siyaset, Ekonomi Ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5, 13-22.
• ASEF (Asia–Europe Foundation). (2022). [Çevrim-içi: https://asef.org/], Erişim Tarihi: 13.01.2022.
• ASEM 1 (1st ASEM Summit). (1996). New comprehensive Asia-Europe partnership for greater growth. Final Chair Statement, 1-2 March 1996, Bangkok, Thailand, [Çevrim-içi: https://cdn.aseminfoboard.org/documents/1996_-_ASEM1_-_Chair_Statement_Svhj1Gx.pdf], Erişim Tarihi: 13.01.2022.
• ASEM 12 (12th ASEM Summit). (2018). Global Partners for Global Challenges, Chair’s Statement, [Çevrim-içi: https://cdn.aseminfoboard.org/documents/ASEM12-Chairs-Statement.pdf], Erişim Tarihi: 13.01.2022.
• ASEM 13 (13th ASEM Summit). (2021). Strengthening Multilateralism for Shared Growth, Chair’s Statement, Cambodia, [Çevrim-içi: https://cdn.aseminfoboard.org/documents/FINAL_ASEM13-Chair%E2%80%99s-Statement.pdf], Erişim Tarihi: 13.01.2022.
• ASEM Info board. (2022). [Çevrim-içi: https://www.aseminfoboard.org/about/overview], Erişim Tarihi: 13.01.2022.
• ASEM Pillars. (2022). [Çevrim-içi: https://www.aseminfoboard.org/about/pillars-of-asem], Erişim Tarihi: 13.01.2022.
• ASEM Process. (2022). [Çevrim-içi: https://www.aseminfoboard.org/about/asem-process], Erişim Tarihi: 13.01.2022.
• ASEM Summit. (2022). [Çevrim-içi: https://www.aseminfoboard.org/events/13th-asem-summit-asem13], Erişim Tarihi: 13.01.2022.
• Baert, F., Scaramagli, T., & Söderbaum, F. (2014). Introduction: Intersecting interregionalism. F. Baert, T. Scaramagli, & F. Söderbaum (Ed.) Intersecting interregionalism: Regions, global governance and the EU (ss. 1-12). New York: Springer Publishing.
• Berridge, G. R. (2010). Diplomacy: Theory and practice. (4th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan Press.
• Concept Note. (1996). Asia-Europe Meeting Summit of Heads of State and Government. Bangkok, Thailand. 1-2 March 1996. [Çevrim-içi: https://cdn.aseminfoboard.org/documents/1996_-_ASEM1_-_Background_gxCA3fp.pdf], Erişim Tarihi: 13.01.2022.
• De Crombrugghe, B. (2011). The value of the Asia-Europe Meeting. Studia Diplomatica, 64, Special Issue: Geopolitics and Geostrategy in the Asia-Pacific Region: Europe as Actor or Spectator? 109-127.
• Dent, C. M. (2003). From inter-regionalism to trans-regionalism? Future challenges for ASEM. Asia Europe Journal, 1, 223-235.
• Dent, C. M. (2004). The Asia-Europe Meeting and inter-regionalism: Toward a theory of multilateral utility. Asian Survey, 44, 213-236.
• Doidge, M. (2011). The European Union and interregionalism: Patterns of engagement. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
• Doidge, M. (2019). ASEM’s first two decades: A role discovered. Baltic Journal of European Studies, 9, 6-19.
• Donduran, C. (2020). Sistemik faktörlerin bir ürünü olarak bölgeselcilik. Kırklareli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4, 251-266.
• Dunn, D. H. (1996a). How useful is summitry? İçinde D. H. Dunn (Ed.), Diplomacy at the highest level: The evolution of international summitry (ss. 247-268). London: Macmillan Press.
• Dunn, D. H. (1996b). What is summitry? İçinde D. H. Dunn (Ed.), Diplomacy at the highest level: The evolution of international summitry (ss. 3-22). London: Macmillan Press.
• Fawcett, L. (1995). Regionalism in historical perspective. İçinde L. Fawcett, & A. Hurrell (Eds.), Regionalism in world politics: Regional organization and international order (ss. 9-36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Feinberg, R. (2013). Institutionalized summitry. İçinde A. F. Cooper, J. Heine, & R. Thakur (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modern diplomacy (ss. 303-318). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Gaens, B. (2008). ASEM’s background and rationale. İçinde B. Gaens (Eds.), Europe-Asia interregional relations: A decade of ASEM (ss. 9-28). Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
• Gaens, B. (2018). Two decades of the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM). İçinde B. Gaens, & G. Khandekar (Eds.), Inter-regional relations and the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) (ss. 9-32). London: Palgrave Macmillan Press.
• Gaens, B., & Khandekar, G. (Eds.). (2018). Inter-regional relations and the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM). London: Palgrave Macmillan Press.
• Gardini, G. L., & Malamud, A. (2018a). Debunking interregionalism: Concepts, types and critique – with a Pan-Atlantic Focus. İçinde F. Mattheis & A. Litsegård (Eds.), Interregionalism across the Atlantic Space (ss. 15-31). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• Gardini, G. L., & Malamud, A. (2018b). Interregionalism and the Americas: A conceptual framework. İçinde G. L. Gardini, S. Koschut, & A. Falke (Eds.), Interregionalism and the Americas (ss. 1-18). Lanham: Lexington Books.
• Goldstein, E. (1996). The origins of summit diplomacy. İçinde D. H. Dunn (Ed.), Diplomacy at the highest level: The evolution of international summitry (ss. 23-37). London: Macmillan Press.
• Hänggi, H. (2006). Interregionalism as a multifaceted phenomenon: In search of a typology. İçinde H. Hänggi, R. Roloff, & J. Rüland (Eds.), Interregionalism and international relations (ss. 31-62). London: Routledge Press.
• Hänggi, H., Roloff, R., & Rüland, J. (2006a). Interregionalism: A new phenomenon in international relations. İçinde H. Hänggi, R. Roloff, & J. Rüland (Eds.), Interregionalism and international relations (ss. 3-14). London: Routledge Press.
• Hänggi, H., Roloff, R., & Rüland, J. (Eds.). (2006b). Interregionalism and international relations. London: Routledge Press.
• Hardacre, A. (2010). The Rise and fall of interregionalism in EU external relations, Dordrecht: Republic of Letters.
• HDFA (Helsinki Declaration on the Future of ASEM). (2006). [Çevrim-içi: https://www.aseminfoboard.org/media/press-releases/helsinki-declaration-on-the-future-of-asem], Erişim Tarihi: 13.01.2022.
• Hettne, B. (2005). Beyond the ‘new’ regionalism. New Political Economy, 10, 543-571.
• Hettne, B. (2008). EU as a global actor: An anatomy of actorship. Paper at the EU in International Affairs 2008 Conference Vrije Universiteit, Brussel, 24-26 April 2008, [Çevrim-içi: https://www.ies.be/files/repo/conference2008/EUinIA_IV_1_Hettne.pdf], Erişim Tarihi: 13.01.2022.
• Hwee, Y. L. (2003). Asia and Europe: The development and different dimensions of ASEM. London: Routledge Press.
• Hwee, Y. L. (2007). The inter-regional dimension of EU-Asia relations: EU-ASEAN and The Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) process. İçinde P. Anderson, & G. Wiessala (Eds.). The European Union and Asia: Reflections and Re-Orientations (ss. 173-191). Amsterdam: Rodopi Publishing.
• Hwee, Y. L. (2019). Asia-Europe Meeting: Contemporary challenges and the way forward. AVI Policy Brief, 1-11.
• Hwee, Y. L., & López-Vidal, L. (2008). Regionalism and interregionalism in the ASEM Context: Current dynamics and theoretical approaches. Documentos CIDOB ASIA, 23. [Çevrim-içi: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/103570/doc_asia_23.pdf], Erişim Tarihi: 13.01.2022.
• İskit, T. (2020). Diplomasi: Tarihi, kurumları ve uygulaması. (7. b.), İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Keva, S., & Gaens, B. (2008). ASEM’s institutional infrastructure. İçinde B. Gaens (Ed.), Europe-Asia interregional relations: A decade of ASEM (ss. 115-134). Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
• Khandekar, G. (2018). Reinventing ASEM: A need for relevance. İçinde B. Gaens, & G. Khandekar (Eds.), Inter-regional relations and the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) (ss. 157-172). London: Palgrave Macmillan Press.
• Mace, G., Thérien, J-P., Tussie, D., & Dabène, O. (2016). Conclusion: Summitry and governance—an assessment. İçinde G. Mace, J.-P. Thérien, D. Tussie, & O. Dabène (Eds.), Summits and regional governance: The Americas in comparative perspective (ss. 228-238). New York: Routledge Press.
• Mehmetcik, H. (2019). Bölgeselcilik çalışmalarında bölgeler arası ve bölgeler ötesi ilişkiler: Avrupa Birliği ve Afrika Birliği ilişkileri örneği, Uluslararası Siyaset Bilimi ve Kentsel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(Özel Sayı), 72-84.
• Özdal, B. (2018). Diplomasi. İçinde B. Özdal, & R. K. Karaca (Eds.), Diplomasi tarihi-1 (ss. 29-91). (3. b.), Bursa: Dora Yayınları.
• Reçber, K. (2011). Diplomasi ve konsolosluk hukuku. Bursa: Dora Yayınları.
• Reiterer, M. (2004). ASEM: Value-added to international relations and to the Asia-Europe relationship. İçinde W. Stokhof, P. van der Valde, & Y. L. Hwee (Eds.), The Eurasian space. Far more than two continents (ss. 9-22). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
• Rüland, J. (2014). Interregionalism and international relations: Reanimating an obsolescent research agenda? İçinde F. Baert, T. Scaramagli, & F. Söderbaum (Eds.), Intersecting interregionalism: Regions, global governance and the EU (ss. 15-35). New York: Springer Publishing.
• Scholte, J. A. (2016). Summitry, governance, and democracy. İçinde G. Mace, J.-P. Thérien, D. Tussie, & O. Dabène (Eds.), Summits and regional governance: The Americas in comparative perspective (ss. 13-29). New York: Routledge Press.
• Söderbaum, F. (2016). Rethinking regionalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan Press.
• Song, W. (2007). Regionalisation, inter-regional cooperation and global governance. AEJ, 5, 67-82.
• Van Langenhove, L. (2011). Building regions: The regionalization of the world order. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.