Comparison of The Sixième Arrondisse and Sixth Region in Turkey Which is First Modern Experience of Local Government in Turkey
Abstract
As a result of the
post-industrial revolution period, the changing social cultural structure
obliged states to create new institutions. As a result of the rapid migration
from the village to the city, the population balance between the village and
the city has deteriorated considerably and the cities have started to become
uninhabitable. One of the biggest factors that made the cities uninhabitable
was the chaos of service at the point of who would do the urban services. The
West, who has tried to find long-term workarounds to this problem, decided that
it was insufficient to produce services with workarounds and decided to
establish a local government. The process is similar but not as a historical
development of local governments has followed a similar process in Turkey. In
other words, the developments in the West and in particular the legal
regulations in France have been followed to form an Ottoman local government
model. One of the biggest indicators of this is the Sixth Region (altıncı daire-i belediye). The name of the Sixth Region, established in the
most developed regions of Istanbul, is inspired by Sixieme Arrondissment (Sixth
Region), where the most distinguished and modern sections of Paris, where
Ottoman bureaucrats lived for a while, lived during the Tanzimat period. In
this study, it will be tried to reveal the similarities between the Altıncı
Daire established in Beyoğlu and Galata regions and the Sixieme Arrondissment
in Paris by focusing on the Ottoman reflections of French local government
regulations.
Keywords
Turkish Local Government Modernization,French Local Governments,Sixth Region,Sixieme Arrondissment
Kaynakça
- Aktepe, M. (1982). Dünkü Fransızlar Blak Bey ve oğlu M. Alexandre Blaeque ve Edouard Blaeque. Tarih Dergisi, 33, 255-270.
- Belli, A. (2017). Türk yerel yönetim sisteminin yerellik ilkesi açısından değerlendirilmesi. TURKISH STUDIES -International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, (Prof. Dr. Tahsin Aktaş Armağanı) 12(3), 75-92.
- Bayram, P. (2017). 19. Yüzyıl Osmanlı Devleti’nde kentleşme: Yönetsel reformlar ile Osmanlı aydınlarının kent üzerine izlenimlerine dayalı karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme. Laü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(2), 227-244.
- Bozkurt, N. (2007). İbrahim Hakkı (Paşa)’ nın 1877 tarihli dersa‘âdet belediye kanunu’na dair lâyihası. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18, 21-40.
- Birnbaum, N. (1971). Toward a critical sociology. New York:Oxford University Press.
- Canatan, B. (2001). Fransa’da yerinden yönetimin anayasal kaynakları. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler Dergisi, 10(1), 7-25.
- Copeland T., Paris (2019) , France The City of Light, http://depts.washington.edu/open2100/Resources/1_OpenSpaceSystems/Open_Space_Systems/paris.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 11.01.2019).
- Çiçek, Y.(2014). Geçmişten günümüze Türkiye’de yerel yönetimler. KSÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1), 53-64.
- Daemen H. ve Schaap L. (2000). Development in Local Democracies, Citizen and city. Ed. Daemen H. ve Schaap L., Developments in fifteen local democracies in Europe içinde (s.129-144), Delft, Eburon.
- Demirel, D. (2011). Tanzimat’tan Cumhuriyet’e kamu yönetiminde yeniden yapılanma (1839 - 1923). Türk İdare Dergisi, 473, 97-111.