Araştırma Makalesi

Effects of Active Learning on Students’ Performance in Higher Learning Institutions

Cilt: 10 Sayı: 17 31 Mart 2019
PDF İndir
TR EN

Effects of Active Learning on Students’ Performance in Higher Learning Institutions

Abstract

The study features analysis of the performance of 305 university students from Cukurova University at different grades. The study aims to establish how the memories and overall performance regarding different study materials of students from diverse grades differ from each other. Qualitative study design was employed with data collected from students in three different courses. Results were tabulated as per the various courses under study. Two tables, featuring five most remembered concepts in all courses, and all course recall outcomes were also included to offer a cross-sectional view. The results pointed to a correlation between teaching methods and remembrance patterns in all the participants. Depending on the grade and the content, enhanced understanding of the course material was found to depend on the forms of class presentations adopted by the tutor. It is therefore important that the tutor choose appropriate teaching methods and techniques that would deliver optimal experiences to all the students in the same class. Notably, there were higher average and mean scores for course materials taught through video presentation compared to the rest of the learning forms. 

Keywords

Introductory psychology,active learning,statistics,cognitive psychology,memory

Kaynakça

  1. Acer, E. K., & Güçlü, N. (2017). An analysis of the expansion of higher education in Turkey using the new institutional theory. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 17(6), 1911-1933. doi:http:-//dx.doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.6.0031
  2. Alvarez-Bell, R., Wirtz, D., & Bian, H. (2017). Identifying keys to success in innovative teaching: Student engagement and instructional practices as predictors of student learning in a course using a team-based learning approach. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 5(2), 128-146.
  3. Amasyalı, M. F. (2013, June). Active learning for Turkish sentiment analysis. In Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA), 2013 IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
  4. Baskan, G. A., & Ayda, N. K. (2018). A case study on the problems of teacher training system based on the opinions of faculty members, school administrators, teachers, and unionists in north Cyprus. Education Sciences, 8(3), 127. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390-/educsci8030127
  5. Börkan, B., Ünlühisarcıklı, Ö., Caner, H. A., & Sart, Z. H. (2015). The catch-up education programme in turkey: Opportunities and challenges. International Review of Education, 61(1), 21-41. doi:h ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11159-015-9464-2
  6. Bray, M., Mazawi, A. E., & Sultana, R. G. (Eds.). (2013). Private tutoring across the Mediterranean. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  7. Çelik, Z., & Gür, B. S. (2013). Turkey's Education Policy During the AK Party Era (2002-2013). Insight Turkey, 15(4). doi:http://dx.-doi.org/10.1007/s11159-015-9464-2
  8. Cooper, K. M., Downing, V. R., & Brownell, S. E. (2018). The influence of active learning practices on student anxiety in large-enrollment college science classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1-18. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0123-6
  9. Corlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications for educating our teachers in the age of innovation. Education and Science, 39(171), 74-85. doi:http://dx.doi.-org/10.1007/s11159-015-9464-2
  10. Çiçen, Y. B. (2016). The institutional fundamentals of Turkey's economic performance: A new institutional perspective. Turkish Economic Review, 3(1), 207-215. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/ter.v3i1.708

Kaynak Göster

APA
Hanımoğlu, E. (2019). Effects of Active Learning on Students’ Performance in Higher Learning Institutions. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 10(17), 949-972. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.524707