Araştırma Makalesi

Systematic Review of Glass Ceiling Effect in Academia: The Case of Turkey

Cilt: 13 Sayı: 19 30 Eylül 2019
PDF İndir
EN TR

Systematic Review of Glass Ceiling Effect in Academia: The Case of Turkey

Abstract

As women started to take an active role in business life, the problems faced by women in organizational life attracted the attention of researchers. The concept of glass ceiling effect, which is popular in recent years, has been studied in many business areas. This study was held with the aim of reviewing studies published between January 2000 and May 2019 in Turkey about glass ceiling effect perception of women working in academia and systematically reviewing data obtained from the studies. A total 168 publications were reached, and 3 of them were evaluated as part of the study according to inclusion criteria. Results were obtained by focusing on variables affecting ceiling glass effect perception, assessment tools used in studies and solutions suggested to break glass ceilings in academia. In general, it was found that very less known according glass ceiling effect perception in academia. Main findings show that main factors that are related to glass ceiling effect perception are opinion of women duties in family and business life, organisational policies, power distance and organisational factors that impede the rise of women in hierarchy. Systematic review of related studies has put forth scientific evidence on the importance of the problem. Since the academy is an area where women work intensively, the problem of ceiling glass effect perception of women working in academia should be studied in-depth

Keywords

Glass Ceiling Effect,Academia,Gender Inequality,Systematic Review

Kaynakça

  1. Aker, J. (2009). From glass ceiling to inequality regimes. Sociologie du Travail, 51(2), 199-217.
  2. Aksoy, N. (2018). Cam tavanın ötesi: Akademisyen azınlıklar-Ankara ve İstanbul örneği. Başkent Üniversitesi Ticari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2), 74-95.
  3. Belghiti-Mahut, S., and Briole, A. (2004). L'implication organisationnelle et les femmes cadres: Une interrogation autour de la validation de l'échelle de Allen et Meyer (1996). Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 10(2), 145-164.
  4. Berlingo, L., Girault, A., Azria, E., Goffinet, F., ve Le Ray, C. (2019). Women and academic careers in obstetrics and gynaecology: Aspirations and obstacles among postgraduate trainees–a mixed‐methods study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 126(6), 770-777.
  5. Bertrand, M., Black, S. E., Jensen, S., and Lleras-Muney, A. (2018). Breaking the glass ceiling? The effect of board quotas on female labor market outcomes in Norway. The Review of Economic Studies, 86(1), 191-239.
  6. Bilen-Green, C., Froelich, K. A., and Jacobson, S. W. (2008). The prevalence of women in academic leadership positions, and potential impact on prevalence of women in the professorial ranks. “WEPAN 208 Women in Engineering ProActive Network” National Conference.
  7. Can, E., Kaptanoğlu, S., and Halo, L. M. (2018). Akademisyenlerde cam tavan sendromunun güç mesafesi ile ilişkisi. Journal of Marmara University Social Sciences Institute/Öneri, 13(50), 52-64.
  8. Cannings, K. (1988). The earnings of female and male middle managers: A Canadian case study. Journal of Human Resources, 23(1), 34-56.
  9. Cho, J., Lee, T. and Jung, H. (2014). Glass ceiling in a stratified labor market: Evidence from Korea. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 32, 56-70.
  10. Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., Ovadia, S., and Vanneman, R. (2001). The glass ceiling effect. Social Forces, 80(2), 655-681.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Öztürk, İ., & Şimşek, A. H. (2019). Systematic Review of Glass Ceiling Effect in Academia: The Case of Turkey. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 13(19), 481-499. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.592860