Internal and External Factors Affecting Entrepreneurship from the Eyes of Entrepreneurs

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 23, 1849 - 1884, 31.03.2020

Berat Çiçek , Yusuf Emre Karakaş

https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.631493

Cited By: 1

Öz

In this study, it is aimed to reveal what the internal and external factors affecting entrepreneurship are and which of these factors have superiority over others in choosing the entrepreneurship career. For this purpose, a qualitative research was conducted. In this context, in-depth interviews were conducted with 16 entrepreneurs owning workplaces in various provinces of Turkey, 9 of whom are men and 7 of whom are women. During the interviews, a formerly prepared interview form consisting of 10 semi-structured questions was used. The data were analysed by NVivo package program according to thematic network analysis method. According to the findings of the study, internal factors and external factors play a role among the factors that push individuals to entrepreneurship. However, internal factors were found to be more effective. Especially personality traits were determined to be the most important factor in choosing the entrepreneurship career. The research differs from other studies in that it examines internal and external factors together and focuses on individuals who are already entrepreneurs rather than those who have the potential to choose an entrepreneurship career. In addition, the discovery of the ideals and dreams in the direction of the opinions of entrepreneurs as a factor prompting individuals to entrepreneurship has enabled the study to make an original contribution to the literature. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Entrepreneurship, Need for Achievement, Locus of Control, Self-Efficacy, Access to Capital, Business and Sector Knowledge, Social Network, Entrepreneurship Education

Girişimcilerin Gözünden Girişimciliği Etkileyen İçsel ve Dışsal Faktörler

Öz

Bu çalışmada bireylerin girişimci olmasında rol oynayan içsel ve dışsal faktörlerin neler olduğu ve bu faktörlerden hangisinin girişimcilik kariyerini seçmede diğerlerine üstünlük kurduğunun ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda nitel bir araştırma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu bağlamda Türkiye’nin çeşitli illerinde işyeri sahibi olan, 9’u erkek ve 7’si kadın olmak üzere toplam 16 girişimci ile derinlemesine görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Görüşmelerde önceden hazırlanmış ve 10 adet yarı yapılandırılmış sorudan oluşan görüşme formu uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler tematik ağ analizi yöntemine göre NVivo paket programı aracılığıyla analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmanın bulgularına göre bireyleri girişimciliğe iten unsurlar arasında içsel faktörler ve dışsal faktörler rol oynamaktadır. Fakat içsel faktörlerin daha etkili olduğu görülmüştür. Özellikle kişilik özelliklerinin girişimcilik kariyerini seçmede en önemli unsur olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Araştırma, içsel ve dışsal faktörleri bir arada irdelemesi ve girişimcilik kariyerini tercih etme potansiyeli olanlardan ziyade halihazırda girişimcilik yapan bireylere odaklanması yönüyle diğer çalışmalardan ayrılmaktadır. Ayrıca girişimcilerin görüşleri doğrultusunda sahip olunan ideallerin ve hayallerin bireyleri girişimciliğe iten birer faktör olmasının keşfedilmesi, çalışmanın literatüre yönelik özgün bir katkı sunmasını sağlamıştır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Girişimcilik, Başarma İhtiyacı, Kontrol Odağı, Öz Yeterlilik, Sermayeye Erişim, İş ve Sektör Bilgisi, Sosyal Çevre, Girişimcilik Eğitimi

Kaynakça

• Acs, Z. J., Arenius, P., Hay, M., ve Minniti, M. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2004 executive report. Retrieved from UK:
• Acs, Z. J., ve Audretsch, D. B. (2003). Introduction to the handbook of entrepreneurship research. In Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 3-20): Springer.
• Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self‐efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 32(4), 665-683.
• Akhmetshin, E. M., Romanov, P. Y., Zakieva, R. R., Zhminko, A. E., Aleshko, R. A., ve Makarov, A. L. (2019). Modern Approaches to Innovative Project Management in Entrepreneurship Education: A Review of Methods and Applications in Education. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 22, 1-15.
• Asante, E. A., ve Affum-Osei, E. (2019). Entrepreneurship as a career choice: The impact of locus of control on aspiring entrepreneurs' opportunity recognition. Journal of Business Research, 98, 227-235.
• Athiyaman, A., Dabson, B., Hamm, G. F., Henderson, J., Holley, J., Hustedde, R., Loveridge, S. (2007). Entrepreneurship and local economic development: Lexington Books.
• Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research, 1(3), 385-405.
• Audretsch, D. B., Thurik, R., Verheul, I., ve Wennekers, S. (2002). Entrepreneurship: determinants and policy in a European-US comparison (Vol. 27): Springer Science & Business Media.
• Balaban, Ö., ve Özdemir, Y. (2008). Girişimcilik eğitiminin girişimcilik eğilimi üzerindeki etkisi: Sakarya üniversitesi İİBF örneği. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 32, 133-147.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
• Barbosa, S. D., Gerhardt, M. W., ve Kickul, J. R. (2007). The role of cognitive style and risk preference on entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(4), 86-104.
• Baron, R. A. (2004). The cognitive perspective: a valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship's basic “why” questions. Journal of business venturing, 19(2), 221-239.
• Bates, T. (1985). Entrepreneur human capital endowments and minority business viability. Journal of Human Resources, 20(4), 540-554.
• Baum, J. R., Frese, M., ve Baron, R. A. (2014). Born to be an entrepreneur? Revisiting the personality approach to entrepreneurship. In The psychology of entrepreneurship (p. 73-98): Psychology Press.
• Becker, G. S., Murphy, K. M., ve Tamura, R. (1990). Human capital, fertility, and economic growth. Journal of political economy, 98(5, Part 2), S12-S37.
• Blanchflower, D. G., ve Oswald, A. J. (1998). What makes an entrepreneur? Journal of labor Economics, 16(1), 26-60.
• Blawatt, K. (1995). Defining the entrepreneur: a conceptual model of entrepreneurship. CCSBE-CCPME Proceedings, 13-37.
• Boyd, N. G., ve Vozikis, G. S. (1994). The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(4), 63-77.
• Bradley, D. E., ve Roberts, J. A. (2004). Self‐employment and job satisfaction: investigating the role of self‐efficacy, depression, and seniority. Journal of small business management, 42(1), 37-58.
• Brandstätter, H. (2011). Personality aspects of entrepreneurship: A look at five meta-analyses. Personality and individual differences, 51(3), 222-230.
• Brass, D. J. (1992). Power in organizations: A social network perspective. Research in politics and society, 4(1), 295-323.
• Brockhaus, R. H. (1975). IE locus of control scores as predictors of entrepreneurial intentions. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings.
• Burns, P. (2016). Entrepreneurship and small business: Palgrave Macmillan Limited.
• Busenitz, L. W., West III, G. P., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G. N., ve Zacharakis, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions. Journal of management, 29(3), 285-308.
• Carraher, S. M., Buchanan, J. K., ve Puia, G. (2010). Entrepreneurial need for achievement in China, Latvia, and the USA. Baltic Journal of Management, 5(3), 378-396.
• Charoensukmongkol, P. (2019). The Moderating Effect of Locus of Control on the Relationship between Perceived Poor Business Performance and Superstitious Behaviors of Thai Entrepreneurs. BU Academic Review, 18(1), 1-17.
• Chen, C. C., Greene, P. G., ve Crick, A. (1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers? Journal of business venturing, 13(4), 295-316.
• Chowdhury, S., Endres, M. L., ve Frye, C. (2018). The influence of knowledge, experience, and education on gender disparity in entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 31(5), 371-389.
• Clercq, D. D., ve Arenius, P. (2006). The role of knowledge in business start-up activity. International Small Business Journal, 24(4), 339-358.
• Cohoon, J. M., Wadhwa, V., ve Mitchell, L. (2010). Are successful women entrepreneurs different from men? Available at SSRN 1604653.
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, S95-S120.
• Coleman, S. (2000). Access to capital and terms of credit: A comparison of men-and women-owned small businesses. Journal of small business management, 38(3), 37.
• Collins, C. J., Hanges, P. J., ve Locke, E. A. (2004). The relationship of achievement motivation to entrepreneurial behavior: A meta-analysis. Human performance, 17(1), 95-117.
• Cope, J., Jack, S., ve Rose, M. B. (2007). Social capital and entrepreneurship: An introduction. International Small Business Journal, 25(3), 213-219.
• Crant, J. M. (1996). The proactive personality scale as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of small business management, 34, 42-49.
• Creswel, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los angeles: University of Nebraska–Lincoln.
• Cunningham, J. B., ve Lischeron, J. (1991). Defining entrepreneurship. Journal of small business management, 29(1), 45-61.
• Çiçek, B. (2016). Girişimcilik dersinin öğrencilerin girişimcilik eğilimi üzerindeki etkisi: Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi İİBF’de bir araştırma. Paper presented at the International Conference on Quality in Higher Education, Sakarya-TURKEY, November.
• Çiçek, B. (2018). Social media entrepreneurship (Sosyal medya girişimciliği). İçtimaiyat Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(1), 10-17.
• Çiçek, B., ve Aknar, A. (2019). Kişilik özelliklerinin tükenmişlik ve presenteizm davranışları üzerindeki etkisi. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 54(3), 1234-1258.
• Çiçek, B., ve Karakaş, Y. E. (2015). Girişimcilik eğitimi alan adayların kurumsallaşma algısını ölçmeye yönelik bir araştırma. Turgut Özal Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Siyaset Kongresi, 3, 11-13.
• Dakhli, M., ve De Clercq, D. (2004). Human capital, social capital, and innovation: a multi-country study. Entrepreneurship & regional development, 16(2), 107-128.
• Davidsson, P., ve Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of business venturing, 18(3), 301-331.
• Douglas, E. J., ve Shepherd, D. A. (2002). Self-employment as a career choice: Attitudes, entrepreneurial intentions, and utility maximization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(3), 81-90.
• Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., ve Jackson, P. R. (2012). Management research: Sage.
• Embi, N. A. C., Jaiyeoba, H. B., ve Yussof, S. A. (2019). The effects of students’ entrepreneurial characteristics on their propensity to become entrepreneurs in Malaysia. Education+ training.
• Eryılmaz, M. E. (2011). Yeni kurumsalcı örgüt kuramı perspektifinden İlköğretim örgütsel alanında yaşanan kurumsal değişim ve nedenleri. Middle East Technical University Studies in Development, 38(3).
• Fayolle, A., ve Gailly, B. (2008). From craft to science: Teaching models and learning processes in entrepreneurship education. Journal of European industrial training, 32(7), 569-593.
• Gadar, K., ve Yunus, N. K. Y. (2009). The influence of personality and socio-economic factors on female entrepreneurship motivations in Malaysia. International review of business research papers, 5(1), 149-162.
• Galloway, L., ve Brown, W. (2002). Entrepreneurship education at university: a driver in the creation of high growth firms? Education+ training, 44(8/9), 398-405.
• Gatewood, E. J., Shaver, K. G., ve Gartner, W. B. (1995). A longitudinal study of cognitive factors influencing start-up behaviors and success at venture creation. Journal of business venturing, 10(5), 371-391.
• Giné, X. (2011). Access to capital in rural Thailand: An estimated model of formal vs. informal credit. Journal of Development Economics, 96(1), 16-29.
• Glaser, B. G., ve Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research: Routledge.
• Greve, A., ve Salaff, J. W. (2003). Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(1), 1-22.
• Guest, G., Bunce, A., ve Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods, 18(1), 59-82.
• Gürol, Y., ve Atsan, N. (2006). Entrepreneurial characteristics amongst university students: Some insights for entrepreneurship education and training in Turkey. Education+ training, 48(1), 25-38.
• Hansemark, O. C. (1998). The effects of an entrepreneurship programme on need for achievement and locus of control of reinforcement. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 4(1), 28-50.
• Hansen, E. L. (1995). Entrepreneurial networks and new organization growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19(4), 7-19.
• Haynie, J. M., Shepherd, D., Mosakowski, E., & Earley, P. C. (2010). A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset. Journal of business venturing, 25(2), 217-229.
• Hoang, H., ve Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of business venturing, 18(2), 165-187.
• Hofstede, G., ve Minkov, M. (2010). Long-versus short-term orientation: New perspectives. Asia Pacific business review, 16(4), 493-504.
• Hynes, B. (1996). Entrepreneurship education and training-introducing entrepreneurship into non-business disciplines. Journal of European industrial training, 20(8), 10-17.
• İlhan, S. (2003). Sosyo-Ekonomik Bir Fenomen Olarak Girişimciliğin Oluşumunu Etkileyen Başlıca Faktörler. Muğla Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi(11), 61-79.
• Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40-50.
• Izquierdo, E., ve Buelens, M. (2011). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions: The influence of entrepreneurial self-efficacy and attitudes. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 13(1), 75-91.
• Jing, L.-L., ve Sung, M. (2012). University students personality traits and entrepreneurial intention: Using entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial attitude as mediating variable. International Journal of Economic Research 3 (3), 76-82.
• Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., ve Thoresen, C. J. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of personality and social psychology, 83(3), 693.
• Katz, J. A. (2003). The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education: 1876–1999. Journal of business venturing, 18(2), 283-300.
• Kristiansen, S., ve Indarti, N. (2004). Entrepreneurial intention among Indonesian and Norwegian students. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 12(01), 55-78.
• Krueger Jr, N. F., Reilly, M. D., ve Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of business venturing, 15(5-6), 411-432.
• Kuratko, D. F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 577-597.
• Kuratko, D. F. (2007). Entrepreneurial leadership in the 21st century: Guest editor's perspective. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(4), 1-11.
• Ladzani, W. M., ve Van Vuuren, J. J. (2002). Entrepreneurship training for emerging SMEs in South Africa. Journal of small business management, 40(2), 154-161.
• Larson, A. (1991). Partner networks: Leveraging external ties to improve entrepreneurial performance. Journal of business venturing, 6(3), 173-188.
• Lee, J. (1996). The motivation of women entrepreneurs in Singapore. Women in Management Review, 11(2), 18-29.
• Liñán, F., Rodríguez-Cohard, J. C., ve Rueda-Cantuche, J. M. (2011). Factors affecting entrepreneurial intention levels: a role for education. International entrepreneurship and management Journal, 7(2), 195-218.
• Lüthje, C., ve Franke, N. (2003). The ‘making’of an entrepreneur: testing a model of entrepreneurial intent among engineering students at MIT. R&d Management, 33(2), 135-147.
• Mazzarol, T., Volery, T., Doss, N., ve Thein, V. (1999). Factors influencing small business start-ups: a comparison with previous research. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 5(2), 48-63.
• McClelland, D. C. (1962). Business drive and national achievement. Harvard Business Review, 40(4), 99-112.
• McClelland, D. C. (1965). N achievement and entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1(4), 389.
• McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation: CUP Archive.
• McGee, J. E., ve Peterson, M. (2019). The long‐term impact of entrepreneurial self‐efficacy and entrepreneurial orientation on venture performance. Journal of small business management, 57(3), 720-737.
• McGee, J. E., Peterson, M., Mueller, S. L., ve Sequeira, J. M. (2009). Entrepreneurial self‐efficacy: refining the measure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(4), 965-988.
• McGrath, R. G., Mac Grath, R. G., ve MacMillan, I. C. (2000). The entrepreneurial mindset: Strategies for continuously creating opportunity in an age of uncertainty (Vol. 284): Harvard Business Press.
• McMullan, W., ve Gillin, L. (2001). Entrepreneurship education in the nineties: Revisited. Entrepreneurship education: A global view, 57-77.
• Minniti, M., ve Bygrave, W. (1999). The microfoundations of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 41-52.
• Mitchell, R. K., Busenitz, L., Lant, T., McDougall, P. P., Morse, E. A., ve Smith, J. B. (2002). Toward a theory of entrepreneurial cognition: Rethinking the people side of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(2), 93-104.
• Mitra, J. (2008). Towards an analytical framework for policy development. In J. Potter (Ed.), Entrepreneurship and higher education. Paris: OECD—Local Economic and Employment Development (LEED).
• Mueller, S. L., ve Thomas, A. S. (2001). Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness. Journal of business venturing, 16(1), 51-75.
• Muzyka, D., De Koning, A., ve Churchill, N. (1995). On transformation and adaptation: Building the entrepreneurial corporation. European Management Journal, 13(4), 346-362.
• Namey, E., Guest, G., McKenna, K., ve Chen, M. (2016). Evaluating bang for the buck: a cost-effectiveness comparison between individual interviews and focus groups based on thematic saturation levels. American Journal of Evaluation, 37(3), 425-440.
• Neck, H. M., Meyer, G. D., Cohen, B., ve Corbett, A. C. (2004). An entrepreneurial system view of new venture creation. Journal of small business management, 42(2), 190-208.
• Neumeyer, X., Santos, S. C., Caetano, A., ve Kalbfleisch, P. (2019). Entrepreneurship ecosystems and women entrepreneurs: A social capital and network approach. Small Business Economics, 53(2), 475-489.
• Nieman, G. (2006). Business management: A value chain approach: Van Schaik Publishers.
• Nykänen, M., Salmela-Aro, K., Tolvanen, A., ve Vuori, J. (2019). Safety self-efficacy and internal locus of control as mediators of safety motivation–Randomized controlled trial (RCT) study. Safety science, 117, 330-338.
• O'Connor, A. (2013). A conceptual framework for entrepreneurship education policy: Meeting government and economic purposes. Journal of business venturing, 28(4), 546-563.
• Oosterbeek, H., Van Praag, M., ve Ijsselstein, A. (2010). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship skills and motivation. European economic review, 54(3), 442-454.
• Orhan, K. (2017). Girişimci kaderini yener mi: girişimci eğilime kaderciliğin etkisi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 13(5), 143-159.
• Perry, C., Macarthur, R., Meredith, G., ve Cunnington, B. (1986). Need for achievement and locus of control of Australian small business owner-managers and super-entrepreneurs. International Small Business Journal, 4(4), 55-64.
• Peterman, N. E., ve Kennedy, J. (2003). Enterprise education: Influencing students’ perceptions of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(2), 129-144.
• Peters, M. P., ve Brush, C. G. (1996). Market information scanning activities and growth in new ventures: A comparison of service and manufacturing businesses. Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 81-89.
• Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., ve Nanetti, R. Y. (1994). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy: Princeton university press.
• Rauch, A., ve Frese, M. (2007). Let's put the person back into entrepreneurship research: A meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners' personality traits, business creation, and success. European Journal of work and organizational psychology, 16(4), 353-385.
• Robinson, P., ve Haynes, M. (1991). Entrepreneurship education in America's major universities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(3), 41-52.
• Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological monographs: General and applied, 80(1), 1.
• Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2004). Pathways to successful entrepreneurship: Parenting, personality, early entrepreneurial competence, and interests. Journal of vocational behavior, 65(3), 498-518.
• Sesen, H. (2013). Personality or environment? A comprehensive study on the entrepreneurial intentions of university students. Education+ training, 55(7), 624-640.
• Shane, S. A. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for information, 22(2), 63-75.
• Steel, W. (1994). Changing the institutional and policy environment for small enterprise development in Africa. Small Enterprise Development, 5(2), 4-9.
• Strauss, A., ve Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques: Sage publications Thousand Oaks, CA.
• Taormina, R. J., ve Kin-Mei Lao, S. (2007). Measuring Chinese entrepreneurial motivation: Personality and environmental influences. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 13(4), 200-221.
• Teece, D. J. (1993). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 22(2), 112-113.
• Thomas, K. W., ve Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management review, 15(4), 666-681.
• Thompson, J. L. (1999). The world of the entrepreneur–a new perspective. Journal of workplace learning, 11(6), 209-224.
• West, W. (2001). Beyond grounded theory: The use of a heuristic approach to qualitative research. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 1(2), 126-131.
• Wijbenga, F. H., ve van Witteloostuijn, A. (2007). Entrepreneurial locus of control and competitive strategies–The moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(5), 566-589.
• Wilson, F., Kickul, J., ve Marlino, D. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurial self–efficacy, and entrepreneurial career intentions: Implications for entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 387-406.
• Wu, S., Matthews, ve Dagher, G. K. (2007). Need for achievement, business goals, and entrepreneurial persistence. Management Research News, 30(12), 928-941.
• Yıldırım, A., ve Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Yu Cheng, M., Sei Chan, W., ve Mahmood, A. (2009). The effectiveness of entrepreneurship education in Malaysia. Education+ training, 51(7), 555-566.
• Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., ve Hills, G. E. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of applied psychology, 90(6), 1265.
• Zigarmi, D., Galloway, F. J., ve Roberts, T. P. (2018). Work locus of control, motivational regulation, employee work passion, and work intentions: An empirical investigation of an appraisal model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(1), 231-256.