Araştırma Makalesi

Ortaokul Öğretmenlerinin Algılarına Göre Okul Yöneticilerinin Liderlik Stilleri İle Örgütsel Sinizm Arasındaki İlişki

Cilt: 7 Sayı: 12 30 Haziran 2017
Eray Demirçelik , Mehmet Korkmaz
PDF İndir
EN TR

The Relationship Between the Leadership Styles of School Managers and Organizational Cynicism According to the Perceptions of Secondary School Teachers

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine the relationship between leadership styles perceived by teachers of school principals and the organizational cynics. In the research, it has been tried to investigate how much of organizational cynicism can be attributed to leadership styles. The study was conducted according to the relational screening model. The study group selected by the purposeful sampling method consists of a total of 142 teachers working in five secondary schools in Kayseri. The Organizational Cynicism Scale was used to determine organizational cynicism. The Multicultural Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ 5x-short) was used to determine the leadership styles of school managers. Correlation coefficients were calculated for the relationship between variables, whether the variables influence each other and what the power of explanation is revealed by multiple regression analysis. According to research findings, school principals mostly exhibit transformative leadership behaviours. There is a negative relationship between the transformational leadership dimension and the cognitive and behavioural dimensions of organizational cynicism. As a result of the regression analysis performed, transformational leader's influence on cognitive and behavioural dimensions of organizational cynicism is significant.

Keywords

Leadership styles,organizational cynicism,school manager,teacher

Kaynakça

  1. Andersson, L. (1996). Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework. Human Relations, 49, 1395-1418.
  2. Başaran, E. (1991). Turkey education system. Ankara: Gül.
  3. Bass, B. M. (1997). Personal selling and transactional/ transformational leadership. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 17(3), 19-28.
  4. Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Developing transformational leadership:1992 and beyond. Journal of European Industrıal Training, 14(5), 21-27.
  5. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1995). MLQ-Multifactor leadership questionnairre. California: Mind Garden.
  6. Bommer, W. H., Rich, G. A. & Rubin, R. S. (2005). Changing attitudes about change:Longitudinal effects of transformational leader behavior on employee cynicism about organizational change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(7), 733-753.
  7. Brandes, P., Dharwadkar, R. & Dean, J. W. (1999). Does organizational cynicism matter? Employee and supervisor perspectives on work outcomes. Eastern Academy of Management Proceedings, 150-153. Outstanding Empirical Paper Award.
  8. Buluç, B. (2009). The relationships between organizational commitment and leadership styles of principals based on elementary school teacher’s perceptions. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 15(57), 5-34.
  9. Cemaloğlu, N. (2007). The relationship between the leadership styles of school administrators and mobbing. Journal of Hacettepe Univer-sity Education Faculty, 33, 77-87.
  10. Çakıcı, A. & Doğan, S. (2014). The impact of organizational cynicism on business performance: A research in vocational colleges. Journal of Doğuş University, 15(1), 79-89.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Demirçelik, E., & Korkmaz, M. (2017). The Relationship Between the Leadership Styles of School Managers and Organizational Cynicism According to the Perceptions of Secondary School Teachers. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 7(12), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.309630