Çağdaş Pedagojik Anlayışa Uygun Üç Düşünür ve Üç Yazı (1910-1919)

Cilt: 4 Sayı: 7 23 Temmuz 2016
Savaş Karagöz
PDF İndir
EN TR

Three Philosopher and Three Article Appropriate Contemporary Pedagogical Comprehenson (1910-1919)

Öz

In this paper, II. Constitutional Period education system and the ideas effecting the education system Repuplic Period. Ne İçin Geri Kaldık” by Sâtı Bey,’ “Bizde maarif nasıl telakki ediliyor?” by İsmail Hakkı (Baltacıoğlu) and “Mekteplerde İnzibat Ve Ahlaki Seciyeyi Takviye by Muallim Halil Fikret (Kanat) were translated into Turkish to give new horizons to today’s educators. Expectations from the education, importance of education, advancements in education, teachers’ ambitions for working, inefficient teaching techniques and their negative effects on students were the main subject hold in these three Works. Furthermore, it was proposed some solutions to the problems.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sâtı Bey, İsmail Hakkı (Baltacıoğlu), Halil Fikret (Kanat), teacher, Education, psychology, personality, character, morality, discipline, education in prisons and beatings

Kaynakça

  1. Baltacıoğlu, İsmail H. (1915). “ Bizde Maarif Nasıl Telakki Ediliyor?” Tedrisat Mecmuası, Yıl 5, Sayı 28-2, Cilt 5, 7 Nisan 1331(1915), S.34- 39.
  2. Kanat, Halil F. (1919). “Mekteplerde İnzibat Ve Ahlaki Seciyeyi Takviye 2”, Tedrisat Mecmuası, Yıl 10, Sayı 47-4, Ağustos 1919, S. 218-228. Kanat, Halil F. (1919). “Mekteplerde İnzibat Ve Ahlaki Seciyeyi Takviye”, Tedrisat Mecmuası, Yıl 10, Sayı 46-3, 10 Temmuz 1919, S.152- 157.
  3. Karagöz, S., Duman, T. (2014). 1908-1928 Yıları Arası Süreli Yayınlarda Yer Alan Eğitim Görüşleri Ve Öneriler. Uluslararası Sosyal Araş- tırmalar Dergisi, Cilt 7. Sayı: 35, S.576-594. Issn: 1307-9581.
  4. Sâtı, M. (1910). “Ne İçin Geri Kaldık” Tedrisat-I İptidaiye Mecmuası. Sayı 2, Yıl 1, 1 Mart 1326 (1910), S: 37-46.
  5. Sati, M. (1910). “Ümit Ve Azim” Tedrisat-I İptidaiye Mecmuası. Sayı 4, Yıl 1, 15 Mayıs 1326 (1910), S: 101-107.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Karagöz, S. (2016). Three Philosopher and Three Article Appropriate Contemporary Pedagogical Comprehenson (1910-1919). OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 4(7), 83-99. https://izlik.org/JA48PD92LP
AMA
1.Karagöz S. Three Philosopher and Three Article Appropriate Contemporary Pedagogical Comprehenson (1910-1919). opus. 2016;4(7):83-99. https://izlik.org/JA48PD92LP
Chicago
Karagöz, Savaş. 2016. “Three Philosopher and Three Article Appropriate Contemporary Pedagogical Comprehenson (1910-1919)”. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches 4 (7): 83-99. https://izlik.org/JA48PD92LP.
EndNote
Karagöz S (01 Temmuz 2016) Three Philosopher and Three Article Appropriate Contemporary Pedagogical Comprehenson (1910-1919). OPUS International Journal of Society Researches 4 7 83–99.
IEEE
[1]S. Karagöz, “Three Philosopher and Three Article Appropriate Contemporary Pedagogical Comprehenson (1910-1919)”, opus, c. 4, sy 7, ss. 83–99, Tem. 2016, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA48PD92LP
ISNAD
Karagöz, Savaş. “Three Philosopher and Three Article Appropriate Contemporary Pedagogical Comprehenson (1910-1919)”. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches 4/7 (01 Temmuz 2016): 83-99. https://izlik.org/JA48PD92LP.
JAMA
1.Karagöz S. Three Philosopher and Three Article Appropriate Contemporary Pedagogical Comprehenson (1910-1919). opus. 2016;4:83–99.
MLA
Karagöz, Savaş. “Three Philosopher and Three Article Appropriate Contemporary Pedagogical Comprehenson (1910-1919)”. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, c. 4, sy 7, Temmuz 2016, ss. 83-99, https://izlik.org/JA48PD92LP.
Vancouver
1.Savaş Karagöz. Three Philosopher and Three Article Appropriate Contemporary Pedagogical Comprehenson (1910-1919). opus [Internet]. 01 Temmuz 2016;4(7):83-99. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA48PD92LP