Derleme

A Critique of the Corporate Governance Approaches from a Deontological Perspective: Can the Corporate Objective Embrace the Interests of Employees?

Cilt: 9 Sayı: 16 30 Aralık 2018
PDF İndir
TR EN

A Critique of the Corporate Governance Approaches from a Deontological Perspective: Can the Corporate Objective Embrace the Interests of Employees?

Abstract

What should the corporate objective be? How should the interests of employees feature in said objective? Do employees have intrinsic value other than instrumental value? There are, of course, a number of different arguments that have been advanced in response to these questions; the majority of which have been built upon a range of different theoretical positions. In order to answer such questions, this study critically analyses the most prominent corporate governance approaches, which mostly see employees as only means in the corporation’s and/or shareholders’ ends. The study argues that employees should not merely be treated as instruments to the ends of the corporation or corporate shareholders. It argues that a normative approach to realise the corporate objective can be found within a non-consequential stakeholder theory. Thus according to this paper, employees can be respected genuinely only if the objective of the corporation is redefined from an intrinsic perspective. 

Keywords

Corporate Governance,Business Ethics,Stakeholder Theory,Deontological

Kaynakça

  1. Aglietta, M., & Rebérioux, A. (2005). Corporate governance adrift: A critique of shareholder value. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  2. Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. The American economic review, 62(5), 777-795.
  3. Arnold, D. G., & Bowie, N. E. (2003). Sweatshops and respect for persons. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(2), 221-242.
  4. Bainbridge, S. (2008). The new corporate governance in theory and practice. Oxford University Press.
  5. Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management journal, 42(5), 488-506.
  6. Blair, M. M. (2003). Value, corporate governance and corporate performance: A post-Enron reassessment of the conventional wisdom. In Cornelius, P. K. and Kogut, B. (Eds.), Corporate governance and capital flows in a global economy. Oxford University Press.
  7. Blair, M. M. (2012). Corporate law and the team production problem. Research Handbook on the Economics of Corporate Law, 33.
  8. Blair, M. M., & Stout, L. A. (1999). A team production theory of corporate law. Virginia Law Review, 85(2), 247-328.
  9. Bowie, N. E. (2017). Business ethics: A Kantian perspective. Cambridge University Press.
  10. Brink, A. (2010). Enlightened corporate governance: Specific investments by employees as legitimation for residual claims. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(4), 641-651.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Özyürek, M. (2018). A Critique of the Corporate Governance Approaches from a Deontological Perspective: Can the Corporate Objective Embrace the Interests of Employees? OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 9(16), 2480-2510. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.493876