Araştırma Makalesi

Köy Ölçeğinde Yerel Değerler ve Kırsal Alan Kimliği Analizi: Bayburt Örneği

Cilt: 7 Sayı: 13 29 Aralık 2017
PDF İndir
EN TR

Local Values in Village Scale and Analysis of Rural Area Identity: Sample of Bayburt

Abstract

Rural areas are multifaceted places that are based on farming, have face-to-face relationships, involving a social structure which have undeveloped division of labor and specialization, and are important for the protection of cultural and natural values. In this context, while identification and analysis of rural identities and values are important, they also form the basis for local and regional studies. In this study; in order to determine the local values at the village level and to identify the rural area identity, 10 village settlements representing the region in which they are located(Bayburt) have been analyzed in terms of natural-cultural landscape values, traditional-modern architectural elements and settlement patterns. With data collection, observation studies and individual interviews carried out in the study, natural and cultural values, characteristics of identity were put forward and the dominant landscape characters of the area were determined and evaluated. In general, apart from intra-village transportation and landscape, there are no major problems in infrastructure systems.In the rural areas of this province, north-south and east-west lines are the scene of visual changes. The changes that occur with the mystery of a settlement located in high sections among the trees and the transparency of a village spread over the ovary are tempting. The most striking feature of the mentioned rural settlements is that they do not have an effective architectural character. In addition, most of the villages have a mosque in the center and a village square which is usually formed around the mosque.

Keywords

Rural landscape,rural identity,village,Bayburt

Kaynakça

  1. Arıcı, İ., (1982). Kırsal toplu yerleşimler ve işletme avlularının düzenlenmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Ziraat Dergisi, 13(3-4), 173, Erzurum.
  2. Aydemir, E., (2010). Yöresel mimari ve kırsal dokunun korunması: Artvin, Şavşat, balıklı mahallesi örneği. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İTÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  3. Çubuk, M., (1985). Türkiye'de kentleşme süreci ve kırsal alan sorunları kolokyumu. Dünya Şehircilik Günü Kolokyumları II, MSÜ Fen Bi-limleri Enstitüsü Yayınları.
  4. Dirik, H., (2005). Kırsal peyzaj (planlama ve uygulama ilkeleri). İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Yayın No:4559-486.
  5. Erdem, M., (2012). Kırsal yerleşim peyzaj kimlik özelliklerinin tespiti, korunması ve geliştirilmesine yönelik değerlendirme matisi önerisi. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul.
  6. Gallent, N., Juntti, M., Kidd, S., Shaw, D., (2008). Introduction to rural planning. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
  7. Koç, N., Şahin, Ş., (1999). Kırsal peyzaj planlaması. Ankara: Ankara üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayın No: 1509(463).
  8. Mucher, C. A., Klijn J. A., Wascher D. M., Schamine J. H.J., (2010). A new European Landscape Classification (LANMAP): A transparent, flexible and user-oriented methodology to distinguish landscapes. Ecological Indicators, 10,87–103.
  9. Neuman, M., (2000). Regional design: Recovering a great landscape architecture and urban planning tradition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 47, 115-128.
  10. Tempesta, T., (2010). The perception of agrarian historical landscapes: A study of the Veneto plain in Italy. Landscape and Urban Planning 97, 258–272.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Özhancı, E., & Yılmaz, H. (2017). Local Values in Village Scale and Analysis of Rural Area Identity: Sample of Bayburt. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 7(13), 927-964. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.341215